Bariatric surgery improves urinary incontinence but not anorectal function in obese women

Impact of weight loss on the risk of urinary incontinence: the role of sex and body type

INTRODUCTION

Although weight loss is known to alleviate urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms, the effects of sex and body size on this relationship remain insufficiently explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018, comprising 28,161 participants. Weighted logistic regression analysis, fitted curves, and subgroup analysis were used to assess the association between the percentage of weight loss and UI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, multivariate logistic regression showed an inverse relationship between weight loss percentage and UI risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-0.99). Compared with weight loss percentages < 0%, the risk of UI significantly decreased with weight loss percentages > 5% (weight loss percentage 5.1-10%: OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00; weight loss percentage 10.1-15%: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.97; weight loss percentage > 15%: OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.70). Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that this relationship was more significant in males and non-overweight/non-obese populations.

CONCLUSION

There was an inverse relationship between weight loss percentage and UI risk, with noticeable differences based on sex and body size. However, these findings warrant further investigation.

Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Pelvic Floor Disorders in Female Patients with Severe Obesity: a Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is associated with pelvic floor disorders (PFD). Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most effective weight loss methods. Although SG has been found to improve urinary incontinence (UI) and overactive bladder (OAB), its impact on fecal incontinence (FI) remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized study involved 60 female patients with severe obesity who were randomly assigned to two groups: the SG group and the diet group. The SG group underwent SG, while the diet group received a low-calorie, low-lipid diet for 6 months. The patients' condition was assessed before and after the study using three questionnaires: the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS), the Overactive Bladder 8-Question Awareness Tool (OAB-V8), and the Wexner Score (CCIS).

RESULTS

After 6 months, the SG group had a significantly higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) compared to the diet group (p<0.01). Both groups showed a decrease in the ICIQ-FLUTS, OAB-V8, and CCIS scores (p<0.05). UI, OAB, and FI improved significantly in the SG group (p<0.05), but no improvement was observed in the diet group (p>0.05). The correlation between %TWL and PFD was statistically significant but weak, with the strongest correlation between %TWL and ICIQ-FLUTS score and the weakest correlation between %TWL and CCIS score (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend bariatric surgery for the treatment of PFD. However, given the weak correlation between %TWL and PFD after SG, further research should explore factors other than %TWL that are effective in recovery, particularly in relation to FI.

Impact of bariatric surgery on urinary incontinence in morbidly obese individuals

BACKGROUND

There is scanty evidence on the impact of bariatric surgery on urinary incontinence (UI) in the Asian population.

METHODOLOGY

Patients who underwent bariatric surgery from June 2018 to June 2019 were screened using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) questionnaire. Patients having UI were identified and followed until 1 year of surgery using the ICIQ-UI-SF. These were classified as having stress, urge, or mixed type of UI. The prevalence, change in scores, and the number of pads used were compared at baseline and at follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients underwent bariatric surgery of whom, 41 patients (M = 2, F = 39) had UI. Stress incontinence was seen in 70.7%, 19.5% had urge incontinence, and rest had the mixed type. Using logistic regression, it was found that female gender was the most important predictor of having UI (OR: 8.33). The prevalence of UI decreased from 27.7% at baseline to 8.1% at 6 months and 3.4% at 12 months. The mean ICIQ-UI-SF score improved from 8.76 (SD = 3.2) at baseline to 0.66 (SD = 2.1) at 12 months of follow-up. The proportion of patients with UI using any number of pads decreased from 92.7% at baseline to 9.8% at 12 months. There was a decrease in the number of patients having moderate to very severe UI from 35 (85.4%) at baseline to 2 (4.9%) at 12 months. Proportion of patients showing resolution was highest among the stress incontinence group at 96.5%. Presence or absence of comorbidities did not significantly influence the ICIQ-UI-SF scores.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery leads to profound improvement in UI in obese individuals which is well sustained until 1 year of follow-up. Resolution rates might be higher in Asian population.

Weight loss with bariatric surgery or behaviour modification and the impact on female obesity-related urine incontinence: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Women with obesity are at risk of pelvic floor dysfunction with a 3-fold increased incidence of urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and double the risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Association of Urology (EAU) recommend that women with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m² should consider weight loss prior to consideration for incontinence surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess this recommendation to aid in the counselling of women with obesity-related urinary incontinence (UI). Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System online (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and SCOPUS were systematically and critically appraised for all peer reviewed manuscripts that suitably fulfilled the inclusion criteria established a priori and presented original, empirical data relevant to weight loss intervention in the management of urinary incontinence. Thirty-three studies and their outcomes were meta-analysed. Weight loss interventions were associated in a decreased prevalence in UI (OR 0.222, 95% CI [0.147, 0.336]), SUI (OR 0.354, 95% CI [0.256, 0.489]), UUI (OR 0.437, 95% CI [0.295, 0.649]) and improved quality of life (PFDI-20, SMD -0.774 (95% CI [-1.236, -0.312]). This systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence that weight loss interventions are effective in reducing the prevalence of obesity-related UI symptoms in women. Bariatric surgery in particular shows greater sustained weight loss and improvements in UI prevalence. Further large scale, randomized control trials assessing the effect of bariatric surgery on women with obesity-related UI are needed to confirm this study's findings.

Changes in bowel habits after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Introduction

Bariatric surgery has a significant impact on dietary intake, weight loss, patient’s metabolism and also on defaecation stereotypes.

Aim

To investigate changes in bowel habits of morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

Material and methods

This was a prospective clinical cohort study conducted to assess changes in bowel habits after LSG in a single institution.

Results

In total, 124 patients were enrolled in the study (age 47.1 ±11.2 years, body mass index (BMI) 44.3 ±6.8 kg/m²). The mean weight loss 6 months after LSG was 29.1 ±11.1 kg; percentage excess weight loss was 56.2 ±20.4%. Before surgery, 35.5% of patients had constipation and 6.5% of patients had faecal incontinence (FI). No correlation was found between rising level of BMI and constipation or incontinence prevalence/severity. Data analysis has not confirmed increased prevalence/severity of postoperative constipation or incontinence 6 months after LSG. Out of the group of patients with preoperative constipation, clinically relevant improvement was noted in 45.5% of patients after the surgery. Among patients without constipation before surgery, impairment was noted in 21.2% of patients. Out of the group of patients with preoperative incontinence, improvement was found in 37.5% of patients; none of these patients reported clinically relevant impairment of incontinence symptoms.

Conclusions

The present study has not revealed increased prevalence/severity of postoperative constipation or anal incontinence 6 months after LSG. Our findings suggest that weight loss in patients after LSG might be associated with an improvement of constipation symptoms of individual patients.

A prospective study of anal symptoms and continence among obese patients before and after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The effects of bariatric surgery on anal continence are not known. Data about proctologic lesions are very rare and do not include clinical data. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate anal continence and anal lesions before and after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

METHODS

We prospectively included all patients presenting for bariatric surgery consultation at Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France, between 20 April 2015 and 16 December 2017. The patients were evaluated with questionnaires, anorectal manometry and clinical examination before SG (at enrollment) and between 12 and 24 months after (SG). Anal incontinence was defined as a Vaizey score above 4.

RESULTS

Of 118 enrolled patients, 98 had SG. The patients were mostly women (n = 99, 84.6%). Median patient age was 45 years (IQR 34-54 years). The median follow-up period after surgery among the 86 patients who completed follow-up was 15 months (IQR 12.5-17.3 months). There was no significant change in the prevalence of anal incontinence after SG (12.8% preoperatively vs 24.4% postoperatively, p = 0.06). The median Vaizey score was 4 (IQR 4-4) both before and after SG (p = 0.1). No patient had de novo anal incontinence but worsening of anal incontinence was noted in 10 patients. Manometry revealed significantly lower median resting pressure (29 mmHg [IQR 22-68 mmHg] vs 22 mmHg [IQR 15-30 mmHg], p = 0.0015) and maximal squeeze pressure (IQR 29-74 mmHg vs IQR 30-60 mmHg, p = 0.0008) after SG. Anismus was more frequent after SG and was associated with constipation and Bristol type 1-2 stool consistency. Quality of life was unchanged. Proctologic lesions were rare and were present in 11 patients (12%) at enrollment and in 2 (2.4%) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SG affected clinical anal continence but not significantly, and manometric measurements for anal pressures were lower postoperatively. Proctologic lesions were rare in this study population.

The impact of bariatric surgery on urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obesity and overweight are strongly associated with stress and urgency urinary incontinence, and weight loss has been associated with improvement in urinary incontinence. We aimed to measure pooled effect sizes for different weight loss procedures on incontinence-specific quality of life and incontinence cure rate in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched using a pre-defined strategy for relevant cohort studies. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for the weighted mean difference for urinary quality of life scores and weighted overall pooled estimates for proportions of women cured. We explored heterogeneity using meta-regression, testing the type of bariatric surgery and change in BMI as predictors of effect size. The studies were categorised as either low or high risk of bias using a novel instrument specifically designed for longitudinal symptom research studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies (n = 3,225) were included. Incontinence-specific quality of life scores were improved by 14% (weighted mean difference = -14.79; CI = -18.47 to -11.11; I² = 87.1%); the proportion of women cured of any urinary incontinence was 59% (95% CI = 51 to 66%) and the proportion of women cured of stress urinary incontinence was 55% (95% CI = 40 to 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery results in clinically meaningful improvements in incontinence-specific quality of life. Current data are limited by both short-term follow-up and unexplained heterogeneity among studies.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of bariatric surgery (BS) on the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD), specifically on urinary incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and fecal incontinence (FI).

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017068452) with a literature search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO databases for all publications related to BS and PFD, with no language restrictions, from inception to September 2018.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two authors screened for study eligibility and extracted data. Only prospective cohorts assessing women with morbid obesity and the prevalence of PFD before and after BS in multiple academic and private centers were included. UI, POP, and FI were defined according to the International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society joint consensus, and diagnosis was made based on self-report or questionnaires.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Our search strategy retrieved 957 results. Of those, 28 studies were included for full analysis, and 20 studies (n = 3684 patients) were selected for final analysis. The main reasons for exclusion were missing data before and after BS (n = 7) and combined data of men and women who underwent BS (n = 1). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most common surgical technique. Pooled analysis (16 studies) showed that women had a mean body mass index reduction of 12.90 kg/m² after treatment (95% confidence interval [CI], -14.82 to -10.97; p < .0001). The relative risk reduction was 67% (n = 19; odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% CI, 0.26-0.41; p < .0001) for UI, 52% (n = 5; OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22-1.07; p = .07) for POP, and 20% (n = 9; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.21; p = .29) for FI. Funnel plots for UI and FI did not suggest any publication bias. With regard to the standardized questionnaires for PFD, the International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 and its subscale Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire-7, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20, and its subscale Urinary Distress Inventory-6 showed statistically significantly lower scores. Sexual function, represented by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12, showed no statistically significant improvement after surgery.

CONCLUSION

BS has a significant impact on reducing UI, but FI and POP, in obese women.

Obesity and Stress Urinary Incontinence: Impact on Pathophysiology and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity is highly prevalent and is associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The purposes of this review are to assess the pathophysiology of SUI in the obese female and review the outcomes of weight loss and anti-incontinence surgery in this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

While increased intra-abdominal pressure appears to be the common pathophysiologic link between obesity and SUI, neurogenic and metabolic pathways have been proposed. Both surgical and non-surgical weight loss continue to have beneficial effects on SUI; however, long-term outcomes are largely absent. Midurethral sling (MUS) surgery is largely effective in the obese population, with a complication profile similar to that in non-obese women. Obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for failure of MUS. While weight loss should be the primary modality to improve SUI in the obese woman, MUS remains an effective and safe option in those women undertaking surgery.

Incidence of new-onset benign anal disorders after bariatric surgery

New-onset benign anal disorders (NBADs) represent a potential complication following bariatric surgery, although their incidence in this population is not well studied. The preoperative characteristics, weight loss, bowel habits and NBADs data of 196 patients with bariatric surgery were collected by telephone interviews and medical records review and evaluated retrospectively. Ninety-nine patients had undergone gastric bypass (GBP) and 97 had a modified biliopancreatic diversion (MBPD). Fifty-nine patients were excluded. The mean follow-up of the remaining 137 patients was 87.8 months, and 51 of them (37.2%) developed NBADs. Haemorrhoids were the most common diagnosis and 27.5% of the patients that developed NBADs were treated surgically. Patients who developed NBADs had a longer follow-up time (92.5 vs. 85.1 months, P = 0.003), and those with an abnormal bowel habit (diarrhoea or constipation) had a higher percentage of NBADs (54.5 vs. 28.3%, P = 0.003). NBADs were more frequent after MBPD (52.9%) than after GBP (21.7%) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis found that only an abnormal bowel habit was associated with NBADs, with an odds ratio of 3.2 (95% CI: 1.5-6.9, P = 0.003). As NBADs are a common complication after bariatric surgery, further studies should be performed to find the reasons for these complications.

Are Obese Patients at an Increased Risk of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Compared to Non-obese Patients?

PURPOSE

Factors associated with increased intra-abdominal pressure such as chronic cough, morbid obesity, and constipation may be related to pelvic floor dysfunction. In this study, we compared anorectal manometry values and clinical data of class II and III morbidly obese patients referred to bariatric surgery with that of non-obese patients.

METHODS

We performed a case-matched study between obese patients referred to bariatric surgery and non-obese patients without anorectal complaints. The groups were matched by age and gender. Men and nulliparous women with no history of abdominal or anorectal surgery were included in the study. Anorectal manometry was performed by the stationary technique, and clinical evaluation was based on validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Mean age was 44.8 ± 12.5 years (mean ± SD) in the obese group and 44.1 ± 11.8 years in the non-obese group (p = 0.829). In the obese group, 65.4% of patients had some degree of fecal incontinence. Mean squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese than in non-obese patients (155.6 ± 64.1 vs. 210.1 ± 75.9 mmHg, p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference regarding mean rest pressure in obese patients compared to non-obese ones (63.7 ± 23.1 vs. 74.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.051). There were no significant differences in anorectal manometry values between continent and incontinent obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of fecal incontinence among obese patients was high regardless of age, gender, and body mass index. Anal squeeze pressure was significantly lower in obese patients compared to non-obese controls.

Is Bariatric Surgery a Prophylaxis for Pelvic Floor Disorders?

Introduction

Obesity is one of the well-documented risk factors of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). The PFDs include urinary and fecal incontinence (UI, FI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Surgery-induced weight loss improves different kinds of incontinence as well as POP symptoms. However, there is a lack of evidence how bariatric surgery influences pelvic floor anatomy and function in women without previous PFDs and whether it may be concerned as PFD prophylaxis tool.

Materials and Methods

The present analysis is a prospective, non-randomized case-control study from January 2014 to September 2017. Participants underwent pelvic floor ultrasound examination with bladder neck position estimation at rest, during levator ani tension, and at Valsalva maneuver before surgery and 12–18 months after. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) > 2 stage and PFD complaints were the exclusion criteria.

Results

Fifty-nine patients underwent bariatric surgery (57 sleeve gastrectomy and 2 gastric bypass). Mean BMI decreased from 43.8 ± 5.9 to 29 ± 4.6 kg/m² after surgery (p < 0.001). Statistically significant higher position of the bladder neck at rest, during tension, and at Valsalva maneuver (p < 0.05) was shown after surgery. We did not demonstrate differences in bladder neck mobility and bladder neck elevation at tension after weight loss.

Conclusions

Bariatric surgery is associated with a betterment of bladder neck position at rest, tension, and Valsalva maneuver in women without PFDs. We postulate that bariatric surgery may be a tool for PFD prevention. It does not improve levator ani function and does not limit bladder neck mobility, which implicates that it has no influence on preexisting pelvic dysfunction.

Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence in obese patients: A prospective case-matched study of 201 patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an emerging risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI). The aim of this study was to characterize pathophysiologic mechanisms of FI in obese patients compared with non-obese patients in a prospective case-matched study.

METHODS

The general characteristics and data of the anorectal manometry and endosonography of patients who were evaluated for FI at a single institution from 2005 to 2015 were prospectively assessed. Fecal incontinence was defined by a Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) >4. Obesity was defined by a body mass index ≥30 kg/m² . Obese patients were case-matched with two age- and sex-matched non-obese patients.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were included (67 obese matched with 134 non-obese). The CCIS, Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom Constipation Score and quality of life score were comparable between obese and non-obese patients with FI. Factors significantly associated with obesity in FI patients were cholecystectomy (odds ratio [OR]=3.45 [1.19-10.32], P=.0230), irritable bowel syndrome - diarrhea (OR=2.94 [1.22-7.19], P=.0158), upper part of the anal canal resting pressure ≥22 mm Hg (OR=3.45 [1.45-8.76], P=.0045), maximum rectal tolerable volume ≥240 mL (OR=3.14 [1.34-7.54], P=.0082), and abdominal pressure ≥28 mm Hg (OR=2.75 [1.13-7.33], P=.0248) by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Obese patients with FI had a comparable severity of FI to that of non-obese patients with FI. Regarding obesity in patients with FI, physicians should focus on stool consistency.

The effect of non-surgical weight loss interventions on urinary incontinence in overweight women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although the aetiology of urinary incontinence can be multifactorial, in some cases weight loss could be considered as a part of the therapeutic approach for urinary incontinence in people who are overweight. The objective of this study was to review and meta-analyse the effect of non-surgical weight loss interventions on urinary incontinence in overweight women. Web of Science, PubMed, Pedro, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane were systematically searched for clinical trials that met the a priori set criteria. Data of women who participated in non-surgical weight loss interventions (diet, exercise, medication or a combination) were included in the meta-analysis. After removing duplicates, 62 articles remained for screening on title, abstract and full text. Six articles (totalling 2,352 subjects in the intervention groups) were included for meta-analysis. The mean change in urinary incontinence (reported as frequency or quantity, depending on the study) after a non-surgical weight loss intervention, expressed as standardized effect size and corrected for small sample sizes (Hedges' g), was -0.30 (95%CI = -0.47 to -0.12). This systematic review and meta-analysis shows evidence that a non-surgical weight loss intervention has the potential to improve urinary incontinence and should be considered part of standard practice in the management of urinary incontinence in overweight women.