A Comparison of Bariatric Surgery in Hospitals With and Without ICU: a Linked Data Cohort Study

Patient Outcomes and Rate of Intensive Care Unit Admissions Following Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 775 Patients

Background The last two decades have seen a significant rise in obesity and its adverse consequences across the globe. Bariatric surgery has emerged as a widely employed therapeutic approach for weight reduction and alleviating the risk of obesity-related chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. As bariatric procedures are gaining popularity, the complications associated with these procedures can not be ignored. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions following bariatric surgery and ICU-related mortality. Methodology This retrospective study conducted at King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain evaluated the patient outcomes and the rate of ICU admissions following bariatric surgery between 2018 and 2022. Demographic data of the patients were extracted from electronic health records. The primary endpoint was ICU admission incidence and mortality, while secondary outcomes included risk factors, duration of ICU stay, and complications leading to ICU admission. Results Of the 775 patients included, 66.3% were female. The mean age of the patients was 35.92 ± 21.12 years. Over 91% of the patients had a body mass index above 30 kg/m2. The most common primary procedure was laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (75%), followed by gastric bypass (22.6%). In revision bariatric surgery, the majority (91.3%) had a conversion from sleeve gastrectomy to gastric bypass. Overall, 0.77% of patients were admitted to the ICU, with the majority being unplanned ICU admissions (0.52%). The average ICU stay was 21 days (1 to 54 days). The most common reason for ICU admission was sepsis, septic shock, and gastric leakage. Conclusions The results of this study show a relatively lower number of ICU admissions after bariatric surgery compared to previous studies.

Efficacy of patient selection criteria for obesity surgery in a non-high-dependency unit/intensive care unit facility

BACKGROUNDS

Publicly funded obesity surgery remains underfunded in Australia. One barrier to expansion is the perception that perioperative care requires critical care facilities. This study evaluates the effectiveness of patient selection criteria in avoiding unplanned patient transfer and adverse outcomes in obesity surgery performed at a facility without a high-dependency unit/intensive care unit (HDU/ICU).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing obesity surgery between January 2017 and March 2020 in a centre with specific screening criteria. Criteria included: body mass index <48 for males and <52 for females with up to three stable comorbidities from a selected list. Revision sleeve or bypass procedures were contraindicated. Primary outcome was patient transfer to our main campus. Secondary outcomes included return to theatre (RTT), readmission and death. Outcomes were compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) performed at the same centre.

RESULTS

A total of 387 obesity surgery procedures were performed; 372 patients (96%) were discharged without complication. Fifteen (3.9%) were transferred to the main campus, eight were admitted to ICU and two required re-operation. Twelve (3.1%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge, five required re-operation. Transfer, 30-day readmission and 30-day emergency department presentation rates were similar in comparison to LC. RTT during index admission (0.5% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.006) and during 30-day post-operative period (1.8% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.025) was lower in the obesity surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Carefully selected screening criteria allow obesity surgery to be performed at a well-supported non-HDU/ICU facility with few complications and acceptable rates of unplanned patient transfer.

Temporary Trans-gastric Stent Deployment Over a 20 French Gastrostomy for Single-Stage Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography After Gastric Bypass

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of pancreato-biliary disorders after gastric bypass is challenging due to altered anatomy. Several techniques have been proposed to overcome this condition; however, none has emerged as the gold standard treatment. Furthermore, a decision-making algorithm evaluating when and why apply one technique over another is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To describe a novel trans-gastric approach to allow endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) anatomy soon after prior laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and to propose a decision-making algorithm for selection of the most suitable technique according a tailored approach.

SETTING

Private hospital.

METHODS

Between January and March 2020, patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy referred to our tertiary center to undergo ERCP after recent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively evaluated. A 20 french (Fr) gastrostomy was performed during cholecystectomy. A single-stage ERCP was carried out by means of temporary trans-gastric stent deployment over a 20 Fr gastrostomy.

RESULTS

A total of 5 patients (mean age 41; mean body mass index 48.3) were enrolled. ERCP was performed after an average of 2 days from surgery. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 100%. No adverse events occurred. Spontaneous closure of the gastrostomy after its bedside removal was observed in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach allows to perform a single-stage ERCP in RYGB patients, early after LC, with no need of any other re-interventions. Any surgeon facing unexpected biliary disorders, during LC, can easily perform a 20 Fr gastrostomy thus allowing the patient to undergo early ERCP without any delay.

Immediate postoperative of bariatric surgery in the intensive care unit versus an inpatient unit. A retrospective study with 828 patients

Objective

To compare the incidence of complications and the duration of hospitalization of patients undergoing bariatric surgery admitted to the intensive care unit or a post-surgical hospitalization unit.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 828 patients admitted between January 2010 and February 2015 during the immediate postoperative period of bariatric surgery in a hospital. Data were collected via electronic medical records. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables, and the chi-square was used to compare categorical variables.

Results

Patients in both groups had similar demographic characteristics, with no significant differences in anthropometric data and comorbidities. There was no significant difference in the comparison of complications between the two groups. However, the group admitted to the intensive care unit had longer hospitalization times (median of 3 days versus 2 days, p < 0.05), and hospital costs were 8% higher.

Conclusion

The present study found no benefit in the routine admittance of patients to the intensive care unit after undergoing bariatric surgery. This practice increased hospitalization time and hospital costs, which wasted resources. It is necessary to create objective criteria to identify patients requiring intensive care unit admission after bariatric surgery.

The Anaesthetic Assessment, Management and Risk Factors of Bariatric Surgical Patients requiring Postoperative Intensive Care Support: A State-Wide, Five-Year Cohort Study

Summary

Bariatric surgery is a rapidly growing and dynamic discipline necessitating a specialised anaesthetic approach coordinating high-risk patients with appropriate postoperative intensive care (ICU) support. The relationship between the anaesthetic and ICU utilisation after bariatric surgery is poorly understood. All adult bariatric surgery patients admitted to any ICU over a five-year period between 2007 and 2011 in Western Australia were identified from hospital admission records and cross-referenced against the Western Australian Department of Health Data Linkage Unit database. During the study period 12,062 patients underwent bariatric surgery with 581 (4.8%) patients admitted to ICU immediately following surgery. The mean preoperative ASA score was 3.3 (standard deviation 1.1) with 76.9% of patients assessed by their anaesthetist for the first time on the day of surgery. Blood pathology (75%) and ECG (46.3%) were the most common preoperative investigations. Intraoperatively, 2.1% of patients had a grade 4 intubation with only 3.4% of patients requiring video-assisted intubation. Despite being deemed at high risk, 23.6% of patients were managed with 20 Gauge or smaller intravenous access. Anaesthetic complications were extremely uncommon (0.5% of all bariatric cases) but accounted for 9.7% of all postoperative ICU admissions. Smoking history, but not body mass index ( P=0.46), was the only significant prognostic factor for respiratory or airway-related anaesthetic complications ( P=0.012). In summary, the anaesthesia management of bariatric surgery varied widely in Western Australia, with smoking as the only significant preoperative risk factor for respiratory or airway-related anaesthesia complications.