Influence of the Resected Gastric Volume on the Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Development and Evaluation of a Quality Assessment Tool for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos: A Review and Comparison of Academic and Online Video Resources

BACKGROUND

Video recording of surgical procedures is increasing in popularity. They are presented in various platforms, many of which are not peer-reviewed. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) videos are widely available; however, there is limited evidence supporting the use of reporting guidelines when uploading LSG videos to create a valuable educational video. We aimed to determine the variations and establish the quality of published LSG videos, in both peer-reviewed literature and on YouTube, using a newly designed checklist to improve the quality and enhance the transparency of video reporting.

METHODS

A quality assessment tool was designed by using existing research and society guidelines, such as the Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization (BMSS). A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify video case reports (academic videos) and a similar search was performed on the commercial YouTube platform (commercial videos) simultaneously. All videos displaying LSG were reviewed and scored using the quality assessment tool. Academic and commercial videos were subsequently compared and an evidence-based checklist was created.

RESULTS

A total of 93 LSG recordings including 26 academic and 67 commercial videos were reviewed. Mean score of the checklist was 5/11 and 4/11 for videos published in articles and YouTube, respectively. Academic videos had higher rates of describing instruments used, such as orogastric tube (P < 0.001) and stapler information (P = 0.04). Fifty-four percent of academic videos described short-term patient outcomes, while not reported in commercial videos (P < 0.001). Sleeve resection status was not universally reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Videos published in the academic literature are describing steps in greater detail with more emphasis on specific technical elements and patient outcomes and thus have a higher educational value. A new quality assessment tool has been proposed for video reporting guidelines to improve the reliability and value of published video research.

Can Weight of The Resected Stomach Predict Weight Loss Results After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Many factors have been investigated in the literature to predict weight loss outcomes after LSG. However, insufficient data regarding the resected stomach weight (RGW) exists. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between RGW and weight loss outcomes 1 year after LSG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients who underwent LSG in a tertiary care center were evaluated retrospectively. The statistical analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between preoperative demographics, RGW, and the excess weight loss percentage (%EWL) and percent total weight loss (%TWL).

RESULTS

The mean RGW was 169.7±40.1, ranging from 101 to 295 grams. The RGW was significantly correlated with preoperative weight (r=0.486; P<0.001), body mass index (r=0.420; P=0.002), and age (r=0.327; P=0.01). However, RGW did not predict postoperative weight loss, as measured by percent total weight loss (%TWL) and percent excess weight loss (%EWL), respectively (r=0.044; P=0.75 and r=-0.216; P=0.11). Multiple linear regression analysis identified age as a negative predictor for both %TWL (β=-0.351, P=0.005) and %EWL (β=-0.265, P=0.03), while preoperative body mass index was a negative predictor for %EWL (β=-0.469, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The RGW, although correlated with patient characteristics, does not serve as a reliable predictor of postoperative weight loss in the first year after LSG. Further research is needed to improve predictive models and patient care in bariatric surgery.

Sleeve Gastrectomy: Does the Amount of Stomach Removed Matter?

PURPOSE

Data regarding the associations between percent weight loss and the volume and weight of stomach resected during sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are mixed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the size and volume of stomach removed during laparoscopic SG on percent total body weight lost (%TBWL).

METHODS

An observational case series study was performed on 67 patients for 1 year after SG at a single university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. Data were collected on demographics, medical history, and %TBWL at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Pearson's correlation matrices and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Most patients (88.1%) were female with a mean age of 44 years. The mean volume of stomach resected was 1047.0 cubic centimeters, and the median weight resected was 123.0 g. Follow-up data were available for 44 patients at 1-year post-operation. There was no association between the volume and weight of stomach resected and %TBWL at 1-year post-operation; however, greater %TBWL was associated with younger patient age (r =  - 0.525, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

One year after SG, no associations between %TBWL and the volume and weight of stomach resected were observed.

Does Gastric Expansibility Affect Weight Loss Success After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

Reduced excess weight loss (EWL) or regain is a worrying problem after metabolic surgery. Factors attainable from the resected specimen that can predict this outcome are investigated. We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients who had undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. We collected demographic data, preoperative gastric emptying measurements, volume, expansion capacity, and 6-dimensional measurements of sleeve gastrectomy specimens. Correlations between EWL, body mass index levels, and gastric specimen measurements related to gastric remnant dimensions were also scrutinized. We found a significant correlation between the gastric specimen and remnant gastric volume, the resection line length in the gastric specimen, and 12th-month EWL%. Antrum expansibility was significantly increased in patients with weight regain. There was also a negative correlation between weight loss and age at postoperative first and third years. Sleeve resection line measurement and resected antrum diameter measurements can be used to predict weight loss, especially in the first year postoperatively.

Radiographic Measurement of Gastric Remnant Volume After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Assessment of Reproducibility and Correlation with Weight Loss

BACKGROUND

As a restrictive procedure, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) relies primarily on the reduction of gastric volume. It has been suggested that an immediate postoperative gastric remnant volume (GRV) may influence long-term results of LSG; however, there are no consensus in this matter. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of different radiographic methods of GRV calculation and evaluate their correlation with the weight loss (WL) after surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 174 patients who underwent LSG in the period from 2014 to 2017. Using UGI, GRV was measured with 3 different mathematical methods by 2 radiologists. Intraobserver and interobserver calculations were made. Correlation between GRV and WL were estimated with calculations percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

During analysis of intraobserver similarities, the results of ICC calculation showed that reproducibility was good to excellent for all GRV calculation methods. The intraobserver reproducibility for Reader I was highest for cylinder and truncated cone formula and for Reader II for ellipsoid formula. The interobserver reproducibility was highest for ellipsoid formula. Regarding correlation between GRV and WL, significant negative correlation has been shown on the 12th month after LSG in %TWL and %EWL for every method of GRV calculation, most important for ellipsoid formula (%TWL - r(X,Y) = -0.335, p < 0.001 and %EWL - r(X,Y) = -0.373, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Radiographic methods of GRV calculation are characterized by good reproducibility and correlate with the postoperative WL.

Correlation of Gastric Volume and Weight Loss 5 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The volume of the gastric reservoir (VGR) after sleeve gastrectomy influences weight loss in the short-term, but long-term results are scarce. The aim was to analyze the correlation between the VGR and weight loss at 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

It is a prospective observational study of 50 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from February 2009 to December 2013. An upper gastrointestinal series was performed at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years after surgery. A composite formula was used for VGR estimation. Weight loss-related data included the following: body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine other factors that might influence long-term weight loss results.

RESULTS

The %EWL at 1 year was 74.5(63.8-86) vs. 55.5(47-74.3) at 5 years (p < 0.001). The VGR 1 month after surgery was 114.9 (90.5-168.3) mL. The VGR increased from 216.7 (155.1-278.6) to 367.5 (273-560.3) mL (p < 0.001) at 1 and 5 years. Although a significant inverse correlation was observed between VGR and BMI, %EWL, and %EBMIL at 1 year, it disappeared at 5 years. In the multivariate analysis, the main factor to predict worse weight results at 5 years was a pre-surgical BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

The VGR increased progressively during the study period. Although an inverse relationship between VGR and weight was found at 1 year, this correlation did not remain at 5 years. A preoperative BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² is the main predictive factor of poor weight outcomes.

Geometry of Sleeve Gastrectomy Measured by 3D CT Versus Weight Loss: Preliminary Analysis

BACKGROUND

The size of the remnant stomach with respect to weight loss failure after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the actual size and volume of the remnant stomach, as measured by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry, on weight loss after LSG.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of 52 patients who underwent LSG between October 2008 and February 2019 were assessed. Weight metrics were recorded at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. 3D-CT volumetry was performed 1 year postoperatively, and the total remnant stomach volume (TSV), proximal stomach volume (PSV), antral stomach volume (ASV), and the distance between the pylorus and the distal edge of staple line (DPS) were measured. The relationship between the weight metrics and aforementioned factors was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients who underwent LSG, 40 patients participated in this study. The average body mass index preoperatively was 38.3 ± 5.1 kg/m², and the average percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) 1 year after LSG was 26.6 ± 9.3%. The average TSV, PSV, ASV, and DPS were 123.2 ± 60.3 ml, 73.4 ± 37.2 ml, 49.8 ± 30.3 ml, and 59.9 ± 18.5 mm, respectively. The DPS (r = - 0.394, p = 0.012) and ASV (r = - 0.356, p = 0.024) were correlated with %TWL 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual DPS and ASV measured by 3D-CT affected weight loss after LSG. 3D-CT may be useful for the immediate identification of factors affecting insufficient weight loss in patients; this may, in turn, aid in the implementation of early intervention treatments.

Correlation of weight loss with residual gastric volume on computerized tomography in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review

Laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. There is wide variation however in post-operative weight loss on long term follow-up, and residual gastric volume (RGV) is believed to be an important variable. Multiple studies have correlated RGV as assessed by Computerized Tomography volumetry with excess weight loss (EWL%) following LSG, but definite consensus is lacking. This article systematically reviews the published studies in English literature to ascertain whether any correlation exists between the RGV and EWL% following LSG. Ten studies were included in this review, and significant differences were noted in the technique of RGV assessment, and timing of RGV and EWL% assessment. Five studies found a statistically significant correlation between the RGV and EWL%. One study found a correlation which did not reach statistical significance. Two additional studies reported that the resected volume rather than RGV correlated with the EWL%. Meta-analysis of studies reporting correlation between RGV and EWL% showed that up to 26.3% (95% CI: 5.1%-56.1%) of variability in EWL% can be explained by variations in RGV. A lower RGV is likely to result in a better post-operative weight loss following LSG. There is need for standardization of technique and timing of RGV assessment.

Sleeve Volume and Preoperative Gastric Volume Assessment Using Three-dimensional MDCT Gastrography and Their Correlation to Short-term Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Weight Loss

PURPOSE

Several factors including preoperative stomach capacity and sleeve volume impact weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We aimed at measuring these volumes using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) gastrography and correlating them with postoperative weight losses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Morbidly obese patients prepared for LSG during 2018 were included in the study. MDCT gastrography was performed 1 week before, 6 and 12 months after LSG. Preoperative gastric volume and postoperative sleeve volumes were measured. Correlation with preoperative BMI and postoperative %TWL was performed. The change in sleeve volume at 6 and 12 months was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients (62 F) were included. Mean preoperative BMI was47 ± 7 kg/m². Follow-up was achieved in 89 patients (91%) and 82 patients (83%) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Mean %TWL was 24 ± 3 and 32.8 ± 3 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.05). Preoperative gastric volume ranged from 800 to 1800 ml (mean ± SD, 1310 ± 307) and dropped significantly to range from 140 to 170 ml (158 ± 9) and from 165 to 210 ml (181 ± 12) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Pouch was not significantly dilated at 12 vs. 6 months postoperatively. Preoperative gastric volume was significantly correlated with preoperative BMI (p = 0.006*) but not with postoperative weight losses. Correlation between postoperative pouch volumes and weight losses at 6 and 12 months postoperatively showed no significance.

CONCLUSION

Sleeve pouch is significantly smaller than preoperative stomach, but not significantly correlated to weight loss. Restriction is an important, but not the only factor controlling weight loss after LSG.

Impact of Resection Volume/Stapler Firings-Ratio on Perioperative Complications and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Major postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is often related to staple line leaks (SLL). Of note, a recent study suggested a central role of the absolute numbers of stapler firings as a predictive factor for postoperative morbidity due to SLL. In addition, a larger gastric remnant volume could be responsible for lower weight loss after LSG, and nevertheless, the gastric resection volume (GRV) is strictly related to the residual volume.

Methods

Prospectively, collected data of 384 consecutive patients with complete follow-up at 12 months after LSG at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified according to three different variables (i.e., number of stapler firings, GRV, and GRV/stapler firings-ratio), and respective impact on postoperative complications and weight loss was analyzed.

Results

High absolute number of stapler firings was linked to increased intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and prolonged hospitalization, but was not associated with SLL, transfusion rate or revisional procedures. Absolute GRV showed no impact on both complications and outcome after LSG. Interestingly, higher ratio of GRV/stapler firings was not only linked to decreased intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stay but also to higher Excess Body Mass Index Loss (EBMIL) at 12 months after LSG.

Conclusions

Here, we introduce GRV/stapler firings-ratio as a simple predictive factor for identifying patients at risk for postoperative complications and impaired weight loss that is superior compared with absolute number of stapler firings or GRV alone.

Impact of Resected Gastric Volume on Postoperative Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Among the bariatric surgery community, it has recently emerged the idea of a possible association between resected gastric volume (RGV) and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). If the size of the sleeve depends on the bougie caliber, the resected volume of the stomach remains something which is not possible to standardize. The aim of the study was to investigate a possible relationship between RGV and weight loss after LSG. We developed a mathematical method to calculate the RGV, based on the specimen size removed during LSG. Ninety-one patients (63 females and 28 males) affected by morbid obesity were included in the study. They underwent LSG between 2014 and 2016. Mean preoperative BMI was 45 ± 6.4. At 1 year after LSG, the mean BMI was 30 ± 5.3 and the EWL% was 65 ± 20.2. The statistical analysis of RGV, BMI, and EWL% at 1-year follow-up did not find any correlation between the volume of stomach removed and the weight loss after LSG. Further studies in the future should clarify the potential role of RGV during LSG. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03938025.

High Resected Gastric Volume and poorly controlled DM2 in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Our aim is to evaluate the effects of High Resected Gastric Volume(HRGV) on poorly Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus(DM2) after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy(LSG).

METHODS

256 patients were divided into two groups according to the RGV: < 1500 mL(Group A: 131 pts) and > 1500 mL(Group B: 147 pts). % excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL), Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), HbA1c, C peptide were assessed before surgery and at the 3rd day, 6th,12th,24th,36th month after LSG.

RESULTS

A significant difference in %EBMIL between the two groups at 24 and 36 months was found. RGV was not significantly associated with DM2 in the multivariate logistic regression. FBG levels showed no differences between the two groups. A significant decrease of Hb1Ac at 6 and 12 months was found in group B. The C-peptide level showed a significant reduction at 6 and 12 months in group B.

CONCLUSION

The HRGV may play a role in the regulation of the glucose metabolism in the first year after LSG without influence in poorly DM2 control. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Stapleless Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Reasoning and Technical Insights

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with staple line reinforcement (SLR) is a popular and safe treatment option for morbid obesity. We have developed, devised, and described our own method of stapleless laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which in our limited study appeared safe, efficacious, and potentially cost-effective.

METHODS

We analyzed the outcome of our modified LSG in a case series of three middle-aged women (median age 42 years old). Our main modification was sutured closure of the stomach rather than the commonly utilized technique of stapled closure. Our primary measure of success was the occurrence of post-operative leak. Secondary measures were (a) length of operation, (b) duration of inpatient stay, and (c) percentage of weight loss at 6 and 12 months post operation.

RESULTS

Median operative time = 132 min (120-195 min), and median inpatient stays were 2 days. No post-operative leaks were recorded. The median excess weight loss at 6 months was 39% of initial weight loss and 57.7% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapleless LSG has the potential to be an affordable alternative to the traditional LSG. High-powered studies and a formal cost analysis are required.

Changes in Gastric Volume and Their Implications for Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relatively new surgical technique for the treatment of morbid obesity. It is unclear whether the volume of the gastric remnant can expand after surgery as a result of intraluminal pressure maintained over time. If this were the case, the increased volume could affect weight loss and the improvement in comorbidities. This study aims to assess the evolution of residual gastric volume (RGV) during the first year after LSG and its relationship with weight loss.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of 112 patients who underwent LSG from February 2009 to December 2013. In order to measure the RGV after surgery, all patients were evaluated radiologically by an esophagogastroduodenal (EGD) transit at 1 and 12 postoperative months.

RESULTS

All patients showed a significant reduction in BMI compared with the preoperative measurement (33.48 ± 5.78 vs. 50.54 ± 6.69 kg/m²; p < 0.001). Increased RGV was observed when comparing the results obtained by EGD transit at 1 (68.39 ± 25.89 cm³) and 12 postoperative months (122.58 ± 38.76 cm³; p < 0.001). There was no association between increase in gastric volume and weight loss at 1-year follow-up (r = 0.01; p = 0.910).

CONCLUSIONS

The volume of the gastric remnant increased significantly during the first year after LSG. However, this increase was not associated with weight loss. Further prospective research with longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm or contrast the present results.