Postoperative Bleeding and Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Experience

Efficacy of Omentopexy on Complications of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a commonly performed type of bariatric surgery. Early complications of LSG include bleeding, leakage, pulmonary embolism, and surgical site infections. Most surgeons try to implement preventive methods, such as omentopexy. Staple line-imbrication, which has a difficult learning curve, often prevents complications. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of omentopexy on patients with imbricated LSG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study applied a retrospective data analysis design to patients who underwent LSG between 2020 and 2023. All patients' staple lines were imbricated, and patients were then divided into two groups: omentopexy group and control group. Patients' demographic features, such as age, gender, height, weight, body mass index(BMI), bleeding, leakage, and reoperations, were recorded and examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 1356 patients were included in the study (540 in omentopexy, 816 in control), of which the mean age was 37.9 ± 10.5 years, 82.3% were women, and mean BMI was 40.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2. The mean bleeding rate was 1.0% (1.3-0.7%), the mean leakage rate was 0.2% (0.2-0.2%, respectively), and the mean reoperation rate was 0.6% (0.7% and 0.5%, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Omentopexy is a technique that is widely used to prevent staple line complications. According to our study, omentopexy applied to an imbricated stapler line increased the operation time but did not affect bleeding or leakage ratios. This is the first study to evaluate the effect of omentopexy on imbricated staple lines. The findings of the study indicate that omentopexy has no additional benefit on early complications when using staple-line imbrication.

Effect of Intraoperative Blood Pressure Regulation on Postoperative Hemorrhage After Bariatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

With a rising number of bariatric procedures, the absolute number of postoperative complications is increasing, too. Postoperative bleeding, particularly along the staple line, is a recognized challenge. Numerous strategies including reinforcement of the staple line (SLR) have been proposed to improve bleeding rates, but no single technique has shown superiority over the others. In our bariatric center, we have implemented intraoperative blood pressure regulation alone, without SLR, to reduce hemorrhagic complications postoperatively.

METHODS

This retrospective observational analysis compares the incidence of postoperative bleeding in two groups of consecutive patients (total n = 438 patients), one with and one without intraoperative blood pressure elevation to 150 mmHg systolic without the additional use of staple line reinforcement. This intervention was integrated into our standard bariatric surgical procedure, no randomization or matching was conducted. Significant postoperative bleeding was defined as drop of hemoglobin of more than 2.5 mg/dl in 48 h and one of the following symptoms: lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L, bloody drainage, quantity of drainage more than 200 ml and/or radiological signs.

RESULTS

Defined postoperative bleeding occurred in 33 (7.5%) patients. We observed a decrease in bleeding rates from 10% to 5% (n = 22 vs. n = 11) after introducing intraoperative blood pressure increase (p = 0.034). The rate of revisional surgery for bleeding also decreased from 2.7% to 0.5% (n = 6 vs. n = 1). In multivariate analysis, the intervention with blood pressure elevation showed a significant decrease on bleeding rates (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The use of increased intraoperative blood pressure alone, without staple line reinforcement, appears to be an effective and suitable method for reducing post-bariatric hemorrhagic complications.

Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Should They Be Used?

Purpose

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide for the treatment of morbid obesity. Blake-type drains are widely used in this procedure despite the lack of clear evidence regarding their benefits in the diagnosis and treatment of common postoperative complications such as gastric suture line leak (GSLL) and postoperative bleeding (PB).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective descriptive study with prospective case registry was conducted, analyzing all patients who underwent LSG between January 2012 and December 2022 at a high-volume center. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the role of drains for diagnosis and treatment of GSLL and PB in LSG. Our secondary outcome was to determine drain related surgical site infection (DRSSI) rate.

Results

A total of 335 LSG were performed in the studied period. In all patients one abdominal drain was placed during surgery. Six GSLL (1.79%) and 5 PB (1.49%) were recorded. Drain placement did not prove to ensure early diagnosis or conservative management of GSLL or PB after LSG. Furthermore, an incidence of DRSSI of 4.1% (14 patients) was found.

Conclusion

In our study, no clear diagnostic or therapeutic benefits of the systematic use of drains for GSLL or PB in LSG was found; but drain use did show a considerable rate of DRSSI, which must be taken into consideration prior to considering drain systematic use. While no randomized prospective trials have been performed, the retrospective data does not support drain systematic use.

Reinforcement in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is It Effective?

BACKGROUND

Despite the success of bariatric surgery in treating obesity, it can still lead to complications. The most serious and feared technical complications are bleeding and leakage from the gastric staple line. In this study, stapler line reinforcement was investigated to determine whether it affects postoperative leakage and bleeding rates and their management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 510 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were evaluated retrospectively. They were divided into 2 groups according to whether reinforcement of the staple line with running imbricating sutures was performed.

RESULTS

In the reinforcement group, there were two leaks (0.7%), which were diagnosed seven and eight days after surgery. In the non-reinforcement group, there were nine leaks (4%). There was no difference between the two groups in staple line bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that reinforcement with continuous imbricating sutures is associated with less stapler line leakage and a lower reoperation rate at the cost of increased operative time.

Gastric Staple Line Reinforcement With Ligation Clips for Hemostasis in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

In Pakistan and worldwide, there is a lack of literature on the role of ligation clips in controlling hemostasis in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. ligation clips are being used to secure hemostasis and act as staple line reinforcement to prevent intra-operative and postoperative bleeding. Data can be utilized to reflect the role of staple line reinforcement with ligation clips so as to guide surgeons about its safety and efficacy.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and included 120 patients. The patients' demographic parameters, BMI, intra-operative and postoperative bleeding in terms of hematemesis, melena, and fall in hemoglobin (Hb) postoperatively were compared to preoperative Hb and recorded.

RESULT

One hundred and twenty cases of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were included with a mean age of 44.77±12.05 years. The mean BMI was 52.06±13.85 preoperatively. The mean drop in hemoglobin was 0.04±0.26 with a p-value of 0.07, which is statistically insignificant. Among 120 cases, two (1.7%) patients reported episodes of melena, and four (3.3%) patients reported hematemesis. Postoperative hypotension was recorded in six (5%) patients and eight (6.7%) patients had postoperative tachycardia.

CONCLUSION

This study shows ligation clip application along the staple line is an effective means of hemostasis similar to suture application.

Topical hemostatic application on staple line in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-surgeon experience

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a common bariatric procedure with low complication rates. Several hemostatic agents have been used to reduce staple line bleeding, but its impact is unclear. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare the early (30-day) complications comparing oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) and fibrin sealant (FS) application on the staple line. The secondary endpoints were to compare the need for postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative blood work values of hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), drain output volume and hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent LSG between January and October 2021 was performed. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the use of ORC versus FS on the staple line. Early postoperative complications, Hb level, WBC count, and drain output volume were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total number of 77 patients were included: 27 in the ORC-group and 50 in the FS-group. No major complication was recorded in both groups. There was no significant difference in the need for blood transfusion, Hb value, and drain output volume on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2. There was a significantly higher WBC count in the ORC-group on POD 1 and 2. There was no difference in hospital LOS between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of FS and ORC was associated with a comparable low rate of bleeding. ORC causes an increased WBC count postoperatively, but this showed no clinical relevance.

Correct Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Are We Increasing the Bleeding? A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most common bariatric surgery procedure. Bleeding is the most common complication of this surgery and mostly occurs from the staple line. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether waiting between compression and firing during the stapling phase reduces the postoperative bleeding. Methods: A total of 325 patients who underwent LSG between April and July 2022 were analyzed prospectively. In terms of postoperative bleeding, the two groups, which we waited 30 seconds between staple firings and the no wait group, were compared. Results: The mean age of patients was 37.36 (±11.12) years and mean body mass index was 45.18 (±3.1) kg/m². Eleven patients needed transfusion. The rate of haemorrhagic complications was 3.38% (Group 1% 6.21 and Group 2% 1.11) (P = .012). The duration of surgery was ∼10 minutes longer in the study group, which we waited (P = .0001). Conclusions: During the stapling stage in LSG, waiting between compression and firing can help reduce postoperative bleeding.

Management of Staple Line Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background and Objectives:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become one of the most popular bariatric surgeries in the United States with a low rate of morbidity and effective weight loss. However, staple line leak remains a feared complication requiring a lengthy and difficult treatment course until resolution. This study outlines the various treatment methods used within a high-volume bariatric practice for successful leak resolution without necessitating a conversion procedure.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with staple line leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a three-surgeon bariatric practice from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019.

Results:

A total of 10 staple line leaks were identified with a leak rate of 0.9%. Patients presented on average 29.3 days postoperatively and were all diagnosed on computed tomography. Three patients were initially managed operatively with washout and drainage procedure. Six patients were managed endoscopically initially with either stent or over-the-scope clip placement. Most patients required multiple interventions with an average of 2.4 interventions per patient. Average time to leak resolution was 48.2 days (15–95 days).

Conclusion:

Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy requires a multimodal approach usually requiring multiple interventions before leak resolution. We demonstrate effective utilization of varying interventions that lead to effective leak resolution and avoid conversion operations.

Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

Staple line reinforcement (SLR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the most commonly utilized techniques for SLR.

Materials and Methods

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare no reinforcement (NR), suture oversewing (SR), glue reinforcement (GR), bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (Gore® Seamguard®) (GoR), and clips reinforcement (CR). Risk Ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were used as pooled effect size measures.

Results

Overall, 3994 patients (17 RCTs) were included. Of those, 1641 (41.1%) underwent NR, 1507 (37.7%) SR, 689 (17.2%) GR, 107 (2.7%) GoR, and 50 (1.3%) CR. SR was associated with a significantly reduced risk of bleeding (RR=0.51; 95% CrI 0.31–0.88), staple line leak (RR=0.56; 95% CrI 0.32–0.99), and overall complications (RR=0.50; 95% CrI 0.30–0.88) compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Operative time was significantly longer for SR (WMD=16.2; 95% CrI 10.8–21.7), GR (WMD=15.0; 95% CrI 7.7–22.4), and GoR (WMD=15.5; 95% CrI 5.6–25.4) compared to NR. Among treatments, there were no significant differences for surgical site infection (SSI), sleeve stenosis, reoperation, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

SR seems associated with a reduced risk of bleeding, leak, and overall complications compared to NR while no differences were found vs. GR, GoR, and CR. Data regarding GoR and CR are limited while further trials reporting outcomes for these techniques are warranted.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z.

Training in bariatric and metabolic endoscopy

The limited penetration of bariatric surgery and the scarce outcome of pharmacological therapies created a favorable space for primary bariatric endoscopic techniques. Furthermore, bariatric endoscopy is largely used to diagnose and treat surgical complications and weight regain after bariatric surgery. The increasingly essential role of endoscopy in the management of obese patients results in the need for trained professionals. Training methods are evolving, and the apprenticeship method is giving way to the simulation-based method. Existing simulation platforms include mechanical simulators, ex vivo and in vivo models, and virtual reality simulators. This review analyzes current training methods for bariatric endoscopy and available training programs with dedicated bariatric core curricula, giving a glimpse of future perspectives.

The Impact of Staple Line Reinforcement Utilization on Bleeding and Leak Rates Following Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Obesity: a Propensity and Case-Control Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is a commonly used technique during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for severe obesity. There remains controversy over the potential benefit or risk associated with SLR. There are currently no consensus recommendations about SLR use. Its use is surgeon-dependent and remains controversial.

STUDY AIM

To determine the impact of staple line reinforcement on staple line leak and bleeding rates after sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant User File (MBSQIP-PUF) database, we identified patients who had a SG in 2015 and 2016. SLR utilization status was used to create two cohorts. An unmatched cohort analysis was performed, and the outcomes were compared. A propensity score and case-control matched cohort analysis were then performed, and the outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS and SAS.

RESULTS

Of the 189,173 SG cases identified, SLR utilization was noted in 127,521 (67.4%). In the unmatched analysis, bleeding and reoperation were significantly higher in the cohort without SLR utilization. In both propensity score and case-control matched analysis, bleeding and reoperation remained significantly higher in the cohort without SLR utilization. There was no difference in mortality and staple line leak rates between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

SLR significantly reduces bleeding and reoperation rates following SG and has no deleterious impact on staple line leak rate. While further prospective studies factoring in the SLR method and staple characteristics are needed, this large database analysis supports the use of routine SLR during SG to reduce the risk of perioperative bleeding and reoperation.

Effectiveness of Fibrin Sealant Application on the Development of Staple Line Complications After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the effectiveness of the use of fibrin sealant (FS) for preventing the development of staple line complications (SLCs) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the best means of preventing SLCs after SG.

METHODS

This was a prospective, intention-to-treat, randomized, 2 center study of a group of 586 patients undergoing primary SG (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01613664) between March 2014 and June 2017. The 1:1 randomization was stratified by center, age, sex, gender, and body mass index, giving 293 patients in the FS group and 293 in the control group (without FS). The primary endpoint (composite criteria) was the incidence of SLCs in each of the 2 groups. The secondary criteria were the mortality rate, morbidity rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and risk factors for SLC.

RESULTS

There were no intergroup differences in demographic variables. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of SLCs was similar in the FS and control groups (1.3% vs 2%, respectively; P = 0.52). All secondary endpoints were similar: complication rate (5.4% vs 5.1%, respectively; P = 0.85), mortality rate (0.3% vs 0%, respectively; P = 0.99), GL rate (0.3% vs 1.3%, respectively; P = 0.18), postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma rate (1% vs 0.7%, respectively; P = 0.68), reoperation rate (1% vs 0.3%, respectively; P = 0.32). Length of stay was 1 day in both groups (P = 0.89), and the readmission rate was similar (5.1% vs 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.32). No risk factors for SLCs were found.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of postoperative SLCs did not appear to depend on the presence or absence of FS.

Endoluminal solutions to bariatric surgery complications: A review with a focus on technical aspects and results

Obesity is a growing problem in developed countries, and surgery is the most effective treatment in terms of weight loss and improving medical comorbidity in a high proportion of obese patients. Despite the advances in surgical techniques, some patients still develop acute and late postoperative complications, and an endoscopic evaluation is often required for diagnosis. Moreover, the high morbidity related to surgical reintervention, the important enhancement of endoscopic procedures and technological innovations introduced in endoscopic equipment have made the endoscopic approach a minimally-invasive alternative to surgery, and, in many cases, a suitable first-line treatment of bariatric surgery complications. There is now evidence in the literature supporting endoscopic management for some of these complications, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, stomal and marginal ulcers, stomal stenosis, leaks and fistulas or pancreatobiliary disorders. However, endoscopic treatment in this setting is not standardized, and there is no consensus on its optimal timing. In this article, we aim to analyze the secondary complications of the most expanded techniques of bariatric surgery with special emphasis on those where more solid evidence exists in favor of the endoscopic treatment. Based on a thorough review of the literature, we evaluated the performance and safety of different endoscopic options for every type of complication, highlighting the most recent innovations and including comparative data with surgical alternatives whenever feasible.