Pharmacokinetics in Morbid Obesity: Influence of Two Bariatric Surgery Techniques on Paracetamol and Caffeine Metabolism

Pharmacokinetics after bariatric surgery: adverse effects and drug safety issues in bariatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Medication management after bariatric surgery is a major and complex challenge. The altered gastrointestinal anatomy/physiology post-surgery may impact oral drug absorption/pharmacokinetics, with potential clinical implications. Along with multiple studies/cases of impaired post-surgery drug absorption/pharmacokinetics, leading to potential treatment failure, reports of increased drug exposure, leading to post-bariatric safety issues and adverse effects risk, are also available; yet, this second scenario of increased post-surgery drug levels, is less familiar in practice.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we highlight and overview the literature reports of increased post-bariatric drug exposure and safety issues, and discuss the underlying relevant mechanisms. Finally, we provide clinical recommendations for managing this therapeutic challenge.

EXPERT OPINION

Around 25 drugs were found to exhibit post-bariatric enhanced pharmacokinetics and risk of adverse effects. Among them, toxicity with lithium treatment is well-established. Clear safety concerns were also raised for other drugs, including levothyroxine, atorvastatin, paracetamol and, importantly, immediate-release morphine. Cautious use, while closely monitoring clinical signs of toxicity, is advised for these drugs. Realizing the potentially altered post-bariatric pharmacokinetics of various drugs, and, in particular, the risk of increased exposure with related adverse effects, is essential for providing optimal pharmacological therapy and overall patient care to the growing bariatric population.

Bioavailability of Orally Administered Drugs After Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Oral drug absorption after bariatric surgery is likely to be altered, but the impact of different bariatric surgery procedures on individual drugs is not uniform. The aim of this article is to describe factors influencing the bioavailability of orally administered drugs after bariatric surgery and to provide readers with practical recommendations for drug dosing. We also discuss the medications that may be harmful after bariatric surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

The fundamental factors for enteral drug absorption are the production of gastric acid; the preserved length of the intestine, i.e., the size of the absorption surface and/or the preserved enterohepatic circulation; and the length of common loop where food and drugs are mixed with digestive enzymes and bile acids. Bypassing of metabolizing enzymes or efflux pumps and changes in intestinal motility can also play an important role. Significant changes of drug absorption early after the anatomic alteration may also be gradually ameliorated due to gradual intestinal adaptation. The most affected drugs are those with low or variable bioavailability and those undergoing enterohepatic circulation. Attention should also be paid to oral drug formulations, especially in the early postoperative period, when immediate-release and liquid formulations are preferred. The changes in oral bioavailability are especially clinically meaningful in patients treated with drugs possessing narrow therapeutic index (e.g., oral anticoagulants, levothyroxine, and anticonvulsants) or in acute conditions (e.g., anti-infectives); nevertheless, it may also influence the therapeutic value of chronic therapy (e.g., antidepressants. antihypertensives, antiplatelets, statins, PPIs, contraceptives, and analgesics); therapeutic effect of chronic therapy is further influenced by pharmacokinetic alterations resulting from weight loss. Therapeutic drug monitoring, periodical clinical evaluation, and adequate dose adjustments are necessary. Due to safety reasons, patients should avoid oral bisphosphonates, regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and, if possible, corticosteroids after bariatric surgery.

Digoxin Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Obesity Before and After a Gastric Bypass or a Strict Diet Compared with Normal Weight Individuals

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Several drugs on the market are substrates for P-glycoprotein (P-gp), an efflux transporter highly expressed in barrier tissues such as the intestine. Body weight, weight loss, and a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may influence P-gp expression and activity, leading to variability in the drug response. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate digoxin pharmacokinetics as a measure of the P-gp phenotype in patients with obesity before and after weight loss induced by an RYGB or a strict diet and in normal weight individuals.

METHODS

This study included patients with severe obesity preparing for an RYGB (n = 40) or diet-induced weight loss (n = 40) and mainly normal weight individuals scheduled for a cholecystectomy (n = 18). Both weight loss groups underwent a 3-week low-energy diet (<1200 kcal/day) followed by an additional 6 weeks of <800 kcal/day induced by an RYGB (performed at week 3) or a very-low-energy diet. Follow-up time was 2 years, with four digoxin pharmacokinetic investigations at weeks 0, 3, and 9, and year 2. Hepatic and jejunal P-gp levels were determined in biopsies obtained from the patients undergoing surgery.

RESULTS

The RYGB group and the diet group had a comparable weight loss in the first 9 weeks (13 ± 2.3% and 11 ± 3.6%, respectively). During this period, we observed a minor increase (16%) in the digoxin area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity in both groups: RYGB: 2.7 µg h/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67, 4.7], diet: 2.5 µg h/L [95% CI 0.49, 4.4]. In the RYGB group, we also observed that the time to reach maximum concentration decreased after surgery: from 1.0 ± 0.33 hours at week 3 to 0.77 ± 0.08 hours at week 9 (-0.26 hours [95% CI -0.47, -0.05]), corresponding to a 25% reduction. Area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity did not change long term (week 0 to year 2) in either the RYGB (1.1 µg h/L [-0.94, 3.2]) or the diet group (0.94 µg h/L [-1.2, 3.0]), despite a considerable difference in weight loss from baseline (RYGB: 30 ± 7%, diet: 3 ± 6%). At baseline, the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity was -5.5 µg h/L [95% CI -8.5, -2.5] (-26%) lower in patients with obesity (RYGB plus diet) than in normal weight individuals scheduled for a cholecystectomy. Further, patients undergoing an RYGB had a 0.05 fmol/µg [95% CI 0.00, 0.10] (29%) higher hepatic P-gp level than the normal weight individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics following weight loss induced by a pre-operative low-energy diet and an RYGB or a strict diet (a low-energy diet plus a very-low-energy diet) were minor and unlikely to be clinically relevant. The lower systemic exposure of digoxin in patients with obesity suggests that these patients may have increased biliary excretion of digoxin possibly owing to a higher expression of P-gp in the liver.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Pharmacokinetics of Drugs: a Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity constitutes a major public health concern and has been recognized as an epidemic. To date, bariatric surgery remains the most effective way for substantial long-lasting weight loss in severe obesity. The purpose of this review is to summarize how the pharmacokinetics of drugs are affected by the most common types of bariatric surgery, i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

RECENT FINDINGS

Limited data are available regarding the changes in pharmacokinetics of drugs after bariatric surgery. The lack of existing guidelines may lead patients to experience drug toxicity or therapeutic undertreatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters that need to be taken into consideration postoperatively include gastric motility, gastric volume, pH, surface area, bile secretions, carrier proteins, and first-pass metabolism. For drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, other factors need to be monitored closely, including plasma drug levels, patients' clinical outcomes, and laboratory markers. Patients should be followed up frequently and treated in accordance with their response to the drug therapy. Bariatric surgery may affect the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, due to the resultant anatomical changes and the substantial weight loss. Therefore, there is a need to identify those potential changes and adjust patients' medication doses in order to achieve higher efficacy and avoid toxicity.

Application of a Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS)-Based Method for the Determination of Paracetamol and Four of its Metabolites as a Tool for Pharmacokinetic Studies in Obese and Non-Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a drug is influenced by several factors, which can lead to a suboptimal dosing regimen in specific patient populations. As obesity becomes increasingly prevalent, it is important that optimized dosing schemes are available for these patients. To set up such dosing schemes, PK studies should be performed in this population. Regarding paracetamol (acetaminophen [APAP]), obese patients would benefit from a tailored dosing scheme, as both the volume of distribution and metabolism are increased compared with non-obese patients. This includes metabolism by cytochrome P450 2E1, which is involved in APAP-associated hepatotoxicity. To decrease the burden for patients in these PK studies, finger-prick sampling could be used.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the quantitative determination of APAP and four metabolites in different blood-based matrices and to determine if capillary dried blood samples, collected directly following finger-prick, could serve as a tool to investigate APAP PK in obese and non-obese patients.

METHODS

In this study, we performed a clinical validation of methods for the determination of APAP and four of its metabolites (APAP-glucuronide, APAP-sulfate, APAP-mercapturate, and APAP-cysteine) in blood, plasma, and dried blood. The latter was obtained by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), either starting from the venous blood or collected directly following a finger-prick. Results were compared between the different matrices and, in addition, blood:plasma (B:P) ratios were determined for the different analytes.

RESULTS

Liquid and dried venous blood results were in good agreement. Furthermore, differences between capillary (finger-prick) and venous VAMS blood samples remained limited for most analytes. However, for APAP-cysteine, caution should be paid to the interpretation of concentrations in (dried) blood. With the exception of APAP, concentrations were higher in plasma compared with blood, with B:P ratios ranging between 0.52 and 0.65. A time-dependent change in median B:P ratio was observed for APAP and APAP-cysteine. Additionally, a time-dependent trend was seen for APAP, as well as for APAP-glucuronide and APAP-mercapturate, for the distribution between capillary and venous blood.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that finger-prick sampling is a viable alternative to conventional venous blood sampling to investigate the PK of APAP and its metabolites in obese and non-obese patients.

Drug pharmacokinetics in the obese population: challenging common assumptions on predictors of obesity-related parameter changes

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is associated with many physiological changes. We review available evidence regarding five commonly accepted assumptions to a priori predict the impact of obesity on drug pharmacokinetics (PK).

AREAS COVERED

The investigated assumptions are: 1) lean body weight is the preferred descriptor of clearance and dose adjustments; 2) volume of distribution increases for lipophilic, but not for hydrophilic drugs; 3) CYP-3A4 activity is suppressed and UGT activity is increased, implying decreased and increased dose requirements for substrates of these enzyme systems, respectively; 4) glomerular filtration rate is enhanced, necessitating higher doses for drugs cleared through glomerular filtration; 5) drug dosing information from obese adults can be extrapolated to obese adolescents.

EXPERT OPINION

Available literature contradicts, or at least limits the generalizability, of all five assumptions. Clinical studies should focus on quantifying the impact of duration and severity of obesity on drug PK in adults and adolescents, and also include oral bioavailability and pharmacodynamics in these studies. Physiologically-based PK approaches can be used to predict PK changes for individual drugs, but can also be used to define in general terms based on patient characteristics and drug properties, when certain assumptions can or cannot be expected to be systematically accurate.

Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Omeprazole Using a Population Approach

Omeprazole is commonly prescribed to obese patients and patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The pharmacokinetics of oral omeprazole after LSG are still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of oral omeprazole in obese patients before and after LSG. A total of 331 blood samples were collected from 62 obese patients preoperatively (visit 1) followed by 41 patients 7 days post-LSG (visit 2) and 20 patients 1 month post-LSG (visit 3). Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM to characterize the effect of LSG on omeprazole absorption and disposition. A one-compartment model with 12 transit absorption compartments and linear elimination successfully described the data. Compared with pre-surgery, the oral omeprazole time to maximum plasma concentration (T_max) was reduced and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) was higher, but the apparent clearance (CL/F) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) were unchanged 7 days and 1 month after surgery. In addition, the CYP2C19 genotype and liver function exhibited a significant influence on omeprazole CL/F. LSG increased the rate of omeprazole absorption but did not affect omeprazole exposure. A dose of 20 mg omeprazole once daily may be adequate for relieving gastrointestinal tract discomfort at short-term follow-up post-LSG.

Practical Challenges-Use of Paracetamol in Children and Youth Who are Overweight or Obese: A Narrative Review

Worldwide, > 380 million children and adolescents are overweight or obese, including 41 million children aged < 5 years. Obesity can change the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs by altering their distribution, metabolism, and elimination. Thus, children who are overweight or obese are at increased risk for receiving inappropriate doses of commonly used drugs, which can result in treatment failure, adverse events, and/or drug toxicity. This review analyzes available data on paracetamol dosing for pain and fever in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese to identify gaps and challenges in optimal dosing strategies. Literature searches using Medline, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were conducted to identify English-language articles reporting paracetamol pharmacokinetics, dosing practices, and guidelines in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese. Of 24 relevant studies identified, 20 were specific to overweight/obese individuals and 15 were specific to children and/or adolescents. Data on paracetamol pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese are lacking, and there is no high-quality evidence to guide paracetamol prescribing practices in these patients. Adult data have been extrapolated to pediatric populations; however, extrapolation does not address differences in paracetamol metabolism in adults versus children; the efficacy and safety effects of such differences are unknown. Given the growing worldwide prevalence of obesity in children and adolescents and the likelihood that paracetamol use in this population will increase accordingly, obesity-specific pediatric dosing guidelines for paracetamol are urgently needed. High-quality research is necessary to inform such guidelines.

Short- and medium-term impact of bariatric surgery on the activities of CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP1A2 in morbid obesity

Morbid obesity and bariatric surgery induce anatomical, physiological and metabolic alterations that may alter the body’s disposition of drugs. Current literature on this topic is limited and sometimes inconsistent. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) is a superfamily of enzymes that metabolize around 75% of all marketed drugs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index and bariatric surgery on CYP activities. Firstly, we evaluated the in vivo activity of 4 major CYP isoenzymes (CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP1A2) in normal weight, overweight, and morbidly obese individuals. Secondly, we assessed the short- (1 month) and medium-term (6 month) effects of the most commonly employed bariatric surgery techniques (laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) on the activity of these enzymes. CYP3A4 activity was lower in morbidly obese individuals, compared to normal-weight controls. Interestingly, bariatric surgery normalized CYP3A4 activity. In comparison with normal-weight controls, morbidly obese individuals had higher CYP2D6 activity, which was only observed in individuals with two functional alleles for this isoenzyme. Neither body mass index nor surgery had significant effects on CYP2C9 and CYP1A2 activities. Overall, no relevant differences in CYP activities were found between surgical techniques. In conclusion, further studies should evaluate whether the observed alterations in CYP3A4 activity will require dose adjustments for CYP3A4 substrates especially in morbidly obese individuals before and after bariatric surgery.

Influence of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Pharmacokinetics of Tramadol After Single Oral Dose Administration

Background and Objectives

The number of overweight, obese and diabetic patients is constantly increasing. Metabolic disorders may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, e.g., by altering the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes. Tramadol is a commonly used analgesic metabolised mainly via CYP2D6 to its active metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of overweight, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus on tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol pharmacokinetics.

Methods

All patients received a single oral dose (100 mg) of tramadol. The plasma concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were measured with the validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescence detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were calculated by non-compartmental methods.

Results

After nephrectomy, the patients were divided into four groups—a control group (n = 12, mean [SD] age 61 [14] years, body mass index (BMI) 22 [2] kg/m², CL_cr (creatinine clearance) 74 [30] mL/min); an overweight group (n = 15, mean [SD] age 63 [11] years, BMI 27 [1] kg/m², CL_cr 81 [35] mL/min); an obese group (n = 12, mean [SD] age 57 [8] years, BMI 33 [4] kg/m², CL_cr 113 [51] mL/min); and an obese and diabetic group (n = 9, mean [SD] age 64 [10] years, BMI 33 [4] kg/m², CL_cr 87 [35] mL/min). Apart from the time to first occurrence of maximal concentration (t_max), there were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol among the groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the O-desmethyltramadol/tramadol ratios among the four groups of patients after nephrectomy.

Conclusions

No significant differences were found in the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, indicating that the opioid can be administered to overweight, obese and diabetic patients without dosage adjustment.

Drug Dose Selection in Pediatric Obesity: Available Information for the Most Commonly Prescribed Drugs to Children

Obesity rates continue to rise in children, and little guidance exists regarding the need for adjustment away from total body weight-based doses for those prescribing drugs to this population of children. A majority of drugs prescribed to children with obesity result in either sub-therapeutic or supra-therapeutic concentrations, placing these children at risk for treatment failure and drug toxicities. In this review, we highlight available obesity-specific pharmacokinetic and dosing information for the most frequently prescribed drugs to children in the inpatient and outpatient clinical settings. We also comment on available dosing recommendations for drugs prescribed to treat common pediatric obesity-related comorbidities. This review highlights that there is no safe or proven 'rule of thumb,' for dosing drugs for children with obesity, and a striking lack of pharmacokinetic data to support the creation of dosing guidelines for children with obesity for the most commonly prescribed drugs. It is important that those prescribing for children with obesity are aware of these gaps in knowledge and of potential drug treatment failure or adverse events related to drug toxicity as a result of these knowledge gaps. Until more data are available, we recommend close monitoring of drug response and adverse events in children with obesity receiving commonly prescribed drugs.

The influence of bariatric surgery on oral drug bioavailability in patients with obesity: A systematic review

Anatomical changes in the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent weight loss may influence drug disposition and thus drug dosing following bariatric surgery. This review systematically examines the effects of bariatric surgery on drug pharmacokinetics, focusing especially on the mechanisms involved in restricting oral bioavailability. Studies with a longitudinal before-after design investigating the pharmacokinetics of at least one drug were reviewed. The need for dose adjustment following bariatric surgery was examined, as well as the potential for extrapolation to other drugs subjected to coinciding pharmacokinetic mechanisms. A total of 22 original articles and 32 different drugs were assessed. The majority of available data is based on Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) (18 of 22 studies), and hence, the overall interpretation is more or less limited to RYGBP. In the case of the majority of studied drugs, an increased absorption rate was observed early after RYGBP. The effect on systemic exposure allows for a low degree of extrapolation, including between drugs subjected to the same major metabolic and transporter pathways. On the basis of current understanding, predicting the pharmacokinetic change for a specific drug following RYGBP is challenging. Close monitoring of each individual drug is therefore recommended in the early postsurgical phase. Future studies should focus on the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on drug disposition, and they should also aim to disentangle the effects of the surgery itself and the subsequent weight loss.

Systematic review of drug bioavailability following gastrointestinal surgery

PURPOSE

Inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetics variability in humans affects the way in which drugs act on the body. Gastrointestinal surgery has an impact on this variability and significantly alters the kinetics of drugs in post-surgical patients. The way in which pharmacokinetic profiles are modified depends on the type of operative procedure performed. The extent to which the absorption of different groups of drugs is affected varies according to the site and length of intestinal resections.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Three databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. For each drug, potential changes in absorption were described, including recommendations extracted from the results of the studies and collected according to authors' criteria as practical conclusions, and grades of recommendation were determined by levels of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight articles were collected during the selection process after the bibliographic search. The main outcomes for 60 drugs from the various studies were classified according to each type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications in the digestive tract secondary to gastrointestinal surgery may compromise the bioavailability of drugs. Decreased absorption surface, gastric emptying speed, and gastric pH alteration are factors to be taken into account in the management of pharmacological treatment after surgery. Evidence supported by data in clinical practice is scarce, but after studying the pharmacokinetic profile of some molecules, it is possible to offer recommendations for its adaptation to the patient's clinical situation.

Impact of body weight, low energy diet and gastric bypass on drug bioavailability, cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic biomarkers: protocol for an open, non-randomised, three-armed single centre study (COCKTAIL)

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) is associated with changes in cardiometabolic risk factors and bioavailability of drugs, but whether these changes are induced by calorie restriction, the weight loss or surgery per se, remains uncertain. The COCKTAIL study was designed to disentangle the short-term (6 weeks) metabolic and pharmacokinetic effects of GBP and a very low energy diet (VLED) by inducing a similar weight loss in the two groups.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open, non-randomised, three-armed, single-centre study is performed at a tertiary care centre in Norway. It aims to compare the short-term (6 weeks) and long-term (2 years) effects of GBP and VLED on, first, bioavailability and pharmacokinetics (24 hours) of probe drugs and biomarkers and, second, their effects on metabolism, cardiometabolic risk factors and biomarkers. The primary outcomes will be measured as changes in: (1) all six probe drugs by absolute bioavailability area under the curve (AUC_oral/AUC_iv) of midazolam (CYP3A4 probe), systemic exposure (AUC_oral) of digoxin and rosuvastatin and drug:metabolite ratios for omeprazole, losartan and caffeine, levels of endogenous CYP3A biomarkers and genotypic variation, changes in the expression and activity data of the drug-metabolising, drug transport and drug regulatory proteins in biopsies from various organs and (2) body composition, cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic biomarkers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The COCKTAIL protocol was reviewed and approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (Ref: 2013/2379/REK sørøst A). The results will be disseminated to academic and health professional audiences and the public via presentations at conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals and press releases and provided to all participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02386917.