Pre-surgical Weight Loss Predicts Post-surgical Weight Loss Trajectories in Adolescents Enrolled in a Bariatric Program

Towards precision medicine in bariatric surgery prescription

Obesity is a complex, multifactorial and chronic disease. Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment intervention for obesity and obesity-related diseases. However, weight loss after surgery can be highly heterogeneous and is not entirely predictable, particularly in the long-term after intervention. In this review, we present and discuss the available data on patient-related and procedure-related factors that were previously appointed as putative predictors of bariatric surgery outcomes. In addition, we present a critical appraisal of the available evidence on which factors could be taken into account when recommending and deciding which bariatric procedure to perform. Several patient-related features were identified as having a potential impact on weight loss after bariatric surgery, including age, gender, anthropometrics, obesity co-morbidities, eating behavior, genetic background, circulating biomarkers (microRNAs, metabolites and hormones), psychological and socioeconomic factors. However, none of these factors are sufficiently robust to be used as predictive factors. Overall, there is no doubt that before we long for precision medicine, there is the unmet need for a better understanding of the socio-biological drivers of weight gain, weight loss failure and weight-regain after bariatric interventions. Machine learning models targeting preoperative factors and effectiveness measurements of specific bariatric surgery interventions, would enable a more precise identification of the causal links between determinants of weight gain and weight loss. Artificial intelligence algorithms to be used in clinical practice to predict the response to bariatric surgery interventions could then be created, which would ultimately allow to move forward into precision medicine in bariatric surgery prescription.

Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents with Obesity: Long-Term Perspectives and Potential Alternatives

BACKGROUND

Severe obesity among adolescent shows a worrisome trend in regard to its increasing prevalence and poses a great challenge for treatment. Conservative measures have modest effects on weight loss, usually fail in achieving a sustainable weight loss and resolution of comorbidities. This has led to greater utilization of bariatric surgery (BS) that offers a fast reduction in body mass index with little perioperative complications. Despite the increasing utilization of BS, data are still insufficient, regarding their long-term outcome in adolescents. We review short- and long-term effects of BS and their implications on bone health and nutritional deficiencies in adolescents. In addition, we discuss possible pharmaceutical alternatives.

SUMMARY

BS results in a substantial weight loss of roughly 37% in the first-year post-operation and is superior to conservative measures in resolution of metabolic comorbidities. BS significantly improves health-related quality of life. Longer follow-up (F/U) shows weight regain in 50% of patients. Furthermore, reduced bone mass and nutritional deficiencies were reported in up to 90% of patients. Most recently, alternative to BS became more relevant with approval of GLP-1 analogues use in adolescents. GLP-1 analogues are potent enough to induce moderate clinically meaningful weight loss and improvement of metabolic component.

KEY MESSAGES

We conclude that obese adolescents without major obesity-related complications may benefit from pharmacological interventions with lifestyle modification. We advise considering BS as treatment approach in adolescents with severe obesity and major obesity-related complications with proper preoperative preparation and postoperative F/U in excellence centers.

Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss on Postoperative Weight Loss Revealed from a Large Nationwide Quality Registry

PURPOSE

Weight loss before bariatric surgery is not mandatory, but questions remain as to whether preoperative weight loss has an impact on weight loss after surgery. Most studies have small sample sizes. The objective was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative and successful postoperative weight loss defined as ≥25% total weight loss (TWL) at 1 and 2 years after primary bariatric surgery with regard to the obesity-related comorbidities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from a large nationwide quality registry of patients who underwent a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or gastric bypass (GBP) between January 2015 and January 2018. Patients with completed screening and preoperative and postoperative data were included. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for each technique and follow-up years separately.

RESULTS

In total, 8751 were included in the analysis. Patients with preoperative weight loss were more likely to achieve ≥25% postoperative TWL in both procedures. Patients with higher preoperative weight loss of 5-10% had an increased likelihood for achieving 25% TWL compared to 0-5%, OR 1.79 (CI (1.42-2.25), p < 0.001) vs 1.25 (CI (1.08-1.46), p < 0.004) for the GBP group for year 2 postoperative. This was the same for the SG group at year 2, OR 1.30 (CI (1.03-1.64), p < 0.029) vs 1.14 (CI (0.94-1.38), p < 0.198).

CONCLUSION

Patients with preoperative weight loss were more likely to achieve ≥25% postoperative TWL at 1 and 2 years after surgery in both procedures; moreover, the extent of preoperative weight loss contributes to the significance and odds of this success.

Analysis of Trajectories of Care After Bariatric Surgery Using Data Mining Method and Health Administrative Information Systems

CONTEXT

The 30-day readmission rate after bariatric surgery is considered an important metric of the quality of hospital care. However, readmission rate beyond 30 days is rarely reported and does not provide any information about trajectories of care which would be of great interest for healthcare planning. The aim of this study was to analyze trajectories of care during the first year after bariatric surgery on a nationwide basis using data mining methods.

METHOD

This was a retrospective descriptive study on the trajectories of care within the first year after bariatric surgery. Data were extracted from a national administrative claims database (the PMSI database) and trajectories were defined as principal diagnosis of successive readmissions. Formal Concept Analysis was performed to find common concepts of trajectories of care.

RESULTS

We included for analysis 198,389 bariatric procedures performed on 196,323 patients. Twelve main concepts were selected. About one third of patients (32.4%) were readmitted in the first year after surgery. Most common trajectories were as follows: regular follow-up (14.9%), cholelithiasis (2.2%), abdominal pain (1.9%), and abdominal sepsis (1.3%). Important differences were found in trajectories among different bariatric procedures: 1.8% of gastric banding patients had pregnancy-related events (delivery or medical abortion), while we observed a readmission rate for abdominal sepsis in 2.7% and 5.1% of patients operated of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy respectively.

CONCLUSION

Administrative claim data can be analyzed through Formal Concept Analysis in order to classify trajectories of care. This approach permits to quantify expected postoperative complications and to identify unexpected events.

Psychopathology and Adolescent Bariatric Surgery: A Topical Review to Support Psychologists in Assessment and Treatment Considerations

The rising rates of severe obesity among adolescents in the United States indicate a dire need for more intensive weight management strategies. While current evidence suggests that bariatric surgery is a safe and efficacious intervention for adolescents, the linkages with psychopathology before and after surgery are not well understood. Psychologists are an integral part of the interdisciplinary surgery team and play an important role in preparing youth for bariatric surgery as well as supporting adolescents post-surgery. The present manuscript reviews the literature on psychopathology in the context of adolescent bariatric surgery, discusses consideration of psychopathology as a contraindication for surgery, and provides recommendations on how psychologist members of the bariatric surgery team may balance attention to motivation and adherence to medical recommendations with assessment and treatment of psychopathology. Finally, the importance of continued research to confirm clinical consensus regarding decision-making and expansion of psychological resources within adolescent bariatric surgery programs are discussed.

Factors affecting weight loss variability in obesity

Current obesity treatment strategies include diet, exercise, bariatric surgery, and a limited but growing repertoire of medications. Individual weight loss in response to each of these strategies is highly variable. Here we review research into factors potentially contributing to inter-individual variability in response to treatments for obesity, with a focus on studies in humans. Well-recognized factors associated with weight loss capacity include diet adherence, physical activity, sex, age, and specific medications. However, following control for each of these, differences in weight loss appear to persist in response to behavioral, pharmacological and surgical interventions. Adaptation to energy deficit involves complex feedback mechanisms, and inter-individual differences likely to arise from a host of poorly defined genetic factors, as well as differential responses in neurohormonal mechanisms (including gastrointestinal peptides), metabolic efficiency and capacity of tissues, non-exercise activity thermogenesis, thermogenic response to food, and in gut microbiome. A better understanding of the factors involved in inter-individual variability in response to therapies will guide more personalized approaches to the treatment of obesity.

Weight and Waiting for Adolescent's Bariatric Surgery: Changes in Weight During Waiting Periods for Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is an emerging effective treatment option for adolescents suffering from morbid obesity. However, the surgery is often in high demand with long waiting periods. No prior research regarding the significance of waiting periods for bariatric surgery in adolescents was found. Our study aimed to evaluate changes in weight trends in adolescent candidates for bariatric surgery during the waiting period between acceptance and admission to the bariatric process (pre-surgical preparation, surgery, and follow-up).

METHODS

Fifty-one adolescent bariatric surgery candidates were accepted and subsequently admitted to the bariatric process. BMI data was retrieved from medical files and direct measurements, and BMI-change trends during the waiting period were compared with naturalistic trends (i.e., prior to the first evaluation for bariatric surgery).

RESULTS

Naturalistic BMI-trends showed an average gain of 0.3 BMI points per-month. After acceptance to the bariatric process and during the waiting period, this figure dropped, and candidates for surgery lost an average of 0.06 BMI points per-month. Waiting periods lasted an average of 5.2 months. Shorter waiting periods were associated with better weight reduction and maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant reduction in weight-gaining trends occurred during the waiting period for bariatric surgery in adolescents, which may reflect motivational and lifestyle changes due to expectancy for surgery. Decision makers may aim for short waiting periods in order to capitalize on this effect. Further research needs to be conducted in order to clarify the effects of waiting periods for bariatric surgery in adolescents.

Partnering Support Interventions with Bariatric Surgery to Maximize Health Outcomes in Adolescents with Severe Obesity

OBJECTIVE

Rates of adolescents with severe obesity continue to rise worldwide, with concurrent increases in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) uptake. The gap between support (lifestyle, pharmacotherapy) interventions and MBS as treatment options for adolescents has been understudied. This review, couched in a socio-ecological framework, investigates how support interventions for adolescents with severe obesity could be combined or sequenced with MBS to optimize health outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search revealed 36 published articles between 1995 and 2019 that included the combination of support interventions and MBS among adolescents.

RESULTS

There were no studies that specifically reported outcomes or effect sizes for the combination of lifestyle intervention with MBS. Previous studies have reported individual results for either lifestyle intervention or MBS but not for their compound effect.

CONCLUSIONS

As rates of adolescents with severe obesity are on the rise globally, future research should focus on how partnering support interventions with MBS can amplify positive short- and long-term health outcomes and within a socio-ecological framework. Understanding the sequence of these approaches will be of particular importance. High-risk and vulnerable populations such as ethnic minorities who have suffered a disproportionate burden of the obesity epidemic must be included in rigorously tested future trials of combination interventions to maximize health outcomes worldwide.