Transjejunal Laparoscopic-Assisted ERCP: a Technique to Deal with Choledocholithiasis After Roux-En-Y Reconstruction

Averting an Unnecessary Revision of a Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy by Surgically Creating an Access Point for the Endoscopic Assessment of the Anastomosis: A Report of a Case

Introduction: Primary sclerosing cholangitis sets the scene for several pathologies of both the intrahepatic and the extrahepatic biliary tree. Surgical treatment, when needed, is almost unanimously summarized in the creation of a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, a procedure with a relatively high associated failure rate. Presentation of case: A 70-year-old male, diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis, was submitted to a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy due to a dominant stricture of the extrahepatic biliary tree. Recurrent episodes of acute cholangitis dictated a workup in the direction of a possible stenosis at the level of the anastomosis. The imaging studies were inconclusive while both the endoscopic and the transhepatic approach failed to assess the status of the anastomosis. A laparotomy, with the intent to revise a high suspicion for stenosis hepaticojejunostomy, was decided. Intraoperatively, a decision to assess the hepaticojejunostomy prior to the scheduled surgical revision, via endoscopy, was made. In this direction, an enterotomy was made on the short jejunal blind loop in order to gain luminal access and an endoscope was propelled through the enterotomy towards the biliary enteric anastomosis. Results: The inspection of the anastomosis under direct endoscopic vision showed no evidences of stenosis and averted an unnecessary, under these circumstances, revision of the anastomosis. Conclusions: The surgical revision of a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is a highly demanding operation with an increased associated morbidity, and it should be reserved as the final resort in the treatment algorithm. An approach of utilizing surgery to facilitate the endoscopic assessment prior to proceeding to the surgical revision of the anastomosis appears justified.

[Cholecystolithiasis and intestinal bypass procedures]

With the increasing number of surgical interventions for obesity, the numbers of associated complications, such as gallstones after bariatric surgery are also increasing. The incidence of postbariatric symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is 5-10%; however, the numbers of severe complications due to gallstones and the probability of a necessary extraction of gallstones are low. For this reason, a simultaneous or preoperative cholecystectomy should only be carried out in symptomatic patients. Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid reduced the risk of gallstone formation in randomized trials but not the risk of complications related to gallstones in cases of pre-existing gallstones. The most frequently used access route to bile ducts after intestinal bypass procedures is the laparoscopic approach via the stomach remnants. Other possible access routes are the enteroscopic approach as well as the endosonography-guided puncture of the stomach remnants.

Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomosis Worm Obstruction and Its Laparoscopic Management: A Case Report and Review of Literature

We report a surprising case of intraoperatively detected worm obstruction of a hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis. The patient presented with acute cholangitis including fever, abdominal pain, obstructive jaundice and sepsis. Six years earlier, she had undergone open cholecystectomy with a right subcostal incision. Ultrasonography that night depicted the absence of the gall bladder and the presence of apparent stones in the common hepatic and common bile ducts. The patient was posted for laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct. Intraoperatively, worm obstruction was found in the hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis created during the previous operation. The obstruction was managed laparoscopically, and the patient recovered without any complications and was monitored for two years. In a search of PubMed and Google Scholar, we found reports of laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as an established method of relieving hepaticojejunostomy obstruction; however, we found no case of laparoscopic extraction of obstructing worms. Laparoscopic exploration of a hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis through the afferent Roux loop is a feasible and safe alternative to other advanced methods of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, for which special technique, logistics, and training are required but may not be available in many parts of the world.

Transjejunal Laparoscopic Assisted ERCP in a Patient with Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy

Background and Objectives: Nowadays, with the increasing laparoscopic expertise and accessibility to modern surgical tools, laparoscopic assisted ERCP (LAERCP) has become an effective approach for the management of bile stone disease in patients with modified gastrointestinal anatomy. In contrast to patients with gastric bypass in whom a transgastric LAERCP approach is usually performed, the resultant anatomy of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy precludes a gastric approach as the newly formed bilioenteric anastomosis is not reachable through the stomach. Therefore, a transjejunal approach has been described as an alternative LAERCP technique. To the best of our knowledge this is the tenth case of transjejunal LAERCP reported worldwide. Materials and Methods: We present the case of a 50-year-old female with history of biliary injury during a cholecystectomy corrected with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy who presented to our center with manifestations of acute abdomen. After laboratory and image analysis, diagnosis of intrahepatic lithiasis was confirmed. The decision to perform a transjejunal LAERCP was made due to the complex anatomy in this patient. No complications were found during surgery and in the follow up period. Conclusions: Transjejunal LAERCP is an effective approach for endoscopic management of biliary complications in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and other modified gastrointestinal anatomy. Previous recommendations by more experienced teams have been reported, nonetheless, there are too few cases reported to make definitive recommendations and conclusions. In limited settings, such as ours, some of these recommendations may not be applicable. We are certain that, with the increasing expertise and innovations in laparoscopy surgery for the management of complications that cannot be addressed by endoscopic or noninvasive measures, more cases will be reported.