1
|
Gerges WB, Omar ASM, Shoka AA, Hamed MA, Abdelrahim HS, Makram F. ReSleeve or revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass for failed primary sleeve gastrectomy with dilated gastric tube: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:787-798. [PMID: 38057540 PMCID: PMC10830658 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10609-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) has been increasingly performed due to weight loss failure (WLF). Many revisional procedures have been proposed after primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (pLSG) failure, including ReSleeve gastrectomy (ReLSG), and laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB). Choosing the RBS post-pLSG failure represents a challenge. WLF without gastric tube (GT) dilation is undoubtedly converted to a malabsorptive procedure, but the presence of GT dilation makes it more difficult to select a RBS. This study aimed to compare two relatively simple revisional procedures after pLSG failure with dilated GT to help decision making on which procedure better done to which patient. METHODS Data of 52 patients who completed one year follow-up (FU) after their RBS (ReLSG: 27 or LOAGB: 25) for their failed pLSG were collected, assessed, correlated to weight loss (WL) and compared. RESULTS Mean operative time was 97 ± 18.4 min. with revisional LOAGB (RLOAGB) and 62 ± 11 min. with ReLSG. Six patients (11.5%) had seven postoperative procedure-specific complications. Significant hemorrhage occurred in three patients. Two cases of leakage were encountered with each procedure. LOAGB Patients had lower mean final weight (76.2 ± 10.5 vs 85.3 ± 13), lower mean Final BMI (26.4 ± 2.5 vs 29.7 ± 2.9) and higher mean percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) (83.6 ± 13.5% vs 60.29 ± 14.6%). All RLOAGB patients and 77.8% of ReLSG patients had EWL% > 50%. RLOAGB patients had higher EWL% compared to ReLSG (p < 0.001). Insufficient WL (IWL) patients had higher EWL% compared to weight regain (WR) patients (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION Both procedures (RLOAGB and ReLSG) were relatively safe and effective in terms of WL. RLOAGB led to higher WL compared to ReLSG in all types of patients despite higher Caloric intake. IWL patients had more WL compared to WR patients. WL was not related to GT dilation type. Large-scale longer-FU studies are still needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION PACTR202310644487566 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wadie Boshra Gerges
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Ahmed S M Omar
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Ain Shoka
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Hossam S Abdelrahim
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Fady Makram
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Axer S, Lederhuber H, Stiede F, Szabo E, Näslund I. Weight-Related Outcomes After Revisional Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Non-response After Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2023; 33:2210-2218. [PMID: 37209388 PMCID: PMC10289909 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06630-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Weight non-response after sleeve gastrectomy is an emerging issue. This systematic review compared revisional procedures for weight-related outcomes. We searched several databases for relevant articles and included adult patients with revisional bariatric procedures after primary sleeve gastrectomy. Twelve trials with 1046 patients were included, covering five revisional procedures. There were no randomised controlled trials, and 10 studies had a critical risk of bias. Significant variations in inclusion criteria, therapy benchmarks, follow-up schemes, and outcome measurements were observed, preventing meaningful comparison of results. Evidence-based treatment strategies for weight non-response after sleeve gastrectomy cannot be deduced from the current literature. Prospective studies with well-defined indications, standardised techniques, and strict adherence to outcome measurements are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Axer
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Campus USÖ, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
- Department of General Surgery, Torsby Hospital, Box 502, 685 29, Torsby, Sweden.
| | - Hans Lederhuber
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Church Lane, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Franziska Stiede
- GP Practice Dr. Fritz Weidinger & Dr. Katharina Klein, Hauptstraße 93, 82327, Tutzing, Germany
| | - Eva Szabo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Campus USÖ, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ingmar Näslund
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Örebro University, Campus USÖ, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fehervari M, Banh S, Varma P, Das B, Al-Yaqout K, Al-Sabah S, Khwaja H, Efthimiou E, Ashrafian H. Weight loss specific to indication, remission of diabetes, and short-term complications after sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:384-395. [PMID: 36581551 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Long-term complications such as insufficient weight loss (IWL) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may necessitate SG conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The aim of this review was to determine the indication-specific weight loss and diabetes remission after SG conversion to RYGB (STOBY). Our objective was to extract all available published data on indication for conversion, weight loss, remission of diabetes, and short-term complications after STOBY. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes following STOBY. A random effects model was used for meta-analysis. The search identified 44 relevant studies. Overall short-term (12-mo) excess weight loss (EWL) was 54.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-63%) in 23 studies (n = 712) and total weight loss (TWL) was 19.9% (95% CI, 14%-25%) in 21 studies (n = 740). For IWL, short-term (12-mo) pooled weight loss outcomes were 53.9% EWL (95% CI, 48%-59%) in 14 studies (n = 295) and 22.7% TWL (95% CI, 17%-28%) in 12 studies (n = 219), and medium-term (2-5 yr) outcomes were 45.8% EWL (95% CI, 38%-53%) in 7 studies (n = 154) and 20.6% TWL (95% CI, 15%-26%) in 9 studies (n = 206). Overall diabetes remission was 53% (95% CI, 33%-72%), and the perioperative complication rate was 8.2% (95% CI, 7.6%-8.7%). Revisional SG conversion to RYGB for IWL can achieve good weight loss outcomes and diabetes remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matyas Fehervari
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Serena Banh
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Piyush Varma
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bibek Das
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Haris Khwaja
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roach E, Laplante S, Stogryn S, Maeda A, Jackson T, Okrainec A. Weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing conversion to Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3208-3214. [PMID: 35982286 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09506-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite excellent reported outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a percentage of patients go on to have a secondary bariatric surgery to manage side-effects or address weight regain after LSG. Reported weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) after previous LSG are variable. We sought to determine the weight-loss outcomes of patients undergoing LRYGB after LSG in the largest bariatric surgical network in Canada and to determine whether outcomes differ according to indications for conversion. METHODS The Bariatric Registry is a multi-center database with prospectively collected standardized data on patients undergoing bariatric surgery at ten Bariatric Centers of Excellence within the Ontario Bariatric Network in Ontario, Canada. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent LRYGB after previous LSG between 2012 and 2019. Weight loss outcomes were compared between patients who underwent LRYGB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain and those who underwent conversion to LRYGB for other reasons. RESULTS Excluding patients with multiple revisions and those without follow-up data, 48 patients were included in the analysis: 33 patients (69%) underwent conversion to LRGYB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain (Group 1) and 15 patients (31%) underwent conversion for other reasons (Group 2). Mean body mass index (BMI) measured pre-LSG, pre-LRYGB, and at mid-term follow-up after LRYGB was 61, 48, and 43 kg/m2 in Group 1 and 51, 39, and 34 kg/m2 in Group 2, respectively. ΔBMI and %total weight loss (TWL) at mid-term follow-up were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Conversion to LRYGB after previous LSG resulted in an additional loss of 4 kg/m2 in BMI points at mid-term follow-up. Patients lost a similar number of BMI points and cumulative %TWL was similar regardless of reason for conversion. This can help inform surgical decision-making in the setting of weight regain after LSG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Roach
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of General Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, 8MP-325. 399 Bathurst St., Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.
| | - Simon Laplante
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shannon Stogryn
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Azusa Maeda
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Timothy Jackson
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Okrainec
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A C, N C, A I. Postoperative morbidity and weight loss after revisional bariatric surgery for primary failed restrictive procedure: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 102:106677. [PMID: 35589051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND revisional bariatric surgery is gaining increasing interest as long term follow-up studies demonstrate an elevated failure rate of primary surgery due to insufficient weight loss, weight regain or complications. This particularly concerns restrictive bariatric surgery which has been widely adopted from the '80s till present through different procedures, notably vertical banded gastroplasty, laparoscopic adjusted gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to define which revisional bariatric procedure performs the best after failure of primary restrictive surgery. METHODS a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 39 studies was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane protocol. RESULTS biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch guarantees the best results in terms of weight loss (1 and 3-years %TWL MD: 12.38 and 28.42) followed by single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (9.24 and 19.13), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (7.16 and 13.1), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (4.68 and 7.3) compared to re-sleeve gastrectomy. Duodenal switch and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are associated to an increased risk of late major morbidity (OR: 3.07 and 2.11 respectively) compared to re-sleeve gastrectomy while no significant difference was highlighted for the other procedures. Re-sleeve gastrectomy is the revisional intervention most frequently burdened by weight recidivism; compared to it, patients undergoing single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass have the lowest risk of weight regain (OR: 0.07). CONCLUSION considering the analyzed outcomes altogether, single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass are the most performing revisional procedures after failure of restrictive surgery due to satisfying short and mid-term weight loss and low early and late morbidity. Moreover, single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass has low risk of weight recidivism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chierici A
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre Hospitalier D'Antibes Juan-les-Pins, 107, av. de Nice, 06600, Antibes, France
| | - Chevalier N
- Inserm U1065, C3M, Nice, France; Université Côte D'Azur, Nice, France; Service D'Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Médecine de la Reproduction, Archet 2 Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Iannelli A
- Université Côte D'Azur, Nice, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice - Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, Nice, France; Inserm, U1065, Team 8 "Hepatic complications of Obesity and alcohol", France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Treatment Options for Weight Regain or Insufficient Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2022; 32:2035-2046. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06020-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
7
|
Hu Y, Ji G, Li G, Manza P, Zhang W, Wang J, Lv G, He Y, Zhang Z, Yuan K, von Deneen KM, Chen A, Cui G, Wang H, Wiers CE, Volkow ND, Nie Y, Zhang Y, Wang GJ. Brain Connectivity, and Hormonal and Behavioral Correlates of Sustained Weight Loss in Obese Patients after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Cereb Cortex 2020; 31:1284-1295. [PMID: 33037819 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The biological mediators that support cognitive-control and long-term weight-loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remain unclear. We measured peripheral appetitive hormones and brain functional-connectivity (FC) using magnetic-resonance-imaging with food cue-reactivity task in 25 obese participants at pre, 1 month, and 6 month after LSG, and compared with 30 normal weight controls. We also used diffusion-tensor-imaging to explore whether LSG increases brain structural-connectivity (SC) of regions involved in food cue-reactivity. LSG significantly decreased BMI, craving for high-calorie food cues, ghrelin, insulin, and leptin levels, and increased self-reported cognitive-control of eating behavior. LSG increased FC between the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC) and increased SC between DLPFC and ACC at 1 month and 6 month after LSG. Reduction in BMI correlated negatively with increased FC of right DLPFC-pgACC at 1 month and with increased SC of DLPFC-ACC at 1 month and 6 month after LSG. Reduction in craving for high-calorie food cues correlated negatively with increased FC of DLPFC-pgACC at 6 month after LSG. Additionally, SC of DLPFC-ACC mediated the relationship between lower ghrelin levels and greater cognitive control. These findings provide evidence that LSG improved functional and structural connectivity in prefrontal regions, which contribute to enhanced cognitive-control and sustained weight-loss following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hu
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Gang Ji
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Guanya Li
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Peter Manza
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Wenchao Zhang
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Jia Wang
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Ganggang Lv
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Yang He
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Zhida Zhang
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Kai Yuan
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Karen M von Deneen
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Antao Chen
- Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
| | - Guangbin Cui
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, China
| | - Huaning Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Corinde E Wiers
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Yongzhan Nie
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Center for Brain Imaging, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, China
| | - Gene-Jack Wang
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Revision surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a nationwide study with 10 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:1497-1504. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
9
|
Friedman DT, Martin MJ. Comment on: Five years results after resleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:1191-1194. [PMID: 32636174 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew J Martin
- Department of Surgery, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chahine E, Alkandari M, De Simone B, Dirani M, D'alessandro A, Saikaly E, Gumbs A, Cartillone MC, Crispo L, Chouillard MA, Kassir R, Chouillard E. Weight Regain After Gastric Plication: Reoperative Sleeve Gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass?-Analysis of 116 Consecutive Cases. Obes Surg 2020; 30:3982-3987. [PMID: 32557390 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04767-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In France, laparoscopic gastric plication (GP) has rarely been utilized as a weight loss procedure. Although relatively safe and efficient, its long-term results are still controversial. The goal of this study is to assess the indications and outcomes of revisional surgery post-GP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2010 and September 2017, patient characteristics undergoing GP were prospectively collected from our database. Failure of conservative treatment or presence of anatomical anomaly explaining weight loss insufficiency was an indication for revisional surgery (RS). RESULTS A total of 300 patients were included, 41 patients were lost to follow-up (13.7%), 124 patients (41.3%) had total weight loss (TWL) > 30%, and 116 patients (38.7%) underwent RS. Revisional procedures were laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 72 patients (62.1%) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in 44 patients (37.9%). The median interval to RS was 29 months. The mean operative time was 60 min for the SG and 125 min for the RYGB (p < 0.0001). Mortality was nil. Significant morbidity occurred in eight patients (6.9%) including 4 non-abdominal complications, 1 gastric leak, 1 case of hemorrhage, 1 case of hematoma, and 1 intra-abdominal abscess. The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 2.9 days (range, 1-11) for the SG group vs 3.2 days (range, 2-8) for the RYGB group (p = 0.608). CONCLUSION GP is associated with a relatively high rate of weight regain or insufficient weight loss. When compared to SG, RYGB seems to be the safer revisional procedure with fewer surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Chahine
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France.
| | - Mubarak Alkandari
- Department of General Surgery, AlSabah Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Mazen Dirani
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Antonio D'alessandro
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Elias Saikaly
- Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Andrew Gumbs
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Maria Cristina Cartillone
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Luigi Crispo
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Marc Anthony Chouillard
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| | - Radwan Kassir
- Department of General Surgery, CHU Felix-Guyon, St-Denis, La Reunion, France
| | - Elie Chouillard
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Center, 10 rue du Champ Gaillard, 78300, Poissy, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Resleeve for failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:1383-1391. [PMID: 32682774 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Despite excellent long-term results, insufficient weight loss, weight regain, and pathologic gastroesophageal reflux disease may require revisional procedures after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Resleeve gastrectomy (ReSG) for failed LSG, has been proposed as an alternative to more complex malabsorptive procedures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the current evidence on the therapeutic role and outcomes of ReSG for failed LSG. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science data sets were consulted. A systematic review and Frequentist meta-analysis were performed. Ten studies published between 2010 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria for a total of 300 patients. The age of the patient population ranged from 20 to 66 years old and 80.5% were females. The elapsed time between the LSG and ReSG ranged from 9 to 132 months. The estimated pooled prevalence of postoperative leak and overall complications were 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = .5%-4.7%) and 7.6% (95%CI = 3.1%-13.4%). The estimated pooled mean operative time and hospital length of stay were 51 minutes (95%CI = 49.4-52.6) and 3.3 days (95%CI = 3.13-3.51). The postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 36 months and the estimated pooled mean percentage excess weight loss was 61.46% (95%CI = 55.9-66.9). The overall mortality ranged from 0% to 2.2%. ReSG after failed LSG seems feasible and safe with acceptable postoperative leak rate, overall complications, and mortality. The effectiveness of ReSG in term of weight loss seems promising in the short-term but further studies are warranted to explore its effect on patients' quality of life, postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease, and long-term weight loss.
Collapse
|