Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Analgesic efficacy of a laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane block versus no transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric gastric bypass surgery a retrospective analysis among 332 individuals

BACKGROUND

To reduce opioid consumption and improve early mobility, the administration of a transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) was introduced in abdominal surgery decades ago. But the usefulness of this nerve block prior to laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients with obesity is still under debate. Hence, the study at hand was conducted.

METHODS

In 2023 a retrospective single-centre analysis among patients who did or did not receive a laparoscopic (L) TAP block prior to LRYGB was performed. The primary objective was the early postoperative pain level (1 h) using the visual analog scale (VAS) after LRYGB. Main secondary objectives were the determination of the pain level from 1 to 80 h after surgery and the cumulative postoperative painkiller use.

RESULTS

A total of 111 individuals received and 202 did not receive a L-TAP block prior to LRYGB. The groups were homogeneous with respect to age, gender distribution and Body Mass Index. No L-TAP related complications occurred. After multivariate analysis the administration of the nerve block had no effect on relevant pain (VAS ≥ 6) from one to 80 h after LRYGB. One hour after surgery, the individuals who received the L-TAP suffered, with significance, from less pain (VAS score 2.77 vs. 3.84: p < 0.001) in comparison to those who did not receive the nerve block. No difference was revealed in terms of cumulative postoperative opioid painkiller use.

CONCLUSION

The L-TAP block is a safe procedure and sufficiently reduces post-operative pain one hour after gastric bypass surgery, but does not bring any benefits in the further course.

Analgesic efficacy of the external oblique intercostal fascial plane block on postoperative acute pain in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes significant postoperative pain, necessitating effective multimodal analgesia strategies. This study evaluated the efficacy of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) in this context.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study conducted between April and December 2023 included 60 patients who underwent LSG. Patients were divided into the EOIB (30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine/side) and control (no block) groups. The primary outcome was the cumulative intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included 12-h MME consumption, pain scores, intraoperative remifentanil use, rescue analgesia requirements, time to first analgesic request, nausea/vomiting scores, antiemetic use, and American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Turkish Version (APS-POQ-R-TR) scores.

RESULTS

The control group had significantly higher median opioid consumption than the EOIB group at 12 (14.4 vs. 5.8 mg; P < 0.001) and 24 h (25.9 vs. 10.6 mg; P < 0.001) postoperatively. The need for rescue analgesics did not differ significantly (43.3 vs. 23.3%; P = 0.1). The EOIB group exhibited significantly higher patient satisfaction (APS-POQ-R-TR score 2.91 vs. 4.42; P < 0.001) and consistently lower pain scores across all time points (P < 0.001). The EOIB group had lower nausea/vomiting scores (P < 0.001), fewer patients requiring antiemetics (16.7% vs. 40%; P = 0.045), longer time to first morphine request (57.5 vs. 25 min; P < 0.001), and lower remifentanil use (850 vs. 1050 μg; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative EOIB, as a part of multimodal analgesia, provides effective analgesia for acute pain in patients undergoing LSG.

Postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-centre historical cohort study

PURPOSE

Concerns around delayed emergence and opioid-induced ventilatory impairment in bariatric surgery can lead to intraoperative reliance on short-acting opioids and avoidance of long-acting analgesics with potential sedative effects. Nevertheless, an overly-conservative intraoperative analgesic strategy may result in significant pain at emergence and higher opioid requirements in later phases of care. We sought to establish the pattern of intraoperative analgesic use in bariatric surgical patients as well as their postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements.

METHODS

We undertook a single-centre historical cohort study. We explored associations between intraoperative analgesic interventions and pain scores and opioid requirements in postanesthesia care units (PACUs), and associations between the quality of analgesia at emergence and subsequent pain and patient-centred recovery outcomes.

RESULTS

We extracted perioperative data for 939 patients who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery between January 2018 and October 2019. Only 39% of patients received long-acting opioids intraoperatively and there was minimal use of nonopioid analgesic adjuncts. Nearly 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pain on PACU arrival; 97% of patients received intravenous opioids for rescue analgesia (mean dose, 31 mg oral morphine equivalents). Lower pain scores at PACU admission and discharge were associated with subsequent lower inpatient pain scores, lower opioid requirements, shorter time to ambulation, and shorter length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

In bariatric surgical patients, effective intraoperative analgesic strategies that improve early pain control may have an impact on recovery and pain experience. Judicious use of intraoperative opioids coupled with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques should be considered and balanced against concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects in this patient population.

A comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus serratus anterior plane block plus subcostal transversus abdominus plane block for bariatric laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a rapidly growing global health concern. Limited long-term success of diet, behavioural modification and medical therapy have led to the increased performance of bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which permanently reduces the size of the stomach, has been shown to cause considerable weight loss, as well as improving or even eliminating obesity related medical comorbidities such as diabetes, obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension. Unfortunately, this surgery can also result in significant postoperative pain which, when combined with the dangers of perioperative opioid administration for bariatric patients, can lead to a significantly reduced quality of recovery. Opioid-sparing analgesia has been widely recommended for perioperative bariatric patients, but research into the optimum regional analgesia approach for this surgery is lacking, with no trials to date comparing different regional analgesic techniques. This study protocol describes a randomised clinical trial aimed at answering this question, comparing the quality of recovery after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for patients who receive erector spinae plane block, versus those who receive serratus anterior plane block plus subcostal TAP block.

METHODS

We propose a prospective, randomised, blinded (investigator) clinical trial in a tertiary hospital in Ireland. Seventy patients presenting for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be randomised to two study groups-group A will receive bilateral erector spinae blockade; group B will receive left sided serratus anterior plane block plus subcostal TAP blocks. Both groups will receive the same dose of the same local anaesthetic and the different regional technique performed will be the only difference in their care. The primary outcome will be QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively, a validated international tool for assessing a patient's overall postoperative recovery.

DISCUSSION

Regional analgesia should be a mainstay of perioperative opioid-sparing analgesia where possible. This is especially important in the bariatric cohort who are particularly susceptible to the complications of perioperative opioid administration. To the best of our knowledge, this trial will be the first to compare efficacy of two different regional analgesia techniques for bariatric patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT05839704, on March 5, 2023. All items from the World Health Organisation Trial Registration Data Set have been included.

Enhanced recovery after surgery improves clinical outcomes in adolescent bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidence-based, multimodal approaches to optimize patient recovery and minimize complications.

OBJECTIVES

Our team evaluated clinical outcomes following the implementation of an ERAS protocol for adolescents undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Academic hospital, New York, NY, USA.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution longitudinal assessment of adolescents who underwent laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) between August 2021 and November 2022. Unpaired t-tests and Fisher's exact test were used to compare means between groups and categorical factors.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included in the study, 21 who participated in the ERAS protocol and 22 control patients. ERAS cohort was 52% females, with a median age of 17.5 years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 46.3 kg/m2. The non-ERAS cohort was 59% females, with a median age of 16.7 years and a median BMI of 44.0 kg/m2. There were no significant differences between baseline characteristics. Patients in the ERAS group had a shorter time to oral intake (10.7 hours versus 21.5 hours, P < .01), lower morphine milligram equivalents (18.2 versus 97.0, P < .01), and shorter length of stay (1.5 days versus 2.0 days, P = .01). There were no significant differences between return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days (3 versus 2, P = .66) or readmissions (0 versus 1, P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

The described ERAS protocol is safe and effective in adolescents undergoing laparoscopic VSG and is associated with shorter time to oral intake, reduced opioid requirements, and shorter hospital lengths of stay with no increase in return ED visits or readmissions.

Laparoscopic assisted versus ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) guided by laparoscopy and ultrasound showed promise in enhancing the multimodal analgesic approach following several abdominal procedures. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between Laparoscopic (LAP) TAP block (LTAP) and ultrasound-guided TAP block (UTAP) block in patients undergoing LAP bariatric surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This non-inferiority randomized controlled single-blind study was conducted on 120 patients with obesity scheduled for LAP bariatric surgeries. Patients were allocated into two equal groups: LTAP and UTAP, administered with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine on each side.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the total morphine consumption, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at all times of measurements, and time to the first rescue analgesia (p > .05) between both groups. The duration of anesthesia and duration of block performance were significantly shorter in the LTAP group than in the UTAP group (p < .001). Both groups had comparable post-operative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

In LAP bariatric surgery, the analgesic effect of LTAP is non-inferior to UTAP, as evidenced by comparable time to first rescue analgesia and total morphine consumption with similar safety blocking through the low incidence of post-operative complications and patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) (ID: PACTR202206871825386) on June 29, 2022.

Exploring the Gender-Specific Impact of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine on Early Postoperative Pain in Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background: Early postoperative pain is a significant problem in bariatric and metabolic surgery. Our study aimed to investigate the potential role of intraperitoneal bupivacaine hydrochloride in pain management in the early postoperative period after bariatric and metabolic surgery. Methods: This double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study included 68 individuals who underwent bariatric and metabolic surgery at the Department of Surgery, Istanbul Aydin University Hospital. The study group received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride intraperitoneally at the operative site, and the control group received 20 mL of normal saline. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores of each patient were recorded at 2nd, 4th, and 6th hours postoperatively. Results: Our study found significant differences in VAS scores of patients between study group and control group at 2nd, 4th, and 6th hours postoperatively. Significant differences were found between male and female patients in the control group at 2nd, 4th, and 6th hours postoperatively. Interestingly, no significant difference was found between female patients in the study group and control group at 2nd, 4th, and 6th hours postoperatively. Conclusions: Our study suggests that intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine hydrochloride is effective in reducing early postoperative pain in male patients. However, no significant difference was found between the study group and the control group in female patients. Our results indicate that there may be a gender-related difference in the response to bupivacaine administration. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the optimal dosing and administration of local anesthetics for postoperative pain management.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Port-Site Infiltration with Local Anesthetics in Bariatric Surgery: a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has shown great potential usefulness in the management of postoperative pain; however, there is lacking evidence regarding its use in bariatric surgery. This randomized double-blind trial was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of the TAP block and port-site infiltration (PSI) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We included patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing bariatric surgery. From July 2020 to July 2021, all eligible patients were randomized to receive either laparoscopic-assisted TAP block or PSI. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, we included 113 patients. Fifty-one were allocated to the TAP block group and 62 to the PSI group. The mean age was 47.9 ± 11.2 years, 88 (77.9%) patients were female, and mean BMI was 40.5 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Operative time was 110 ± 42 min vs. 114 ± 41 min in the TAP block and PSI groups (p = 0.658). At 24 h after surgery, pain on the VAS was 2.5 ± 2.6 vs. 2.3 ± 2.1 (p = 0.661). No significant difference between the groups was noted at 3, 6, 12, and 18 h. Also, opioid and antiemetic consumption, the length of stay (3.4 ± 1.5 days vs. 3.2 ± 1.1 days, p = 0.392), and satisfaction score (154 ± 10 pts vs. 154 ± 16 pts, p = 0.828) were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing bariatric surgery and receiving either the TAP block or the PSI had similar postoperative pain, nausea, length of stay, and satisfaction. As PSI is technically easier and more reproducible, it might be the first choice for postoperative multimodal analgesia in bariatric surgery.

Predictors of post-discharge pain and satisfaction with pain management after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pain management after bariatric surgery remains challenging given the risk for analgesia-related adverse events (e.g., opioid use disorder, marginal ulcers). Identifying modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain outcomes may improve quality of care. We evaluated the extent to which patient and procedural factors predict 7-day post-discharge pain intensity, pain interference, and satisfaction with pain management after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included adults undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery at two university-affiliated hospitals and one private clinic. Preoperative assessments included demographics, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (score range 0-52), Patient Activation Measure (low [< 55.1] vs. high [≥ 55.1]), pain expectation (0-10), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) anxiety and depression scales. At 7 days post-discharge, assessments included PROMIS-29 pain intensity (0-10) and pain interference scales (41.6-75.6), and satisfaction with pain management (high [10-9] vs. lower [8-0]). Linear and logistic regression were used to assess the association of pain outcomes with potential predictors.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-one patients were included (mean age = 44 ± 11 years, BMI = 45 ± 8 kg/m2, 77% female, 71% sleeve gastrectomy). At 7 days post-discharge, median (IQR) patient-reported pain intensity was 2.5 (1-5), pain interference was 55.6 (52.0-61.2), and 76% of patients reported high satisfaction with pain management. Pain intensity was predicted by preoperative anxiety (β + 0.04 [95% CI + 0.01 to + 0.07]) and pain expectation (+ 0.15 [+ 0.05 to + 0.25]). Pain interference was predicted by preoperative anxiety (+ 0.22 [+ 0.11 to + 0.33]), pain expectation (+ 0.47 [+ 0.10 to + 0.84]), and age (- 0.09 [- 0.174 to - 0.003]). Lower satisfaction was predicted by low patient activation (OR 1.94 [1.05-3.58]), higher pain catastrophizing (1.03 [1.003-1.05]), 30-day complications (3.27 [1.14-9.38]), and age (0.97 [0.948-0.998]).

CONCLUSION

Patient-related factors are important predictors of post-discharge pain outcomes after bariatric surgery. Our findings highlight the value of addressing educational, psychological, and coping strategies to improve postoperative pain outcomes.

Prescription and consumption of opioids after bariatric surgery: a multicenter prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

In the current opioid crisis, bariatric surgical patients are at increased risk of harms related to postoperative opioid overprescribing. This study aimed to assess the extent to which opioids prescribed at discharge after bariatric surgery are consumed by patients.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18yo) undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Preoperative assessments included demographics and patient-reported measures. Information regarding surgical and perioperative care interventions (including discharge prescriptions) was obtained from medical records. Self-reported opioid consumption was assessed weekly up to 30 days post-discharge. Number of opioid pills prescribed and consumed was compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors of post-discharge opioid consumption.

RESULTS

We analyzed 351 patients (mean age 44 ± 11 years, BMI 45 ± 8.0 kg/m2, 77% female, 71% sleeve gastrectomy, length of stay 1.6 ± 0.6 days). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge (median 15 pills [IQR 15-16], 112.5 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) [IQR 80-112.5]) was significantly higher than patient-reported consumption (median 1 pill [IQR 0-5], 7.5 MMEs [IQR 0-37.5]) (p < 0.001). Overall, 37% of patients did not take any opioids post-discharge and 78.5% of the opioid pills prescribed were unused. Increased post-discharge opioid consumption was associated with male sex (IRR 1.54 [95%CI 1.14 to 2.07]), higher BMI (1.03 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.05]), preoperative opioid use (1.48 [95%CI 1.04 to 2.10]), current smoking (2.32 [95%CI 1.44 to 3.72]), higher PROMIS-29 depression score (1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.04]), anastomotic procedures (1.33 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.75]), and number of pills prescribed (1.04 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.06]).

CONCLUSION

This study supports that most opioid pills prescribed to bariatric surgery patients at discharge are not consumed. Patient and procedure-related factors may predict opioid consumption. Individualized post-discharge analgesia strategies with minimal or no opioids may be feasible and should be further investigated in future research.

Perioperative truncal peripheral nerve blocks for bariatric surgery: an opioid reduction strategy

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgical patients are vulnerable to cardiopulmonary depressant effects of opioids. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to improve postoperative morbidity recommends regional anesthesia for postoperative pain management. However, there is limited evidence that peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have added benefit.

OBJECTIVE

Study the effect of PNB on postoperative pain and opioid use following bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Academic medical center, United States.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. A total of 44 patients received the control ERAS protocol with preoperative oral extended-release morphine sulfate (MS), while 45 patients underwent a PNB with either intrathecal morphine (IM) or oral MS per local ERAS protocol. The PNB group either underwent preoperative bilateral T7 paravertebral (PVT) PNBs (27 patients) with IM or postoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) PNBs (18 patients) with oral MS. The primary outcome compared total opioid consumption between the ERAS control group and the PNB group up to 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included comparison by block type and postoperative pain scores.

RESULTS

PVT or TAP PNB patients had a reduction in mean postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) requirements compared with the ERAS protocol cohort at 24 hours (93.9 versus 42.8 mg), P < .0001; at 48 hours (72.6 versus 40.5 mg); and in pain scores at 24 hours (5.64/10 versus 4.46/10), P = .02. OME and pain scores were higher in the SG cohort.

CONCLUSION

Addition of truncal PNB to standard ERAS protocol for bariatric surgical patients reduces postoperative total opioid consumption.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as a Strategy for Effective Pain Management in Patients with Pain during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), unlike laparotomy, is an invasive surgical procedure, and some patients report mild to moderate pain after surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to be an appropriate method for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, there have been few studies on the efficacy of TAP block after LC surgery, with unclear information on the optimal dose, long-term effects, and clinical significance, and the analgesic efficacy of various procedures, hence the need for this review. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies published from inception to the present. Post-mean and standard deviation values for pain assessed were extracted, and mean changes per group were calculated. Clinical significance was determined using the distribution-based approach. Four different local anesthetics (Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Lidocaine, and Levobupivacaine) were used at varying concentrations from 0.2% to 0.375%. Ten different drug solutions (i.e., esmolol, Dexamethasone, Magnesium Sulfate, Ketorolac, Oxycodone, Epinephrine, Sufentanil, Tropisetron, normal saline, and Dexmedetomidine) were used as adjuvants. The optimal dose of local anesthetics for LC could be 20 mL with 0.4 mL/kg for port infiltration. Various TAP procedures such as ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block and other strategies have been shown to be used for pain management in LC; however, TAP blockade procedures were reported to be the most effective method for analgesia compared with general anesthesia and port infiltration. Instead of 0.25% Bupivacaine, 1% Pethidine could be used for the TAP block procedures. Multimodal analgesia could be another strategy for pain management. Analgesia with TAP blockade decreases opioid consumption significantly and provides effective analgesia. Further studies should identify the long-term effects of different TAP block procedures.

Effect of Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetics in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of intraperitoneal local anesthesia (IPLA) has been confirmed in other fields, but its use in bariatric surgery remains debatable. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of IPLA in bariatric surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing IPLA's analgesic effect in bariatric surgery were included in this study. Pain-related indicators were the outcome.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with 979 patients were included. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in IPLA group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that IPLA was associated with lower pain scores in 6 h and at 24 h compared to the control group, without significant differences at 8, 12, and 48 h. Meanwhile, IPLA reduced the dose of opioids taken postoperatively. Additionally, there were no differences in adverse events between the two groups. As far as the number of postoperative analgesics used and hospital stays were concerned, our results did not show statistical differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

IPLA can reduce postoperative pain safely and effectively, particularly during the early postoperative stage.

The Use of Peripheral Nerve Blockade in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery: Is There a Benefit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to synthesize recent literature investigating the use of regional anesthesia for minimally invasive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies investigating the use of newer peripheral nerve blocks such as erector spinae plane (ESP) and quadratus lumborum (QL) block are very limited. Evidence supporting the use of peripheral nerve blockade in laparoscopic or robotic surgery is very limited and of low-moderate quality. While transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block may decrease opioid and pain scores after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery, and colorectal surgery, the benefit of the block in the presence of multimodal analgesia remains to be clarified. Unilateral paravertebral block may be beneficial for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. ESP and rectus sheath blockade may enhance analgesia in laparoscopic surgery, but the magnitude of this benefit may not be clinically relevant. Limited evidence supports the use of QL block in laparoscopic urologic surgery. There is insufficient recent evidence to support the use of TAP or QL block for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Efficacy of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain management and surgery side effects in laparoscopic bariatric surgeries

PURPOSE

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a new option for reducing postoperative pain. This study investigated the effects of laparoscopic TAP block on postoperative adverse events and analgesia and antiemetics requirements after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial study, patients were randomly divided into control (N = 20) or TAP block (N = 20) groups. In the TAP block group, the block was performed under direct laparoscopic guidance after surgery and before the removal of trocars.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (75%) versus four patients (20%) received opioids within the first 6 h in the control and TAP groups, respectively (p-value < 0.001). The cumulative amount of opioids consumed in the 24 and 48 h after surgery was lower in the TAP group (p-value < 0.001). The visual analog scale (VAS) regarding general and wound-specific pain was significantly lower in the TAP group compared to the control group at 6 and 24 h both at rest and in movement. However, there was no significant difference at 48 h postoperatively. The percentages of patients having postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, and resumption of bowel movement were not significantly different between the two groups at any time (6, 24, and 48 h) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic-guided TAP block is a pragmatic, applicable, and minimally invasive regional technique and can be part of effective postoperative pain management in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Applying it laparoscopically without the need for ultrasound is also useful and effective.

Patients with sleep-disordered breathing for bariatric surgery

The prevalence of patients with obesity continues to rise worldwide and has reached epidemic proportions. There is a strong correlation between obesity and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and, in particular, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OSA is often undiagnosed in the surgical population. Bariatric surgery has been recognized as an effective treatment option for both obesity and OSA. Laparoscopic bariatric procedures, particularly laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), have become the most frequently performed procedures. OSA has been identified as an independent risk factor for perioperative complications and failure to recognize and prepare for patients with OSA is a major cause of postoperative adverse events, suggesting that all patients undergoing bariatric surgery should be screened preoperatively for OSA. These patients should be treated with an opioid-sparing analgesic plan and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) perioperatively to minimize respiratory complications. With the number of bariatric surgical patients with SDB likely to continue rising, it is critical to understand the best practices to manage this patient population.