The Influence of Different Alimentary and Biliopancreatic Limb Lengths in Gastric Bypass Patients

Total Alimentary Limb Length Is Not Associated with Weight Loss Following Proximal Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) typically manipulates the proximal portion of the small intestine, leaving a variable and unknown common channel and total alimentary limb length (TALL). Despite high variability in postoperative weight loss, the factors contributing to this variability remain unknown. Given the known variability in small intestinal length, this unmeasured variability in TALL may be associated with weight loss responses.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that TALL is associated with postoperative weight loss following primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

SETTING

Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

METHODS

A total of 329 patients were recruited for this observational study and consented to laparoscopic measurement of the entire small intestinal length at the time of primary RYGB. Of these patients, 208 had successful measurement of the small bowel length (SBL) and underwent RYGB with a fixed biliopancreatic limb length (BPL, 50 cm). Common channel length (CCL) was allowed to vary normally to test the association between TALL and postoperative weight loss.

RESULTS

Follow-up rates were 77% at 6 months and 41% at 24 months. Average SBL was 592 cm (min = 390 cm, max = 910 cm), with a standard deviation of 107 cm that led to significant variation in CCL (shortest 190 cm, longest 730 cm). Regression was used to model weight loss and body mass index, as well as percent change from baseline, for each patient given the measured TALL and CCL. Despite significant variation in TALL, there were no clinically significant effects of TALL or CCL on weight loss up to 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

With a fixed BPL, normal variation in TALL does not significantly contribute to weight loss variability following RYGB. Future studies are needed to better understand the importance of intestinal limb lengths in primary and revisional RYGB surgery.

Fewer patients with insufficient weight loss after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after 5 years of follow-up

This study aims to give a comprehensive overview of the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during 5 years of follow-up in terms of weight loss, the remission of obesity-associated diseases and complications. We performed a retrospective cohort study, with a 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) comparison between all adult patients who underwent a primary OAGB or RYGB in 2016. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2 were excluded. In total, 372 patients underwent OAGB and 113 patients RYGB. After performing a 1:1 PSM, we obtained two nearly identical cohorts of 113 patients. After OAGB, the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly higher during 5 years of follow-up. Also, more patients after OAGB had a successful weight loss (TWL > 20%) after 5 years (86% vs. 72%; p = .019). The remission of obesity-associated diseases and short-term complications did not differ between both procedures. Persistent reflux was the reason for conversion to RYGB in 11.3% of the patients after OAGB. More internal herniations were seen after RYGB (10.4% vs. 1.9%; p = .010). Overall, the proportion of patients with major mid-term complications did not differ between both procedures. In conclusion, OAGB resulted in more weight reduction and especially fewer patients with insufficient weight loss during 5 years of follow-up, while remission of obesity-associated diseases remained the same.

A Meta-Analysis Comparing RYGB with Long Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus Long Alimentary Limb (AL) in Groups with Equal or Nearly Equal Combined Bypass Lengths (Combined BPL and AL Lengths): Does Switching Seats Enhance Weight Loss?

It is well-established that extending either the biliopancreatic limb (BPL), the alimentary limb (AL), or both, results in increased combined bypass (CB) length, which in turn leads to enhanced weight loss and potential nutritional deficiencies due to heightened malabsorptive effects. However, a key question remains: Assuming no change in CB length, does altering BPL length affect outcomes? To address this question, we examined studies comparing long BPL and long AL (short BPL) while maintaining equal or nearly equal CB lengths. We conducted this systematic literature review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a meta-analysis on weight loss outcomes, adverse events and safety-related outcomes, gastrointestinal complaints, and nutritional outcomes at the 2-year mark.

The One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Is a Suitable Alternative to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Body Mass Index ≥50 kg/m2: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2 is more challenging for the metabolic bariatric surgeon because of a thicker abdominal wall, more visceral fat, and hepatomegaly by liver steatosis. This study aimed to give an overview of 5-year outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in these patients in terms of weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study focused on patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 undergoing OAGB or RYGB between 2015 and 2017 at a nonacademic teaching hospital in the Netherlands. A 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison was conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 158 patients underwent OAGB and 32 patients RYGB. After performing a 1:1 PSM, we obtained two nearly identical cohorts of 28 patients. Follow-up data after 5 years were available in 79% of the patients after OAGB and 82% of the patients after RYGB. Both procedures resulted in equal weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and short-term complications. More minor midterm complications were seen after OAGB (50% versus 18%; p = 0.011) due to reflux complaints (50% versus 7%; p < 0.001). The number of patients with major midterm complications did not differ (7% after OAGB versus 14% after RYGB; p = 0.388). The only major complication after OAGB was conversion to RYGB due to reflux in 7.1% of the patients. In contrast, major complications following RYGB were more diverse.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures resulted in similar weight loss, remission of comorbidities, short-term and major midterm complications, making OAGB a suitable alternative to RYGB for patients with a BMI ≥50 kg/m2.

Therapeutic Options for Recurrence of Weight and Obesity Related Complications After Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: An IFSO Position Statement

Obesity is a chronic disease that may require multiple interventions and escalation of therapy throughout the years. Until recently, no universal definition existed for recurrent weight gain and insufficient weight loss. Standardization of reporting is key so outcomes can be compared and data can be pooled. The recent IFSO consensus provided standard terminology and definitions that will likely resolve this in the future, and publishers will need to enforce for authors to use these definitions. This current IFSO position statement provides guidance for the management of recurrent weight gain after bariatric surgery.

The Impact of Longer Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Weight Loss and Comorbidity Improvement at 5 Years After Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Different limb lengths are used in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery, as there is no consensus which limb length strategy has the best outcomes. The biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is thought to play an important role in achieving weight loss and associated comorbidity resolution. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a longer BPL on weight loss and comorbidity improvement at 5 years after primary RYGB.

METHODS

All patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing primary RYGB between 2014-2017 with registered follow-up 5 years after surgery were included. Long BPL was defined as BPL ≥ 100 cm and short BPL as BPL < 100 cm. The primary outcome was achieving at least 25% total weight loss (TWL) at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included absolute %TWL and improvement of comorbidities. A propensity score matched logistic and linear regression was used to estimate the difference in outcomes between patients with long and short BPL.

RESULTS

At 5 years, long BPL had higher odds to achieve ≥ 25% TWL (odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.01 - 1.41]) and was associated with 1.26% higher absolute TWL (β = 1.26, 95% CI [0.53 - 1.99]). Furthermore, long BPL was more likely to result in improved diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.17, 95% CI [1.31 - 3.60]) and hypertension (OR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.06 - 1.99]).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing RYGB with longer BPL achieved higher weight loss and were more likely to achieve improvement of comorbidities at 5 years.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus a 200-cm BPL, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assessed the impact of performing OAGB with a 150-cm BPL versus a 200-cm BPL concerning weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse nutritional effects. The analysis included studies that compared patients who underwent OAGB with a 150-cm BPL and 200-cm BPL. Eight studies were eligible for this review after searching in the EMBASE, PubMed central database, and Google scholar. The pooled analysis revealed favoring the 200-cm BPL limb length for weight loss, with a highly significant difference in the TWL% (p=0.009). Both groups showed comparable comorbidities remission. Significantly higher ferritin and folate deficiency rates were found in the 200-cm BPL group. Considering a 200-cm BPL when performing OAGB delivers a better weight loss outcome than a 150-cm BPL, which is at the expense of a more severe nutritional deficiency. No significant differences were found regarding the comorbidities' remission.

Outcomes of laparoscopic revisional conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Diff erent strategies for obese and non-obese Asian patients

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most performed bariatric procedure now. Some patients would necessitate a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as a salvage procedure for intractable gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, outcome of the revision in Asians with co-existed obesity and those non-obese is not clear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent revisional laparoscopic RYGB after SG between 2007 and 2019 for intractable GERD with data of one year follow-up. Pre-operative clinical data, perioperative outcomes, GERD symptoms, weight loss and medication details were analyzed. Patients were classified into those with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 and < 25 kg/m².

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (44 women, 11 men; mean age 42.5 years) were included. Mean interval from the initial SG to revision surgery was 51.2 months (range, 5-132). Mean body mass index before SG was 34.6 kg/m², whereas that before revision surgery was 27.6 kg/m². All the patients required continue proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to control the GERD symptoms before surgery. Among them, 36 (65.4%) patients in the obese group received long BP limb (>100 cm) RYGB for associated obesity but the common channel was assured to ≥ 400 cm or 70% of small bowel length, the other 19 (34.6%) patients in the non-obese group received standard BP limb (<100 cm) RYGB. There was no difference in basic characters between the two groups before revision surgery except a higher mean BMI (30.0 vs. 22.2 kg/m², p < 0.001), blood pressure and triglyceride in obese group. One year after revision surgery, all the patients had improved GERD symptoms but only 33 (60%) can completely wave PPI, without difference between the 2 groups. Obese group with a long BP limb RYGB had a significant higher % total weight loss (TWL) than non-obese group (%TWL 9.1% vs. -3.1%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic revision to RYGB is a safe and effective treatment for patients with intractable GERD after SG but some patients may still have residual GERD symptoms. Using a modified RYGB technique in revision surgery may help in weight reduction for obese Asian patients.

Biliopancreatic Limb Length as a Potential Key Factor in Superior Glycemic Outcomes After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimal length of biliopancreatic (BP) and Roux limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for improved glycemic control are not known.

PURPOSE

To investigate how the lengths of the BP and Roux limbs in RYGB differentially affect postoperative glycemic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic literature search using the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that reported glycemic outcomes after RYGB and lengths of the BP and Roux limbs.

DATA EXTRACTION

A total of 28 articles were included for data extraction. Glycemic outcomes after RYGB were assessed on the basis of two definitions: remission and improvement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We categorized the included studies into four groups according to the BP and Roux limb lengths. The type 2 diabetes remission/improvement rates were as follows: long BP-long Roux group 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90)/0.81 (0.73-0.89), long BP-short Roux group 0.76 (0.66-0.87)/0.82 (0.75-0.89), short BP-long Roux group 0.57 (0.36-0.78)/0.64 (0.53-0.75), and short BP-short Roux group 0.62 (0.43-0.80)/0.53 (0.45-0.61). Meta-regression analysis also showed that a longer BP limb resulted in higher postoperative type 2 diabetes remission and improvement rates, whereas a longer Roux limb did not. There was no significant difference or heterogeneity in baseline characteristics, including diabetes-related variables, among the four groups.

LIMITATIONS

Not all included studies were randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer BP limb length led to higher rates of type 2 diabetes remission and improvement by 1 year after RYGB in comparisons with the longer Roux limb length.

[Therapeutic Options for Regaining Weight after Bariatric Surgery]

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to create an overview of diagnostic and therapeutic options for weight regain (WR) and insufficient weight loss (IWL) after bariatric surgery (BS). With increasing popularity of BS, WR is becoming more relevant.

METHODS

We combined recent literature on WR and IWL with personal experience to suggest possible proceedings if WR or IWL is diagnosed.

RESULTS

If an anatomical-pathological cause can be detected, surgical therapy is the most effective. If WR or IWL is idiopathic, a multimodal therapeutic concept is necessary for sufficient therapeutic success. Depending on the initial BS, a combination of lifestyle intervention, medication and surgical therapy seems most effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive diagnostic testing is necessary prior to any surgical intervention. In idiopathic WR after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), we suggest lengthening the biliopancreatic limb and shortening the common channel. After Sleeve-Gastrectomy (SG), we currently see RYGB as most effective in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and SADI-S as a feasible option if no GERD is present.

Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Weight Loss, Postoperative Complications, and Remission of Comorbidities in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aimed to evaluate the effects of biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on weight loss, postoperative complications, and remission of comorbidities in OAGB.. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases to find related OAGB articles. Both BPL length < 200 cm (by - 17.79, 95% CI - 19.23, - 16.34) and BPL length ≥ 200 cm (by - 14.93, 95% CI - 15.66, - 14.20) significantly decreased BMI. Regarding the effect of BPL length on comorbidities and postoperative complications, it was shown that BPL length < 200 cm is safer and more effective. Therefore, standardization of BPL length < 200 cm is suggested. Bypassing ≥ 200 cm of the small bowel does not ameliorate weight loss or resolve comorbidities significantly, and it is related to more frequent postoperative complications and nutritional deficiencies. Registration number in PROSPERO: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021225499.

Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Different Lengths of Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and a BMI < 35 kg/m2: 5-Year Outcomes in Chinese Patients

PURPOSE

There have been no definite conclusions about the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) and alimentary limb (AL) lengths in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operations for different populations and BMIs. Western scholars have performed many studies on the lengths of the BPL and AL in patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m². However, for diabetic Chinese patients with BMI < 35 kg/m², few people have compared the effects of different BPL and AL lengths on patient prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively for 87 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) who underwent RYGB with a BPL of 50 cm and an AL of 50 cm (BPL50/AL50) or with a BPL of 100 cm and an AL of 100 cm (BPL100/AL100) and who were followed up for 5 years.

RESULTS

The cohort included 42 patients in the BPL50/AL50 group and 45 patients in the BPL100/AL100 group. At 5 years, there were significant differences in BMI, total weight loss (TWL%), glycosylated hemoglobin, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance between BPL50/AL50 and BPL100/AL100 (P < 0.05). Diabetes remission rate of the BPL100/AL100 group was significantly higher than that of the BPL50/AL50 group. Diabetes remission at 1 year after surgery correlated with the length limb (BPL + AL), duration of diabetes and TWL%. There was no difference in complications between BPL50/AL50 and BPL100/AL100.

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB with BPL100/AL100 is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic patients with a BMI < 35 kg/m² and offers significant improvement in weight loss and glycemic control.

Comparing a Short Biliopancreatic Limb to a Long Biliopancreatic Limb in Patients with a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with 4 Years Follow-up

INTRODUCTION

In order to design the most effective weight loss procedure, the ideal biliopancreatic limb (BPL) and alimentary limb (AL) length in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) have been discussed extensively. Yet, no consensus has been reached. The aim of this study was to compare weight loss after a short and long BPL in patients who underwent a RYGB with a minimum of 4 years follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study consisted of 574 patients who underwent a primary RYGB procedure between March 2015 and January 2017. Patients were divided in two groups based on the surgical procedure performed: a short BPL group (BPL of 50 cm with an AL of 150 cm) and long BPL group (BPL of 150 cm with an AL of 75 cm). The percentage total weight loss (%TWL) between groups was compared up to 4 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were 30-day postoperative complications and health-related quality of life (RAND-36).

RESULTS

The short BPL group consisted of 286 patient and the long BPL group of 288 patients. Follow-up rates of both groups at the first, second, third, and fourth year after surgery were comparable. The long BPL group showed significantly more %TWL compared to the short BP limb group starting at 6 months (p = 0.004) until 4 years after surgery (p < 0.001). Thirty-day complications and health-related quality of life did not differ.

CONCLUSION

The results showed significantly more %TWL in patients receiving a long BPL compared to the short BPL up to 4 years after surgery.