Fifteen Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Weight Loss, Remission of Associated Medical Problems, Quality of Life, and Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-Long-Term Follow-Up in a Multicenter Study

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Staple Line Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

The long-term outcomes of patients with staple line leaks (SLL) after SG are under-reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with SLL after SG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a maintained patient registry of patients undergoing SG between January 2012 and December 2020 in a single bariatric center was analyzed and included patients with SLL. Outcomes were compared to a group without SLL.

RESULTS

During this period, 1985 patients underwent SG of which 61 patients (3.1%) developed leak. 26 patients (1.3%) had overt SLL and the rest had organ space infection around the staple line. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 39.8 ± 11.3 and 41.5 ± 4.7, respectively. 7 patients (11.4%) underwent concomitant surgery and 12 patients (19.7%) had intraoperative complications. Leak was complicated by Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 in 31 patients (50.8%). Reoperation rate was 27.8% (n = 17). ≥ 2 interventions were required in 26% of patients (n = 16). Two patients died during hospitalization due to septic complications. Long-term follow-up of median 121 months was available in 78% of the cohort (n = 48). The median total weight loss and BMI were 27% and 30.1 kg/m2, respectively. Weight loss outcomes were higher in comparison to patients without SLL. Seven patients (14.6%) underwent SG revision. All associated medical problems improved during follow-up except for gastroesophageal reflux which was found in 50% of cohort.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes of SG patients with SLL are satisfactory in terms of weight loss, resolution of comorbidities, and requirement for surgical revision.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2022 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States

BACKGROUND

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), despite being the most effective durable treatment for obesity, remains underused as approximately 1% of all qualified patients undergo surgery. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery established a Numbers Taskforce to specify the annual rate of obesity treatment interventions utilization and to determine if patients in need are receiving appropriate treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To provide the best estimated number of metabolic and bariatric procedures being performed in the United States in 2022.

SETTING

United States.

METHODS

We reviewed data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. In addition, data from industry and state databases were used to estimate activity at non-accredited centers. Data from 2022 were compared mainly with data from the previous 2 years.

RESULTS

Compared with 2021, the total number of MBS performed in 2022 increased from approximately 262,893 to 280,000. The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) continues to be the most commonly performed procedure. The gastric bypass procedure trend remained relatively stable. The percentage of revision procedures and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch procedures increased slightly. Intragastric balloon placement increased from the previous year. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty increased in numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 6.5% increase in MBS volume from 2021 to 2022 and a 41% increase from 2020, which demonstrates a recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. SG continues to be the most dominant MBS procedure.

Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer Vision Model for Sleeve Gastrectomy: Experience in One Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common metabolic and bariatric procedure performed. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for automated real-time data structuring and annotations of surgical videos has immense potential of clinical applications. This study presents initial real-world implementation of AI-based computer vision model in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and external validation of accuracy of safety milestone annotations.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of 49 consecutive SG videos was captured and analyzed by the AI platform (December 2020-August 2023). A bariatric surgeon viewed all videos and assessed safety milestones adherence, compared to the AI annotations. Patients' data were retrieved from the bariatric unit registry.

RESULTS

SG total duration was 47.5 min (interquartile range 36-64). Main steps included preparation (12.2%), dissection of the greater curvature (30.8%), gastric transection (28.5%), specimen extraction (7.2%), and final inspection (14.4%). Out of body time comprised 6.9% of the total video. Safety milestones components and AI-surgeon agreements included the following: bougie insertion (100%), distance from pylorus ≥ 2 cm (100%), parallel to lesser curvature (98%), fundus mobilization (100%), and distance from esophagus ≥ 1 cm (true-100%, false-13.6%; kappa coefficient 0.2, p = 0.006). Intraoperative complications included notable hemorrhage (n = 4) and parenchymal injury (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The AI model provides a fully automated SG video analysis. Outcomes suggest its accuracy in four of five safety milestone annotations. This data is valuable, as it reflects objective performance measures which can help us improve the surgical quality and efficiency of SG. Larger cohorts will enable SG standardization and clinical correlations with outcomes, aiming to improve patients' safety.

ReSleeve or revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass for failed primary sleeve gastrectomy with dilated gastric tube: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) has been increasingly performed due to weight loss failure (WLF). Many revisional procedures have been proposed after primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (pLSG) failure, including ReSleeve gastrectomy (ReLSG), and laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB). Choosing the RBS post-pLSG failure represents a challenge. WLF without gastric tube (GT) dilation is undoubtedly converted to a malabsorptive procedure, but the presence of GT dilation makes it more difficult to select a RBS. This study aimed to compare two relatively simple revisional procedures after pLSG failure with dilated GT to help decision making on which procedure better done to which patient.

METHODS

Data of 52 patients who completed one year follow-up (FU) after their RBS (ReLSG: 27 or LOAGB: 25) for their failed pLSG were collected, assessed, correlated to weight loss (WL) and compared.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 97 ± 18.4 min. with revisional LOAGB (RLOAGB) and 62 ± 11 min. with ReLSG. Six patients (11.5%) had seven postoperative procedure-specific complications. Significant hemorrhage occurred in three patients. Two cases of leakage were encountered with each procedure. LOAGB Patients had lower mean final weight (76.2 ± 10.5 vs 85.3 ± 13), lower mean Final BMI (26.4 ± 2.5 vs 29.7 ± 2.9) and higher mean percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) (83.6 ± 13.5% vs 60.29 ± 14.6%). All RLOAGB patients and 77.8% of ReLSG patients had EWL% > 50%. RLOAGB patients had higher EWL% compared to ReLSG (p < 0.001). Insufficient WL (IWL) patients had higher EWL% compared to weight regain (WR) patients (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Both procedures (RLOAGB and ReLSG) were relatively safe and effective in terms of WL. RLOAGB led to higher WL compared to ReLSG in all types of patients despite higher Caloric intake. IWL patients had more WL compared to WR patients. WL was not related to GT dilation type. Large-scale longer-FU studies are still needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PACTR202310644487566 (retrospectively registered).

Effect of Primary Versus Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Fatty Acid Profile

INTRODUCTION

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is one option of a revisional procedure for failed sleeve gastrectomy. Moreover, it can be used as a primary bariatric procedure, and is an effective surgery resulting in significant weight loss and the resolution or improvement of obesity-associated medical problems, accompanied by low perioperative complications. However, as with any therapy, OAGB has its limitations, including micronutrient deficiency or malnutrition. In our study, we compared the fatty acid (FA) profile in serum of patients after both primary OAGB (pOAGB) and revisional OAGB (rOAGB) to identify potential postsurgical FA alterations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study on patients with obesity who underwent OAGB procedures (pOAGB n=68; rOAGB n=17), conducted from 2016 to 2018. In blood, we analyzed a series of biochemical parameters, and in the serum, the FA profile was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The percentage of excess BMI loss (% EBMIL) after pOAGB was 73.5 ± 2.47% in comparison to 45.9 ± 4.15% in the rOAGB group (p<0.001). In contrast to the lack of effect of rOAGB on most polyunsaturated FAs, in the pOAGB group, there was a decrease in eicosapentaenoic acid, and eicosatetraenoic and docosahexaenoic acid levels (p<0.001). We also found a decrease in very long-chain FAs (VLCFAs) and an increase in branched-chain FAs (BCFAs) after both types of OAGB procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both OAGB procedures improved the profile of most FAs, leading to a decrease in VLCFAs, which are considered harmful, and an improvement in BCFAs, which are considered to be beneficial. There is a need to further investigate the possibility of n-3 polyunsaturated FA supplementation after pOAGB, due to the large decrease in these FAs after pOAGB.

Third time's a charm: band to sleeve to bypass

BACKGROUND

Adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are frequently converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to weight recurrence or band complications. Such conversions carry a higher-risk than primary procedures. Some patients undergo two conversions-from AGB to SG, and subsequently from SG to RYGB. This presents a unique situation with limited literature on indications and complication rates associated with these double conversions.

METHODS

We examined the 2020-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use File to evaluate conversions from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. Patient and operative characteristics, along with outcomes, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

We identified 276 patients who underwent a conversion from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. The primary reason for the second conversion (SG to RYGB) was gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at 55.1%, followed by inadequate weight loss or weight regain (IWL/WR) at 36.9%. The remaining reasons included dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, or others. Patients converted for IWL/WR demonstrated a higher baseline body mass index and prevalence of sleep apnea compared to other cohorts (both p < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients in the "other reasons" group had the highest rate of open surgical approaches (9.1%) and concurrent lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.022), with correspondingly higher rates of anastomotic leak, reoperations, serious complications, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing double conversions (AGB to SG to RYGB) do so primarily for GERD or IWL/WR. Further research is required to better define the optimal primary operation for each patient, aiming to reduce the necessity for multiple conversions.

Comparative analysis of sleeve conversions of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2020 Database

BACKGROUND

Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the dominant bariatric procedure, studies have shown conversion rates of up to 30%. These conversions are generally for weight regain (WR), insufficient weight loss (IWL) or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Before 2020, details on why conversions were being performed were not collected in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use Data File (PUF). Now, the indication for sleeve conversion is noted in the PUF, allowing identification and reporting sleeve conversion reasons.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the reasons for SG conversions nationwide.

SETTING

The 2020 MBSAQIP PUF.

METHODS

The 2020 MBSAQIP PUF was examined to determine the reasons why SG were converted to other operations. The data field of "Revision/Conversion Final Indication" was used along with "Procedure type." Primary bariatric operations were excluded. Descriptive statistics were applied. Different reasons for conversion and operations were compared by preoperative characteristics and operative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 103,782 primary SG reported in the 2020 PUF. There were 7181 SG that were converted to other operations. The most common conversion (86.2%) was to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The main reason for SG conversion was GERD at 48.4%, followed by WR/IWL (41.9%). Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve patients differed significantly from RYGB patients in specific preoperative characteristics and operative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The most common procedure SG is converted to is the RYGB. GERD was the most common reason for SG conversion, followed by WR/IWL.

Cost-Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Living with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Aims

The favourable effects of bariatric surgeries on body weight reduction and glucose control have been demonstrated in several studies. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgeries has been confirmed in several analyses. The aim of the current analysis was to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgeries in obese patients with type 2 diabetes in Hungary compared to conventional diabetes treatments based on economic modelling of published clinical trial results.

Materials and Methods

Patients entered the simulation model at the age of 45 with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and type 2 diabetes. The model was performed from the public payer's perspective, comparing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures to conventional care of diabetes. The results were provided separately for three BMI categories.

Results

The base-case analysis demonstrated that both surgery types were dominant; i.e., they saved 17 064 to 24 384 Euro public payer expenditures and resulted in improved health outcomes (1.36 to 1.50 quality-adjusted life years gain (QALY)) in the three BMI categories. Bariatric surgeries extended the life expectancy and the disease-free survival times of all the investigated diabetes complications. All the scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case analysis, such that bariatric surgeries remained dominant compared to conventional diabetes treatments.

Conclusion

The results of this cost-effectiveness analysis highlight the importance of bariatric surgeries as alternatives to conventional diabetes treatments in the obese population. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that a wider population has access to these surgeries in Hungary.

Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: weight loss and resolution of comorbidities at 15 years and beyond

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold-standard bariatric procedure with proven efficacy in morbidly obese populations. While the short-term benefits of LRYGB have been well-documented, durable weight loss and long-term resolution of obesity-related comorbidities have been less clearly described.

METHODS

This single-center study prospectively reports weight loss and comorbidity resolution in patients undergoing LRYGB between August 2001 and September 2007 with at least 15-year follow-up. Data were collected at the time of surgery; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively; and then annually thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 486 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were predominantly female (88.7%), and the median age was 36.0 [IQR 29.0-45.0] years. Patients were ethnically diverse, including Black/African American (43.6%), White/Caucasian (35.0%), Hispanic (18.3%), and other backgrounds (3.1%). Mean preoperative weight and body mass index were 133.0 ± 21.9 kg and 48.4 ± 6.5 kg/m2, and the median number of comorbidities was 6.0 [IQR 4.0-7.0]. Follow-up rates at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were 75.3%, 37.2%, 35.2%, and 18.9%, respectively. On average, maximum percentage total weight loss (%TWL) occurred 2 years postoperatively (- 36.2 ± 9.5%), and ≥ 25% TWL was consistently achieved at 1, 5, 10, and 15-year time intervals (- 28.0 ± 13.0% at 15 years). Patients with comorbidities experienced improvement or resolution of their conditions within 1 year, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (83/84, 98.8%), obstructive sleep apnea (112/116, 96.6%), hypertension (142/150, 94.7%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (217/223, 97.3%). Rates of improved/resolved comorbidities remained consistently high through at least 10 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LRYGB provides durable weight loss for at least 15 years after surgery, with stable average relative weight loss of approximately 25% from baseline. This outcome corresponds with sustainable resolution of obesity-related comorbidities for at least 10 years after the initial operation.

Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Review of Studies Reporting 10+ Years Outcomes

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Systematic search of Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase was performed in order to find all the articles reporting 10+ years of LSG results. Eleven studies including 1020 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall weighted mean %TWL was 24.4% (17-36.9%), and remission rates from TD2M to HTN were 45.6% (0-94.7%) and 41.4% (0-78.4%), respectively. De novo GERD had an overall prevalence of 32.3% (21.4-58.4%), and five cases (0.5%) of Barrett's disease were reported. Revisional surgery was required for 19.2% (1-49.5%) of patients, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the most common secondary procedure.

Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) in a Single-Surgeon Experience on 892 Patients Over 11 Years

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been the most frequently performed bariatric procedure since 2014, with continually growing popularity. This study aimed to present our 30-day morbidity and mortality following LSG over a period of 11 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study that was based on prospectively collected data from patients undergoing LSG by the same surgeon from July 2011 to the end of August 2022. The LSG-associated 30-day morbidity and mortality and the risk factors for 30-day morbidity were assessed.

RESULTS

This study included 892 patients who underwent LSG over the course of 11 years. Early postoperative adverse events were encountered in 16 patients (1.79%). Overall, twelve patients (1.35%) required blood transfusions, and two patients (0.22%) required ICU admission. The re-operation rate was 0.9% (n = 8) and the mortality rate was 0.22% (n = 2). The patient's BMI, hypertension, and revisional surgery were marginally significant/significant predictors of early postoperative morbidity. The mean EBWL% was 63.8 ± 15.55 at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the previously reported LSG's short-term safety in terms of a low rate of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Preoperative BMI, hypertension, and revisional surgery are risk factors for 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease and or Insufficient Weight-Loss: a Comparative Study

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a popular surgical weight-loss procedure, but there are increasing reports of revisional Roux-Y-gastric-bypass (R-RYGB) to manage weight-loss failure (WLF) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SG, with little data available in these settings.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all consecutive patients undergoing R-RYGB for WLF or RGERD after SG in two bariatric care centers from 2012 to 2018.

RESULTS

Of 720 patients, 46 (3.6%) underwent R-RYGB (RGERD, n = 25; 54.4%; WLF, n = 21; 45.6%) within 44.8 ± 27.5 months post-SG. SG had enabled 27% ± 11.6 total weight loss (TWL) in the RGERD group vs. 7.2% ± 12.5% TWL in the WLF group (p < 0.001). At R-RYGB, WLF-group patients had a higher BMI (47.8 ± 8.4 vs. 34.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2; p < 0.001) and a higher number of comorbidities (2.4 ± 1.5 vs 1.5 ± 1.2; p < 0.02) compared to RGERD-group patients, while severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) was not significantly different between groups (6.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.6). %TWL was still higher in the RGERD group at 12 months post-R-RYGB (35.6% ± 10.4 vs. 23.8% ± 9.2; p < 0.01) but not after 24 months post-R-RYGB. R-RYGB corrected reflux symptoms in 32 (94%) patients and reduced PPI use in 29 (97%) patients (p < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference. A history of adjustable gastric banding (AGB) (N = 8;17.4%) prior to SG was associated with a similar prevalence of GERD at R-RYGB and a lower %TWL (AGB:13.1 ± 10.2 vs. No AGB:31.6 ± 8.5; p < 0.05) at 3 years post-R-RYGB.

CONCLUSION

R-RYGB following SG provides remission of reflux symptoms in 94% of patients and extra weight loss in patients with WLF, except in patients with a history of AGB prior to SG.

Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) on Weight Loss in Patients with Obesity: a 5-Year and 11-Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is the most efficient treatment for patients with clinically severe obesity who have failed to obtain satisfactory weight loss through lifestyle modification and medical treatments. This study aimed to present our long-term laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) efficacy in terms of weight loss and obesity-related complications resolution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study that was based on prospectively collected data from patients undergoing LSG by the same surgeon from July 2011 to the end of August 2022. The LSG-associated short-term (at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively) and long-term (at 5 years and 11 years postoperatively) weight loss, and the short-term (6 months postoperatively) and long-term (5 and 11 years postoperatively) rates of obesity-related complications were assessed.

RESULTS

This study included 892 patients who underwent LSG over 11 years. At the 1-year follow-up, data on 860 patients were available, while at the 5-year and 11-year follow-ups, data on 193 patients and 48 patients, respectively, were available. The mean EBWL% was 84.57 ± 18.41%, 64.22 ± 15.53%, and 66.01 ± 8.66% at the 1-year, 5-year, and 11-year follow-ups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study adds new evidence concerning the short-term efficacy of LSG. The long-term assessment showed relatively sustainable weight loss and obesity-related complications resolution, with a regression of the short-term gains that was still far from the baseline burden.

Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy. Myth or reality?

Sleeve gastrectomy has become the most performed bariatric surgery technique in the world. This bariatric technique has been related to the appearance of gastroesophageal reflux and recently with de novo Barrett's esophagus. It is not clear that this leads to an increased incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. In this review we analyze the current scientific literature to try to answer the true incidence of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy, and whether these data should make us change the indications for this technique.

Revisional Procedures after Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Recurrence or Inadequate Weight Loss: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database

INTRODUCTION

The safety of conversional bariatric procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for weight recurrence (WR) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) is debated due to limited evidence. Conversion options include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). We aimed to compare serious complications and mortality rates between these procedures within 30 days.

METHODS

Using the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients who underwent a conversion from SG to RYGB, SADI, or BPD-DS. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of 30-day complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 7388 patients (77.6% RYGB, 8.7% SADI, 13.7% BPD-DS), those undergoing SADI and BPD-DS had higher preoperative body mass index. Conversion reasons included WR (63.0%) and IWL (37.0%). SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative times (p < 0.001) and higher leak rates (p = 0.001). Serious complications, reoperations, readmissions, and 30-day mortality were similar across groups. Conversion procedure type was not an independent predictor of complications.

CONCLUSION

RYGB was the most performed conversional procedure after SG. The study indicated a similar safety profile for revisional RYGB, SADI, and BPD-DS, with comparable 30-day complications and mortality rates. However, SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative time and higher leak rates.

Mid-Term Outcomes After Conversion Procedures Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

In the long term, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be associated with insufficient weight loss (IWL), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and persistence or relapse of associated medical problems. This study's objective is to present mid-term results regarding weight loss (WL), evolution of associated medical problems, and reoperation rate of patients who underwent a conversion after SG.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with a minimal follow-up of 2 years after conversion.

RESULTS

In this series of 549 SGs, 84 patients (15.3%) underwent a conversion, and 71 met inclusion criteria. They were converted to short biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (short BPL RYGB) (n = 28, 39.4%), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) (n = 19, 26.8%), long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (long BPL RYGB) (n = 17, 23.9%), and re-sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) (n = 7, 9.9%). Indications were GERD (n = 24, 33.8%), IWL (n = 23, 32.4%), IWL + GERD (n = 22, 31.0%), or stenosis/kinking of the sleeve (n = 2, 2.8%). The mean pre-revisional body mass index (BMI) was 38.0 ± 7.5 kg/m2. The mean follow-up time after conversion was 5.1 ± 3.1 years. The overall percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was greatest after BPD/DS (36.6%) and long BPL RYGB (32.9%) compared to RSG (20.0%; p = 0.004; p = 0.049). In case of GERD, conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) led to a resolution of symptoms in 79.5%. 16.9% of patients underwent an additional revisional procedure.

CONCLUSION

In the event of IWL after SG, conversion to BPD/DS provides a significant and sustainable additional WL. Conversion to RYGB leads to a reliable symptom control in patients suffering from GERD after SG.

Long-Term Outcomes 10 Years after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single Center Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in the world. The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes after 10 years.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LSG between 2005 and 2010 in a single center were retrospectively assessed, focusing mainly on the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) after 10 years. Inadequate weight loss was defined as a %EWL < 50% or the need to perform a revisional bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 149 patients underwent LSG, with a median preoperative body mass index of 42.0 ± 6.5 kg/m2. Ten patients (6.7%) underwent previous bariatric procedure. Patients eating behavior was described as volume eaters in 73 (49%), sweet eaters in 11 (7.4%) and both volume and sweet eaters in 65 (43.6%). Six patients died during follow-up and 25 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 118 (79%) patients who completed full follow-up. Thirty-five patients (23.5%) needed a revisional bariatric surgery. For the 83 remaining patients, the mean %EWL was 35.9% at 10 years, only 23 of 83 patients (27.7%) had a %EWL ≥ 50%. Thus 80.5% patients (95/118) experienced inadequate weight loss 10 years after LSG. A lower %EWL after 1 year was predictive for inadequate weight loss after 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Ten years after LSG, the rate of inadequate weight loss was high, reaching 80% of patients. Thirty percent of patients required a revisional bariatric procedure. New studies must try to identify patients who are good candidates for LSG and strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

Quality of life in bariatric patients up to twelve years after surgery - Results from a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric interventions (BI, including surgical interventions) are effective in patients with massive obesity, i.e., a body mass index (BMI) > 40, and their number has steadily increased during the past decade. Yet, the stability of improvements in quality of life (QoL) in post-interventional patients is understudied and restricted to studies with small samples and short follow-ups.

METHODS

Patients with BI between 2004 and 2018 were identified in a health claims database and invited to fill in a survey, comprising sociodemographic and lifestyle information and psychometric scales. QoL was assessed with the Bariatric QoL (BQL) scale with lower scores denoting worse QoL. BMI and excess weight loss (EWL) were calculated for the time soon after intervention (EWL-T1) and when filling the survey (EWL-T2).

RESULTS

The majority of n = 2151 patients were female (80.7 %), had a mean age of 54.5 years and a mean BMI of 34.8. The mean EWL-T1 was 79 % (EWL-T2: 64.6 %). The mean BQL score was 47.6 and decreased with BMI (18.5-24.9: 52.6 vs. >40: 38.7), EWL-T2 (>66 %: 51.3 vs. <65 %: 42.1) and years since intervention (3-4: 48.2 vs >8: 45.1, each p < .001). For EWL-T1, the association between higher EWLs and higher BQL scores was stronger in females than in males (p < .005); for EWL at T2, both sexes did not differ in this regard (p = .848). Among normal-weight persons, males scored significantly lower on the BQL than females (44.9 vs. 54.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-interventional QoL improvements diminish over time and depend on the weight loss, with significant differences between men and women.

Weight loss maintenance after bariatric surgery

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for patients with morbid obesity and its comorbidities. However, many patients experience weight regain (WR) after achieving their nadir weight. Establishing the definition of WR is challenging as postoperative WR has various definitions. Risk factors for WR after MBS include anatomical, racial, hormonal, metabolic, behavioral, and psychological factors, and evaluating such factors preoperatively is necessary. Long-term regular follow-up and timely treatment by a multidisciplinary team are important because WR after surgery is multi-factorial. Although lifestyle interventions that focus on appropriate dietary education, physical activity education or interventions, and behavioral psychological interventions are suggested, more well-designed studies are needed because studies evaluating intervention methods and the effectiveness of WR prevention are lacking. Anti-obesity drugs can be used to prevent and manage patients with WR after MBS; however, more research is needed to determine the timing, duration, and type of anti-obesity drugs used to prevent WR.

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indications, Prevalence, and Safety

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) frequently requires conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or weight recurrence. Current evidence evaluating the safety of conversion from SG to RYGB and its indications is limited to single centers.

METHODS

The objective was to determine the rate of serious complications and mortality of conversion of SG to RYGB (SG-RYGB) compared to primary RYGB (P-RYGB). This was a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database which includes 30-day outcomes. Individuals undergoing P-RYGB or SG-RYGB were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine if revisional surgery was an independent predictor of serious complications or mortality.

RESULTS

In 2020 and 2021, 84,543 (86.3%) patients underwent P-RYGB and 13,432 (13.7%) underwent SG-RYGB. SG-RYGB cohort had lower body mass index, lower rates of diabetes and hypertension, and higher rates of GERD. GERD was the most common indication for revision (55.3%) followed by weight regain (24.4%) and inadequate weight loss (12.7%). SG-RYGB had longer operative times (145 vs. 125 min, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of serious complications (7.2 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). This included higher rates of anastomotic leak (0.5 vs. 0.4%, p = 0.002), bleeding (2.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), and reoperation (3.0 vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001) but not death (0.1 vs. 0.1%, p = 0.385). On multivariable analysis, SG-RYGB was independently predictive of serious complications (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.32, p < 0.001) but not mortality (p = 0.316).

CONCLUSIONS

While SG-RYGB is safe with a low complication rate, SG-RYGB was associated with a higher rate of serious complications compared to P-RYGB.

Best practice approach for redo-surgeries after sleeve gastrectomy, an expert's modified Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common metabolic and bariatric surgical (MBS) procedure worldwide. Despite the desired effect of SG on weight loss and remission of obesity-associated medical problems, there are some concerns regarding the need to do revisional/conversional surgeries after SG. This study aims to make an algorithmic clinical approach based on an expert-modified Delphi consensus regarding redo-surgeries after SG, to give bariatric and metabolic surgeons a guideline that might help for the best clinical decision.

METHODS

Forty-six recognized bariatric and metabolic surgeons from 25 different countries participated in this Delphi consensus study in two rounds to develop a consensus on redo-surgeries after SG. An agreement/disagreement ≥ 70.0% on statements was considered to indicate a consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached for 62 of 72 statements and experts did not achieve consensus on 10 statements after two rounds of online voting. Most of the experts believed that multi-disciplinary team evaluation should be done in all redo-procedures after SG and there should be at least 12 months of medical and supportive management before performing redo-surgeries after SG for insufficient weight loss, weight regain, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Also, experts agreed that in case of symptomatic GERD in the presence of adequate weight loss, medical treatment for at least 1 to 2 years is an acceptable option and agreed that Roux-en Y gastric bypass is an appropriate option in this situation. There was disagreement consensus on efficacy of omentopexy in rotation and efficacy of fundoplication in the presence of a dilated fundus and GERD.

CONCLUSION

Redo-surgeries after SG is still an important issue among bariatric and metabolic surgeons. The proper time and procedure selection for redo-surgery need careful considerations. Although multi-disciplinary team evaluation plays a key role to evaluate best options in these situations, an algorithmic clinical approach based on the expert's consensus as a guideline can help for the best clinical decision-making.

Long-term Reported Outcomes Following Primary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Long-term laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) outcomes in patients with obesity are scarce. We aimed to examine the outcomes and subjective experience of patients who underwent primary LSG with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective observational analysis of patients who underwent primary LSG in a single center with 5-15 years of follow-up. Patients' hospital chart data supplemented by a detailed follow-up online questionnaire and telephone interview were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study sample included 578 patients (67.0% female) with 8.8 ± 2.5 years of mean follow-up, with a response rate to the survey of 82.8%. Mean baseline age and body mass index (BMI) were 41.9 ± 10.6 years and 42.5 ± 5.5 kg/m², respectively. BMI at nadir was 27.5 ± 4.9 kg/m², corresponding to a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 86.9 ± 22.8%. Proportion of patients with weight regain, defined as nadir ≥ 50.0% EWL, but at follow-up < 50.0% EWL, was 34.6% (n = 200) and the mean weight regain from nadir was 13.3 ± 11.1 kg. BMI and EWL at follow-up were 32.6 ± 6.4 kg/m² and 58.9 ± 30.1%, respectively. The main reasons for weight regain given by patients included "not following guidelines," "lack of exercise," "subjective impression of being able to ingest larger quantities of food in a meal," and "not meeting with the dietitian." Resolution of obesity-related conditions at follow-up was reported for hypertension (51.7%), dyslipidemia (58.1%) and type 2 diabetes (72.2%). The majority of patients (62.3%) reported satisfaction with LSG.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long term, primary LSG was associated with satisfactory weight and health outcomes. However, weight regain was notable.

Long-term (11 + years) efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone bariatric procedure: a single-center retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is currently the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of SG as a stand-alone bariatric procedure.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis of 104 patients who underwent SG as a stand-alone bariatric procedure between January 2005 and December 2009. Weight loss, weight regain, remission or improvement of comorbidities and the new onset of comorbidities were the main outcomes of the study.

RESULTS

The percent excess body weight loss (%EBWL), percent excess body mass weight (BMI) loss (%EBMIL), and percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) were 59 ± 25, 69 ± 29, and 29 ± 12, respectively, after a mean follow-up of 13.4 years. At the last follow-up, nearly two thirds of patients (67.3%) had an %EBWL greater than 50. The percentage of patients who experienced significant weight regain ranged from 47 to 64%, depending on the definition used for weight regain. The rate of improvement or remission of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, and degenerative joint disease at a mean follow-up of 13.4 years was 40%, 94.7%, 70%, 100%, and 42.9%, respectively. The new onset of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in the same period was 43%.

CONCLUSION

Our data supports that SG results in long-lasting weight loss in the majority of patients and acceptable rates of remission or improvement of comorbidities. Weight regain and GERD may be issues of particular concern during long-term follow-up after SG.

Does the use of bioabsorbable mesh for hiatal hernia repair at the time of bariatric surgery reduce recurrence rates? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anywhere from 16% to 37% of patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgery are estimated to have a hiatal hernia. To address the lack of long-term data showing the efficacy of bioabsorbable mesh in reducing the recurrence of hiatal hernia in patients who undergo bariatric surgery, we evaluated the world literature and performed a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate hiatal hernia recurrence rates after placement of bioabsorbable mesh in bariatric patients.

SETTING

Meta-analysis of world literature.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE with search terms including "hiatal hernia recurrence," "bariatric surgery," "bioabsorbable mesh," "Gore BIO-A," and "trimethylene carbonate." Analysis was conducted to compare surgical time, length of stay, recurrence rate, hernia size, and changes in body mass index before and after surgery between mesh-group (MG) and nonmesh (NM) patients. The meta-analysis was described using standardized mean difference, weighted mean difference, effect size, and 95% confidence interval (CI). An I² statistic was computed to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 1351 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Four studies had both an MG and an NM group. There were 668 patients in the MG and 683 patients in the NM group. Hernia size noted in the NM group (7 cm²) was compared with that in the MG (6.5 cm²) (95% CI: 3.89-9.14; P = .86). The MG had fewer recurrences than the NM group (effect size, 2% versus 14%; 95% CI: -.26 to -.02; P = .027). The average follow-up was 28.8 months for the MG and 32.8 months for the NM group.

CONCLUSION

Repair with bioabsorbable mesh at the time of the index bariatric surgery is more effective at reducing the recurrence rate of hiatal hernia than suture cruroplasty. Further studies investigating the long-term outcomes of bioabsorbable mesh placed at the time of bariatric surgery are needed.

Weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing conversion to Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Despite excellent reported outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), a percentage of patients go on to have a secondary bariatric surgery to manage side-effects or address weight regain after LSG. Reported weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) after previous LSG are variable. We sought to determine the weight-loss outcomes of patients undergoing LRYGB after LSG in the largest bariatric surgical network in Canada and to determine whether outcomes differ according to indications for conversion.

METHODS

The Bariatric Registry is a multi-center database with prospectively collected standardized data on patients undergoing bariatric surgery at ten Bariatric Centers of Excellence within the Ontario Bariatric Network in Ontario, Canada. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent LRYGB after previous LSG between 2012 and 2019. Weight loss outcomes were compared between patients who underwent LRYGB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain and those who underwent conversion to LRYGB for other reasons.

RESULTS

Excluding patients with multiple revisions and those without follow-up data, 48 patients were included in the analysis: 33 patients (69%) underwent conversion to LRGYB for insufficient weight loss/weight regain (Group 1) and 15 patients (31%) underwent conversion for other reasons (Group 2). Mean body mass index (BMI) measured pre-LSG, pre-LRYGB, and at mid-term follow-up after LRYGB was 61, 48, and 43 kg/m² in Group 1 and 51, 39, and 34 kg/m² in Group 2, respectively. ΔBMI and %total weight loss (TWL) at mid-term follow-up were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion to LRYGB after previous LSG resulted in an additional loss of 4 kg/m² in BMI points at mid-term follow-up. Patients lost a similar number of BMI points and cumulative %TWL was similar regardless of reason for conversion. This can help inform surgical decision-making in the setting of weight regain after LSG.

Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy Converted to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

Purpose

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide but there is also a high conversion rate mainly due to weight regain and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) reported in studies with long-term follow-up. The aim of this study is to highlight benefits and limitations of converting SG patients to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

Setting

Retrospective cross-sectional-study, medical university clinic setting.

Methods

This study includes all patients converted from primary SG to RYGB or OAGB by 12/2018 at the Medical University of Vienna. Patients were examined using gastroscopy, esophageal manometry, 24-h pH-metry, and questionnaires.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were converted from SG to RYGB (n = 45) or OAGB (n = 13). Total weight loss of patients converted to RYGB and OAGB was 41.5% and 44.8%, respectively, at nadir. Six patients had Barrett’s esophagus (BE) after SG. In four out of these six patients, a complete remission of BE after conversion to RYGB was observed; nevertheless, two patients after RYGB and one after OABG newly developed BE. Clinical GERD improved at a higher rate after RYGB than after OAGB. Both revisional procedures improved associated medical problems.

Conclusion

Conversion to RYGB is probably the best option for patients with GERD after SG. OAGB has shown a low potential to cure patients from GERD symptoms after SG. In terms of additional weight loss and remission of associated medical problems, both procedures studied were equal. Surveillance gastroscopies every 5 years after SG revisions are recommended.

Graphical abstract

Fifteen Years after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Gastroscopies, Manometries, and 24-h pH-Metries in a Long-Term Follow-Up: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric operation with over 340,000 procedures per year. There are only few studies presenting follow-up results >10 years in the literature today. The aim of this study was the objective evaluation of long-term outcomes of at least 15 years after SG in non-converted patients.

METHODS

This study (multicenter cross-sectional; university-hospital based) includes all non-converted patients with primary SG before December 2005 at participating bariatric centers. The following methods were used: gastroscopy, esophageal manometry, 24-h pH-metry, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).

RESULTS

After removing converted patients, patients with bariatric procedures before SG, and deceased patients from the cohort, 20 of 53 participants have met the inclusion criteria. Of this group, 55% are suffering from symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); 45% are without GERD. Esophagitis, hiatal hernias, Barrett's esophagus, and enlarged sleeves were found in 44%, 50%, 13%, and 69% of patients during gastroscopy. Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was normal at 20.2 ± 14.1 mm Hg during manometry. Reflux activity in 24 h, number of refluxes, and DeMeester score were increased at 12.9 ± 9.7%, 98.0 ± 80.8, and 55.3 ± 36.3 during 24-h pH-metry. Patients with GERD scored significantly lower in the GIQLI than patients without GERD: 107.6 ± 18.4 versus 127.6 ± 14.4 (p = 0.04).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Fifteen years after primary SG, objective testing has shown that GERD, esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus are major issues for these patients. Surveillance endoscopies at 5-year intervals in all SG patients and 3-year intervals in patients with Barrett's esophagus are recommended.

GERD and Barrett's esophagus as indications for revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: experience of a bariatric center of excellence IFSO-EC and narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide; due to its extensive impact and analysis, multiple procedure-related early and late complications have been described. Gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus are highly debated issues related to sleeve gastrectomy in long-term follow-up. This review aims to explore the association between sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux in terms of their occurrence, and to analyze the protective or affecting factors.

AREAS COVERED

Gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

EXPERT OPINION

Gastroesophageal reflux is the Achilles' heel of sleeve gastrectomy and is affected by multiple procedure-related functional or mechanical factors (intrathoracic migration, stenosis, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence). Its postoperative incidence is about 30% with significant variability among groups, especially in terms of preoperative workup (lack of routine upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy and symptom assessment). Strict patient selection and mandatory pre-operative endoscopy are the primary steps taken to prevent and reduce the incidence of post-operative severe gastroesophageal reflux. However, patients should also be informed of the possibility of the 'de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease' (incidence - 22-50%) and the need for surgical revision in selected cases (0.5-7%).