Five Year Trends in the Utilization of Robotic Bariatric Surgery Procedures, United States 2015-2019

Robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of cost, peri-operative outcomes and learning curve in a prospective cohort study

Minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy as a treatment for individuals living with severe obesity remains the most common operation in bariatric and metabolic surgery. With the introduction of robotic-assisted surgery, an increasing proportion of sleeve gastrectomies are performed using the da Vinci robotic surgical platform. To date, the evidence to support or contest this practice is still unclear although meta-analyses have shown safety and feasibility. Here we present a prospective cohort study comparing 101 consecutive patients who had either robotic-assisted or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Short-term outcomes, including length of stay and thirty-day complication rates, as well as the total consumable cost for both the laparoscopic and robotic-assisted procedures were collected. We also assessed the learning curve associated with robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy. The cohort had similar baseline characteristics in terms of BMI and co-morbidity. The mean operative time, post-operative CRP and complication rates were the same in both groups. Length of stay was statistically shorter for the robotic-assisted cohort in comparison to the laparoscopic cohort; 1.3 days versus 1.9 days, respectively (p < 0.005). The percentage of patients requiring only a single night admission was significantly higher at 82% in the robotic-assisted group, compared to 32% in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.005); in the context of a nurse-led-discharge protocol. Total consumable cost was significantly lower in the robotic group at an average of £2310, compared to £2665 in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.001). The learning curve for the procedure was found to be 26 cases, predominantly driven by the resectional component of the procedure. Robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy on the 4th generation da Vinci system utilising robotic advanced energy and Sureform stapling is safe and effective. This cohort study suggests that using the robotic platform is favourable in terms of overall consumable cost and may reduce length of stay. In the context of previous robotic experience, the observed learning curve is relatively short.

Fully Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Complete Gastric Staple Line Bioabsorbable Reinforcement: How I Do It (a Video)

Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is gaining place among surgeons. In our initial RSG practice, we noticed that gastric staple line intraoperative bleeding is more frequent and more important compared to the conventional laparoscopic approach. Any technique that could reduce the likelihood of intraoperative bleeding in RSG would be of tremendous benefit. The present video report is a detailed description of a fully RSG using complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement, minimizing intraoperative bleeding. We present the case of a 32-year-old female patient with severe obesity (weight = 132 kg; BMI = 46.8 kg/m2) that underwent fully RSG in our department. RSG technique is thoroughly described, highlighting several important aspects of RSG, including (i) patient positioning to optimize access and ergonomics; (ii) the use of a Nathanson liver retractor, avoiding interference with robotic arms; (iii) trocar placement strategy; (iv) intraoperative selection of stapler reloads; and (v) the use of a bioabsorbable reinforcement (Seamguard®, Gore) for staple line reinforcement and bleeding minimization. Operative time was 180 min, and, blood loss was minimal (< 10 ml). The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, without bleeding, gastric leak, or other complications. Only simple oral analgesics were required postoperatively. At 1-month follow-up visit, the patient had lost 10 kg and reported significant improvement in overall health. Complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement seems to decrease intraoperative bleeding when the robotic approach is used for sleeve gastrectomy. Prospective randomized studies are needed to validate this approach as gold standard practice for RSG.

Retrospective matched case-control comparison of Totally Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy (RSG) during the learning curve with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG): why is operative time different?

Robotic approach is slowly rising in metabolic surgery, and laparoscopy is still considered the gold standard for Sleeve Gastrectomy. Aim of our study was to assess and compare outcomes of RSG through a matched comparison with LSG. Retrospective search of prospectively maintained database of our surgical department was carried out find all consecutive patients who underwent RSG from April 2023 to August 2024. Each subject who underwent RSG was matched one-to-one with a patient treated with LSG in the same period. Operative time (docking + console time for the robotic procedures), length of stay, need for rescue drugs, and perioperative complications were recorded calculated and compared. A total number of 50 patients (25 RSG and 25 LSG) were included in the present analysis. Operative time in the LSG group was significantly shorter than in the RSG group (57.8 ± 12.3 VS 80.6 ± 16.6 min, p < 0.01), but it was comparable to console time (57.8 ± 12.3 VS 56.9 ± 19.6, p = 0.85). Mean docking time was 23.7 ± 11 min. Length of stay, readmissions, conversion to laparoscopy/open surgery, early complications, and rescue drugs administration were comparable between the two groups. Age, sex, and BMI were not good predictors neither of laparoscopic nor robotic operative time. RSG during the learning curve proved as safe as LSG, but it was associated with longer operative time due to the duration of the docking step. Operation length may become comparable once the learning curve plateau is reached. Age, BMI, and sex are not good criteria of choice between the two approaches.

Cost drivers of gastric sleeve procedures performed using robotic platform

BACKGROUND

Robotic bariatric surgery adoption rates have increased, and the higher costs associated with robotic sleeve gastrectomy (rSG) are a concern.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the factors associated with increased costs of rSG.

SETTING

US hospital database.

METHODS

Patients who underwent rSG between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022 were extracted from PINC AI Healthcare Data. Inpatient total, variable, and fixed costs were converted to 2022 USD. Factors including patients and provider characteristics, types of staplers used (laparoscopic bedside staplers [LBS], other unspecified bedside staplers [OBS], and robotic staplers [RS]) were evaluated. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to examine baseline balance among groups. Multivariable general linear model was used to identify cost drivers.

RESULTS

There were 27,778 patient records, of which 25.6% used LBS, 10.3% used OBS, and 64.1% were RS cases. Increased costs were driven by type of stapler, patients aged 55-64, male, non-White race, non-Medicare insurance, higher comorbidity, and disease severity, and hospitals in West region, rural, more than 500 beds, with the lower hospital and surgeon's volume. After adjusting for other cost drivers, the procedures done by LBS significantly reduced variable costs by $651 ± $86 (mean difference ± standard error) and $564 ± $54 and fixed costs by $1716 ± $62 and $2297 ± $54 compared to OBS and RS. In total, the use of LBS significantly reduced total inpatient costs by $2384 ± $118 and $2692 ± $90 compared to OBS and RS, respectively. Also, LBS had fewer blood transfusions and intensive care unit visits than OBS and RS.

CONCLUSIONS

RS and OBS were critical cost drivers in patients undergoing rSG compared to major brand bedside staplers.

Predictors and Outcomes Associated with Bariatric Robotic Delivery: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 318,151 Patients

Background: The adoption of robotic bariatric surgery has increased dramatically over the last decade. While outcomes comparing bariatric and laparoscopic approaches are debated, little is known about patient factors responsible for the growing delivery of robotic surgery. A better understanding of these factors will help guide the planning of bariatric delivery and resource allocation. Methods: Data were extracted from the MBSAQIP registry from 2020 to 2021. The patient population was organized into primary robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus those who underwent laparoscopic procedures. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling were conducted to characterize cohort differences and identify independent patient predictors of robotic selection. Results: Of 318,151, 65,951 (20.7%) underwent robot-assisted surgery. Patients undergoing robotic procedures were older (43.4 ± 11.8 vs. 43.1 ± 11.8; p < 0.001) and had higher body mass index (BMI; 45.4 ± 7.9 vs. 45.0 ± 7.6; p < 0.001). Robotic cases had higher rates of medical comorbidities, including sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and diabetes mellitus. Robotic cases were more likely to undergo RYGB (27.4% vs. 26.4%; p < 0.001). Robotic patients had higher rates of numerous complications, including bleed, reoperation, and reintervention, resulting in higher serious complication rates on multivariate analysis. Independent predictors of robotic selection included increased BMI (aOR 1.02), female sex (aOR 1.04), GERD (aOR 1.12), metabolic dysfunction, RYGB (aOR 1.08), black racial status (aOR 1.11), and lower albumin (aOR 0.84). Conclusions: After adjusting for comorbidities, patients with greater metabolic comorbidities, black racial status, and those undergoing RYGB were more likely to receive robotic surgery. A more comprehensive understanding of patient factors fueling the adoption of robotic delivery, as well as those expected to benefit most, is needed to better guide healthcare resources as the landscape of bariatric surgery continues to evolve.

Emerging multi-port soft tissue robotic systems: a systematic review of clinical outcomes

Multiple novel multi-port robotic surgical systems have been introduced into clinical practice. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these novel robotic systems to conventional laparoscopic technique and established da Vinci robotic surgical platforms. A literature search of Embase, Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines from 2012 to May 2023. Studies comparing clinical outcomes of novel multi-port robotic surgical systems with laparoscopic or the da Vinci platforms were included. Case series with no comparison groups were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to report patient and outcome data. A systematic narrative review was provided for each outcome. Twelve studies comprised of 1142 patients were included. A total of 6 novel multi-port robotic systems: Micro Hand S, Senhance, Revo-i MSR-5000, KangDuo, Versius, and Hugo™ RAS were compared against the laparoscopic or the da Vinci robotic platforms. Clinical outcomes of these novel robotic platforms were comparable to the established da Vinci platforms. When compared against conventional laparoscopic approaches, the robotic platforms demonstrated lower volume of blood loss, shorter length of stay but longer operative time. This systematic review highlighted the safe implementation and efficacy of 6 new robotic systems. The clinical outcomes achieved by these new robotic systems are comparable to the established da Vinci robotic system in simple to moderate case complexities. There is emerging evidence that these new robotic systems provide a viable alternative to currently available robotic platforms.

Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare outcomes and utilization of robotics in bariatric procedures across two-time intervals, chosen because they correspond to drastic changes in technology utilization-namely, a new platform and a new stapling device. Outcomes of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rRYGB) and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (rSG) across this changing landscape have not been well studied, despite increasing popularity.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP database was analyzed over early (2015-2016) and late (2019-2020) time intervals. Patients who underwent rSG and rRYGB were identified, and the cohorts were matched for 26 preoperative characteristics using Propensity Score Matching Analysis. We then compared 30-day outcomes and bariatric-specific complications between the early and late time frames for rSG and rRYGB.

RESULTS

49,442 rSG were identified: 13,526 cases in the early time frame and 35,916 in the late time frame. The matched cohorts were 13,526 for the two groups. 30-day outcomes showed that in the late time frame, rSG was associated with lower rates of pulmonary complications (0.1% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001), readmissions (2.5% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001), interventions (0.6% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001), reoperations (0.7% vs 1.0%, p = 0.024), length of stay (1.36 ± 1.01 days vs 1.76 ± 1.79 days, p < 0.001), operative time (92.47 ± 41.70 min vs102.76 ± 45.67 min p < 0.001), staple line leaks (0.2% vs 0.4%, p = 0.001) and strictures (0.0% vs 0.2%, p < 0.001). Similarly, 21,933 rRYGB were found: 6,514 cases were identified in the early time frame and 15,419 in the late time frame. The matched cohorts were 6,513 for the two groups. 30-day outcomes revealed that the late time fame rRYGB was associated with lower rates of pulmonary complications (0.1% vs 0.3%, p = 0.012), readmissions (6.3% vs 7.2%, p = 0.050), interventions (2.0% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001), length of stay (1.69 ± 1.46 days vs 2.13 ± 2.12 days p < 0.001), postoperative bleeding (0.4% vs 0.7%, p = 0.001), stricture (0.4% vs 0.8%, p < 0.001) and anastomotic ulcer (0.2% vs 0.4%, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Compared to early robotic bariatric surgery outcomes, a significant reduction in pulmonary complications, readmissions, reoperations, interventions and length of stay were seen in 2019-20 after rSG and rRYGB. Potential contributing factors include increased surgical experience and advances in the robotic platform. A significant recent reduction in staple line leaks with faster operative times associated with rSG suggests that stapling technology has had a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Outcomes of Staple Line Reinforcement Following Robotic Assisted Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on MBSAQIP Database

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes for Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in RA-SG based on the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database for 2019.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected patients who underwent RA-SG in the MBSAQIP PUF (Public Utility File) for the year 2019 and grouped them based on their SLR status: Oversewing (OS), Buttressing (BR), both OS and BR and neither. Our primary outcomes were bleeding, organ space infection (OSI), and adverse events (AEs), and our secondary outcomes were operation length, hospital length of stay, readmissions, and conversion to open rates. We conducted separate chi square or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate and multivariable direct logistic regression models for the categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

We found 115,621 patients with complete data of which there were 16,494 who underwent RA-SG. Our results did not show a statistically significant decrease in incidence of postoperative bleeding for BR and OS (Adjusted OR = 0.782, p = 0.2291 and Adjusted OR of 0.482, p = 0.054 for BR and OS respectively). There was a statistically significant effect for SLR status on operation length, with OS patients having the highest operative times (log-transformed mean = 2.03), followed by both BR + OS patients (log-transformed mean = 1.99). BR patients had the shortest operation length.

CONCLUSION

SLR did not result in any significant differences related to bleeding, OSI or AEs following RA-SG according to MBSAQIP for the year 2019. However, OS resulted in significantly longer operative time compared to BR alone.

Factors Related to Bleeding and Leak Rates After Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Robotic sleeve gastrectomy has been increasing in annual incidence in recent years. Although rare, post op bleeding and leak in these cases can lead to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization.

OBJECTIVES

To determine preop comorbidity risk factors and operative techniques associated with risk of bleeding or leak within 30 days of robotic sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP database was analyzed. A total of 53,548 RSG cases were included in analysis. Surgeries took place from accredited centers in the USA from 2015 to 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative anticoagulation, renal failure, COPD, and OSA were found to increase in the risk for transfusion requirements after SG. Receiving a transfusion and smoking increased the risk for leak. Staple line reinforcement significantly decreased transfusion and leak rates. Staple line oversewing did not have an impact on bleeding or leak.

Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Approach Using a Standardized Definition: First Look at the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) Data

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of robotic-assisted (RA-) approach compared to the standard laparoscopic (L-) approach using the 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) registry Public Use File (PUF). Our secondary objective is to establish standards for the reporting of outcomes using PUF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the PUF database (n = 168,568), patients were divided into sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), revisions, and conversions and then analyzed separately. We created balanced covariate through propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). We also conducted multivariable relative risk regression to confirm our results.

RESULTS

For RYGB, the incidence of "transfusion" was significantly lower in the RA-RYGB compared to the L-RYGB. There was no significant difference in the rate of Serious Event Occurrences (SEOs) or rate of intervention at 30 days. For SG, there was a higher rate of "transfusion" in the RA group. Incidence of SEOs was also significantly higher in the RA-group. There was no significant difference in SEOs for conversions; however, revisions had a trend toward a lower rate of SEOs favoring the robotic approach. Operative times were significantly higher for all RA-groups.

CONCLUSION

RA- approach in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains controversial because of differences in outcomes. The use of SEOs as reported by MBSAQIP in its semi-annual report can be used as a composite score to assess outcomes while using PUF. Further studies are needed to compare RA- to L- MBS.

Identifying Workflow Disruptions in Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery: Elucidating Challenges Experienced by Surgical Teams

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery is an effective and durable treatment for weight loss for patients with extreme obesity. Although traditionally approached laparoscopically, robotic bariatric surgery (RBS) has unique benefits for both surgeons and patients. Nonetheless, the technological complexity of robotic surgery presents new challenges for OR teams and the wider clinical system. Further assessment of the role of RBS in delivering quality care for patients with obesity is necessary and can be done through a human factors approach. This observational study sought to investigate the impact of RBS on the surgical work system via the study of flow disruptions (FDs), or deviations from the natural workflow progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RBS procedures were observed between October 2019 and March 2022. FDs were recorded in real time and subsequently classified into one of nine work system categories. Coordination FDs were further classified into additional sub-categories.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine RBS procedures were observed at three sites. An average FD rate of 25.05 (CI =  ± 2.77) was observed overall. FDs were highest between insufflation and robot docking (M = 29.37, CI =  ± 4.01) and between patient closing and wheels out (M = 30.00, CI =  ± 6.03). FD rates due to coordination issues were highest overall, occurring once every 4 min during docking (M = 14.28, CI =  ± 3.11).

CONCLUSION

FDs occur roughly once every 2.4 min and happen most frequently during the final patient transfer and robot docking phases of RBS. Coordination challenges associated with waiting for staff/instruments not readily available and readjusting equipment contributed most to these disruptions.

Gastric Bypass Mortality Trends in Racial Cohorts: Are We Improving?

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) continues to be safely performed in racial cohorts. However, studies continue to report differences in complications, with non-Hispanic black (NHB) patients having a higher rate of adverse outcomes, including mortality. It is unclear how these disparate outcomes have evolved over time. Our objective was to determine RYGB procedure and mortality trends in racial cohorts.

METHODS

Using the 2015 to 2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database, we identified primary RYGB cases performed laparoscopically or robotically. Non-Hispanic white (NHW) and non-Hispanic black (NHB) patient cohorts were matched based on patient and surgical characteristics. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted on the matched pairs. Primary outcomes of interest included year-to-year all-cause and procedure-related mortality. Stata/MP 16.1 was utilized for analysis, and a p-value of < 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval that excluded 1 were considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 148,829 RYGB cases in NHW (82.8%) and Black (17.2%) patients were analyzed. RYGB trends remain similar for NHB and NHW patients over 5 years. In matched cohorts, all-cause mortality (OR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.16-4.29), aggregate related readmission (OR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.27-1.51), related reintervention (OR 1.36; 95% CI: 1.19-1.56), and VTE (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.40-2.45) were more likely in NHB patients. During the study period, year-to-year mortality was higher in NHB patients compared to NHW patients.

CONCLUSION

Over a 5-year period, year-to-year mortality remains higher in NHB patients after RYGB. While bariatric outcomes continue to improve, outcome gaps between racial cohorts seem to persist.

Current Trends in the Utilization of a Robotic Approach in the Field of Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE

The utilization rate of robotic surgery for bariatric procedures is not well-described. Our study identified the proportion of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) procedures in the United States between 2015 and 2020 performed using a robotic (R-) or laparoscopic (L-) approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A descriptive analysis of the 2015-2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant User Data File (PUF) datasets was performed. The primary outcome was (1) surgical cases performed annually and (2) proportion of cases performed using a R- or L- approach. Analysis was done separately for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and revisional bariatric surgery (RBS). Statistical analysis consisted of means and proportions, fold difference, annual slope, and Student's t tests or chi-square tests as appropriate, with statistical significance set to p < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 1,135, 214 procedures were captured between 2015 and 2020. R-RYGB increased from 2554 to 6198 (6.8% to 16.7%), R-SG increased from 5229 to 17,063 (6.0% to 17.2%), R-RBS increased from 993 to 3386 (4.7% to 17.4%), and R-BPD-DS increased from 221 to 393 (22.0% to 28.4%). The greatest annual increase was observed among R-RBS and R-SG (3.70-fold difference; slope 2.4% per year and 2.87-fold difference; slope 2.2% per year, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There is a nationwide increase in the utilization of a R- approach in bariatric surgery. There are concerns related to the potential increase in healthcare expenditures related to robotics. Further studies are needed to establish key performance indicators along with guidelines for training, adoption and utilization of a R- approach.

Is development in bariatric surgery in Germany compatible with international standards? A review of 16 years of data

Bariatric surgery has expanded tremendously internationally over the past decade. In recent years, bariatric surgery has experienced a significant growth in Germany. However, the question arises as to whether this development is in line with international developments or whether there is still room for improvement that could be challenged. 63,990 primary bariatric procedures recorded in the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR) were analyzed from 2005 to April 2021. The distribution of procedures according to different variants was analyzed and presented. In the last 16 years, 17 different procedures have been performed. The most common surgical procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (SG), followed by Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (42%). Adjustable gastric banding (AGB) has declined over time, from 23.5% in the first 5 years to 0.2% in recent years. In comparison, omega-loop gastric bypass has increased over the past 5 years (from 0.4% in the first 5 years to 5.9% in the last 5 years). Laparoscopic procedures have accounted for 96.4% of all bariatric surgeries in recent years. The frequency of some procedures has decreased and some bariatric procedures have lost significance. Overall, bariatric surgery in Germany has developed positively compared to the international trend. Nevertheless, there is one area that needs to be optimized: the development of robotic bariatric surgery, which crawls behind in Germany compared to other countries. To establish the technology in bariatric surgery in a timely manner, a balance must be found between cost neutrality and patient-oriented applications.