The Influence of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Pregnancy, Delivery, and Infant: Does Timing of Pregnancy Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Affect Outcomes?

Conceiving during the first postoperative year after bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of pregnancy outcomes

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of childbearing-aged women have undergone bariatric surgery (BS). Although pregnancy outcomes generally improve after BS, concern remains over the impact of rapid weight loss and the catabolic state that occurs soon after BS. At least a 12-month surgery-to-conception time (SCT) is recommended, though the reasoning behind this has been questioned. This retrospective study was conducted to compare post-BS pregnancies with SCTs of less (Group 1) or more (Group 2) than 12 months.

METHODS

The Hospital Register and Finnish Medical Birth Register were queried for data on BS and subsequent pregnancies. The characteristics of women at surgery and maternal and newborn outcomes in post-BS pregnancies were collected.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2022, 113 women gave birth after BS. This included 17 and 96 patients in Groups 1 and 2. The mean SCTs were 8.0 ± 2.7 and 39.0 ± 24.3 months (p < 0.001), respectively. At BS, the characteristics of age (p = 0.316), weight (p = 0.718), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.114) and surgical technique used (p = 0.648) were similar. During pregnancy, the mean age of Group 1 women was significantly lower (p = 0.005). With no difference in weight (p = 0.961) or BMI (p = 0.567), the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, p = 0.039) was higher in Group 2. The mean gestational age at delivery (p = 0.206) and incidence rates of preterm (p = 0.645), post-term (p = 1.00) and caesarean deliveries (p = 1.00) in the groups were similar. A significantly higher incidence of delivery induction (p < 0.001 was detected in Group 2. The mean newborn weight in Group 1 was lower (p = 0.038), but the mean birth weight standard deviation (p = 0.883) and incidences of low birth weight (< 2500 g, p = 0.345) and small-for-gestational-age newborns (p = 0.469) were similar. The 1- (p = 0.191) and 5-min (p = 0.174) Apgar points in the groups were similar, and no associations between pregnancy outcomes and surgery technique were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome in pregnancies with an SCT 12 months, postponing pregnancy may not always improve pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, all risks should be weighed when counselling women regarding the optimal time of pregnancy after BS.

Midterm Outcome of Early Pregnancy Versus Late Pregnancy After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Controversy regarding the timing of pregnancy and its implications is present in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the midterm outcome of weight loss in women who have undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) followed by pregnancy at two different times.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 53 women who matched the inclusion criteria and included them in the analysis. Demographics and anthropometric measurements were collected. Women who conceived within 12 months of LSG were labeled as early group (EG), and who conceived after 12 months were noted as late group (LG).

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups regarding obesity-associated disease and number of pregnancies before. EG had higher weight (P = 0.0001) and body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.002) at LSG. The mean interval time for EG was 6.7 ± 3.2 months, and LG was 20 ± 5.2 months. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was lower in the EG (P = 0.001). There were no differences in the number of small for gestational age (SGA) births or gestational weight. In the first 2 years after LSG, LG had a higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of body mass index loss (%EBMIL) (P < 0.0001). After 5 years of follow-up, %TWL (P = 0.4) and %EBMIL (P = 0.1) were not statistically significant between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Conception within 12 months from LSG might hinder the weight loss process in the short term but have no significant effect over 5 years of follow-up.

Nutritional Implications of Bariatric Surgery on Pregnancy Management-A Narrative Review of the Literature

One in three women of reproductive age is obese. The mainstay treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery, and the following weight reduction results in a decrease in pregnancy adverse effects, including gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and macrosomia. However, nutritional and vitamin deficiencies due to changes in the gastrointestinal tract after bariatric surgery are associated with an increase in the risk of fetal growth retardation and small for gestational-age neonates. The purpose of this review was to analyze the available recent literature on the subject of the management of pregnancy after bariatric surgery. We searched for available articles from 2007 to 2023 and chose articles of the greatest scientific and clinical value. Micronutrient, vitamin, and protein supplementation is recommended in the prenatal period and throughout the pregnancy. It is advised that pregnant women with a history of bariatric surgery should be provided with regular specialist dietary care. There is still a lack of recommendations about the optimum gestational weight gain after different types of bariatric surgery and for patients of different metabolic statuses. Women of reproductive age undergoing bariatric procedures should be provided with appropriate counseling about adequate contraception, the recommended time-to-conception interval, and the positive and negative influence of bariatric surgery on perinatal outcomes.