Complications Post Abdominoplasty After Surgical Versus Non-surgical Massive Weight Loss: a Comparative Study

A Three-Dimensional Approach To Male Chest Enhancement: A Surgical Algorithm Based On 300 Cases

Gynecomastia is defined as a benign condition of the male caused by tissue overgrowth (Blau and Hazani in Plast Reconstruct Surg 135(2): 425-432, 2015). Its incidence ranges widely in the world population, ranging from 32 to 65% (Innocenti et al. in Ann Plast Surg 78(5):492-496, 2017). Pseudogynecomastia is a condition characterized by deposits of adipose tissue with alteration of the profile of the male thorax. It appears clinically similar to gynecomastia (Hoyos et al. in Plast Reconstr Surg 147:1072-1083, 2021). Several classification systems that characterize the severity of male breast hypertrophy have been described in the literature, and many surgical algorithms have been formulated for its treatment (Holzmer et al. in Plast Reconstruct Surg-Global Open 8:e3161, 2020). The purpose of this original article is to provide a comprehensive surgical algorithm for the management of male chest enhancement based on severity, as defined by the Moschella scale (Tambasco et al. in J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg 90:99-100, 2024). A total of 300 patients treated for bilateral breast hypertrophy are included and reviewed in this retrospective study. Patients have been diversified according to the Moschella scale. For each grade up to grade III, two subgroups were distinguished: A) pinch test less than 0.7 cm and B) pinch test greater than 0.7 cm. For Grade IV, we distinguished: subgroup A) where the distance between the inframammary fold and the nipple was < 3 cm; and subgroup B) where the distance between the inframammary fold and the nipple was > 3 cm. We developed an algorithm, based on this experience, to help to choose the best surgical techniques to perform a three-dimensional result. All patients were treated using multiple surgical techniques. In all cases, we made a reduction in the hypertrophy of the chest, obtaining the three dimensionality. Associate techniques include ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) and helium plasma radiofrequency technology (HPRF). A round block mastectomy (RBm) or skin-reducing mastectomy T inverted (SRM Tinv) is reserved only in limited cases.Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparison of Histological Skin Changes After Massive Weight Loss in Post-bariatric and Non-bariatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Changes in the skin structure, including the collagen and elastin content, have been reported with massive weight loss (MWL) following bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) and have been correlated to a higher risk of complications after body-contouring surgery (BCS). This study aimed at comparing the histological characteristics of the skin of patients having surgical MWL (SMWL) post-BMS to those with non-surgical massive weight loss (NSMWL).

METHODS

This prospective study compared the epidermal thickness, and collagen and elastin fibers content in 80 skin biopsies obtained from BCS procedures performed to patients who experienced MWL defined more than 50% of excess weight loss (%EWL) either SMWL (40 biopsies) or NSMWL (40 biopsies). Twenty biopsies in each group were obtained from abdominoplasties and 20 from breast reductions. Epidermal thickness was measured in H&E-stained sections, collagen fibers were assessed using Masson trichrome-stained sections, and elastin fibers were assessed using Modified Verhoeff's stained sections. Image analysis software was used to calculate the fractions of collagen and elastin fibers.

RESULTS

This study included 77 patients, 38 SMWL patients, and 39 NSMWL patients. The SMWL group had a significantly higher age (p < 0.001), a longer time interval from intervention (p < 0.001), higher initial weight (p < 0.001), higher initial BMI (p < 0.001), lower current weight (p = 0.005), lower current BMI (p < 0.001), and significantly higher %EWL than NSMWL group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding complications after abdominoplasty (p = 1.000). The elastic fibers content in the dermis was significantly higher in the abdominal region of the NSMWL group than SMWL (p = 0.029). All other parameters showed non-significant differences between NSMWL and SMWL in the skin of abdomen and breast.

CONCLUSION

The SMWL group had a significant reduction in elastic fiber content in the skin of the abdomen compared to the NSMWL group. The collagen content was equally reduced in both groups with non-significant differences in both breast and abdomen regions in both groups.