Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Patients with Prior Intragastric Balloon: Results of a Propensity Score Matched Study

Intragastric Balloon as a Bridge Before Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The intragastric balloon (IGB) acts as a restrictive procedure with acceptable short-term weight loss outcomes and a low incidence of major complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether preoperative insertion of an IGB can reduce perioperative complications and improve weight loss outcomes following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched using relevant keywords to include studies on IGB as a bridge before MBS. The main outcome of this study was to compare the weight loss results and complications after MBS between the IGB group and the control group. For the meta-analysis of variables with severe and non-severe heterogeneity, random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analyses were used, respectively. Eleven articles were included. The IGB and control groups included 318 and 501 patients, respectively. The pooled random-effects analysis of six studies showed that preoperative IGB insertion resulted in a body mass index (BMI) loss of 7.45 kg/m2 over a mean follow-up of 6.14 months. The major complication rate for IGB was 5%. The mean BMI change after MBS between the IGB and control groups was not significantly different after 15.06 months (mean difference - 4.08, p = 0.07). Additionally, a fixed-effects analysis of ten studies found no significant difference in post-MBS complication rates between the IGB and control groups (OR 0.66, p = 0.12). Even though using IGB as a bridging approach to subsequent MBS can result in significant reductions in preoperative BMI, this weight loss does not appear to positively impact the overall outcomes of MBS in patients in the long term.

How to establish an endoscopic bariatric practice

Obesity is a chronic, progressive, and relapsing disease of excess adiposity that contributes to more than two hundred medical conditions and is projected to affect more than half the adult population of the United States by the year 2030. Given the limited penetrance of traditional bariatric surgery, as well as the cost and adherence barriers to anti-obesity medications, there is growing interest in the rapidly evolving field of endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs). EBTs are minimally invasive, same-day, per-oral endoscopic procedures and include endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, intragastric balloons, and endoscopic bariatric revisional procedures. This field represents an exciting and innovative subspecialty within gastroenterology. However, building a successful endoscopic bariatric practice requires intentional, coordinated, and sustained efforts to overcome the numerous obstacles to entry. Common barriers include acquisition of the technical and cognitive skillset, practice limitations including the availability of nutrition counseling, facility capabilities, direct-to-consumer marketing, and financial pressures such as facility and anesthesia fees. As the highest-volume center for metabolic and bariatric endoscopy in the United States, we provide insights into successfully establishing an endoscopic bariatric program.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The performance of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in patients with prior laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) has not been characterized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective propensity score-matched study of ESG after LAGB at 2 centers with expertise in bariatric endoscopy. The primary outcome was total weight loss (TWL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included TWL at 3 and 6 months, 12-month excess weight loss (EWL), procedural characteristics, predictors of TWL, and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-six adults (88.5% female, age 50.8 y, BMI 36.5 kg/m 2 ) with prior LAGB (median duration 8 y) underwent ESG at a median of 3 years after LAGB removal. A 2:1 age-matched, sex-matched, and BMI-matched comparator group was created, comprising ESG patients from the same organization and time frame but without prior LAGB. TWL for the LAGB-to-ESG cohort versus the ESG-only cohort was 10.1±5.5% versus 13.0±4.4% at 3 months ( P =0.0256), 12.4±7.2% versus 16.0±5.4% at 6 months ( P =0.0375), and 12.7±8.2% versus 18.4±6.5% at 12 months ( P =0.0149). At 12 months, the LAGB-to-ESG cohort had an EWL of 52.5±50.0%, and 75% achieved TWL ≥10%. There was no association between TWL at 3, 6, or 12 months and the following traits: age or BMI at the time of ESG, patient sex, and time from LAGB removal to ESG. No serious adverse events occurred in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

ESG after LAGB facilitates safe and clinically meaningful weight loss but is attenuated compared to primary ESG.