A neurosurgical navigation system based on intraoperative tumour remnant estimation

Mapping Resection Progress by Tool-Tip Tracking during Brain Tumor Surgery for Real-Time Estimation of Residual Tumor

Surgical resection continues to be the primary initial therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with brain tumors. Computerized cranial neuronavigation based on preoperative imaging offers precision guidance during craniotomy and early tumor resection but progressively loses validity with brain shift. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) and intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) can update the imaging used for guidance and navigation but are limited in terms of temporal and spatial resolution, respectively. We present a system that uses time-stamped tool-tip positions of surgical instruments to generate a map of resection progress with high spatial and temporal accuracy. We evaluate this system and present results from 80 cranial tumor resections. Regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation that are covered by the resection map (True Positive Tracking) and regions of the preoperative tumor segmentation not covered by the resection map (True Negative Tracking) are determined for each case. We compare True Negative Tracking, which estimates the residual tumor, with the actual residual tumor identified using iMRI. We discuss factors that can cause False Positive Tracking and False Negative Tracking, which underestimate and overestimate the residual tumor, respectively. Our method provides good estimates of the residual tumor when there is minimal brain shift, and line-of-sight is maintained. When these conditions are not met, surgeons report that it is still useful for identifying regions of potential residual.

Reliability of Residual Tumor Estimation Based on Navigation Log

The mass of residual tumors has previously been estimated using time-series records of the position of surgical instruments acquired from neurosurgical navigation systems (navigation log). This method has been shown to be useful for rapid evaluation of residual tumors during resection. However, quantitative analysis of the method’s reliability has not been sufficiently reported. The effect of poor log coverage is dominant in previous studies, in that it did not highlight other disturbance factors, such as intraoperative brain shift. We analyzed 25 patients with a high log-acquisition rate that was calculated by dividing the log-available time by the instrument-use time. We estimated the region of resection using the trajectory of surgical instrument that was extracted from the navigation log. We then calculated the residual tumor region and measured its volume as log-estimation residual tumor volume (RTV). We evaluated the correlation between the log-estimation RTV and the RTV in the post-resection magnetic resonance (MR) image. We also evaluated the accuracy of detecting the residual tumor mass using the estimated residual tumor region. The log-estimation RTV and the RTV in the post-resection MR image were significantly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.960; P <0.001). The presence of patient-wise residual tumor mass was detected with a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 92.9%. The individual residual tumor mass was detected with a positive predictive value of 72%. Estimation of residual tumor with adequate log coverage appears to be a suitable method with a high reliability. This method can support rapid decision-making during resection.