A new technique for robotic thyroidectomy: “the daVinci gasless single-incision axillary approach”

Gasless Transaxillary Endoscopic Thyroidectomy with Robotic Assistance: A High-Volume Experience in North America

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction nine years ago, gasless transaxillary thyroidectomy with robotic assistance (RT) has achieved a relatively limited application in North America. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of RT in a recent large, diverse North American population.

METHODS

Consenting patients were selected for the RT approach from November 2010 to July 2015 based on patient preference, and their perioperative data were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 301 robotic thyroidectomies completed in 281 patients, 160 were total thyroidectomy and 141 were lobectomy. Women predominated (98.9%), with a mean age of 41 years (range 17-74 years) and a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 3-71 months). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.7 kg/m² (range 17-44 kg/m²). However, 33.3% of patients had a BMI 25-29.9 kg/m², 12.4% had a BMI 30-34.9 kg/m², 3.5% had a BMI 35-39.9 kg/m², and 0.7% had a BMI ≥40 kg/m². Excluding 20 completion lobectomy, the indications for surgery were indeterminate cytology (53%), malignant cytology (10%), growth (18%), Graves' disease (12%), and other (5%). The mean size of the largest resected nodule was 2.5 cm (range 0.7-6.4 cm). Mean operating time for robotic lobectomy and total thyroidectomy was 81 and 109 minutes, respectively. One patient was converted to standard cervicotomy for failure to progress endoscopically. Complications included temporary dysphonia (6.0%), permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve deficit (1.3%), hypocalcemia (temporary 8.2%, permanent 1.1%), seroma (0.7%), and hematoma requiring reoperation (0.3%). Complications did not differ in patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² compared to those with a BMI <25 kg/m² or with respect to nodules >3 cm or surgery for Graves' thyroiditis. One patient developed grade II arm lymphedema ipsilateral to the axillary incision at two years, which resolved with conservative management. No patient had a surgical site infection or brachial plexopathy. Cancer was present histologically in 133 (48%) patients. Among 91 patients with cancer of the index nodule, 48.4% had papillary, 44.0% follicular variant papillary, 2.2% minimally invasive follicular carcinoma, and 5.5% minimally invasive Hürthle cell carcinoma. One patient had sclerosing variant thyroid paraganglioma. To date, all patients are without evidence of tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

At a high-volume center, gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroid surgery done with robotic assistance is a safe, efficient, and effective approach in a diverse North American patient population.

Robot Assisted Trans Axillary Thyroidectomy: A Subcontinent Experience

To evaluate the outcome and initial hurdles of transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy in the Indian subcontinent. A total of seven (n = 7) patients were operated from August 2016 to February 2017. Ultrasonography was used as a tool to decide the size of thyroid lobe and fine needle aspiration cytology for the type of lesion. All patients underwent ipsilateral brachial plexus nerve conduction studies preoperatively. Two arm positions were evaluated. The robot was docked at the contralateral side of the surgical field. Before discharge from hospital, all patients were given a questionnaire evaluate outcome. Set 1 was answered on the day of discharge and Set 2 at one-month follow up. The most common pathology in our case series was colloid goiter (n = 4) followed by follicular lesion (n = 3). The mean console time was 167 min, with initial two cases taking more than 200 min. The maximum and minimum length of the axillary tunnel was 16 and 27 cm respectively. There was no difference with regard to complication rate with either arm position. None of the patients developed brachial plexus injury and was confirmed by normal nerve conduction study done on postoperative day three. In our experience with transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy, the problems we faced in our population were unique considering the varied physical parameters. Use of malleable retractors comes handy in these situation and we recommend the use of these over the rigid ones. Though both the arm positions had similar outcomes, the one with sideways position was more favorable.