Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: feasibility, technique, and short-term outcomes

Clinical and functional outcome following robotic Heller-myotomy with partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia

Robotic-assisted myotomy with partial fundoplication for patients with achalasia has been established as a safe and effective procedure with similar short-term results and lower rates of intraoperative esophageal perforations. Our aim was to investigate a defined patient cohort undergoing robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery providing pre- and postoperative symptom score and high-resolution manometry to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome.All patients underwent clinical, endoscopic, radiological and manometric investigation to verify the diagnosis of achalasia. High-resolution manometry was performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively and categorized according to the Chicago Classification (v4.0). We used the Eckardt Score to evaluate symptomatic outcome. All patients underwent either robotic-assisted or laparoscopic myotomy with partial anterior fundoplication (180° Dor) using the DaVinci Xi surgical system (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, California, USA). From a total amount of 101 patients, we analyzed the data of 78 (47 robotic and 31 laparoscopic) procedures between 2015 and 2020. All patients showed a significant decrease of the Eckardt Score in the robotic group (median 6 vs. 2) as well as in the laparoscopic group (median 7.5 vs. 3). The postoperative LESP and 4 s-IRP was significantly reduced in all patients in the robotic group [median LESP (mmHg) 34.16 vs. 16.9; median 4 s-IRP (mmHg) 28.85 vs. 14.55], as well as in the laparoscopic group [median LESP (mmHg) 35.34 vs. 17.3; median 4 s-IRP (mmHg) 25.6 vs. 15.9]. There was no significant difference for these parameters between the groups. There was no event of intraoperative esophageal perforation in the robotic cohort, whereas there were 2 in the laparoscopic group. Our data support the safe and effective robotic approach for the surgical treatment of achalasia. Not only the clinical outcome but also the functional results measured by high-resolution manometry are similar to the laparoscopic procedure. Further investigations in larger prospective multicenter studies are needed.

Robotic-assisted foregut surgery is associated with lower rates of complication and shorter post-operative length of stay

BACKGROUND

Two of the most common foregut operations are laparoscopic Heller myotomy and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Robotic assistance, compared to standard laparoscopic approach, may potentially grant surgeons advantages such as enhanced visualization and dexterity. This study compares patient outcomes for Heller myotomy (HM) and Nissen fundoplication (NF) when performed laparoscopically versus robotically.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients at a single institution who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted HM or NF from January 2019 to July 2022 was conducted. 123 HM (72 laparoscopic, 51 robotic-assisted) and 92 NF (62 laparoscopic, 30 robotic-assisted) were performed by three surgeons. Outcomes investigated were operative time, hospital length of stay, pre- and post-operative imaging, resolution of symptoms at 30 days, resolution of symptoms at 90 days, and complications.

RESULTS

In the HM cohorts, the average operative time was longer in the robotic cohort (127 min robotic versus 108 min laparoscopic, p < 0.01). However, overall complication rates (p < 0.05) were lower, and hospital length of stay was shorter in the robotic group (1.5 days compared to 2.7 days, p < 0.001). In the NF cohorts, there was no significant difference in operative time. However, hospital length of stay was shorter in the robotic group (1.54 days compared to 2.7 days, p < 0.001) with otherwise similar outcomes. There was no difference in the rate of post-operative resolution of symptoms or need for additional interventions in either HM or NF.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted HM and NF are associated with shorter hospital stays compared to their respective laparoscopic approaches. Robotic-assisted HM also has a lower rate of complications. Our findings suggest that robotic assistance may be beneficial for shortening hospital length of stay and decreasing complications for certain surgeries specific to Foregut surgery.

Robotic Heller-Dor procedure for oesophageal achalasia: Fluorescence-guided intraoperative assessment of myotomy. A retrospective single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

The robotic Heller-Dor (RHD) procedure for oesophageal achalasia (EA) is safe and effective. We aim to evaluate the intraoperative use of fluorescence imaging, as an alternative means to intraoperative endoscopy, to assess myotomy at the end of the procedure.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients affected with EA underwent RHD. The myotomy was assessed intraoperatively by endoscopy in group A (17 patients), and by fluorescence imaging in group B (17 patients). Perioperative and long-term results were compared.

RESULTS

In group A, one mucosal tear was identified during intraoperative endoscopy. In group B, indocyanine green (ICG) helped identify residual muscle fibres in three cases. No perforation of the oesophageal mucosa occurred in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence-imaging improved the identification of residual muscle fibres and made it possible to verify the integrity of the mucosa without the use of intraoperative endoscopy. A significant reduction in operative times has been related to the use of this technique.

Robotic surgery for the treatment of achalasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experience of the robotic approach for achalasia surgery in a tertiary center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with achalasia who underwent robotic surgery between May 2010 and April 2019 were analyzed. The study variables were collected in a prospective database and a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

45 patients (55.6% male) with a mean age of 44 years were included. The main symptom at diagnosis was dysphagia. 19 patients (42.2%) received endoscopic treatment prior to surgery, mostly pneumatic dilation (84.2%). Heller's myotomy associated with Toupet fundoplication was the surgical technique of choice, with a mean operative time of 211 min. The average stay was 5 days. There were 2 postoperative perforations (4.4%). Perioperative mortality was 0%. The mean follow-up was 64 months. At 3 and 5 years, a significant decrease in the Eckardt score was observed and the manometric study showed a decrease in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure at rest of 58% and 70%, respectively, with persistence of hypomotility of the esophageal body. Pathological gastroesophageal reflux was diagnosed in two patients (5.4%) and 4 (10.8%) presented recurrence of symptoms, requiring endoscopic pneumatic dilations. In 2 cases, the dilations were not effective, so an endoscopic myotomy was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, robotic surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of achalasia.

Robotic esophagomyotomy for achalasia: technical note and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of achalasia has undergone continuous evolution with the advancement of technology. Since the beginning of the new millennium, the employment of robotics has led to technical facilitation with the execution of the myotomy and consequently to improvement of outcomes and decrease perioperative morbidity.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We provide a detailed description of the surgical procedure and the perioperative management together with a literature search of Electronic PubMed/Medline database and Cochrane Library. English written studies on robotic assisted myotomy (case reports, reviews, single arm and comparative studies) were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Between 2001 and 2020, 10 case reports, 13 single arm studies, 10 comparative studies, 2 meta-analysis, 11 reviews and 2 technical notes on robotic assisted esophagomyotomy for achalasia were published.

CONCLUSIONS

As reported by the studies available in the literature and evaluated in this manuscript, robotic assisted cardiomyotomy seems not only feasible but also a safer operation compared with traditional laparoscopic Heller myotomy, due to a significant lower incidence of intraoperative esophageal perforation. Also if large and randomized controlled studies are advocated, robotic assisted esophagocardiomyotomy might be considered superior to laparoscopic Heller myotomy that, until now, is mostly considered the gold standard in the surgical treatment of achalasia.

Robotic surgery for the treatment of achalasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experience of the robotic approach for achalasia surgery in a tertiary center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with achalasia who underwent robotic surgery between May 2010 and April 2019 were analyzed. The study variables were collected in a prospective database and a descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

45 patients (55.6% male) with a mean age of 44 years were included. The main symptom at diagnosis was dysphagia. 19 patients (42.2%) received endoscopic treatment prior to surgery, mostly pneumatic dilation (84.2%). Heller's myotomy associated with Toupet fundoplication was the surgical technique of choice, with a mean operative time of 211minutes. The average stay was 5 days. There were 2 postoperative perforations (4.4%). Perioperative mortality was 0%. The mean follow-up was 64 months. At 3 and 5 years, a significant decrease in the Eckardt score was observed and the manometric study showed a decrease in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure at rest of 58% and 70%, respectively, with persistence of hypomotility of the esophageal body. Pathological gastroesophageal reflux was diagnosed in two patients (5.4%) and 4 (10.8%) presented recurrence of symptoms, requiring endoscopic pneumatic dilations. In 2 cases, the dilations were not effective, so an endoscopic myotomy was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, robotic surgery is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of achalasia.