Expanding the horizon of robotic surgery to large pelvic paraganglioma

Retrospective analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of giant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of giant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL). A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data of patients who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2013 and November 2023 and whose postoperative pathological examination confirmed PPGL (n = 84). Patients were divided into the robot-assisted (n = 33) and laparoscopic (n = 51) groups. Baseline data and intraoperative and postoperative recovery conditions of the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference in the baseline data between the two groups. The time to resume food intake in the robot-assisted group was shorter than that in the laparoscopic group [2 (1-2) vs. 3 (2-3) days, p < 0.001], and the incidence of postoperative morbidity was also lower (15.2% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.009); however, operating room time was longer [265 (240-370) vs. 245 (205-297.5) min, p = 0.039], and overall hospitalization costs were higher [80336.38 (72,014.3-101,555.39) vs. 60,102.13 (43,059.205-88085.35) CNY, p = 0.003]. This study results indicate that robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has a lower postoperative complication rate and faster postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery. However, the surgery is costlier and operating room time is longer than with traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery can be considered for giant PPGL if the patient's financial condition permits.

[Minimally invasive surgery of retroperitoneal paragangliomas : Synopsis of personal experiences]

Retroperitoneal paragangliomas are rare tumors with the characteristics of adrenal pheochromocytomas. They may occur sporadically or in conjunction with hereditary syndromes. Diagnostic methods in paragangliomas include testing of catecholamine secretion and imaging procedures. The first choice treatment is surgical removal, which in the author's opinion is preferably by minimally invasive approaches. Infrarenal paragangliomas should be excised using a laparoscopic transabdominal procedure. For suprarenal tumors the retroperitoneoscopic approach should be used.

A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors

Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2%), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18-89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0%) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic-perineal resection, and 9 (10.8%) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5%. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7%, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2%). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1-8 and 2-10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5-71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.