Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for primary and post-chemotherapy testis cancer

Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer using a single-position supine approach: A case report and literature review

This case study demonstrates a single-position supine approach for robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLDN) for the treatment of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and residual masses after chemotherapy. We performed a bilateral R-RPLDN in a 33-year-old man with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and residual postchemotherapy masses. For this approach, the patient was placed in a steep Trendelenburg position, and a 5-port transperitoneal technique was used, with the robot docked so that the arms were oriented cephalad. This approach allowed simultaneous access to both sides of the retroperitoneum, thereby eliminating the need for bilateral lymphadenectomy and patient repositioning. Bilateral R-RPLDN was performed using a single-position supine approach. This versatile approach offers a less invasive, more efficient, and safer solution for removing residual postchemotherapy testicular cancer masses.

Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer-First Experience and Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon

Background/Objectives: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) plays a crucial role in the staging and treatment of testicular cancer and is often mandatory. RPLND is associated with a high risk of morbidity. The use of minimally invasive techniques has significantly increased the number of robotic procedures performed over the last few years. This study aimed to analyze the perioperative and postoperative outcomes and trends of an increasing number of surgeries performed. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 robotic RPLNDs (R-RPLNDs) performed at our testicular cancer center between 2020 and 2024. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the independent variables of operative time (OT), hospital stay (HS), estimated blood loss, lymph node yield, and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The independent predictors included case number, clinical stage, post-chemotherapy status, preoperative retroperitoneal tumor mass, and body mass index. Furthermore, the patients were categorized into three groups: group A (cases 1-10), group B (cases 11-20), and group C (cases 21-30). A Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to assess differences among the groups concerning OT, HS, and lymph node yield. Results: OT significantly decreased with an increasing number of cases (p < 0.001), and HS was significantly affected by overall complications (p = 0.0006). There were two major perioperative complications (6.6%). No factors predicted overall complications or Clavien-Dindo grades I-II or III-V. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in OT and HS for group C. Conclusions: R-RPLND for GCTs demonstrates a clear learning curve, with significant improvements in OT, HS, and complication rates as surgeons gain experience. Overall, the low complication rates for R-RPLND did not indicate predictive factors for perioperative or postoperative complications. RPLND presents promising potential as a safe and effective treatment for GCTs, especially when performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers.

Feasibility and Oncological Safety of Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Testicular Cancer-Single-Center Experience

Background/Purpose: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) plays a crucial role in the surgical management of testicular cancer. However, RPLND is associated with a high risk of morbidity. Currently, open RPLND (O-RPLND) is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment. The use of minimally invasive techniques has increased significantly over the last few years. This study aimed to compare the safety and oncological outcomes of open (O-RPLND) and robotic (R-RPLND) retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all the patients who underwent RPLND at our testicular cancer center. Standard O-RPLND was performed with the usual equipment, and R-RPLND was performed with the Da Vinci X/Xi surgical system. The pre- and perioperative parameters and the postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), anejaculation, and the relapse rate were recorded. The association between the clinicopathological variables and the complications and relapse was assessed using regression analyses. Results: Sixty-five patients underwent RPLND during 2017-2024 due to testicular cancer (TC), with thirty-one (47.7%) receiving R-RPLND, including seventeen patients post-chemotherapy (55%). Meanwhile, 34 (52.3%) underwent O-RPLND, comprising 31 patients post-chemotherapy (91%). R-RPLND demonstrated excellent results compared to O-RPLND in terms of the operative time (OT) (p < 0.00001). The R-RPLND group had two (6.5%) high-grade (Clavien-Dindo III-V) complications, while four (11.8%) high-grade complications were noted in the O-RPLND group. R-RPLND was linked to a shorter OT (p < 0.00001). The hospital stay for R-RPLND was, on average, 2.7 days shorter. In logistic regression analysis, R-RPLND was non-inferior to O-RPLND for overall complications (p = 0.6) and low-grade Clavien-Dindo (I-II) (p = 0.2) and high-grade Clavien-Dindo (≥III) complications (p = 0.7). The median follow-up was 13 months for R-RPLND and 38 months for O-RPLND. Two relapses were observed in the R-RPLND group (6.5%), and two in the O-RPLND group (5.9%). One patient who underwent R-RPLND developed field-edge recurrence. No significant differences in the relapse and anejaculation rates were found between R-RPLND and O-RPLND (p = 0.9 and p = 0.8, respectively). Conclusions: In conclusion, R-RPLND is a feasible procedure with a low complication rate and an acceptable oncological outcome. It has proven to be significantly shorter to O-RPLND in relation to the lengths of HS and OT. However, R-RPLND is a demanding procedure with a considerable learning curve.

Robot-assisted transmesocolic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: A promising approach

INTRODUCTION

Testicular cancer accounts for 5% of urological tumors, with an incidence of 5.6 cases per 100,000 men per year in Europe (1). Salvage retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for persistent retroperitoneal masses after chemotherapy. The advent of minimally invasive surgery is changing the therapeutic approach. The objective is to present our initial experience with the transmesocolic robotic approach for the surgical management of these masses.

METHODS

We report the perioperative and oncological outcomes of four patients affected by non-seminomatous germ cell tumors who were treated with transmesocolic robotic left para-aortic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

The surgical time for the first case was 220 min, and the average surgical time for the remaining cases was 120 min (SD: 15). Estimated blood loss was 82.5 mL (SD: 79.3). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Pathological anatomy revealed post-pubertal teratoma (30%) and necrosis (70%) in case 1, necrosis with reactive adenitis in case 2, extensive fibrosis in case 3 and post-pubertal teratoma in case 4. Currently, all patients are disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is a safe and precise technique that offers favorable oncological and functional outcomes. The transmesocolic approach represents a feasible option in selected cases, ensuring rapid retroperitoneal access and reduced surgical time.

Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer

BACKGROUND

Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is the accepted standard surgical approach to treat retroperitoneal nodal disease in testis cancer. Increasingly, robotic RPLND (R-RPLND) is being performed due to the potential for lower blood loss, shorter length of stay, and accelerated recovery.

OBJECTIVE

We have performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis comparing the survival and perioperative outcomes of O- and R-RPLND.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Analyzing the data from all patients who underwent primary RPLND at our center between 1990 and 2022, we used PSM to create a 2:1 (O-RPLND:R-RPLND) matched cohort.

INTERVENTION

Primary O-RPLND versus R-RPLND.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was time to relapse. The secondary endpoints included operating time, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complications. Relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare perioperative outcomes of O-RPLND versus R-RPLND.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 178 patients underwent primary RPLND: 137 O-RPLND and 41 R-RPLND. After PSM, 26 patients in the R-RPLND group were matched with 38 in the O-RPLND group. After matching, no significant baseline differences were noted. After a median follow-up of 23.5 mo (interquartile range 4.4-59.2), one (3.8%) relapse was noted in the R-RPLND group versus three (7.8%) in the O-RPLND group; however, this was not significant (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.07-6.31, p = 0.7097). No in-field relapses occurred in either cohort. R-RPLND was associated with a shorter length of stay (1 vs 5 d, p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (200 vs 300 ml, p = 0.032), but longer operative time (8.8 vs 4.3 h, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

R-RPLND offers low morbidity and improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncologic efficacy of the open approach.

PATIENT SUMMARY

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare open and robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) using a propensity score-matched system. We encourage the discussion and inclusion of primary R-RPLND into the standard of care algorithm for patients with de novo clinical stage (CS) II and relapsed CS I with CS II equivalent disease.

Unilateral Post-Chemotherapy Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Stage II Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Sexual and Reproductive Outcomes

We aimed to report sexual and reproductive outcomes following post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal unilateral lymph node dissection (PC-rRPLND) for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) at a high-volume cancer center. We collected records regarding sexual and reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral PC-rRPLND for stage II NSGCTs from January 2018 to November 2021. Preoperative and postoperative (at 12 months) ejaculatory function as well as erectile function, based on the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS), were assessed. Only patients with a pre-operative IIEF-5 of ≥22 and EHS of ≥3 were included in this analysis. Overall, 22 patients undergoing unilateral PC-rRPLND met the inclusion criteria. Of these, seven (31.8%) patients presented an andrological disorder of any type after PC-rRPLND. Specifically, retrograde ejaculation was present in three (13.6%) patients and hypospermia was present in one (4.5%) patient. Moreover, three (13.6%) patients yielded erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 < 22 and/or EHS < 3). Lastly, two (9.1%) succeeded in naturally conceiving a child after PC-rRPLND. Retrograde ejaculation is confirmed to be one of the most common complications of PC-rRPLND. Moreover, a non-negligible number of patients experience erectile dysfunction.

Complete Vascular Replacement of the Infrarenal Inferior Vena Cava and Abdominal Aorta during Post-Chemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for a Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumor

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the leading cause of cancer-related death in males between the ages of 20 and 40. In the advanced stages, the combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgical excision of the remaining tumor can cure many of these patients. Vascular procedures may be required during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in order to achieve the complete excision of all residual retroperitoneal masses. Careful assessment of pre-operative imaging and the identification of patients who could benefit from additional procedures are important for minimizing peri- and postoperative complications. We report on a case of a 27-year-old patient with non-seminomatous TGCT, who successfully underwent post-chemotherapy RPLND with additional infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) and complete abdominal aorta replacement using synthetic grafts.

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy residual mass in testicular cancer: Long-term experience from a tertiary care centre

Objectives

To present our intermediate to long-term oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RA-RPLND) in post-chemotherapy (PC) residual mass in testicular cancers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single-centre experience of RA-RPLND for in such setting.

Methods

Prospectively maintained database of carcinoma testis patients undergoing RA-RPLND from February 2012 to September 2021 was reviewed. Patient demographics, tumour stage and risk groups and chemotherapy details were recorded. Intraoperative details and post-operative complications were also noted. Pathological outcomes included were lymph node yield and histopathology report. Further, follow-up was done for recurrence and antegrade ejaculation status.

Results

Total of 37 cases were done for PC residual masses. International germ cell cancer collaborative group good, intermediate and poor risk proportion was 18 (48.6%), 14 (37.8%) and 5 (13.5%), respectively. Bilateral full template dissection, unilateral modified template dissection and residual mass excision was performed in 59.5% (22/37), 35.1% (13/37) and 5.4% (2/37) patients, respectively. The median size of the excised residual mass was 3.45 cm interquartile range (IQR 2-6 cm), with the largest being 9 cm. The median lymph nodal yield was 19. The most common histology was necrosis (n = 24, 65%), followed by teratoma (n = 11, 30%) and viable malignancy (n = 2, 5%). Antegrade ejaculation was reported in 32 patients (86.4%). After a median follow-up of 41 (IQR 14-64) months, only one patient had a recurrence.

Conclusions

RA-PC-RPLND is thus a safe, feasible and oncologically effective option for selected patients. With increasing experience, larger masses can also be dealt with efficiently.

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a systematic review of perioperative outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) and to compare the perioperative outcomes of R-RPLND with open RPLND (O-RPLND), as RPLND forms an integral part of the management of testis cancer and R-RPLND is a minimally invasive treatment option for this disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed^® , Scopus^® , Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science™ databases were searched for studies reporting perioperative outcomes of primary and post-chemotherapy R-RPLND and studies comparing R-RPLND with O-RPLND.

RESULTS

The search yielded 42 articles describing R-RPLND, including five comparative studies. The systematic review included 4222 patients (single-arm studies, n = 459; comparative studies, n = 3763). Of 459 patients in the single-arm studies, 271 underwent primary R-RPLND and 188 underwent post-chemotherapy R-RPLND. For primary R-RPLND, the operative time ranged from 175 to 540 min and the major complication rate was 4.1%. For post-chemotherapy R-RPLND, the operative time ranged from 134 to 550 min and the major complication rate was 8.5%. The conversion rate to open surgery was 2.2% in primary R-RPLND and 9.0% in post-chemotherapy R-RPLND. In comparison with O-RPLND, R-RPLND was associated with a lower transfusion rate (14.5% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001) and a lower complication rate (18.5% vs 7.8%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted RPLND has acceptable perioperative outcomes in both the primary and post-chemotherapy settings but a notable rate of conversion to open surgery in the post-chemotherapy setting. Compared with O-RPLND, R-RPLND is associated with a lower transfusion rate and fewer overall complications. Given the potential impact of selection bias, the optimal patient selection criteria for R-RPLND remain to be elucidated.

Robotic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A multicenter collaborative study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the perioperative and oncological/functional outcomes of robotic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this retrospective study, we included patients who underwent robotic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection at 7 academic centers between 2011 and 2021. Patients' characteristics, perioperative findings, as well as oncological and functional outcomes are reviewed. Relationships with the main outcome (90-day complications) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients with a median (IQR) age of 30 (25-37) years were included. The main primary histologic type was non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (89%). Seven patients (8%) were electively converted to open. Median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay were 150 ml, 5.6 hours, and 2 days, respectively. Final pathology revealed teratoma in 49 (55%), necrosis/fibrosis in 29 (32%), and viable germ cell tumor in 12 (13%) patients. The 90-day complication rate was 16.7%, most of which were low-grade (Clavien-Dindo < III) and managed conservatively. On multivariable analysis, pure seminoma (odds ratio 17.4) and bilateral dissection template (odds ratio 4.2) were independently associated with 90-day complications. No 90-day hospital readmission was recorded. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 16 (4-32) months, 6 (6.7%) patients had disease recurrence and there was 1 cancer-related death.

CONCLUSION

With appropriate patient selection at centers with expertise in testicular cancer and minimally invasive surgery, robotic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection appears safe and effective, although longer follow-up is warranted.

Twenty Years' Experience in Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer in a Tertiary Referral Center

Background and Objectives: The aim of this article is to present a single-surgeon, open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) series for testicular cancer in a high-volume center. Materials and Methods: We reviewed data from patients who underwent RPLND performed by an experienced surgeon at our institution between 2000 and 2019. We evaluated surgical and perioperative outcomes, complications, Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS), and Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS). Results: RPLND was performed in primary and secondary settings in 21 (32%) and 44 (68%) patients, respectively. Median operative time was 180 min. Median hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 23 (35%) patients, with 9 (14%) events reported as Clavien grade ≥ 3. Patients in the primary RPLND group were significantly younger, more likely to have NSGCT, had higher clinical N0 and M0, and had higher nerve-sparing RPLND (all p ≤ 0.04) compared to those in the secondary RPLND group. In the median follow-up of 120 (56-180) months, 10 (15%) patients experienced recurrence. Finally, 20-year OS, CSS, and RFS were 89%, 92%, and 85%, respectively, with no significant difference in survival rates between primary vs. secondary RPLND subgroups (p = 0.64, p = 0.7, and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusions: Open RPLND performed by an experienced high-volume surgeon achieves excellent oncological and functional outcomes supporting the centralization of these complex procedures.

Robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma: the Princess Margaret Experience

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a treatment option for men in a primary and post-chemotherapy setting. The aim of this review was to explore the published data looking at feasibility, safety and outcomes of robotic RPLND for CSI/II NSGCT but we will in particular highlight how we have approached adoption of robotic RPLND at the Princess Margaret.

METHODS

A review and summary of the published data to date was performed regarding the role of robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma.

RESULTS

Published series of robotic RPLND to date have proven feasibility and safety in experienced centres. Less blood loss, shorter length of stay and decreased morbidity are promising findings. Our data from Princess Margaret strengthen the argument of oncologic efficacy as we operated only on patients with known retroperitoneal disease (Stage at RPLND was IIA (n = 15, 55.6%), IIB (n = 9, 33.3%), IIC (n = 1, 3.7%) and III (n = 2, 7.4%)), did not use adjuvant chemotherapy and found a relapse rate (11%) similar to open RPLND.

CONCLUSIONS

The debate is ongoing regarding the role of robotic RPLND- the excellent oncological outcomes achieved by an open RPLND are the minimum starting point for robotic RPLND. Until such time that robotic RPLND is proven to be gold standard it should be performed in experienced centres by high volume RPLND surgeons and in the setting of a protocol.