Trans-oral robotic surgery for head and neck cancers using the Medrobotics Flex® system: the Adelaide cohort

Impact of tongue base mucosectomy on quality-of-life outcomes: systematic review and single-centre experience

PURPOSE

Tongue base mucosectomy (TBM) is a well-established procedure in investigating cervical squamous cell carcinoma of occult primary. However, its risks have not been balanced against its benefits with validated tools.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted for reported complications and quality-of-life outcomes following TBM. The complications and quality-of-life outcomes following TBM at our institution are then reported using objective metrics and validated assessment tools, including Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HNS), University of Washington Quality-of-life Questionnaire (UW-QOL) and M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Of these, 9 addressed swallowing outcomes described in text, without using validated assessment tools. No studies reported taste, speech and pain outcomes after TBM. Post-operative bleeding was not consistently reported. 20 patients underwent robotic TBM at our institution between 2017 and 2023. The primary tumour was identified in 50% (10/20) of cases. The median time to commencing soft diet and median time of NG feeding was 0 days. The median return to normalcy of diet score was 95. Median post-treatment UW-QOL pain and swallowing scores were 100 and 70 respectively. The median speech score was 100, saliva 70, and taste 70. The median normalised MDADI scores were: global 80; emotional 67; functional 80 and physical 65.

CONCLUSIONS

Validated assessment tools better inform patients about treatment options and can help compare post-TBM results across institutions. Our data demonstrates that TBM patients have a functional post-operative swallow, are pain and gastrostomy free, even after adjuvant treatment. Routine post-operative insertion of NG tube is not necessary.

The Flex Robotic System in Head and Neck Surgery: A Review

The Flex Robotic System is a device intended for robot-assisted visualization and surgical site access to the head and neck. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge about the Flex Robotic System in head and neck transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The primary search was performed using the term "Flex Robot" across several databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus). Patients were treated for both benign and malignant diseases. The oropharynx was the most frequent site of disease, followed by the supraglottic larynx, hypopharynx, glottic larynx, oral cavity, and salivary glands. Most of the studies did not reveal major intra- or post-operative complications. Bleeding incidence was low (1.4-15.7%). Visualization of the lesion was 95-100%, while surgical success was 91-100%. In conclusion, lesions of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx can be successfully resected, thus making the Flex Robotic System a safe and effective tool, reducing the morbidity associated with traditional open surgery.

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil versus Base of Tongue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has become widely adopted for the surgical removal of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, it is currently unknown if TORS has equal efficacy and outcomes in patients with tonsillar or base of tongue (BOT) OPSCC. Therefore, we performed a systematic review, including articles describing the surgical management of OPSCC with TORS that compared margin status, complications, and recurrence between tonsil and BOT. BOT OPSCC had a higher rate of positive margins compared to tonsillar OPSCC. However, no differences were seen in the recurrence or postoperative hemorrhage rates of BOT and tonsillar OPSCC. While a higher rate of positive margins was seen in BOT OPSCC when compared to tonsillar OPSCC, this did not translate to a higher recurrence rate in the BOT group. Future research on which subset of patients with BOT is more likely to have positive margins is warranted to improve the utility of TORS further.

Abstract

Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has become widely adopted for the surgical removal of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with the most common locations being in the tonsil and base of tongue (BOT). However, it is currently unknown if TORS has equal efficacy and outcomes in patients with tonsillar or BOT OPSCC. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the margin status and recurrence rates of tonsillar and BOT OPSCC after TORS. Per PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were systematically searched from inception to 2/28/2022. Articles including the surgical management of OPSCC with TORS that compared margin status, complications, and recurrence between tonsil and BOT were included. Meta-analyses of proportions and odds ratios were performed. A total of 28 studies were included, comprising 1769 patients with tonsillar OPSCC and 1139 patients with BOT OPSCC. HPV positivity was seen in 92.3% of tumors. BOT OPSCC had a higher rate of positive margins compared to tonsillar OPSCC (28.1% [95%CI 15.1–43.3] vs. 7.5% [95%CI 3.3–13.3]). No differences were seen in recurrence between BOT and tonsillar OPSCC (OR 1.1 [95%CI 0.8–1.5], p = 0.480). In addition, no differences in postoperative hemorrhage were seen between tonsillar and BOT OPSCC (10.7% [95%CI 6.1–16.5] vs. 8.8% [95% CI 1.5–21.3]). While a higher rate of positive margins was seen in BOT OPSCC when compared to tonsil OPSCC, this did not translate to a higher recurrence rate in the BOT group. Future research on which subset of patients with BOT is more likely to have positive margins is warranted to improve the utility of TORS further.