1
|
Şenol Çelik S, Tunçbilek Z, Sarıköse S, Topaktaş G, Canda AE. Roles, experience and views of nurses working in robotic surgery settings: A mixed-methods study. J Perioper Pract 2024:17504589241231100. [PMID: 38606911 DOI: 10.1177/17504589241231100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has benefits for patients, but there are challenges to working in this field. In Turkey, training is not provided for nurses working in robotic-assisted surgery, and national legislation on nurses' roles in these settings has not been implemented. This study aimed to demonstrate the roles and experiences of nurses in robotic-assisted surgery in Turkey. This study was conducted as a mixed-methods research. The qualitative data were analysed by content analysis. More than half of the nurses had received basic training in robotic-assisted surgery. Qualitative data consisted of five themes, including the effects of robotic surgery, feelings and thoughts on robotic surgery, working as a nurse in robotic surgery settings, responsibilities of nurses and competence of nurses working in robotic surgery settings. Determining the working conditions and roles of nurses working in robotic-assisted surgery settings by policymakers in regulations is crucial for improving the quality of nursing care and the outcomes of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gülsen Topaktaş
- Department of Education and Certification, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Newland JJ, Sundel MH, Blackburn KW, Cairns CA, Cooper LE, Stewart SJ, Roque DM, Siddiqui MM, Brown RF. Early Implementation of Robotic Training in Surgical and Surgical Subspecialty Residency. Am Surg 2024:31348241229631. [PMID: 38262961 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241229631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery has emerged as an operative tool for many elective and urgent surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early surgical trainees' experiences and opinions of robotic surgery. METHODS An introductory robotic training course consisting of online da Vinci Xi/X training and in-person, hands on training was implemented for residents and medical students across surgical subspecialties at a single institution. A voluntary survey evaluating perceptions of and interest in robotic surgery and prior robotic surgery experience, as well as a basics of robotics quiz, was distributed to participants prior to the start of the in-person session. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the cohort. RESULTS 85 trainees participated in the course between 2020 and 2023, including 58 first- and second-year surgical residents (general surgery, urology, OB/GYN, and thoracic surgery) and 27 fourth-year medical students. 9.4% of participants reported any formal robotic surgery training prior to the session, with only 19% of participants reporting robotic operative experience. 52% of the participants knew of and/or had completed the da Vinci online course modules prior to the scheduled training session. Participants unanimously (100%) agreed that robotic surgery should be implemented into surgical training. CONCLUSIONS There is rising enthusiasm for robotic surgery, yet early exposure and training remain infrequent and inconsistent amongst medical students and new surgical residents. A standardized introduction of multi-disciplinary robotic surgery training should be incorporated into medical school and/or early residency education to ensure surgical residents receive appropriate exposure and training to achieve competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Newland
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Margaret H Sundel
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kyle W Blackburn
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cassandra A Cairns
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura E Cooper
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shelby J Stewart
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dana M Roque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Rebecca F Brown
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brian R, Oh D, Ifuku KA, Sarin A, O'Sullivan P, Chern H. Experience matters for robotic assistance: an analysis of case data. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2421-2426. [PMID: 37450105 PMCID: PMC10492713 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01677-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Many robotic procedures require active participation by assistants. Most prior work on assistants' effect on outcomes has been limited in procedural focus and scope, with studies reporting differing results. Knowing how assistant experience affects operating room time could inform operating room case scheduling and provide an impetus for additional assistant training. As such, this retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the association between assistant experience and operating room time for 2291 robotic-assisted operations performed from 2016 to 2022 at our institution. Linear regression showed a significant association between the presence of a junior resident and increased case length differential with an increase of 26.9 min (p = 0.01). There were no significant associations between the presence of a senior resident (p = 0.52), presence of a fellow (p = 0.20), or presence of a physician assistant (p = 0.43) and case length differential. The finding of increased operating room time in the presence of a junior resident during robotic cases supports consideration of the adoption of formal assistant training programs for residents to improve efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley Brian
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Daniel Oh
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Kelli Ann Ifuku
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ankit Sarin
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Patricia O'Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hueylan Chern
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burke JR, Fleming CA, King M, El-Sayed C, Bolton WS, Munsch C, Harji D, Bach SP, Collins JW. Utilising an accelerated Delphi process to develop consensus on the requirement and components of a pre-procedural core robotic surgery curriculum. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1443-1455. [PMID: 36757562 PMCID: PMC9909133 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01518-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to grow globally. Despite this, in the UK and Ireland, it is estimated that over 70% of surgical trainees across all specialities have no access to robot-assisted surgical training (RAST). This study aimed to provide educational stakeholders guidance on a pre-procedural core robotic surgery curriculum (PPCRC) from the perspective of the end user; the surgical trainee. The study was conducted in four Phases: P1: a steering group was formed to review current literature and summarise the evidence, P2: Pan-Specialty Trainee Panel Virtual Classroom Discussion, P3: Accelerated Delphi Process and P4: Formulation of Recommendations. Forty-three surgeons in training representing all surgical specialties and training levels contributed to the three round Delphi process. Additions to the second- and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from previous rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. There was 100% response from all three rounds. The resulting formulated guidance showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of > 0.8. There was 97.7% agreement that a standardised PPCRC would be advantageous to training and that, independent of speciality, there should be a common approach (95.5% agreement). Consensus was reached in multiple areas: 1. Experience and Exposure, 2. Access and context, 3. Curriculum Components, 4 Target Groups and Delivery, 5. Objective Metrics, Benchmarking and Assessment. Using the Delphi methodology, we achieved multispecialty consensus among trainees to develop and reach content validation for the requirements and components of a PPCRC. This guidance will benefit from further validation following implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Richard Burke
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England, UK
- Robotics and Digital Surgery Initiative, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England
- Leeds Institute Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christina A. Fleming
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England, UK
- The Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Martin King
- The Association of Surgeons in Training, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England, UK
- Craigavon Area Hospital, Craigavon, Northern Ireland
| | - Charlotte El-Sayed
- Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate of Innovation, Digital and Transformation, Health Education England, London, England
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Chris Munsch
- Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate of Innovation, Digital and Transformation, Health Education England, London, England
| | - Deena Harji
- Robotics and Digital Surgery Initiative, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon P. Bach
- Robotics and Digital Surgery Initiative, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, England
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Justin W. Collins
- University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), UK, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Curfman KR, Jones IF, Conner JR, Neighorn CC, Wilson RK, Rashidi L. Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:142. [PMID: 37225935 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04436-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As robotic colorectal surgery continues to advance in conjunction with improved recovery protocols, we began implementing robotic surgery (RS) as an option for emergent diverticulitis surgery. Our hospital system utilizes the Da Vinci Xi system, and staff are required to undergo training, making emergent colorectal surgery a feasible option. However, it is essential to determine the safety with reproducibility of our experiences. METHODS A de-identified retrospective review was performed of Intuitive's national database which obtained data from 262 facilities from January 2018 through December 2021. This identified over 22,000 emergent colorectal surgeries. Of those, over 2500 were performed for diverticulitis in which 126 were RS, 446 laparoscopic surgery (LS), and 1952 open surgery (OS). Clinical outcome metrics including conversion rates, anastomotic leaks, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were obtained. The cohort was defined by patients who were seen in the emergency department (ED) with diverticulitis and proceeded to have a sigmoid colectomy within 24 h of ED arrival. RESULTS RS was associated with increased operating time (RS 262, LS 207, OS 182 min), but data has shown many benefits of emergent RS compared to OS. We identified significant decreases in ICU admission rates (OS 19.0%, RS 9.5%, p = 0.01) and anastomotic leak rates (OS 4.4%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04), with borderline improvement in overall length of stay (OS 9.9, RS 8.9 days, p = 0.05). When compared with LS, RS showed many comparable results. However, RS witnessed a statistically significant improvement in anastomotic leak rates (LS 4.5%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04). Importantly, there was a striking difference in conversion rates to OS. LS converted over 28.7% of cases to OS, whereas RS only converted 7.9%, p = 0.000005. CONCLUSION Given these findings, RS is another MIS tool that could be a safe and feasible option for the acute management of emergent diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian F Jones
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, 98431, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Greenberg AL, Syed SM, Alseidi A, O’Sullivan PS, Chern H. Robotic training for medical students: feasibility of a pilot simulation curriculum. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:1029-1038. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01508-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AbstractWhile robotic procedures are growing rapidly, medical students have a limited role in robotic surgeries. Curricula are needed to enhance engagement. We examined feasibility of augmenting Intuitive Surgical (IS) robotic training for medical students. As a pilot, 18 senior students accepted an invitation to a simulation course with a daVinci robot trainer. Course teaching objectives included introducing robotic features, functionalities, and roles. A 1-h online module from the IS learning platform and a 4-h in-person session comprised the course. The in-person session included an overview of the robot by an IS trainer (1.5 h), skills practice at console (1.5 h), and a simulation exercise focused on the bedside assist role (1 h). Feasibility included assessing implementation and acceptability using a post-session survey and focus group (FG). Survey responses were compiled. FG transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis techniques. Fourteen students participated. Implementation was successful as interested students signed up and completed each of the course components. Regarding acceptability, students reported the training valuable and recommended it as preparation for robotic cases during core clerkships and sub-internships. In addition, FGs revealed 4 themes: (1) perceived expectations of students in the OR; (2) OR vs. outside-OR learning; (3) simulation of stress; and (4) opportunities to improve the simulation component. To increase preparation for the robotic OR and shift robotic training earlier in the surgical education continuum, educators should consider hands-on simulation for medical students. We demonstrate feasibility although logistics may limit scalability for large numbers of students.
Collapse
|
7
|
Stockheim J, Perrakis A, Sabel BA, Waschipky R, Croner RS. RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:495-507. [PMID: 35810233 PMCID: PMC10076401 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01444-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted procedures gain increasing acceptance for daily surgical routine. However, structured training programs are designed for surgeons with high expertise. Hence, a comprehensive training curriculum was established to ensure a basic competence in robotic abdominal surgery for young surgeons during their residency. The aim of the current work is to propose a feasible and effective training concept. The development process of this training curriculum is based on a comprehensive literature review which led to the concept of "robotic curriculum for young surgeons" (RoCS). It was implemented in the daily routine of a German university hospital starting in 2020. The robotic assessment questionnaire (RAQ) was used for electronic data collection. After the initial phase adjustments, it led to an improvement of the initial version of the curriculum. RoCS is a multimodal training program containing basic training through assistance at the operation table during robotic-assisted operations and basic console training. Key elements are the robotic team time-out (rTTO), perioperative process standardization including feasible personnel scheduling and useful procedure clustering into organ systems, procedural steps and procedural step complexity. Evaluation of standardized communication, performance assessment, patient factors and individual overall workload using NASA Task Load Index is realizable. Flexibility and adaptability to internal organization processes of surgical departments are the main advantages of the concept. RoCS is a strong training tool to meet the specific needs of young surgeons and evaluate their learning success of robotic procedural training. Furthermore, comparison within the different robotic systems should be considered. Further studies are needed to validate a multicenter concept design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Stockheim
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Aristotelis Perrakis
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard A Sabel
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Waschipky
- Department of Information Technology (IT) and Medical Engineering, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-Von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Britton CR, Francis I, Tay LJ, Krishnamoothy B. The role of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery: A critical synthesis. J Perioper Pract 2022; 32:208-225. [PMID: 35592944 DOI: 10.1177/17504589221094136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted surgery has grown exponentially since its inception and first approval in the United States in the year 2000. The surgeon operating with the assistance of the robot sits remotely to the patient and another practitioner assists at the bedside. The role of the bedside assistant and the training that is required to undertake this role are understudied topics. AIM To explore the functions, training and professional development of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery and propose the necessary foundations for the safe enactment of the role in the United Kingdom. METHODS Through critical interpretative synthesis, relevant literature was systematically searched and analysed to inform integration of evidence. RESULTS Seventy-three studies were retrieved from the literature, across several health care disciplines and surgical specialities. These were critically analysed to inform a theoretically sound account grounded on evidence. CONCLUSION The role, functions and skills of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery vary across contexts. These were analysed and critically synthetised to produce several keys to the success of bedside assistants in robot-assisted surgery in the context of the United Kingdom and of its national regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Indu Francis
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Li June Tay
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|