Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review

Age of Robotic Surgery and Telemedicine: Is Pakistan Lagging Behind?

Robotic surgery and telemedicine have revolutionized the healthcare industry, offering improved patient outcomes and access to medical knowledge. However, Pakistan lags behind in adopting these cutting-edge technologies due to several challenges, including limited infrastructure, budget constraints, and low awareness among patients and healthcare professionals. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the current state of the healthcare system in Pakistan, highlighting the need for investment and policy reforms to integrate robotic surgery and telemedicine effectively. The potential benefits, including medical tourism, enhanced facilities, and skilled workforce retention, are discussed as incentives for the government to embrace digital medicine and bridge the healthcare gap. Through increased awareness, training programs, and collaborations with other nations, Pakistan can pave the way for a digitally empowered healthcare future.

How long do we need to reach sufficient expertise with the avatera® robotic system?

PURPOSE

To investigate the learning curve in four basic surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, and evaluate the approximate time needed to reach sufficient expertise in performing these tasks with the avatera® system.

METHODS

Twenty urology residents with no previous experience in dry-lab and robotic surgery were asked to complete four basic laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, needle guidance, and suturing) laparoscopically and robotically. All participants were asked to complete the tasks first after watching the Uroweb educational material and, second, after undertaking a 2-hour training in robotic and laparoscopic dry-lab. Thereafter, all trainees continued to undertake 2-hour training programs until being able to complete the tasks with the avatera® robot at the desired time. Paired t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to analyze time differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Time needed to complete all tasks either robotically or laparoscopically was significantly less in the second compared to the first attempt for all Groups in each Task. In the robotic dry-lab, time needed to complete the tasks was significantly less than in the laparoscopic dry-lab. A significant effect of previous laparoscopic experience of the participants on the training time needed to achieve most of the goal times was detected.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study highlight the role of previous laparoscopic experience in the training time needed to achieve the performance time goals and demonstrate that the learning curve of basic surgical skills using the avatera® system is steeper than the laparoscopic one.

Exploring the Evolution of Robotic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives

Robotic surgery has emerged as a transformative technology in obstetrics and gynecology, offering enhanced precision and minimally invasive techniques for various procedures. This paper explores the evolution of robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology, examining its historical development, current applications, and prospects. Through a comprehensive review of the literature and case studies, we highlight the benefits of robotic surgery, including reduced trauma, improved patient outcomes, and increased surgeon capabilities. However, cost, training requirements, and regulatory concerns hinder widespread adoption. Continuing technological innovation is expected to enhance the efficacy and applicability of robotic-assisted procedures. Collaboration between healthcare professionals, researchers, and industry stakeholders is essential to address these challenges and ensure optimal patient care. By embracing the opportunities presented by robotic surgery while addressing associated challenges, practitioners and researchers can contribute to the continued advancement of this transformative technology in obstetrics and gynecology.

Preventing an 8-mm Port Site Hernia in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: Insights From Two Rare Cases and Future Preventive Measures

Port-site incisional hernia (PIH) is an uncommon complication that can arise subsequent to a laparoscopic procedure, potentially leading to severe adverse effects such as intestinal obstruction. We currently present two cases of incarcerated hernia that occurred at an 8-mm trocar site after robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). While occurrences of an 8-mm port-site incisional hernia are infrequent, it is imperative to note that most PIH cases are due to inadequate fascial closure of the port site. Therefore, surgeons must pay attention to closing the fascia of an 8-mm trocar site following RALS.

Robotic surgery: public perceptions and current misconceptions

Whilst surgeons and robotic companies are key stakeholders involved in the adoption of robotic assisted surgery (RS), the public's role is overlooked. However, given that patients hold ultimate power over their healthcare decisions, public acceptance of RS is crucial. Therefore, this study aims to identify public understanding, opinions, and misconceptions about RS. An online questionnaire distributed between February and May 2021 ascertained the views of UK adults on RS. The themes of questions included familiarity, experience and comfort with RS, opinions on its ethical implications, and the impact of factual information provided to the participant. The data were evaluated using thematic and statistical analysis, including assessing for statistical differences in age, gender, education level, and presence in the medical field. Overall, 216 responses were analysed. Participants were relatively uninformed about RS, with a median knowledge score of 4.00(2.00-6.00) on a 10-point Likert scale. Fears surrounding increased risk, reduced precision and technological failure were identified, alongside misconceptions about its autonomous nature. However, providing factual information in the survey about RS statistically increased participant comfort (p = < 0.0001). Most (61.8%) participants believed robot manufacturers were responsible for malfunctions, but doctors were held accountable more by older, less educated, and non-medical participants. Our findings suggest that there is limited public understanding of RS. The numerous common misconceptions identified present a major barrier to the widespread acceptance of RS, since inaccurate fears about its nature could discourage potential patients from engaging with robotic procedures.

Lost Needle During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Laparoscopic or robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy require needle suturing and manipulation. Although uncommon, if a needle is lost during laparoscopy, locating and removing it is challenging. Here, we report a case of needle loss during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). A 51-year-old patient with localized prostate cancer underwent RARP. After vesicourethral anastomosis using a 3-0 Barbed Suture with two threads connected in the tail, the two threads were held with a needle holder. One needle was lost during removal through a 12 mm trocar. A thorough laparoscopic examination of the abdominal cavity identified a needle attached to the abdominal wall, which was successfully removed. Needle loss is uncommon, but familiarity with handling and preventing such cases helps surgeons address further deterioration. Stepwise and intensive exploration should be performed to confirm the needle location.