Implementation of robotic hernia surgery using the Versius® system

Earlier Experience of Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With the New Hugo™ Robotic System in Europe

Introduction

Minimally invasive robotic surgery has increasingly gained acceptance in abdominal wall surgery. The Hugo™ robotic system, with its modular design, offers enhanced maneuverability and flexibility, making it a promising alternative platform for inguinal hernia treatment. This article aims to present our experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair using the Hugo™ system, focusing on clinical outcomes and the challenges encountered during the learning curve.

Materials and Methods

Since the introduction of the Hugo™ system in our department in January 2023, all patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair with this platform have been prospectively enrolled in this study. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and analysed to assess the outcomes.

Results

A total of 69 inguinal hernia repairs were performed using the Hugo™ system in 40 patients, including 29 bilateral and 11 unilateral inguinal hernias. The median console time was 37 min for unilateral hernia while the total procedure time was 45 min (range 30-70 min). The median console time was 94 min for bilateral hernia while the total procedure time was 121.1 min (range 65-236 min). The median docking time for the robotic system was 9.5 min (range: 4.8-20.1 min). No intraoperative complications were observed and only postoperative hematoma was identified and treated.

Conclusion

Robotic inguinal hernia repair with the Hugo™ system is a safe, reproducible, and effective procedure. For teams with a strong background in robotic surgery, the learning curve with the Hugo™ system is rapid, allowing for efficient adaptation of the system to the existing workflow.

First worldwide surgical procedure of giant inguinoscrotal repair with the new Hugo robotic assisted system: video and docking presentation

Giant inguinoscrotal (GIS) hernias are rarely present in clinical settings and its treatment with a minimally invasive approach is often considered a challenge. In recent years, robotic surgical techniques have gained prominence in the medical field, offering advantages over traditional laparoscopic methods. The Hugo robotic system introduces a fresh paradigm by employing independent robotic arms, enhancing manoeuverability in diverse surgical contexts. The aim of this video is to evaluate the efficacy of robotic TAPP (robotic transabdominal preperitoneal) in order to treat a GIS hernia.

Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon's console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study aimed to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance of the Dexter system in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The primary objectives of this multicenter study conducted at three centers in France, Germany, and Switzerland were to document the successful completion of rTAPP procedures and the occurrence of serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grades III-V), device-related events up to 30 days post-surgery. The procedures were performed by three surgeons with varying levels of experience in robotic systems.

RESULTS

50 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (IQR 51.0-72.0) and BMI of 25.1 kg/cm2 (IQR 23.5-28.7), respectively, underwent inguinal hernia repair (33 unilateral, 17 bilateral). All surgeries were successfully completed using three standard laparoscopy trocars. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. The median skin-to-skin operative time was 50 min (IQR 45-60) for unilateral hernias and 96 min (IQR 84-105) for bilateral hernias. The median console time was 30 min (IQR 26-41) for unilateral and 66 min (IQR 60-77) for bilateral hernias. Twenty-six patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and 22 on postoperative day 1.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the use of the Dexter system in rTAPP was feasible and safe in multicenter cohorts, with operative times consistent with the literature on other robotic platforms. Our data demonstrated the accessibility of this new robotic approach, even when adopted by surgeons new to robotics. The Dexter system emerged as a valuable device in the hernia repair toolkit for both experienced robotic surgeons and those new to the field.

Implementation of the Versius Surgical System in Complex Abdominal Wall Repair: First Reported Case of an Robotic ETEP/TAR Procedure

BACKGROUND

Robotic ventral hernia repair has been increasing globally, with comparable outcomes to laparoscopic repair and lower rates of conversion to open surgery. Robotic surgery is increasing in popularity, and there is a number of new robotic systems entering the marketing. We report the first case of a Roboic eTEP using the Versius robotic system in a patient with an incisional hernia.

METHODS

Surgery was performed using the Versius system from CMR surgical which consists of bedside units for each instrument and a console. The patient presented with an incisional hernia measuring 9.5×5 cm in the left flank.

RESULTS

The patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 2 with a drain. There was no need for opioids. The drain was removed at POD 7. The patient presented at POD 10 with erythema and cellulitis in the area that previously had tape on it, and it was resolved with a short course of oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

The eTEP technique for hernia surgery was safe and feasible using the Versius robotic system. Implementation is possible in experienced hands with minimal changes to the surgical techniques.

Initial experience of a single surgeon for safety and feasibility of the Versius Robotic System in robot-assisted cholecystectomy and hernia repair

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and perioperative outcomes of cholecystectomy and hernia repair performed with the Versius Robotic System by a surgeon with no prior robotic surgery experience. A retrospective analysis was conducted on adult patients who underwent cholecystectomy, inguinal, or umbilical hernia repair using the Versius Robotic System between August 2021 and June 2023 et al. Zahra Hospital, Dubai, UAE. A total of 105 patients (mean age 38.9 ± 9.2 years) were included. Significant correlations existed between the number of robot-assisted cholecystectomies and the operative metrics. As the number increased, the duration of the total operative (r = - 0.755, p < 0.001), docking (r = - 0.683, p < 0.001), and console (r = - 0.711, p < 0.001) times decreased, indicating improved efficiency with experience. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the Versius Robotic System for cholecystectomy and hernia repair, even for surgeons lacking prior robotic surgery experience.

Proposal of set-up standardization for general surgery procedures with the CMR Versius system, a new robotic platform: our initial experience

BACKGROUND

The article describes our initial experience using CMR Versius platform for several procedures in general surgery.

METHODS

Between September 2022 and April 2023, seventy patients underwent robotic surgery in a multi-robotic referral center (San Paolo University Hospital, Milan, Italy). Three surgeons with only laparoscopic experience performed 24 cholecystectomies, 13 inguinal hernia repairs, 9 ventral hernia repairs, 7 right hemicolectomies, 11 left hemicolectomies, 1 sigmoidectomy, 1 ileocecal resection, 1 ventral rectopexy, 1 Nissen fundoplication, 1 total splenectomy, and 1 exploration with multiple biopsies.

RESULTS

All surgeries were full-robotic, with only one conversion to laparoscopy. The short length of stay and low rate of severe morbidity are promising findings. Although operative time was lengthened, clinical outcomes were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates that the adoption of Versius system is safe and feasible in general surgery. The standardization of port placement and BSU set-up can certainly reduce the operative time.

Feasibility of Image Inversion for Ventral Hernia Repair Using the Versius System

Background: The aim of our technical report is to demonstrate the image inversion technique in the new Versius Robotic System. Methods: We report a step-by-step surgical maneuver for robotic surgeons when performing robotic ventral hernia repair (VHR) with the Versius Robotic System. Technical Report: The image inversion artifice consists in rotating 180° with the scope using the surgeon's master control in a specific rotation command in the right-hand joystick. The assisting surgeon can do a manual inversion of the camera without the console being aware that the scope is inverted. In this scenario, the 30° Up configuration should be used while informing the console that the scope is looking down. The surgeon can reassign instruments to each joystick. This results in the right joystick controlling the left instrument and left control controlling the right instrument. Since the image is inverted, the movements will look natural on the surgeon console. Conclusions: The use of the image inversion technique with the Versius Robotic System is effective in aiding surgeons to perform the hernia defect closure during robotic VHRs.

Competency assessment for the Versius surgical robot: a validity investigation study of a virtual reality simulator-based test

BACKGROUND

When introducing new equipment like robotic surgical systems, it is essential to ensure that surgeons have the basic skills before operating on patients. The objective was to investigate the validity evidence for a competency-based test for basic robotic surgical skills using the Versius® trainer.

METHODS

We recruited medical students, residents, and surgeons which were classified based on data on clinical experience with the Versius system as either novices (0 min), intermediates (1-1000 min), or experienced (> 1000 min). All participants completed three rounds of eight basic exercises on the Versius trainer, where the first was used for familiarization and the final two for data analysis. The simulator automatically recorded data. Validity evidence was summarized using Messick's framework, and the contrasting groups' standard-setting method was used to define pass/fail levels.

RESULTS

40 participants completed the three rounds of exercises. The discriminatory abilities of all parameters were tested, and five exercises including relevant parameters were selected to be part of the final test. 26 of 30 parameters could differentiate between novices and experienced surgeons but none of the parameters could discriminate between the intermediate and experienced surgeons. Test-retest reliability analysis using Pearson's r or Spearman's rho showed only 13 of 30 parameters had moderate or higher reliability. Non-compensatory pass/fail levels were defined for each exercise and showed that all novices failed all the exercises and that most experienced surgeons either passed or nearly passed all five exercises.

CONCLUSION

We identified relevant parameters for five exercises that could be used to assess basic robotic skills for the Versius robotic system and defined a credible pass/fail level. This is the first step in developing a proficiency-based training program for the Versius system.

Impact of hands-on practice with HugoRAS and Versius System simulators on the attractiveness of robotic surgery among medical and nurse undergraduate students

The scenario of robotic surgery is rapidly evolving with the introduction of new robotic systems. A structured learning program in robotic surgery during academic education is often lacking, especially for undergraduates; as a result, many students may be unaware of indications to robotic surgery and technological progress. The aim of the study is to evaluate the knowledge and interest toward robotic surgery of medical and nurse students, and to analyze how the attractiveness may change after a hand-on training course with new simulators of Hugo RAS and Versius System. We performed a cross-sectional study involving medical and nurse students recruited on a voluntary basis at ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan; participants were invited to join a hands-on practice simulation with the Hugo RAS and/or Versius Trainer Simulator. Before the hand-on exercise, students were asked to fulfill an online anonymous questionnaire addressing knowledge and interest toward robotic surgery. After a 2-h hands-on exercises at the Hugo RAS and/or at the Versius Trainer simulator (preceded by a brief lecture on robotic surgery and new systems), participants were asked to complete a second-round questionnaire to evaluate changes in attractiveness toward robotic surgery. Data were recorded in a database; after a descriptive analysis of the variables, median values were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test, frequencies with the Fisher's exact test and in the case of paired observations (before and after the simulation), the Mc Nemar test was used. Forty-one undergraduates agreed to participate. Twenty-three nursing students and 18 medical students were recruited. Some of them had a basic knowledge in robotic surgery and were able to figure out some surgical indications, given the presence of a robotic program already settled up at the institution. Before the hands-on course, 44.0% nurse students and 36.6% of medical students were interested in surgical disciplines and robotic surgery. After the simulation, all students (100%) reported a high level of interest in robotic surgery and some of them required for a dedicated internship (p < 0.001). The students provided also feedback on the perceived ease-of-use of the robotic simulators (on a scale 0-10); overall, the median score was 8, IQR [7-8], with no differences between nursing and medical students (p = 0.482). In conclusion, the study demonstrates a great interest toward robotic surgery as a part of medical and nurse education. A hands-on simulation further improved the interest of undergraduates from both backgrounds. The technological progress with the availability of new surgical systems will be the future challenge of training programs and should be considered at all levels of education.

New Robotic Platforms in General Surgery: What's the Current Clinical Scenario?

Background and Objectives: Robotic surgery has been widely adopted in general surgery worldwide but access to this technology is still limited to a few hospitals. With the recent introduction of new robotic platforms, several studies reported the feasibility of different surgical procedures. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the current clinical practice with the new robotic platforms in general surgery. Materials and Methods: A grey literature search was performed on the Internet to identify the available robotic systems. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was conducted for all English articles up to 10 February 2023 searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Clinical outcomes, training process, operating surgeon background, cost-analysis, and specific registries were evaluated. Results: A total of 103 studies were included for qualitative synthesis after the full-text screening. Of the fifteen robotic platforms identified, only seven were adopted in a clinical environment. Out of 4053 patients, 2819 were operated on with a new robotic device. Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery specialty performed the majority of procedures, and the most performed procedure was cholecystectomy. Globally, 109 emergency surgeries were reported. Concerning the training process, only 45 papers reported the background of the operating surgeon, and only 28 papers described the training process on the surgical platform. Only one cost-analysis compared a new robot to the existing reference. Two manufacturers promoted a specific registry to collect clinical outcomes. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the feasibility of most surgical procedures in general surgery using the new robotic platforms. Adoption of these new devices in general surgery is constantly growing with the extension of regulatory approvals. Standardization of the training process and the assessment of skills' transferability is still lacking. Further studies are required to better understand the real clinical and economical benefit.