New concepts of coagulation and bleeding in liver disease

D-dimers in advanced liver cirrhosis: Useful biomarker or not?

In clinical practice, the d-dimer levels rule out venous thromboembolism and diagnose disseminated intravascular coagulation. d-dimers increase in both physiological and pathological conditions. Liver cirrhosis, especially in the final stages, is characterized by complex coagulation and fibrinolysis factor disorders. Multiple mechanisms tried to explain the increased d-dimer levels in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. The d-dimer cut-off level used to rule out venous thromboembolism in cirrhosis is higher than that used to confirm the diagnosis of VTE or DIC in noncirrhotic patients. The cut-off d-dimer level used for the prognosis of thrombotic events is not standardized in advanced liver cirrhosis. Thus, it is necessary to update the clinical guidelines regarding the usefulness of d-dimer testing in advanced liver cirrhosis and the cut-off d-dimer levels, which should vary based on the detection method.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients with Thrombocytopenia or with Platelet Dysfunction: The Last 10 Years

Current guideline recommendations for primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are based on randomized clinical trials that usually exclude subjects at a potentially high risk of bleeding complications. For this reason, no specific guideline is available for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with thrombocytopenia and/or platelet dysfunction. However, except in patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulant drugs, antithrombotic prophylaxis should always be considered, for example, in hospitalized cancer patients with thrombocytopenia, especially in those with multiple VTE risk factors. Low platelet number, platelet dysfunction, and clotting abnormalities are also very common in patients with liver cirrhosis, but these patients have a high incidence of portal venous thrombosis, implying that cirrhotic coagulopathy does not fully protect against thrombosis. These patients may benefit from antithrombotic prophylaxis during hospitalization. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 need prophylaxis, but frequently experience thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy. In patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, a high thrombotic risk is usually present, even in the presence of thrombocytopenia. VTE prophylaxis in high-risk conditions is thus suggested in these patients. At variance with severe thrombocytopenia (< 50,000/mm3), mild/moderate thrombocytopenia (≥ 50,000/mm3) should not interfere with VTE prevention decisions. In patients with severe thrombocytopenia, pharmacological prophylaxis should be considered on an individual basis. Aspirin is not as effective as heparins in lowering the risk of VTE. Studies in patients with ischemic stroke demonstrated that thromboprophylaxis with heparins is safe in these patients also during antiplatelet treatment. The use of direct oral anticoagulants in the prophylaxis of VTE in internal medicine patients has been recently evaluated, but no specific recommendation exists for patients with thrombocytopenia. The need for VTE prophylaxis in patients on chronic treatment with antiplatelet agents should be evaluated after assessing the individual risk of bleeding complications. Finally, the selection of patients who require post-discharge pharmacological prophylaxis remains debated. New molecules currently under development (such as the inhibitors of factor XI) may contribute to improve the risk/benefit ratio of VTE primary prevention in this setting of patients.

The Misunderstood Coagulopathy of Liver Disease: A Review for the Acute Setting

The international normalized ratio (INR) represents a clinical tool to assess the effectiveness of vitamin-K antagonist therapy. However, it is often used in the acute setting to assess the degree of coagulopathy in patients with hepatic cirrhosis or acute liver failure. This often influences therapeutic decisions about invasive procedures or the need for potentially harmful and unnecessary transfusions of blood product. This may not represent a best-practice or evidence-based approach to patient care. The author performed a review of the literature related to the utility of INR in cirrhotic patients using several scientific search engines. Despite the commonly accepted dogma that an elevated INR in a cirrhotic patient corresponds with an increased hemorrhagic risk during the performance of invasive procedures, the literature does not support this belief. Furthermore, the need for blood-product transfusion prior to an invasive intervention is not supported by the literature, as this practice increases the risk of complications associated with a patient's hospital course. Many publications ranging from case studies to meta-analyses refute this evidence and provide examples of thrombotic events despite elevated INR values. Alternative methods, such as thromboelastogram, represent alternate means of assessing in vivo risk of hemorrhage in patients with acute or chronic liver disease in real-time in the acute setting.

Prominent protein Z-induced thrombin inhibition in cirrhosis: a new functional assay for hypercoagulability assessment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Protein Z (PZ) is an anticoagulant that accelerates the inhibitory effect of PZ-dependent protease inhibitor (ZPI) on coagulation factor Xa. We assessed functional status of PZ system in 158 patients with liver cirrhosis and 59 healthy controls.

METHODS

Plasma PZ and ZPI levels were measured by enzyme immunoassay. Thrombin generation assays (TGA) were performed with and without thrombomodulin (TM) or PZ, and the ratios were calculated by dividing TGA values with TM or PZ by values without TM or PZ.

RESULTS

PZ and ZPI levels were reduced and elevated in advanced cirrhosis, respectively. The lag time ratio-PZ was significantly higher in cirrhosis patients than controls and correlated with the model for end-stage liver disease score. The peak thrombin ratio-PZ and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) ratio-PZ were significantly lower in cirrhosis patients than controls and correlated with the severity of liver cirrhosis. The peak thrombin ratio-PZ was dramatically reduced in advanced cirrhosis. Cirrhosis patients had a significantly higher ETP ratio-TM than the controls, although the ratio was not correlated with cirrhosis severity. The lag time ratio-PZ and peak time ratio-PZ were significantly correlated with the levels of all coagulation and anticoagulation factors. Interestingly, the lag time ratio-PZ and peak thrombin ratio-PZ were significantly associated with thrombotic events.

CONCLUSION

The anticoagulant role of PZ is insufficient in advanced stages of cirrhosis. Our newly developed functional assay for measuring the PZ system is expected to reflect the ongoing hypercoagulability of cirrhosis.

Management of thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis: A review

Thrombocytopenia is a common complication in liver disease and can adversely affect the treatment of liver cirrhosis, limiting the ability to administer therapy and delaying planned surgical/diagnostic procedures because of an increased risk of bleeding. Multiple factors, including splenic sequestration, reduced activity of the hematopoietic growth factor thrombopoietin, bone marrow suppression by chronic hepatitis C virus infection and anti-cancer agents, and antiviral treatment with interferon-based therapy, can contribute to the development of thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients. Of these factors, the major mechanisms for thrombocytopenia in liver cirrhosis are (1) platelet sequestration in the spleen; and (2) decreased production of thrombopoietin in the liver. Several treatment options, including platelet transfusion, interventional partial splenic embolization, and surgical splenectomy, are now available for severe thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients. Although thrombopoietin agonists and targeted agents are alternative tools for noninvasively treating thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis, their ability to improve thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients is under investigation in clinical trials. In this review, we propose a treatment approach to thrombocytopenia according to our novel concept of splenic volume, and we describe the current management of thrombocytopenia due to liver cirrhosis.

Higher prognostic value of soluble fibrin complexes than D-dimer and fibrin degradation product for disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with liver cirrhosis

Fibrin-related markers may help differentiate disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from liver cirrhosis-associated dysfunctional coagulation. We investigated the significance of three fibrin-related markers [D-dimer, fibrin degradation product (FDP), and soluble fibrin complexes (sFC)] for the assessment of DIC status and prognosis. We classified 235 patients with suspected DIC into two groups according to their condition: the liver cirrhosis group (n = 47) and the no liver cirrhosis group (n = 188). Prothrombin time (PT), and fibrinogen, sFC, D-dimer, antithrombin, and protein C concentrations were measured and DIC scores were calculated using four parameters: platelet count, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and PT. In the liver cirrhosis group, the sFC concentration increased significantly in accordance with DIC score compared with the no liver cirrhosis group, and this increase was more prominent than D-dimer and FDP concentration increases. For the diagnosis of overt DIC in patients with liver cirrhosis, the area under the concentration curve (AUC) was larger for sFC (0.746) than for D-dimer (0.733) and FDP (0.687). Cox analysis also indicated that an elevated sFC concentration is a more significant prognostic factor of DIC than D-dimer or FDP (hazard ratio: 10.78; P = 0.036) in liver cirrhosis group; however, it was not a prognostic factor in the no liver cirrhosis group. sFC is a powerful diagnostic and prognostic marker of DIC in patient with liver cirrhosis. The use of sFC is expected to enhance the diagnosis and prognosis of DIC, particularly in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Clinical utility of viscoelastic tests of coagulation in patients with liver disease

The prothrombin time (PT) and international normalised ratio (INR) are used in scoring systems (Child-Pugh, MELD, UKELD) in chronic liver disease and as a prognostic tool and for dynamic monitoring of hepatic function in acute liver disease. These tests are known to be poor predictors of bleeding risk in liver disease; however, they continue to influence clinical management decisions. Recent work on coagulation in liver disease, in particular thrombin generation studies, has led to a paradigm shift in our understanding and it is now recognised that haemostasis is relatively well preserved. Whole blood global viscoelastic tests (TEG(®) /ROTEM(®) ) produce a composite dynamic picture of the entire coagulation process and have the potential to provide more clinically relevant information in patients with liver disease. We performed a systematic review of all relevant studies that have used viscoelastic tests (VET) of coagulation in patients with liver disease. Although many studies are observational and small in size, it is clear that VET provide additional information that is in keeping with the new concepts of how coagulation is altered in these patients. This review provides the basis for large scale, prospective outcome studies to establish the clinical value of these tests.

Coagulation in hepatobiliary disease

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of coagulation abnormalities accompanying hepatobiliary disorders and to highlight the need for further studies to characterize these derangements and their treatment options in small animal patients.

DATA SOURCES

Veterinary and human medical literature: original research articles, scientific reviews, consensus statements, and recent texts.

SUMMARY

The liver plays an important role in the production and clearance of many components of coagulation. A wide range of hemostatic derangements can occur in patients with hepatobiliary disease including alterations in platelet number and function, coagulation factor levels, anticoagulants, vascular endothelial function, and fibrinolysis. As these hemostatic alterations include both pro- and anticoagulation pathways, the net result is often a rebalanced hemostatic system that can be easily disrupted by concurrent conditions resulting in either clinical bleeding or thrombosis. Conventional coagulation tests are inadequate at identifying the spectrum of coagulation alterations occurring in patients with hepatobiliary disease, but their evaluation is necessary to assess bleeding risk and provide prognostic information. A paucity of information exists regarding the treatment of the coagulation derangements in small animals with hepatobiliary disease. Extrapolation from human studies provides some information about potential treatment options, but further studies are warranted in this area to elucidate the best management for coagulation abnormalities in dogs and cats with hepatobiliary disease.

CONCLUSION

Hepatobiliary disease can have profound effects on coagulation function leading to hypercoagulable or hypocoagulable states. Overall coagulation status with hepatobiliary disease depends on both the type and severity of disease and the presence of associated complications.