Factors associated with mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department with severe hypernatremia

Evaluation and management of hypernatremia in adults: clinical perspectives

Hypernatremia is an occasionally encountered electrolyte disorder, which may lead to fatal consequences under improper management. Hypernatremia is a disorder of the homeostatic status regarding body water and sodium contents. This imbalance is the basis for the diagnostic approach to hypernatremia. We summarize the eight diagnostic steps of the traditional approach and introduce new biomarkers: exclude pseudohypernatremia, confirm glucose-corrected sodium concentrations, determine the extracellular volume status, measure urine sodium levels, measure urine volume and osmolality, check ongoing urinary electrolyte free water clearance, determine arginine vasopressin/copeptin levels, and assess other electrolyte disorders. Moreover, we suggest six steps to manage hypernatremia by replacing water deficits, ongoing water losses, and insensible water losses: identify underlying causes, distinguish between acute and chronic hypernatremia, determine the amount and rate of water administration, select the type of replacement solution, adjust the treatment schedule, and consider additional therapy for diabetes insipidus. Physicians may apply some of these steps to all patients with hypernatremia, and can also adapt the regimens for specific causes or situations.

Efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent bolus compared with slow continuous infusion in patients with severe hypernatremia (SALSA II trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Methods

Conclusion

Early Plasma Osmolality Levels and Clinical Outcomes in Children Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Objective: Identifying high-risk children with a poor prognosis in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is critical. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of early plasma osmolality levels in determining the clinical outcomes of children in PICUs. Methods: We retrospectively assessed critically ill children in a pediatric intensive care database. The locally weighted-regression scatter-plot smoothing (LOWESS) method was used to explore the approximate relationship between plasma osmolality and in-hospital mortality. Linear spline functions and stepwise expansion models were applied in conjunction with a multivariate logistic regression to further analyze this relationship. A subgroup analysis by age and complications was performed. Results: In total, 5,620 pediatric patients were included in this study. An approximately "U"-shaped relationship between plasma osmolality and mortality was detected using LOWESS. In the logistic regression model using a linear spline function, plasma osmolality ≥ 290 mmol/L was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.020, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.010-1.031], while plasma osmolality <290 mmol/L was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 0.990, 95% CI 0.966-1.014). In the logistic regression model with plasma osmolality as a tri-categorical variable, only high osmolality was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.38-2.64), whereas low osmolality was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.84-1.94). The interactions between plasma osmolality and age or complications were not significant. Conclusion: High osmolality, rather than low osmolality, can predict a poor prognosis in children in PICUs.

Rate of Correction of Hypernatremia and Health Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypernatremia is common in hospitalized, critically ill patients. Although there are no clear guidelines on sodium correction rate for hypernatremia, some studies suggest a reduction rate not to exceed 0.5 mmol/L per hour. However, the data supporting this recommendation and the optimal rate of hypernatremia correction in hospitalized adults are unclear.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We assessed the association of hypernatremia correction rates with neurologic outcomes and mortality in critically ill patients with hypernatremia at admission and those that developed hypernatremia during hospitalization. We used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III and identified patients with hypernatremia (serum sodium level >155 mmol/L) on admission (n=122) and hospital-acquired (n=327). We calculated different ranges of rapid correction rates (>0.5 mmol/L per hour overall and >8, >10, and >12 mmol/L per 24 hours) and utilized logistic regression to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to examine association with outcomes.

RESULTS

We had complete data on 122 patients with severe hypernatremia on admission and 327 patients who developed hospital-acquired hypernatremia. The difference in in-hospital 30-day mortality proportion between rapid (>0.5 mmol/L per hour) and slower (≤0.5 mmol/L per hour) correction rates were not significant either in patients with hypernatremia at admission with rapid versus slow correction (25% versus 28%; P=0.80) or in patients with hospital-acquired hypernatremia with rapid versus slow correction (44% versus 40%; P=0.50). There was no difference in aOR of mortality for rapid versus slow correction in either admission (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.7) or hospital-acquired hypernatremia (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3). Manual chart review of all suspected chronic hypernatremia patients, which included all 122 with hypernatremia at admission, 128 of the 327 hospital-acquired hypernatremia, and an additional 28 patients with ICD-9 codes for cerebral edema, seizures and/or alteration of consciousness, did not reveal a single case of cerebral edema attributable to rapid hyprnatremia correction.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find any evidence that rapid correction of hypernatremia is associated with a higher risk for mortality, seizure, alteration of consciousness, and/or cerebral edema in critically ill adult patients with either admission or hospital-acquired hypernatremia.

Lithium treatment, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and the risk of hypernatraemia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hypernatraemia is a serious condition that can potentially become life threatening. It is known that lithium is associated with polyuria and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, risk factors for hypernatraemia. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that lithium treatment was a risk factor for hypernatraemia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study in the Swedish region of Norrbotten into the effects and potential adverse effects of lithium treatment and other mood stabilizers (LiSIE). For this particular study, we included all patients who had experienced at least one episode with a sodium concentration ⩾150 mmol/L between 1997 and 2013. Medical records were reviewed regarding past or current lithium exposure, diabetes insipidus and other potential risk factors for hypernatraemia.

RESULTS

Of 2463 patients included, 185 (7.5%) had experienced 204 episodes of hypernatraemia within the 17-year review period. In patients 65 years or older, infections dominated as the cause with 51%. In patients younger than 65 years, intoxications, particularly with alcohol, dominated as the cause with 35%. In the whole sample, dehydration accounted for 12% of episodes, 25% of which in the context of suspected or confirmed nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Of all episodes, 25% resulted in death, with infection being the most common cause of death in 62% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sample, infections and harmful use of substances including alcohol were the most common causes of hypernatraemia. Both current and past use of lithium also led to episodes of hypernatraemia, when associated with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Clinicians should remain vigilant, have a low threshold for checking sodium concentrations and consider even risk factors for hypernatraemia beyond lithium.

Could sodium imbalances predispose to postoperative venous thromboembolism? An analysis of the NSQIP database

Background

Hyponatremia is common among patients with pulmonary embolism, while hypernatremia increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to evaluate the association between sodium imbalances and the incidence of VTE and other selected perioperative outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) and identified 1,108,704 patients undergoing major surgery from 2008 to 2012. We evaluated 30-day perioperative outcomes, including mortality and cardiac, respiratory, neurological, urinary, wound, and VTE outcomes. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds of 30-day perioperative outcomes.

Results

Compared with the normal sodium group, in which VTE occurred in 1.0% of patients, 1.8% of patients in the hyponatremia group (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.84) and 2.4% of patients in the hypernatremia group (unadjusted OR 2.49) experienced VTE. Crude mortality was 1.3% in the normal sodium group, 4.9% in the hyponatremia group (unadjusted OR 3.93) and 8.4% in the hypernatremia group (unadjusted OR 7.01). Crude composite morbidity was 7.1% for the normal sodium group, 16.7% for the hyponatremia group (unadjusted OR 2.63) and 20.6% for the hypernatremia group (unadjusted OR 3.43). After adjusting for potential confounders, hyponatremia and hypernatremia remained significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of VTE (adjusted OR 1.43 and 1.56, respectively), mortality (adjusted OR 1.39 and 1.39, respectively) and composite morbidity (adjusted OR 2.15 and 3.34, respectively).

Conclusions

Pre-operative hyponatremia and hypernatremia are potential prognostic markers for perioperative 30-day morbidity, mortality and VTE.

Severity of community acquired hypernatremia is an independent predictor of mortality

Hypernatremia develops commonly in critically ill patients during hospitalization, and is associated with adverse outcomes. However, community acquired hypernatremia (CAH) has been rarely studied. We conducted a study in patients who presented to an urban referral hospital, and were admitted with CAH. We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to an urban tertiary care hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. CAH is defined as more than 147 mEq/L at admission in patients not transferred from other hospitals. Severity of hypernatremia is categorized as mild (148-150 mEq/L), moderate (151-154 mEq/L) or severe (≥155 mEq/L). All data were extracted from electronic medical records and the major outcome is hospital mortality. During the study period, 79,998 patients were admitted to the hospital. Of them, 178 patients (0.2%) had hypernatremia at the time of admission. 121 (68.0%) had mild hypernatremia, 33 (18.5%) had moderate hypernatremia, and 24 (13.5%) had severe hypernatremia at admission. During the hospital stay, 91 (51.1%) developed mild hypernatremia, 31 (17.4%) developed moderate hypernatremia and 56 (31.5%) developed severe hypernatremia. Mean duration of hypernatremia was 2.3 ± 2.0 days. The length of hospital stay was 7 (interquartile range 3-23) days and hospital mortality was 24.3%. Multivariate analysis shows that a peak sodium level that qualified as moderate [OR = 11.50, 95% CI (2.67-49.42)] or severe hypernatremia [OR = 5.18, 95% CI (1.43-18.79)] is an independent risk factor for hospital mortality compared to mild hypernatremia. Admission from the emergency department (ED), oral intake restriction, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and respiratory rate (RR) at admission time are also independently associated with hospital mortality. Maximum sodium level in CAH is independently associated with hospital mortality.