Noninvasive auto-titrating ventilation (AVAPS-AE) versus average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) ventilation in hypercapnic respiratory failure patients

Home Noninvasive Ventilation in COPD

Evidence is increasing that long-term noninvasive ventilation (LTNIV) can improve outcomes in individuals with severe, hypercapnic COPD. Although the evidence remains unclear in some aspects, LTNIV seems to be able to improve patient-related and physiologic outcomes like dyspnea, FEV1 and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco2) and also to reduce rehospitalizations and mortality. Efficacy generally is associated with reduction in Pco2. To achieve this, an adequate interface (mask) is essential, as are appropriate ventilation settings that target the specific respiratory physiologic features of COPD. This will ensure comfort, synchrony, and adherence that will result in physiologic improvements. This article briefly reviews the newest evidence and current guidelines on LTNIV in severe COPD. It describes an actual patient who benefitted from the therapy. Finally, it provides strategies for initiating and optimizing this LTNIV in COPD, discussing high-pressure noninvasive ventilation, optimization of triggering, and control of inspiratory time. As demand increases, clinicians will need to be familiar with this therapy to reap its benefits, because inadequately adjusted LTNIV will not be tolerated or effective.

Use of average volume-assured pressure support as a therapeutic option in patients with central sleep apnea syndrome

PURPOSE

Central sleep apnea (CSA) syndrome commonly occurs with other medical conditions such as congestive heart failure, opiate use, and brainstem disorders. Various treatment modalities have been used with varied effectiveness in an attempt to improve ventilation and reduce the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) in patients with CSA. This study evaluated whether or not a bilevel positive airway pressure mode of noninvasive ventilation, average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) is effective in treating CSA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with CSA who underwent AVAPS titration studies at our institution. We included patients with CSA with apnea-hypopnea index (events/hour) (AHI) ≥ 15, and examined the effectiveness of AVAPS in reducing AHI, improving oxygenation parameters, and improving sleep architecture.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients, with mean age 62.8 ± 11.5 years, body mass index (BMI) 33.5 ± 4.7 kg/m², 8 men, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale 9.3 ± 4.9. Five patients had CSA attributed to opiate use, 4 patients had CSA with Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and 3 patients had primary CSA. The only significant change from baseline PSG was AHI reduction with AVAPS: 63.3 ± 19.1 to 30.5 ± 30.3 (p < 0.003). In 5 patients (42%), AHI was reduced to < 15 with AVAPS use. Improvement in AHI was not related to gender, BMI, opiate use, or age. Defining response to therapy as AHI reduced to < 15, we found that lack of hypertension was the only significant predictor of response (p = 0.045). No significant changes in sleep architecture between the two studies were found.

CONCLUSION

AVAPS is an effective mode of treating CSA in a significant proportion of patients. More studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine what factors are associated with response to therapy.