Acute pericarditis or a systemic disease with pleuropulmonary involvement?

Recurrent pericarditis with normal C-reactive protein: Clinical and laboratory features, biomarkers and outcome in a non-inflammatory phenotype

BACKGROUND

Differences in recurrent pericarditis with normal vs. elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) are unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 448 patients with recurrent or incessant pericarditis. CRP levels <10 mg/L were considered normal. Forty-one patients with normal CRP were tested for interleukin 6 (IL-6), serum amyloid A (SAA) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR).

RESULTS

Among the cohort (median age 43 years, 48.4% females), 336 patients (75%) had elevated CRP, while 112 (25%) had normal levels. CRP-negative patients were younger (38.6 vs. 43.5 years, p=0.007) and predominantly female (67.9% vs. 42.0%, p<0.001). They presented less often with fever (23.2% vs. 74.1%, p<0.001), pleural involvement (7.1% vs. 61.6% p<0.001), and neutrophilic leucocytosis (WBC 6760 vs. 12315/µL, p<0.001). Pericardiocentesis was performed rarely in CRP-negative patients (2.7% vs. 13.4%, p=0.001). Recurrence rates were similar (5.4 vs. 5.5/100 months-patient, p=0.918). Among CRP-negative patients, 53 (47.3%) had an incessant course characterized by persistent symptoms (pain and tachycardia); abnormal instrumental findings included ECG changes (28.6%), mild pericardial effusion (86.6%), and cardiac magnetic resonance evidence of effusion/oedema/late gadolinium enhancement (43.7%). Anakinra was administered to 48 CRP-positive (14.3%) and 10 CRP-negative patients (8.9%), leading to good responses with discontinuation of NSAIDs and corticosteroids in 39/48 (81.2%) and 5/10 (50.0%), respectively. Among the 41 CRP-negative patients tested, IL-6 and suPAR levels were always normal, while SAA was elevated in 17.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pericarditis with normal CRP exhibits distinct clinical and laboratory features, often presenting with an incessant course. Although rarely elevated, SAA may help to identify inflammation beyond CRP.

Acute pericarditis with pleuropulmonary involvement, fever and elevated C-reactive protein: A systemic autoinflammatory disease? A cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This cohort study describes a systemic phenotype of pericarditis, comparing this phenotype with other forms of pericarditis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients in our center were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry from 2019 to 2022. 412 patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis were analyzed. "Systemic inflammatory" subset was defined as the presence of all the following criteria: fever ≥38C°, CRP ≥2 times normal values, pleural effusion detected with any imaging techniques. The absence of any of the 3 criteria was defined as "isolated" subset.

RESULTS

We found that 211 (51.2%) of 412 patients (188 female) presented the systemic subset and the variables significantly associated with this subset in univariate analysis (p<0.001) were: higher mean age: 45.5 (±SD 17.2) vs 39.9 (±SD 16.4) years, higher mean CRP values: 128.8 vs 49.9 mg/L, higher proportion of pericardiocentesis: 19% vs 1.5%, higher mean leukocyte count: 13,143.3 vs 9910.3/mm3, higher mean neutrophils number: 10,402.5 vs 6779.8 /mm3 and lower mean lymphocyte count: 1693.9 vs 2079.3 /mm3. As results the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher in systemic inflammatory phenotype: 6.6 vs 3.4 (p< 0.001). Anti-IL1 therapy was started more frequently in the systemic subgroup (26%) than in the isolated subset (7.5%) (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis neutrophil count and lymphopenia were statistically associated with the systemic subset (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This results demonstrate the relevance of the systemic inflammatory phenotype, characterized by pleural effusions, confirming its analogy with autoinflammatory diseases, thus possibly requiring an eventual escalation of therapy to IL-1 inhibitors.

Causes of Polyserositis: A Systematic Review

At present, polyserositis (PS) remains a challenging entity, which resides both in the fact that there is confusion regarding the terminology, and that it is still understudied. We aimed to identify the etiologies of PS, reported in adult patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature on PubMed(MEDLINE) database, using the following (MESH) terms: pleurisy/etiology, pleural effusion/etiology, pericarditis/etiology, pericardial effusion/etiology, pericardial effusion chronic, ascites/etiology, ascitic fluid/etiology, polyserositis, serositis, and serositides.

RESULTS

A total of 1979 articles were identified, dating from 1973 onwards. After screening the articles, we included 114 patients from 23 articles (one case series including 92 patients and 22 case reports) in the final report. The most common diagnosis was neoplasia (30; 26.3%), followed by autoimmune diseases (19, 16.7%) and infections (16, 12.3%). Still, in 35 cases, the etiology of PS remained unkown.

CONCLUSION

PS is a challenging and understudied entity, which is associated with a wide range of diagnoses. However, prospective studies should be developed in order to have a clear understanding regarding its etiologies and their prevalences.

Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis

The field of inflammatory disease of the heart or "cardio-immunology" is rapidly evolving due to the wider use of non-invasive diagnostic tools able to detect and monitor myocardial inflammation. In acute myocarditis, recent data on the use of immunomodulating therapies have been reported both in the setting of systemic autoimmune disorders and in the setting of isolated forms, especially in patients with specific histology (e.g., eosinophilic myocarditis) or with an arrhythmicburden. A role for immunosuppressive therapies has been also shown in severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition that can be associated with cardiac injury and acute myocarditis. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are assessing the role of high dosage methylprednisolone in the context of acute myocarditis complicated by heart failure or fulminant presentation or the role of anakinra to treat patients with acute myocarditis excluding patients with hemodynamically unstable conditions. In addition, the explosion of immune-mediated therapies in oncology has introduced new pathophysiological entities, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and new basic research models to understand the interaction between the cardiac and immune systems. Here we provide a broad overview of evolving areas in cardio-immunology. We summarize the use of new imaging tools in combination with endomyocardial biopsy and laboratory parameters such as high sensitivity troponin to monitor the response to immunomodulating therapies based on recent evidence and clinical experience. Concerning pericarditis, the normal composition of pericardial fluid has been recently elucidated, allowing to assess the actual presence of inflammation; indeed, normal pericardial fluid is rich in nucleated cells, protein, albumin, LDH, at levels consistent with inflammatory exudates in other biological fluids. Importantly, recent findings showed how innate immunity plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein, with inflammasome and IL-1 overproduction as drivers for systemic inflammatory response. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents such as anakinra and rilonacept have been demonstrated highly effective in patients with recurrent pericarditis associated with an inflammatory phenotype.

Cardiac tamponade and massive pleural effusion in a young COVID-19-positive adult

COVID-19 has a broad spectrum of cardiac manifestations, and cardiac tamponade leading to cardiogenic shock is a rare presentation. A 30-year-old man with a history of COVID-19-positive, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) done 1 week ago and who was home-quarantined, came to the emergency department with palpitations, breathlessness and orthopnoea. His ECG showed sinus tachycardia with low-voltage complexes, chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly and left pleural effusion and two-dimensional echocardiography showed large pericardial effusion with features suggestive of cardiac tamponade. He was taken up for emergency pericardiocentesis which showed haemorrhagic pericardial fluid. Intercostal drainage insertion was done for left-sided large pleural effusion. After ruling out all the other causes for haemorrhagic pericardial effusion, the patient was started on colchicine, steroids, ibuprofen and antibiotics to which he responded. Both pericardial and pleural effusions resolved completely on follow-up.

Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Pericarditis: Definitions and New Treatments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to analyze the pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie acute pericarditis, with attention to autoimmune and autoinflammatory pericarditis, and, in addition, to review the available therapeutic armamentarium.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have been published on the use of anti-IL-1 drugs in recurrent pericarditis, including anakinra and rilonacept. The latest, the RHAPSODY study, based on the use of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis, has recently reached phase 3 with promising results in terms of efficacy and safety. Alterations in the function of the inflammasome and the consequent overproduction of IL-1 play a pivotal role in the genesis of autoinflammatory pericarditis. Recent studies added evidence to the importance of anti-IL-1 drugs in the treatment of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents may be very useful in the subset of patients with recurrent pericarditis and a clear inflammatory phenotype.