Clinical outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with cervical spine fractures or with hip fractures

Protect the neck: Devastating outcomes of cervical spine fractures in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine fractures are associated with high mortality in elderly patients. This study aims to identify patient-related and in-hospital factors contributing to this mortality.

METHODS

A 3-year retrospective study of 235 patients aged 65+ presenting with cervical spine fractures was performed. Age cohorts were 65-74, 75-84, and 85+ years. Mortality was measured at 30, 90, 180 and 365-days post-discharge.

RESULTS

Mortality was 11 ​%, 15 ​%, 19 ​%, and 22 ​% at 30-, 90-, 180- and 365-days respectively. Surgery and fracture pattern was not associated with mortality (p ​= ​0.37; p ​= ​0.28). Charlson Comorbidity Index (p ​< ​0.001; hazard ratio [HR] ​= ​1.3), functional dependency (p ​< ​0.001; HR ​= ​2.5) and delirium (p ​< ​0.001; HR ​= ​8.9) were associated with mortality between 0 and 365 days post-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality in cervical spine fractures is associated with CCI and delirium, but not associated with operative management or fracture pattern. This suggests the need for careful consideration in patient selection for cervical spine procedures and aggressive inpatient delirium management.

A systematic review identifying outcome measures used in evaluating adults sustaining cervical spine fractures

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome measures used in studies investigating cervical spine fractures in adults, with or without associated spinal cord injury, to inform development of a core outcome set.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Scopus were searched for relevant studies until May 28, 2022, without a historic limit on study date. Study characteristics, population characteristics and outcomes reported were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our literature search identified 536 studies that met criteria for inclusion, involving 393,266 patients. Most studies were single center (87.3%), retrospective studies (88.9%) and involved a median of 40 patients (range 6-167,278). Treatments assessed included: surgery (55.2%), conservative (6.2%), halo immobilization (4.9%), or a mixture (33.2%). Median study duration was 84 months (range 3-564 months); the timing of clinical and/or radiological follow-up assessment after injury was reported in 56.7%. There was significant heterogeneity in outcomes used, with 79 different reported outcomes measures. Differences in use were identified between smaller/larger, retro-/prospective and single/multicenter cohorts. Over time, the use of radiological outcomes has declined with greater emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Studies of conservative management were more likely to detail PROMs and mortality, whereas surgical studies reported Frankel/ASIA grade, radiological fusion, complication rates, duration of hospital stay and re-operation rates more frequently. In studies assessing the elderly population (> 65 years), use of PROMs, mortality, hospital stay and discharge destination were more common, whereas fusion was reported less often. Response rates for outcome assessments were lower in studies assessing elderly patients, and studies using PROMs.

CONCLUSIONS

We have classified the various outcome measures used for patients with cervical spine fractures based on the COMET outcome taxonomy. We also described the contexts in which different outcomes are more commonly employed to help guide decision-making when designing future research endeavors.

Chronic wounds in persons living with dementia: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Persons living with dementia (PLWD) are at risk for chronic wounds; however, they are rarely included in research.

OBJECTIVES

To inform practice and research directions, the aim of this integrative review was to identify and synthesise previous knowledge about the characteristics of chronic wounds in PLWD, in terms of chronic wound types, prevalence, setting and interventions.

DESIGN

A literature search was conducted for publications in English using PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL. The minimum information required for inclusion was how many PLWD enrolled in the study had wounds.

METHODS

This integrative review followed the Whittemore and Knafl methodology. Data extraction and synthesis were guided by a directed content analysis, with a coding structure based on an initial review of the literature.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were missing characteristics of PLWD including severity of dementia and race/ethnicity/nationality, and none mentioned skin tone. Most focused on pressure injuries in the nursing home and acute care setting. Few included information on interventions. Only one discussed challenges of wound care for a PLWD exhibiting aggression.

CONCLUSION

There is a gap in the literature regarding PLWD and chronic wounds other than pressure injuries that are common in older adults (e.g. diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers). Research is warranted among those PLWD who live alone and those who receive wound care from family caregivers to understand experiences. Knowledge can inform the development of future novel interventions for wound healing. Future research is needed regarding chronic wounds in those who exhibit behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses that care for chronic wounds in PLWD can contribute their knowledge to include information in guidelines on best care practices and contribute their perspective to research teams for future research.