COVID-19 and asplenia: a Janus-faced issue

Updated Recommendations on the Prevention and Treatment of Infections in Children With Asplenia/Hyposplenism

Children with congenital or acquired asplenia or hyposplenism have an increased risk for severe and even life-threatening infections mainly due to encapsulated bacteria. Current practice focuses on preventing severe infections with timely administration of vaccinations, antibacterial prophylaxis when indicated, and urgent evaluation and treatment of febrile events. As new vaccines are now available for both children and adults with asplenia/hyposplenism, we present an up-to-date recommendation on the prevention and management of acute infections in children with asplenia/hyposplenism.

Impact of COVID-19 on people with non-functioning spleens in Australia

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has had enormous impact on health and social systems, with stringent public health measures enacted across Australia. The virus itself disproportionately affects immunocompromised individuals including people without functioning spleens. We thus sought to characterise the psychological and physical impact of COVID-19 and such measures upon this oft-neglected patient group.

METHODS

Adults ≥ 18 years old identified from the Spleen Australia (SA) database were invited to participate in an online survey in November to December 2021 to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Stata (v17, StataCorps, Texas, USA) was used to conduct descriptive and frequency analyses.

RESULTS

2864 respondents were surveyed. The majority were female (1473/2838, 51.9%), Australian-born (2257/2835, 79.6%), and living in Victoria (1755/2822, 62.2%). The largest age group was 61-70 years-old (841/2858, 29.4%). Trauma was the commonest reason for asplenia (826/2724, 30.3%). Respondents reported the pandemic reduced their ability to visit a GP (753/2864, 26.3%), access food (153/2864, 5.3%), medications (179/2864, 6.3%) or spleen-specific vaccines (120/2864, 4.2%), maintain relationships (503/2864, 17.6%), or care for children (127/2864, 4.4%). 84.8% of participants reported at least one impact of COVID, including negative physical health (1463/2864, 51.1%), mental health (733/2864, 25.6%) and financial repercussions (509/2864, 17.8%). 96.9% (2743/2831) had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found detailed evidence of the negative psychological and physical impacts of the pandemic upon this cohort. We recommend that providers consider people without functioning spleens as requiring extra social and psychological support in circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma in Sweden 2000-2020: Increasing rituximab use and better survival in the elderly

The treatment of splenic marginal zone lymphoma is debated: splenectomy (the old standard-of-care) is better than chemotherapy but maybe not better than rituximab-containing treatment. We examined all 358 patients diagnosed with splenic marginal zone lymphoma in Sweden 2000-2020. The median overall survival was 11.0 years. The median age was 73 years; 61% were women. Age was the only independently prognostic clinical characteristic. Eighty-six patients were started on wait-and-watch, 90 rituximab monotherapy, 47 rituximab-chemotherapy, 88 splenectomy, 37 chemotherapy, and 10 both systemic therapy and splenectomy. Overall survival was inferior in patients treated with chemotherapy, but equal in patients treated with rituximab, rituximab-chemotherapy and splenectomy. Patients treated with both systemic therapy and splenectomy showed good outcome, suggesting that surgery can be safely reserved for nonresponders. After adjustment for age, survival did not differ between patients started on wait-and-watch and those treated with splenectomy or rituximab-containing therapy. Over time, rituximab use and survival increased in patients ≥73 years. This is, to our knowledge, the largest population-based study of splenic marginal zone lymphoma patients treated with upfront rituximab. We conclude that wait-and-watch remains the most reasonable option in asymptomatic splenic marginal zone lymphoma patients. Symptomatic patients should be offered single-agent rituximab in first line.

Asplenia and spleen hypofunction

Asplenia (the congenital or acquired absence of the spleen) and hyposplenism (defective spleen function) are common causes of morbidity and mortality. The spleen is a secondary lymphoid organ that is responsible for the regulation of immune responses and blood filtration. Hence, asplenia or hyposplenism increases susceptibility to severe and invasive infections, especially those sustained by encapsulated bacteria (namely, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type b). Asplenia is predominantly due to splenectomy for either traumatic events or oncohaematological conditions. Hyposplenism can be caused by several conditions, including haematological, infectious, autoimmune and gastrointestinal disorders. Anatomical disruption of the spleen and depletion of immune cells, especially IgM memory B cells, seem to be predominantly responsible for the clinical manifestations. Early recognition of hyposplenism and proper management of asplenia are warranted to prevent overwhelming post-splenectomy infections through vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis. Although recommendations are available, the implementation of vaccination strategies, including more effective and immunogenic vaccines, is needed. Additionally, screening programmes for early detection of hyposplenism in high-risk patients and improvement of patient education are warranted.