Surgical treatment for achalasia: when should it be performed, and for which patients?

Short Versus Long Myotomy Length in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: Comparable Efficacy with Potential Reduction in Incidence of Reflux-A Meta-Analysis of 10 Comparative Studies

Background: Shortening the myotomy length during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia has been hypothesized to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) incidence while maintaining procedural efficacy. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of short POEM (S-POEM) and long POEM (L-POEM). Methods: A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines identified studies directly comparing S-POEM and L-POEM. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials tools. A pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. Results: In perioperative outcomes, S-POEM significantly reduced operative time and required fewer clips compared with L-POEM, with no significant differences in adverse events or length of stay. Regarding GERD-related outcomes, S-POEM demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in abnormal esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour pH-impedance testing, with a number needed to treat of 10. While the reduction in symptomatic GERD did not reach statistical significance (P = .06), the P value was very close to the threshold for significance (.05), and all seven included studies reported decreased symptomatic GERD with S-POEM. This is therefore considered a noteworthy finding. The rates of esophagitis and lower esophageal sphincter pressure did not differ significantly between the groups. Efficacy-related outcomes, including clinical success, Eckardt score, and barium height at 5 minutes, were comparable between S-POEM and L-POEM. However, integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the S-POEM group. Conclusions: This study suggests that shortening the myotomy length may reduce GERD incidence following POEM without compromising its efficacy in achalasia treatment. In addition, a shorter myotomy length decreases operative time, potentially reducing time-related costs and improving workflow.

Achalasia Cardia: A Case Series

ABSTRACT

Achalasia cardia is a rare disorder that impacts the lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal body. Due to its wide range of symptoms, it can be difficult to diagnose. Here we report three cases of Achalasia Cardia during a period of 9 months. The first patient, an 18-year-old male, presented with dysphagia and was evaluated with barium swallow and high-resolution manometry (HRM) revealing Achalasia Cardia. In the second case, a 37-year-old female had a prolonged diagnostic journey due to multiple comorbidities before a barium swallow finally revealed achalasia cardia. The third patient, a 47-year-old female was promptly diagnosed with barium swallow. All the cases were successfully treated with laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with anterior Dor's fundoplication. This case series highlights the potential for delayed diagnosis and the importance of early recognition, tailored diagnostic approaches, and the efficacy of surgical management.

Treatment challenges of sigmoid-shaped esophagus and severe achalasia

Background

Achalasia is a chronic motility disorder which may require surgical interventions to effectively manage patients’ symptoms and improve functional status. In late stage achalasia, patients may present with sigmoid-shaped esophagus which complicates traditional treatment approaches for achalasia as the esophagus is massively dilated and dysfunctional with delicate tissue integrity. Severe Achalasia with sigmoid esophagus imposes significant challenge to surgeons and treating physicians. Various assessment modalities and treatment approaches have been tried. Surgical treatment continues to be controversial. Some have argued that a less aggressive approach similar to that in early Achalasia results in satisfactory outcomes. Others have argued a more aggressive approach of esophagectomy is necessary. We present a review of the challenges encountered in each approach with recommendation for selecting the right treatment for the individual cases.

Conclusions

Different treatment options for sigmoid type achalasia are available with ongoing controversy among the options. Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication can provide satisfactory symptoms improvement and treatment outcomes.

•

Late stage achalasia may present with sigmoid-shaped esophagus.

•

Sigmoid shaped esophagus imposes significant treatment challenges due to dilation and delicate tissue integrity.

•

Surgical treatment continues to be controversial.

•

Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication can provide satisfactory symptoms improvement and treatment outcomes.

Peroral endoscopic shorter versus longer myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a comparative retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) is a novel endoscopic treatment for achalasia. It has gained popularity worldwide among surgeons and endoscopists, but no studies have compared peroral endoscopic short with long myotomy for achalasia. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between peroral endoscopic shorter and longer myotomy.

METHODS

The retrospective study enrolled 129 achalasia patients who underwent POEM from July 2011 to September 2017. Based on the myotomy length (ML), patients were divided into shorter myotomy (SM) group (ML ≤ 7 cm, n = 36) and longer myotomy (LM) group (ML > 7 cm, n = 74). Procedure-related parameters, symptom scores, adverse events and manometric data were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The mean ML was 6.0 ± 0.6 cm in SM group, and 11.5 ± 3.1 cm in LM group (p < 0.001). The mean operation time was significantly less in SM group than LM group (46.6 ± 18.5 min vs 62.1 ± 25.2 min, p = 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 28.7 months, treatment success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) was achieved in 94.4% (34/36) of patients in SM group and 91.9% (68/74) in LM group (p = 0.926). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of intraoperative complications (8.4% vs 8.2%, p = 0.823) and reflux rate (8.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.510) between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Peroral endoscopic shorter myotomy is comparable with longer myotomy for treating achalasia with regard to clinical efficacy and has the advantage of shorter procedure time.

Defining the Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Heller Myotomy

Initial outcomes suggest laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) Heller myotomy with anterior fundoplication provides safe, efficacious, and cosmetically superior outcomes relative to conventional laparoscopy. This study was undertaken to define the learning curve of LESS Heller myotomy with anterior fundoplication. One hundred patients underwent LESS Heller myotomy with anterior fundoplication. Symptom frequency and severity were scored using a Likert scale (0 = never/not bothersome to 10 = always/very bothersome). Symptom resolution, additional trocars, and complications were compared among patient quartiles. Median data are presented. Preoperative frequency/severity scores were: dysphagia = 10/8 and regurgitation = 8/7. Additional trocars were placed in 12 patients (10%), of whom all were in the first two quartiles. Esophagotomy/gastrotomy occurred in three patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 per cent. No conversions to “open” operations occurred. Length of stay was 1 day. Postoperative frequency/severity scores were: dysphagia = 2/0 and regurgitation = 0/0; scores were less than before myotomy ( P < 0.001). There were no apparent scars, except where additional trocars were placed. LESS Heller myotomy with anterior fundoplication well palliates symptoms of achalasia with no apparent scar. Placement of additional trocars only occurred early in the experience. For surgeons proficient with the conventional laparoscopic approach, the learning curve of LESS Heller myotomy with anterior fundoplication is short and safe, because proficiency is quickly attained.

A Decade of Investigation: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia

Background: Although laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication has long been considered the gold standard for treatment of patients with achalasia, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged in the last decade as a viable alternative. Methods: A collective review of literature concerning investigations that have reported patient outcomes and treatment success of LHM and POEM for all achalasia subtypes. Results: While POEM has shown excellent short-term safety and efficacy in the relief of symptoms, the long-term symptomatic outcomes after the intervention are yet to be concluded. Further evaluation of patients' interpretations and answers on subjective questionnaires is warranted before determining treatment success for POEM. Use of more reliable and disease-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaires are better justified when comparing a new endoscopic procedure to an established gold standard. The need for objective parameters to measure reflux, longer follow-up studies, and randomized trials comparing POEM to LHM is particularly important when assessing the outcome of this new technique. High incidence of post-POEM pathologic reflux and indication for daily proton pump inhibitor use is of concern, and the lack of more long-term, objective evidence leaves the clinical value of the procedure in a state of uncertainty. Conclusions: The LHM combined with partial fundoplication is still considered to be the gold standard treatment modality for achalasia, but as the POEM procedure rapidly becomes common practice, this treatment may be performed in the majority of achalasia cases. Given the number of flaws overlooked in seminal investigations, careful consideration should be given to the patients being selected for this therapy.

Pre-treatment Eckardt score is a simple factor for predicting one-year peroral endoscopic myotomy failure in patients with achalasia

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel treatment for achalasia with excellent outcomes. But the predictor for treatment failure is not well defined. This study was aimed to prospectively investigate the factors for predicting failed POEM.

METHODS

From June 2011 to May 2015, a total of 115 achalasia patients treated by POEM were included for the retrospective cohort study from Nanfang Hospital and the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province. Patients were followed up with Eckardt score, high-resolution manometry and endoscope. POEM failure was defined as primary failure (Eckardt score failed to decrease to 3 or below) and recurrences (decrease of Eckardt score to 3 or below, then rise to more than 3) during one-year follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the predictive factor. For the associated factor, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized to determine the cutoff value of the predicting factor.

RESULTS

The failure rate of POEM after 1 year was 7.0% (8/115), including 5 primary failure cases and 3 recurrences. Multivariate analysis showed higher pre-treatment Eckardt score was the single independent factor associated with POEM failure [9.5 (6-12) vs. 7 (2-12), odds ratio (OR) 2.24, 95 confidence interval (95% CI) 1.39-3.93, p = 0.001]. The cutoff value (Eckardt score ≥9) had 87.5 sensitivity (95% CI 47.3-99.7%) and 73.8% specificity (95% CI 64.4-81.9%) for predicting failed POEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment Eckardt score could be a predictive factor for failed POEM. Eckardt score ≥9 was associated with high sensitivity and specificity for predicting POEM failure.

Dissatisfaction after laparoscopic Heller myotomy: The truth is easy to swallow

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic Heller myotomy has been shown to well palliate symptoms of achalasia, we have observed a small subset of patients who are "Dissatisfied". This study was undertaken to identify the causes of their dissatisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy from 1992 to 2015 were prospectively followed. Using a Likert scale, patients rated their symptom frequency/severity before and after the procedure. Patients graded their experience from "Very Satisfying" to "Very Unsatisfying."

RESULTS

647 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Fifty (8%) patients, median age 57 years and BMI 24 kg/m² reported dissatisfaction at follow-up subsequent to myotomy. "Dissatisfied" patients were more likely to have undergone prior abdominal operations (p = 0.01) or previous myotomies (p = 0.02). "Dissatisfied" patients had a greater incidence of diverticulectomy (p = 0.03) and had longer postoperative LOS (p = 0.01). Symptom frequency/severity persisted after myotomy for dissatisfied patients (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dissatisfaction after laparoscopic Heller myotomy is directly related to persistent/recurrent symptoms. Previous abdominal operations/myotomies, diverticulectomies, and longer LOS are predictors of dissatisfaction. With this understanding, we can identify patients who might be more prone to dissatisfaction.

Feasibility and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia after failed endoscopic interventions

With advances in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become a novel treatment for esophageal achalasia. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and safety of POEM in patients with achalasia after failed endoscopic interventions. Data on all patients undergoing POEM treatment of achalasia were collected prospectively. We enrolled 61 patients who underwent POEM for achalasia between July 2011 and January 2014. The preoperative intervention group included patients who had undergone botulinum toxin injection or pneumatic balloon dilation before POEM. The preoperative, operative, and short-term outcome data between the groups were compared. Among preoperative intervention group, 22 patients received endoscopic therapy before being referred for operation (18 dilation only, 2 botulinum toxin only, and 2 both treatments). Procedure time in the preoperative intervention group was similar to the nonpreoperative intervention group (60.8 ± 30.9 vs. 62.0 ± 21.0 minutes, P = 0.863). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in Eckardt scores and manometric outcomes at 1-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in pretreatment and posttreatment D-values of symptom scores and lower esophageal sphincter pressures between groups (6.2 ± 2.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.840; 27.9 ± 17.6 vs. 24.9 ± 15.2; P = 0.569). There was also no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative complications (P = 0.958) and gastroesophageal reflux rate (23.5% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.771) between the two groups. Our study demonstrated that POEM is safe and effective, even for treating achalasia in the setting of failed endoscopic interventions.

Limited Hiatal Dissection Without Fundoplication Results in Comparable Symptomatic Outcomes to Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy with Anterior Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Previous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that partial fundoplication following Heller myotomy results in less pathologic acid exposure to the esophagus when compared to myotomy without fundoplication. Recent studies have questioned the necessity of a fundoplication, especially when a limited hiatal dissection (LHD) is performed and the angle of His is preserved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of prospectively maintained data. All patients underwent primary Heller myotomy for achalasia over a 30-month period. In select patients, an LHD was performed anteriorly. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed up to 2 years postoperation using the Achalasia Severity Questionnaire (ASQ), Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL).

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients underwent Heller myotomy during the study interval. The majority of patients underwent Heller myotomy with full hiatal dissection (FHD) (21, 68%). Intraoperative mucosal perforations occurred in 3 (14%) patients undergoing FHD. Patient demographics, surgery details, and baseline symptomatic outcomes did not differ significantly preoperatively. At greater than 1 year postoperation, there was no significant difference between the groups for ASQ, GERD-HRQL, and GIGLI (P = .76, .78, and .33, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Heller myotomy with LHD and no fundoplication and Heller myotomy with FHD and partial fundoplication result in similar GERD-related quality of life outcomes. Further studies (including pH studies) are necessary to determine if fundoplication is a necessary step in selected patients in whom an LHD is possible.

Comparison of conventional versus Hybrid knife peroral endoscopic myotomy methods for esophageal achalasia: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been developed to treat achalasia as a novel less invasive modality. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional knife versus Hybrid knife (HK) during POEM procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2012 and July 2014, 31 patients underwent POEM using HK in our department (HK group), and 36 patients underwent POEM using conventional method (injection needle and triangular tip [TT] knife, TT group). Procedure-related parameters, symptom relief, adverse events were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the age, sex and other baseline characteristics between the two groups. The mean procedural time was significantly shorter in HK group than TT group (53.0 ± 17.2 vs. 67.6 ± 28.4 min, p = 0.015). The mean frequency of devices exchange was 4.7 ± 1.7 in HK group and 10.9 ± 1.8 in TT group (p = 0.000). No serious adverse events occurred postoperatively in both groups. At one-year follow-up, a total of 94% treatment success was achieved in all patients (93.5% in HK group and 94.4% in TT group, p = 0.877).

CONCLUSION

HK in POEM can shorten the procedural time, and achieve similar treatment success compared to conventional TT knife.

Electrical stimulation to increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure after POEM

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative reflux remains to be a challenge for patients with achalasia undergoing Heller myotomy. Similarly, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is gaining rapid acceptance but the impossibility of adding a fundoplication is questioned as the main pitfall to control reflux. Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has emerged as a new alternative for the treatment of reflux disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of combining electrical stimulation with endoscopic esophageal myotomy to prevent post procedural reflux.

METHODS

Five pigs were subjected to POEM. After myotomy was completed, two electrical leads were implanted at the LES level and electrical stimulation was applied with the Endostim system with a regimen of 215 μs (5 mA amplitude), at 20 Hz for 25 min. LES pressures were recorded with manometry at pre and post-myotomy and after LES stimulation.

RESULTS

Myotomy was completed successfully in all cases. Mean pre-myotomy LES pressure was 35.99 ± 8.08 mmHg. After myotomy, the LES pressure significantly dropped to 10.60 ± 3.24 mmHg (p = 0.03). Subsequent to LES-EST, LES pressure significantly increased to 21.74 ± 4.65 mmHg (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study show that LES-EST in healthy animals increases LES pressure after POEM procedure, and could be useful tool to minimize gastroesophageal reflux.

Cervical oesophagostomy in patients with severe dysphagia following radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate the validity and feasibility of cervical oesophagostomy as a treatment for patients with severe dysphagia after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Methods:

The study retrospectively analysed the clinical data, symptoms, physical signs, treatment and outcomes of 12 patients treated with cervical oesophagostomy for severe dysphagia after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, from 2006 to 2010.

Results:

In all 12 cases, the oesophageal stoma remained stable, without any complications such as pharyngeal fistula or inflammation. No oesophageal stricture or granuloma growth was observed. All patients reported significant improvement in their nutritional status and quality of life after the oesophagostomy surgery.

Conclusion:

Cervical oesophagostomy is a valid and feasible method of treating severe dysphagia following radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oesophagostomy shows specific advantages over nasogastric tubing, gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Patients' nutrition and quality of life can be improved significantly if cervical oesophagostomy is executed in a timely fashion, especially in cases with severe trismus and multiple radiation-induced cranial nerve palsies unresponsive to rehabilitation.

Endoscopic myotomy for achalasia

POEM is an effective treatment of functional manometric esophageal outflow obstructive disorders with excellent relief of dysphagia. Reflux rates seem to be similar to that seen with traditional Heller myotomy with fundoplication. The POEM technique provides a true surgical esophageal myotomy without incisional pain. As such, POEM represents the first truly practical application of natural orifice surgery.

Is Dor fundoplication optimum after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia? A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the outcome of acid reflux prevention by Dor fundoplication after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia.

METHODS: Electronic database PubMed, Ovid (Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, EmBase and Ovid MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library were searched between January 1995 and September 2012. Bibliographic citation management software (EndNote X3) was used for extracted literature management. Quality assessment of random controlled studies (RCTs) and non-RCTs was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 and a modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (Version 5.1), and sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially omitting each study.

RESULTS: Finally, 6 studies, including a total of 523 achalasia patients, compared Dor fundoplication with other types of fundoplication after LHM (Dor-other group), and 8 studies, including a total of 528 achalasia patients, compared Dor fundoplication with no fundoplication after LHM (Dor-no group). Dor fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate of clinical regurgitation and pathological acid reflux compared with the other fundoplication group (OR = 7.16, 95%CI: 1.25-40.93, P = 0.03, and OR = 3.79, 95%CI: 1.23-11.72, P = 0.02, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences between Dor fundoplication and no fundoplication in all subjects. Other outcomes, including complications, dysphagia, postoperative physiologic testing, and operation-related data displayed no significant differences in the two comparison groups.

CONCLUSION: Dor fundoplication is not the optimum procedure after LHM for achalasia. We suggest more attention should be paid on quality of life among different fundoplications.

Recent trends in the management of achalasia

Radical treatment for achalasia is currently unavailable. At present, most palliative procedures are designed improve the passage of food through the gastroesophageal junction and thereby alleviate symptoms. Drug therapy is of limited, transient effectiveness. Pneumatic dilation (PD) is considered superior to endoscopic botulinum toxin injection (EBTI). The mainstay of surgical treatment for achalasia is laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with fundoplication, currently considered superior to PD. Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a "state-of-the-art" procedure for minimally invasive surgery, holds great promise for the future management of achalasia. Definitive conclusions regarding the benefits and risks of currently available treatments for achalasia must await the accumulation of evidence from well-designed clinical trials.

Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been developed in the context of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for symptomatic esophageal achalasia, which is a chronic progressive benign disease with severe morbidity and difficult management. Since September 2008, POEM has been successfully performed in more than 200 consecutive patients with symptomatic achalasia at the Digestive Disease Center of Showa University, Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, with excellent short- and long-term results and absence of serious complications. International experience of POEM within clinical studies is also promising. According to these results, POEM is considered as a safe procedure that can be applied to all achalasia patients. However, the low incidence of achalasia (0.3%-1% per 100,000 population), in combination with the potential serious complications related to the technically demanding POEM procedure, has made training difficult. There is therefore an urgent need for an animal model for training to decrease the learning curve. Further, there are other ethical and training issues to address. The pig is the most appropriate animal model for training in POEM due to its anatomy being similar to that of humans. The porcine esophagus has the advantage of easy mobilization due to absence of tight junctions to surrounding organs. A non-survival porcine model would be a simple, inexpensive, and reproducible animal model for training in POEM, without the need for concern about complications. A possible training process might first involve observation of POEM performed by specialists, then training on non-survival and survival porcine models, followed by training in humans under specialist guidance and finally, performance of POEM in humans.

Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been developed in the context of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) as a minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for symptomatic esophageal achalasia, which is a chronic progressive benign disease with severe morbidity and difficult management. Since September 2008, POEM has been successfully performed in more than 200 consecutive patients with symptomatic achalasia at the Digestive Disease Center of Showa University, Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, with excellent short- and long-term results and absence of serious complications. International experience of POEM within clinical studies is also promising. According to these results, POEM is considered as a safe procedure that can be applied to all achalasia patients. However, the low incidence of achalasia (0.3%-1% per 100,000 population), in combination with the potential serious complications related to the technically demanding POEM procedure, has made training difficult. There is therefore an urgent need for an animal model for training to decrease the learning curve. Further, there are other ethical and training issues to address. The pig is the most appropriate animal model for training in POEM due to its anatomy being similar to that of humans. The porcine esophagus has the advantage of easy mobilization due to absence of tight junctions to surrounding organs. A non-survival porcine model would be a simple, inexpensive, and reproducible animal model for training in POEM, without the need for concern about complications. A possible training process might first involve observation of POEM performed by specialists, then training on non-survival and survival porcine models, followed by training in humans under specialist guidance and finally, performance of POEM in humans.