Influence of intersegmental plane size and segment division methods on preserved lung volume and function after pulmonary segmentectomy

Staplers versus energy devices for the intersegmental plane separation in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

In segmentectomy, in addition to the anatomy of the segmental hilum, the identification and separation of the intersegmental plane is also an important step of the operation. Because of its simplicity and high efficiency, most thoracic surgeons choose the staplers. But the energy devices also have its unique advantages in the separation of the intersegmental plane. This study compared the clinical efficacy of staplers and energy devices in the separation of the intersegmental planes during the uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomy through the clinical data.

METHODS

Clinical data of 89 patients undergoing uniport VATS lung segmentectomy from January 2019 to October 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different treatment methods of intersegmental plane, the patients were divided into two groups, 55 in the stapler group and 34 in the energy device group. The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed statistically. And the univariate and multivariate logistic regression were also used to explore the influencing factors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Lung segmentectomy was successfully operated in both groups. There were statistically significant differences in operative duration, number of staplers used, surgical expenses and postoperative complications (P < 0.05). In terms of general data, including tumor location, operative hemorrhage, drainage volume on the first postoperative day, total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative chest tube retention duration, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative blood routine indexes, and postoperative pulmonary function indexes after 3 months, no significant differences were observed (P > 0.05). Smoking history (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.05-24.56, P = 0.043) and intersegmental plane treatment (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.11-9.14, P = 0.031) were risk factors for postoperative complications. Patients of the energy device group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In uniport thoracoscopic segmentectomy, the use of energy devices to treat the intersegmental plane will result in longer operative duration and higher postoperative complication rate, but it does not affect postoperative recovery and can help reduce surgical expenses. Both methods are safe and reliable. Clinically, the two methods can be reasonably selected according to the specific situation.

Advances and safe use of energy devices in lung cancer surgery

Objectives

A clear understanding of energy devices would help achieve high effectiveness and safety and guide the selection of devices. The present review aimed to elucidate the efficacy and adverse events of energy devices in lung cancer to guide the selection of appropriate devices depending on the situation.

Methods

Four major databases were searched electronically for relevant articles published until 16 April 2021. The reference lists of the identified papers were examined. We excluded (1) irrelevant studies, (2) manuscripts published in languages other than English and Japanese, (3) duplicates, and (4) studies for which the full text was not available in the databases. The results and key information obtained were summarized by means of a narrative approach.

Results

A total of 78 papers were included in the review and these were categorized according to the main topic of investigation as follows: (1) electrosurgery-related injuries, (2) fundamentals of electrosurgery, (3) monopolar devices, (4) bipolar electrosurgical devices, (5) ultrasonic energy devices, (6) energy devices in lung cancer surgery, (7) operating room fire risks, and (8) basic principles of surgery.

Conclusions

Understanding energy devices could help us use them in a more effective and safer manner. Knowledge of their selection criteria (suitability), merits, risks, and safety precautions relevant to each process of lung cancer surgery could guide appropriate selection.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11748-022-01775-w.

Comparison of stapler and electrocautery for division of the intersegmental plane in lung segmentectomy

Background

We retrospectively compared the use of a stapler and electrocautery for division of the intersegmental plane during pulmonary segmentectomy.

Methods

We enrolled 156 patients who underwent pulmonary segmentectomy in our department between March 2006 and August 2020. The patients were divided into electrocautery (n=62) and stapler (n=94) groups based on the device used to divide the intersegmental plane. Patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and ratios of actual (calculated using software) to predicted (calculated by counting the resected segments) lung volumes were compared between the two groups. Additionally, we used multivariate analysis to identify the factors that contributed to the incidence of postoperative air leakage after cut-off value was set by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Moreover, a subset analysis was performed based on the type of segmentectomy (common or uncommon). Common segmentectomies included resection of the basilar or superior segment of the lower lobe, or lingular or upper division of the left upper lobe; all other segmentectomies were classified as uncommon.

Results

Compared to the electrocautery group, the stapler group had shorter operative times (P=0.0027), duration of postoperative drainage (P=0.00037), and duration of postoperative hospitalization (P=0.0021). Moreover, incidence of postoperative ≥3 days drainage was significantly reduced in the stapler group (P=0.003). There were no significant differences between the stapler and electrocautery groups in the actual:predicted lung volumes at 6 months (1.01 and 1.04, respectively; P=0.28) or 12 months (1.06 and 1.07, respectively; P=0.68) after surgery. Preoperative lung volume was significantly correlated with preoperative vital capacity (VC) (γ=0.69; P<0.001) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) (γ=0.48; P<0.001). The multivariate analysis indicated that the use of stapler for division of intersegmental plane was the only factor that contributed to reducing the incidence of postoperative ≥3 days drainage (P=0.0027, odds ratio: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.086–0.597). In a subset analysis of uncommon segmentectomy, there were no significant differences among the groups in most perioperative results.

Conclusions

Compared to electrocautery, the use of a stapler for division of the intersegmental plane was associated with better perioperative outcomes, especially reduction of postoperative drainage time, and similar postoperative remnant lung volumes and function.

Efficacy of the Segment-Counting Method in Predicting Lung Function and Volume Following Stapler-Based Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of a segment-counting method in predicting lung function and volume after stapler-based thoracoscopic segmentectomy in comparison with lobectomy.

Methods: Between 2014 and 2018, patients who underwent these procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Thoracic computed tomography and spirometry data before and 1 year after the surgery were assessed. We evaluated the differences between the predicted values using a segment-counting method and the actual postoperative values for lung function and volume in each group. Sub-analyses were also performed to assess the impact of the number of staples and resected segments in predicting patient outcomes.

Results: We included 116 patients (segmentectomy, 69; lobectomy, 47). Actual postoperative lung function and volume values matched the predicted values in the stapler-based segmentectomy group, and significantly exceeded the predictions in the lobectomy group (P <0.01). Sub-analyses revealed lower postoperative lung function values than predicted existed after single segmentectomy, with an odds ratio of 3.29 (95% confidence interval: 1.02–10.70, P = 0.04) in a multivariable analysis. The degree of predicted error regarding lung function was negligible.

Conclusions: The segment-counting method was useful in predicting lung function after stapler-based thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Segmentectomy rarely yielded lower- than-predicted lung function and volume values.

Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Electrocautery and staplers are regarded as the two most common surgical instruments for dissecting the intersegmental plane in segmentectomy. We performed a meta-analysis to compare electrocautery and staplers in terms of their safety and effects.

Methods: A systematic search strategy was performed using PubMed, and the retrieval time was up to April 1, 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CI were applied to determine the effectiveness of dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively.

Results: Six studies including 385 patients were included. The electrocautery had a higher incidence rate of postoperative complication [OR= 1.92, 95% CI (1.12, 3.28), P = 0.02)] and air leak [OR: 3.91, 95% CI (1.64, 9.35), P = 0.002)]. No significant difference was found in the comparison of surgery time, blood loss, and duration of tube days or hospitality days.

Conclusions: Our study indicated that patients under segmentectomy were associated with better safety by using stapler than electrocautery in the reduction of postoperative complications.

Determination of initial airtightness after anatomical laser segmentectomy in an ex vivo model

If a pulmonary pathology can be removed by anatomical segmentectomy, the need for lobectomy is obviated. The procedure is considered oncologically equivalent and saves healthy lung tissue. In every segmentectomy, lung parenchyma must be transected in the intersegmental plane. Using an ex vivo model based on porcine lung, three transection techniques (monopolar cutter + suture, stapler, and Nd:YAG laser) are to be compared with respect to their initial airtightness. At an inspiratory ventilation pressure of 25 mbar, all three preparations were airtight. Upon further increase in ventilation pressure up to 40 mbar, the laser group performed best in terms of airtightness. Since thanks to its use of a laser fibre, this technique is particularly suitable for minimally invasive surgery; it should be further evaluated clinically for this indication in the future.