Urgent lung transplantation in acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia: a sliding door or a new perspective?

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed severe difficulties in managing critically ill patients in hospital care settings. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has been proven to be lifesaving support during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The purpose of this review was to describe the rehabilitative treatments provided to patients undergoing ECMO support during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Scopus for English-language studies published from the databases' inception until June 30, 2021. We excluded editorials, letters to the editor, and studies that did not describe rehabilitative procedures during ECMO support. We also excluded those articles not written in English.

RESULTS

A total of 50 articles were identified. We ultimately included nine studies, seven of which were case reports. Only two studies had more than one patient; an observational design analyzing the clinical course of 19 patients and a case series of three patients. Extracorporeal support duration varied from 9 to 49 days, and the primary indication was acute respiratory distress syndrome COVID-19-related. Rehabilitative treatment mainly consisted of in-bed mobilization, postural transfers (including sitting), and respiratory exercises. After hospital discharge, patients were referred to rehabilitation facilities. Physiotherapeutic interventions provided during ECMO support and after its discontinuation were feasible and safe.

CONCLUSION

The physiotherapeutic treatment of patients undergoing ECMO support includes several components and must be provided in a multidisciplinary context. The optimal approach depends on the patient's status, including sedation, level of consciousness, ECMO configuration, types of cannulas, and cannulation site.

Acute fibrinous and organizing pfneumonia: two case reports and literature review

Background

Acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia (AFOP) is a rare histologic interstitial pneumonia pattern characterized by the intra-alveolar fibrin deposition and organizing pneumonia. Its clinical characteristics are still not well known and there is no consensus on treatment yet.

Case presentation

We report two female cases in their fifties diagnosed with AFOP confirmed by a second lung biopsy. Case 1 was idiopathic AFOP with manifestation of 6-week fever, dyspnea, and cough, while case 2 was secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus and fever was the major symptom. Their chest CT scans revealed bilateral multiple consolidations, predominantly in the lower lobes. Both cases were initially diagnosed with pneumonia, but did not improve after treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. In both cases, transbronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid examination were inconclusive and the pathological diagnosis was confirmed by percutaneous lung biopsy. Both patients had a good clinical response to prednisone.

Conclusions

We report two rare AFOP cases to highlight the importance of awareness of this disease. We further perform the most comprehensive review to date in AFOP, including 150 patients since 2002. Consolidation was the most common imaging pattern, followed by ground-glass opacity and nodules. A lung biopsy is required for a definitive diagnosis. Corticosteroids is recommended as the most effective therapy, but treatment options should depend on the etiology and disease severity.

Diagnostic procedures and clinico-radiological findings of acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia: a systematic review and pooled analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinico-radiological findings of acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia (AFOP) in the literature according to whether a surgical or non-surgical biopsy was performed, as well as to identify prognostic predictors.

METHODS

We searched the Embase and OVID-MEDLINE databases to identify studies that presented CT findings of AFOP and had extractable individual patient data. We compared the clinical and CT findings of the patients depending on whether a surgical or non-surgical biopsy was performed and identified survival predictors using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (surgical biopsy, n = 52; non-surgical biopsy, n = 29) from 63 studies were included. The surgical biopsy group frequently experienced an acute fulminant presentation (p = .011) and dyspnea (p = .001) and less frequently had a fever (p = .006) than the non-surgical biopsy group. The surgical biopsy group had a worse prognosis than the non-surgical biopsy group in terms of mechanical ventilation and mortality (both, p = .023). For survival analysis, the patients with the predominant CT finding of patchy or mass-like air-space consolidation survived more frequently (p < .001) than those with other CT findings. For prognostic predictors, subacute indolent presentation (p = .001) and patchy or mass-like air-space consolidation on CT images (p = .002) were independently associated with good survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of alleged AFOP cases in the literature were diagnosed via non-surgical biopsy, but those cases had different symptomatic presentations and prognosis from surgically proven AFOP. Subacute indolent presentation and patchy or mass-like air-space consolidation at the presentation on CT images indicated a good prognosis in patients with AFOP.

KEY POINTS

• Acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia (AFOP) cases diagnosed via non-surgical biopsy had different symptomatic presentations and prognosis from surgically proven AFOP. • Subacute indolent presentation and patchy or mass-like air-space consolidation on CT images indicated a good prognosis in patients with acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia.