Psychotropic drug dispensing in people with and without cancer in France

Psychoactive drug use and prognosis in patients with cancer presenting with acute cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

The psychoactive drug consumption and the short- and long-term cardiovascular prognosis of patients with cancer admitted for acute cardiovascular events are not well established.

AIMS

To assess the prevalence of psychoactive drug use, in-hospital outcomes and 1-year prognosis in patients with cancer hospitalized for acute cardiovascular events.

METHODS

In a prospective multicentre study of all consecutive patients admitted to intensive cardiac care units, a history of cancer was recorded systematically. The primary outcome was the prevalence of psychoactive drugs detected by urine drug assay. The secondary outcomes were: the rate of in-hospital major adverse events, defined as all-cause death, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest; and the 1-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke.

RESULTS

Among 1499 patients recruited, 151 had a history of cancer (10%), including 61 (40%) with active cancer and 90 (60%) with cancer in remission. Among patients with a history of cancer, 39 (25.8%) tested positive for at least one psychoactive drug. Using a matching approach based on the likelihood of having a cancer, a history of cancer was not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital major adverse events (odds ratio: 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.68-3.45; P=0.3). However, a history of cancer was associated with a higher incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio: 3.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.63-5.67; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of psychoactive drug use among patients with a history of cancer hospitalized for acute cardiovascular events was 25.8%. A history of cancer was an independent predictor of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Patterns and factors associated with the prescription of psychotropic medications after diagnosis of cancer in Chinese patients: A population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Patients with cancer may be prescribed psychotropic medications to address their psychiatric symptoms and disorders. This study examined the patterns and factors associated with the prescription of psychotropics after cancer diagnosis using a population-based database in Hong Kong.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with malignant cancer and had no documented psychiatric diagnosis or psychotropic medications prior to cancer diagnosis, were included. Multivariable log-binomial models were used to explore the associations between predictive factors and psychotropic medications use.

RESULTS

Among 9337 patients, 1868 patients (20.0%) were newly prescribed with psychotropic medications after cancer diagnoses, most commonly hypnotics (50.3%) and antidepressants (32.8%). About one-third (31.4%) were prescribed chronic psychotropics (≥90 days). Approximately 48.3% of patients who were prescribed psychotropic medications received their prescriptions within 1 year after diagnosed with cancer. Only 18.6% of those prescribed psychotropic medications had a registered psychiatric diagnosis. Patients with multiple comorbidities (adjusted risk ratio[aRR] = 2.74; CI = 2.46-3.05) and diagnosed with oral (aRR = 1.89; CI = 1.52-2.35) or respiratory cancers (aRR = 1.62; CI = 1.36-1.93) were more likely to be prescribed psychotropics.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of psychotropic medication is common (20%) among patients with cancer. Our findings highlight the importance of identification and documentation of psychiatric needs among patients with cancer.

Adverse childhood experiences and psychotropic medication prescription among cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at identifying and characterizing adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in a sample of cancer patients and subsequently evaluating the relationship between ACEs and prescription of psychotropic medication among them. Individuals with ACEs have a higher risk of mental health conditions and are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications.

METHODS

A sample of 178 adult patients receiving Supportive Oncology & Survivorship (SOS) services at Huntsman Cancer Hospital in Utah was obtained. ACEs and Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) questionnaires were administered confidentially. A multivariable mixed effect model, adjusting for sex, age, and insurance type while controlling for zip-codes clustering were employed.

RESULTS

Compared to the prevalence of ACEs in the general population, from the CDC-Kaiser Permanente ACEs Study, we found no significant difference in the prevalence of people who had experienced an adverse childhood event (ACEs score > = 1) between our study of cancer patients and the CDC-Kaiser study (67.4% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.29372), but found a significant difference in the prevalence of people who had experienced severe adverse childhood experiences (ACES score > =4) (25.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.00001). Furthermore, this study reveals a significant association between an increase of one unit in the total ACEs score and the odds of psychotropic medication prescription in the past 12 months (OR: 1.233; 95% CI: 1.025, 1.483). Those with a total ACEs score of three or more were found to have 280% higher odds of being prescribed psychotropic medication compared to those with ACEs ≤ 2 (OR: 3.822; 95% CI: 1.404,10.407).

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of cancer patients have a history of ACEs, and thus trauma-informed care approach is essential during their treatment.

New and Persistent Sedative-Hypnotic Use After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sedative-hypnotic medications are used to treat chemotherapy-related nausea, anxiety, and insomnia. However, prolonged sedative-hypnotic use can lead to dependence, misuse, and increased health-care use. We aimed to estimate the rates at which patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer become new persistent users of sedative-hypnotic medications, specifically benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics (Z-drugs).

METHODS

Using the MarketScan health-care claims database, we identified sedative-hypnotic-naïve patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patients who filled 1 and more prescriptions during chemotherapy and 2 and more prescriptions up to 1 year after chemotherapy were classified as new persistent users. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds of new persistent use and associated characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 22 039 benzodiazepine-naïve patients and 23 816 Z-drug-naïve patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy from 2008 to 2017. Among benzodiazepine-naïve patients, 6159 (27.9%) filled 1 and more benzodiazepine prescriptions during chemotherapy, and 963 of those (15.6%) went on to become new persistent users. Among Z-drug-naïve patients, 1769 (7.4%) filled 1 and more prescriptions during chemotherapy, and 483 (27.3%) became new persistent users. In both groups, shorter durations of chemotherapy and receipt of opioid prescriptions were associated with new persistent use. Medicaid insurance was associated with new persistent benzodiazepine use (odds ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval = 1.43 to 2.47) compared with commercial or Medicare insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive sedative-hypnotic medications during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are at risk of becoming new persistent users of these medications after chemotherapy. Providers should ensure appropriate sedative-hypnotic use through tapering dosages and encouraging nonpharmacologic strategies when appropriate.

Potential Drug Interactions Between Psychotropics and Intravenous Chemotherapeutics Used by Patients With Cancer

Introduction: Patients undergoing cancer treatment usually have comorbidities, and psychiatric disorders are commonly seen in these patients. For the treatment of these psychiatric disorders, the use of psychotropic drugs is common, turning these patients susceptible to untoward drug interactions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDI) between chemotherapeutic and psychotropic agents in patients with cancer treated at an oncology service in southern Brazil. Methods: An observational epidemiological study with a cross-sectional census-type design was carried out between October and December 2020. The drug-drug interactions were identified through consultation and analysis of the Medscape Drug Interaction Check and Micromedex databases. The interactions were classified as major, when the interaction can be fatal and/or require medical intervention to avoid or minimize serious adverse effects and moderate, when the interaction can exacerbate the patient's condition and/or requires changes in therapy. Results: A total of 74 patients was included in the study among the 194 patients seen in the oncology service during the period studied. A total of 24 (32.4%) DDIs were found, 21 (87.5%) of which were classified as being of major risk and 3 (12.5%) as moderate risk. According to the mechanism of action, 19 (79.1%) were classified as pharmacodynamic interactions and 5 (20.9%) as pharmacokinetic interactions. Conclusion: It was shown that a considerable percentage of patients undergoing intravenous chemotherapy are at risk of pharmacological interaction with psychotropic drugs. Thus, it is essential that the oncologist considers all psychotropic drugs and other drugs used by patients in order to avoid drug-drug interactions.

The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on primary care in South-eastern France: implementation of a real-time monitoring system based on regional health insurance system data

BACKGROUND

The spring 2020 COVID-19 epidemic severely impacted France's healthcare system. The associated lockdown (17 March- 11 May 2020) and the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 led patients to change their use of healthcare. This article presents the development and implementation of a real-time system to monitor i) private doctors' activity in South-eastern France, and ii) changes in prescription of drugs for people with diabetes, mental health disorders and for certain vaccines from Mars 2020 to October 2020.

METHODS

Data extracted from the regional healthcare insurance databases for 2019 and 2020 were used to construct indicators of healthcare use. They were calculated on a weekly basis, starting from week 2 2020 and compared for the same period between 2019 and 2020.

RESULTS

Private doctors' activity decreased during the spring 2020 lockdown (by 23 % for general practitioners and 46 % for specialists), followed by an almost complete return to normal after it ended until week 41. Over the same period, a huge increase in teleconsultations was observed, accounting for 30 % of private doctors' consultations at the height of the crisis. The start of the lockdown was marked by a peak in drug prescriptions, while vaccinations declined sharply (by 39 % for the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in children under 5 years old, and by 54 % for human papillomavirus vaccine in girls aged 10-14 years old).

CONCLUSION

The ongoing COVID-19 epidemic may lead to health consequences other than those directly attributable to the disease itself. Specifically, lockdowns and foregoing healthcare could be very harmful at the individual and population levels. The latter issue is a concern for French public authorities, which have implemented actions aimed at encouraging patients to immediately seek treatment. However, the COVID-19 crisis has also created opportunities, such as the roll-out of teleconsultation and tele-expertise. The indicators described here as part of the monitoring system can help public decision-makers to become more responsive and to implement tailored actions to better meet the general population's healthcare needs.

New and persistent controlled substance use among patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstructive surgery

PURPOSE

Prolonged use of controlled substances can place patients at increased risk of dependence and complications. Women who have mastectomy and reconstructive surgery (M + R) may be vulnerable to becoming new persistent users (NPUs) of opioid and sedative-hypnotic medications.

METHODS

Using the MarketScan health-care claims database, we identified opioid- and sedative-hypnotic-naïve women who had M + R from 2008 to 2017. Women who filled ≥ 1 peri-operative prescription and ≥ 2 post-operative prescriptions within one year after surgery were classified as NPUs. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate rates of new persistent use and predictive factors. Risk summary scores were created based on the sum of associated factors.

RESULTS

We evaluated 23,025 opioid-naïve women and 25,046 sedative-hypnotic-naïve women. We found that 17,174 opioid-naïve women filled a peri-operative opioid prescription, and of those, 2962 (17.2%) became opioid NPUs post-operatively. Additionally, 9426 sedative-hypnotic-naïve women filled a peri-operative sedative-hypnotic prescription, and of those, 1612 (17.1%) became sedative-hypnotic NPUs. Development of new persistent sedative-hypnotic use was associated with age ≤ 49 [OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.40-2.24)] and age 50-64 [1.60 (1.27-2.03)] compared to age ≥ 65; Medicaid insurance [2.34 (1.40-3.90)]; southern residence [1.42 (1.22-1.64)]; breast cancer diagnosis [2.24 (1.28-3.91)]; and chemotherapy [2.17 (1.94-2.42)]. Risk of NPU increased with higher risk score. Women with ≥ 3 of these risk factors were three times more likely to become sedative-hypnotic NPUs than patients with 0 or 1 factors [2.94 (2.51-3.43)]. Comparable findings were seen regarding new persistent opioid use.

CONCLUSION

Women who have M + R are at risk of developing both new persistent opioid and new persistent sedative-hypnotic use. A patient's risk of becoming an NPU increases as their number of risk factors increases. Non-pharmacologic strategies are needed to manage pain and anxiety following cancer-related surgery.

Use of psychotropic drugs among older patients with bladder cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Older patients diagnosed with cancer are at increased risk of physical and emotional distress; however, prescription utilization patterns largely remain to be elucidated. Our objective was to comprehensively assess prescription patterns and predictors in older patients with bladder cancer.

METHODS

A total of 10,516 older patients diagnosed with clinical stage T1-T4a, N0, M0 bladder urothelial carcinoma from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare were analyzed. We used multivariable analysis to determine predictors associated with psychotropic prescription rates (one or more). Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used as an index to measure adherence in intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Evaluation of psychotropic prescribing patterns and adherence across different drugs and demographic factors was done.

RESULTS

Of the 10,516 older patients, 5621 (53%) were prescribed psychotropic drugs following cancer diagnosis. Overall, 3972 (38%) patients had previous psychotropic prescriptions prior to cancer diagnosis, and these patients were much more likely to receive a post-cancer diagnosis prescription. Prescription rates for psychotropic medications were higher among patients with higher stage BC (p < 0.001). Gamma aminobutyric acid modulators/stimulators and serotonin reuptake inhibitors/stimulators were the highest prescribed psychotropic drugs in 21% of all patients. Adherence for all drugs was 32% at 3 months and continued to decrease over time.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the patients received psychotropic prescriptions within 2 years of their cancer diagnosis. Given the chronicity of psychiatric disorders with observed significantly low adherence to medications that warrants an emphasis on prolonged patient monitoring and further investigation.

Use of the French national health insurance information system for research in the field of mental health: Systematic review and perspectives

PURPOSE

This systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021225296) aimed to describe the use of the French national health insurance information system, which covers the entire French population (67 million inhabitants), for research in the field of mental health.

METHODS

Three electronic databases and a journal hand-search identified 15 265 articles from January 1, 2003 (year of creation of the database) to October 31, 2020. Studies of any design were eligible for inclusion provided that they (i) made use of at least one component of the French health insurance database and (ii) focused on a topic in near and far connection with the field of mental health in France. Database used, design and methods, study period, population, key findings, and type of use for medical research were described.

RESULTS

A total of 152 studies were included in the review analysis. There was an increase in the number of published articles over time throughout the studied period. Studies focusing on adults (n = 139) largely outnumbered those focusing on children and adolescents (n = 11). Pharmacoepidemiological studies were by far the most frequent (n = 123), followed by methodological studies (n = 23), epidemiological studies (n = 17), and health economics studies (n = 3). The most studied psychotropic drugs were antidepressants (n = 27), anxiolytics (n = 27), and opioids (n = 25) while fewer studies focused on methylphenidate (n = 6) and on mood stabilizers (n = 5). Few studies specifically focused on psychiatric disorders, mainly depression (n = 4), suicide (n = 4), and psychotic disorders (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlighted a relatively poor exploitation of the Système national des données de santé database in the field of psychiatric research with regard to the great possibilities it offers, with a clear lag in certain fields such as epidemiological or health economics studies and in specific populations, in particular children and adolescents.

[The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on first-line primary care in southeastern France: Feedback on the implementation of a real-time monitoring system based on regional health insurance data]

Position du problème

L’épidémie de COVID-19 du printemps 2020 a fortement affecté le système de soins. Le confinement et les risques d’exposition au coronavirus ont incité les patients à modifier leur recours aux soins. L’objectif était de partager un retour d’expérience sur la mise en place d’un dispositif de surveillance en temps réel de l’activité des médecins libéraux de la région Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, et de l’évolution des remboursements de médicaments prescrits aux assurés du régime général pour le diabète, pour des troubles de la santé mentale et pour certains vaccins.

Méthodes

Les données ont été extraites à partir des bases régionales de l’Assurance maladie pour les années 2019 et 2020. Elles ont permis de construire des indicateurs en date de soins pour le régime général stricto sensu, calculés de façon hebdomadaire, à partir de la semaine 2.

Résultats

On constate une chute d’activité des médecins libéraux lors du confinement (−23 % pour les médecins généralistes ; −46 % pour les spécialistes), suivie d’un quasi retour à la normale par la suite. Dans le même temps, les téléconsultations ont connu un véritable essor : elles ont constitué 30 % des actes des médecins libéraux au plus fort de la crise. Le début du confinement a été marqué par un pic d’approvisionnement en médicaments, tandis que la vaccination a fortement diminué (−39 % concernant le vaccin contre la rougeole, les oreillons et la rubéole chez les enfants âgés de moins de 5 ans ; −54 % pour le vaccin contre les papillomavirus humains chez les filles âgées de 10–14 ans).

Conclusion

L’épidémie de COVID-19 risque d’entraîner d’autres conséquences sanitaires que celles directement imputables à la COVID-19 elle-même. Le renoncement aux soins pourrait causer des retards de soins fortement préjudiciables aux individus et à la collectivité. Ces questions inquiètent les autorités publiques, qui mettent en place des actions visant à inciter les patients à se soigner sans tarder. Mais la crise liée à la COVID-19 a aussi créé des opportunités, telles que le déploiement de la téléconsultation et de la télé-expertise. Bien que partiels, les indicateurs mis en œuvre peuvent permettre aux décideurs publics d’être réactifs et de mettre en place certaines actions afin de répondre aux besoins de santé des populations.

Use of benzodiazepines non-compliant with guidelines in patients with psychiatric and non-psychiatric chronic disorders

OBJECTIVE

To quantify benzodiazepine use non-compliant with guidelines in patients with psychiatric and non-psychiatric chronic diseases and assess the risk of non-recommended use associated with these diseases.

METHOD

A cohort study was conducted in the French health insurance databases, including 254,488 new benzodiazepine users between 2007 and 2014. Psychiatric, cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes and inflammatory diseases were identified. Patients were followed for 2 years. Non-recommended use was defined as excessive treatment duration, use of long half-life drugs in older patients and concomitant use of several benzodiazepines. Cox models identified the factors associated with non-recommended use.

RESULTS

Non-recommended use was frequent, ranging from 44.9% to 68.1%. It was independently associated with each chronic disease, with a slight increase in patients with chronic inflammatory disease (HR = 1.07; 95%CI 1.03-1.13) or diabetes (HR = 1.09; 1.06-1.12), a higher risk in those with chronic cardiovascular disease (HR = 1.34; 1.31-1.37) or cancer (HR = 1.30; 1.25-1.35) and the highest risk in those with psychiatric disease (HR = 2.04; 2.00-2.09).

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic disease have a high risk of benzodiazepine use leading to a higher exposure than recommended. Prescribers should be aware of the need to comply with the recommendations, especially in these patients who are the most frail and vulnerable to adverse events.

Eight-Year Follow-up of Hypnotic Delivery by Adults Aged 50 and Older from an Insurance Database

Study objectives

This study sought to (1) identify patterns of hypnotic use among persons aged 50 and older for 8 years and (2) describe characteristics and correlates associated with them.

Methods

A representative sample of national health insurance system beneficiaries was followed up from 2006 through 2013; individuals were grouped according to hypnotic delivery trajectories by latent class mixed models.

Results

We identified four different temporal trajectories of hypnotic delivery among users. Delivery was occasional for 40% and regular for 60% (quasi-continuous "use": 27%; increasingly frequent over time: 17%; decreasingly frequent: 16%). Quasi-continuous "users" received hypnotics for more than 70% of the follow-up period and occasional "users" for less than 8%. We found no clear evidence of dose escalation. The three regular-delivery trajectories shared similar correlates (psychiatric disorders, somatic comorbidity, and coprescriptions of antidepressants or antipsychotics), but association with somatic comorbidity was highest by far for quasi-continuous "users."

Conclusions

Our results suggest that chronic hypnotic use covers different patterns resulting from different long-term temporal delivery trajectories. Because difficulties in stopping or reducing use may vary greatly according to these trajectories, patients may need individualized management approaches.