Development, implementation, and evaluation of a multidisciplinary oncology sexual health clinic in a Canadian cancer care setting

Comparison of sexual function of people with colorectal cancer with and without colostomy bag in Iran: a comparative cross-sectional study

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare sexual function in individuals with colorectal cancer, with and without a colostomy bag. A quantitative, descriptive-comparative design was employed, and a cluster random sampling method was used to recruit 252 patients with colorectal cancer. Data collection tools included a participants characteristics form, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for men, and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for women. The mean IIEF total score for men with a colostomy was 26.17 ± 15.30, and for men without a colostomy, it was 29.05 ± 17.14. The mean FSFI total score for women with a colostomy was 6.40 ± 7.21, and for women without a colostomy, it was 9.10 ± 14.67. There was no statistically difference in IIEF scores between men with and without colostomy bags (p > 0.05). However, women with colostomy bags had significantly lower FSFI scores compared to women without colostomy bags (p < 0.05). Addressing sexual concerns in individuals with colorectal cancer is crucial for enhancing their sexual well-being and overall quality of life. Comprehensive support, timely interventions, and targeted services are essential to help patients navigate the challenges and improve their overall well-being.

Sexual Health and Integrative Pleasure (SHIP) Model: Using a clinical case example to guide assessment and treatment

This manuscript presents a conceptual model-the Sexual Health and Integrative Pleasure (SHIP) Model-for the clinical assessment and intervention of sexual health concerns. The model was developed by a group of couple/marital family therapy and psychologists who specialize in the treatment of sexual problems. The model consists of five philosophical foundations (systems framework, intersectionality, biopsychosocial model, lifespan approach, and empiricism) and five core therapeutic components (sexual literacy, sexual adaptation and resilience, relational intimacy, pleasure-oriented positive sexuality, and multidisciplinary care). We define each foundation and component, and compare and contrast the SHIP model with other existing sexual health models. Finally, we demonstrate how the SHIP model was used to provide individual and couple therapy with a cis/heterosexual couple in a university-based sexual health clinic and make recommendations for additional clinical applications of the model.

An online Sexual Health and Rehabilitation eClinic (TrueNTH SHAReClinic) for prostate cancer patients: a feasibility study

Purpose

The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of implementing the TrueNTH SHAReClinic as a pan-Canadian sexual health and rehabilitation intervention for patients treated for localized prostate cancer.

Methods

The feasibility study was designed to evaluate the accessibility and acceptability of the intervention. Participants from five institutions across Canada were enrolled to attend one pre-treatment and five follow-up online clinic visits over 1 year following their prostate cancer (PC) treatment.

Results

Sixty-five patients were enrolled in the intervention. Website analytics revealed that 71% completed the intervention in its entirety, including the educational modules, with an additional 10% completing more than half of the intervention. Five thousand eighty-three views of the educational modules were made along with 654 views of the health library items. Over 1500 messages were exchanged between participants and their sexual health coaches. At 12 months, the intervention received an overall average participant rating of 4.1 out of 5 on a single item satisfaction measure.

Conclusion

Results support the TrueNTH SHAReClinic as highly acceptable to participants as defined by intervention adherence and engagement. The TrueNTH SHAReClinic demonstrated promise for being a feasible and potentially resource-efficient approach to effectively improving the sexual well-being of patients after PC treatment.

Perspectives of health care providers referring patients to a newly implemented sexual health program in a Canadian cancer center

PURPOSE

Screening and discussion about sexual health concerns within cancer care are frequently impeded by lack of access to sexual health resources and lack of fluency with sexual health topics. To address this, a multi-disciplinary sexual health program was developed and piloted in a Canadian tertiary cancer center. The aim of this study was to assess referring health care providers' perspectives on the newly implemented oncology sexual health program.

METHODS

A brief online survey was administered system-wide to cancer care providers to query their perceptions of the pilot multidisciplinary sexual health program, the Oncology and Sexuality, Intimacy and Survivorship (OASIS) program.

RESULTS

According to survey results, the OASIS program was perceived by health care providers as valuable, helpful for patients, and important for addressing gaps in clinical care. Additional comments indicated an ongoing need for increased access to information about the program and referral procedures.

CONCLUSION

Survey results highlight the need for consistent program dissemination efforts to equip health care providers with accessible patient education materials and easily implemented referral procedures. Importantly, providers indicated that they were more likely to raise the topic of sexuality with patients because they had somewhere to refer patients who had sexual concerns. Overall, findings inform efforts to implement sexual health programming within cancer care institutions.