Racial disparities in follow-up care of early-stage lung cancer survivors

Early-Stage Lung Cancer in the Era of Lung Cancer Screening: Veterans Health Administration Outperforms Other Insurance Models

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening guidelines were introduced in the United States in 2013, with variable implementation. This study evaluated temporal diagnostic trends in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis since the introduction of these guidelines.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the Veterans Administration Corporate Data Warehouse and the National Cancer Database. We evaluated temporal trends in the distribution of NSCLC stage at the time of diagnosis along with differences based on insurance coverage type, including uninsured, privately insured, Medicare, Medicaid, and Veterans Affairs (VA) coverage, with adjustment for clinically relevant variables.

RESULTS

Among 1,450,965 patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2020, the proportion of NSCLC cases diagnosed at stage I increased in all insurance groups by 12.74%, 2%, 0.25%, and 2.57% for the VA, Medicare, private insurance, and Medicaid, respectively. If all insurance systems achieved the unadjusted stage distribution seen in the Veterans Health Administration, an additional 45,684 patients would be diagnosed with stage I NSCLC and 65,933 fewer patients would be diagnosed with stage IV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with any form of insurance, there has been an increase in the proportion of early-stage NSCLC (stage I and II) and a corresponding decrease in the proportion of stage III and IV since the introduction of national lung cancer screening guidelines. As the largest integrated single-payer health care system in the United States, the VA dramatically outperforms other insurance types, perhaps attributable to universal coverage and robust lung cancer screening programs.

Disparities across the continuum of lung cancer care: a review of recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Health disparities have long been noted in lung cancer incidence and survival and persist across the continuum of care. Understanding the gaps in care that arise from disparities in lung cancer risk, screening, treatment, and survivorship are essential to guiding efforts to achieve equitable care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature continues to show that Black people, women, and people who experience socioeconomic disadvantage or live in rural areas experience disparities throughout the spectrum of lung cancer care. Contributing factors include structural racism, lower education level and health literacy, insurance type, healthcare facility accessibility, inhaled carcinogen exposure, and unmet social needs. Promising strategies to improve lung cancer care equity include policy to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke and harmful pollutants, more inclusive lung cancer screening eligibility criteria, improved access and patient navigation in lung cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment, more deliberate offering of appropriate surgical and medical treatments, and improved availability of survivorship and palliative care.

SUMMARY

Given ongoing disparities in lung cancer care, research to determine best practices for narrowing these gaps and to guide policy change are an essential focus of future lung cancer research.

Disparities Across the Continuum of Lung Cancer Care

Despite the overall decline in lung cancer incidence and mortality, minority populations continue to bear a higher disease burden. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and disproportionately impacts minority populations. Social determinants of health-including low-socioeconomic status, lack of health insurance, and access to health care- disproportionately impact racial, ethnic, and rural populations resulting in direct consequences on lung cancer disparities.