Restless legs syndrome in patients with depressive disorders

Associations of anxiety and depression with restless leg syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The levels of anxiety and depression among patients with restless leg syndrome (RLS) are controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the levels of depression and anxiety among individuals with RLS with those of healthy controls.

Methods

We conducted an extensive electronic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception dates to 20 June 2023. Studies presenting data on depression and anxiety in individuals with RLS were included, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty-one studies matched the inclusion criteria. Significantly more depressive symptoms were present in the individuals with RLS than in those without RLS, as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory [mean difference (MD) = 6.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 5.54-7.62, p < 0.01; heterogeneity I2 = 0%, p = 0.99]. Similarly, the results from the Beck Anxiety Inventory indicated that there were significantly more pronounced anxiety symptoms in the individuals with RLS than in those without RLS (MD = 9.30, 95%CI = 7.65-10.94, p < 0.01; heterogeneity I2 = 0%, p = 0.92). The other anxiety and depression scales also yielded statistically significant results. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, with the primary contributing factor probably being the scoring criteria of the scales.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis found that the levels of depression and anxiety symptoms were significantly higher in individuals with RLS than in their healthy counterparts.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023410364, (identifier CRD42023410364).

Potential Effect of Vortioxetine on Restless Leg Syndrome

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic progressive movement disorder characterized by abnormal sensations, especially at rest and at night, as the need and urge to move the lower extremity. It has been reported that RLS severity and frequency increase in patients with anxiety and depression. It has been reported that serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline can cause RLS symptoms. No adverse effects of vortioxetine on RLS have been reported in the literature. In this case series, we report the effect of vortioxetine in patients with RLS with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In this case series, the effect of adding vortioxetine to treatment on RLS symptoms is reported in 7 patients (5 female). After the use of vortioxetine, 5 of 7 patients' symptoms regressed without the need to start a separate drug for primary movement disorder. In conclusion, we believe that studies should be conducted to investigate the efficacy of vortioxetine in the treatment of RLS. Therefore, randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the effect and safety of vortioxetine on RLS symptoms.

The relationship between sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, and cognitive function with restless legs syndrome (RLS) in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) has a significant effect on sleep and quality of life. Delays in diagnosis and treatment are frequent due to a lack of awareness. In this study, a clinical analysis was performed to examine the relationship between sleep, mood, and cognitive function in RLS.

METHODS

According to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score (PSQI), patients with RLS were divided into a sleep disorders group (SD, PSQI > 7) and non-sleep disorders group (NSD, PSQI ≤ 7). Healthy controls were selected as a control group matched for age, cultural background, and marital status. We compared differences between the three groups using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression (HAMD), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The SD and NSD groups were also assessed with the Restless Leg Syndrome Rating Scale (RLSRS) and the severity of RLS between the two groups was compared. The analysis used t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

(1) Among the 54 RLS patients, 30 people in the control group, 35 patients with sleep disorders (SD, 65%), and 19 patients without sleep disorders (NSD, 35%), there were no significant differences in age, educational level, marital status, or trauma history. (2) The comparison results of the case group (SD and NSD) and the control group showed highly significant differences (P < 0.01) in the PSQI-HAMA-HAMD score but no significant differences between the NSD group, the SD group, and the control group in MMSE score. There was no difference between the NSD group and the control group in the MoCA, but a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the SD group and the control group was found. (3) The comparison between the NSD and the SD groups revealed significant differences in the RLSRS, HAMA, and HAMD scores (P < 0.05), but there were no statistical differences (P > 0.05) between two groups on MMSE and MoCA score. (4) Correlation and regression showed that there was a linear correlation between PSQI scores and RLSRS and HAMD scores in patients with RLS (P < 0.05). The regression equation was PSQI =  - 2.393 + 0.494 RLSRS + 0.170 HAMD.

CONCLUSIONS

RLS patients were prone to sleep disorders, anxiety, and depression. Sleep disorders increased with the severity of the RLS and had some influence on the patient's cognitive function. Sleep disorders were closely related to RLSRS and HAMD.

We need to do better: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of restless legs syndrome screening instruments

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of screening instruments for restless legs syndrome (RLS) and reports sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). Searches for primary studies were conducted in electronic databases. Of the 1541 citations identified, 52 were included in the meta-analysis. The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using QUADAS-2. Only 14 studies assessed the reference standard in all participants or in all screen-positives and a selection of screen-negatives. Bivariate meta-analysis of these 14 studies estimated median sensitivity to be 0.88 (0.72-0.96) and specificity 0.90 (0.84-0.93); based on a population prevalence of 5%, the calculated PPV was 0.31 (0.27-0.34). For all 52 studies, with either full or partial verification of RLS status, we constructed best-case scenario sensitivities and specificities at pre-defined levels of prevalence: across all samples, when prevalence is 5%, the median best-case scenario PPV is 0.48 with significant between-study heterogeneity. No RLS screening instruments can currently be recommended for use without an expert clinical interview in epidemiological studies. For conditions with statistically low prevalence such as RLS, the specificity, not the sensitivity, of a screening instrument determines true prevalence. Therefore, future instruments should maximize specificity. We provide guidelines on RLS ascertainment in epidemiological studies that requires a two-step process with clinical interview following a screening test, and given the poor reporting quality of many RLS epidemiological studies, we include an RLS reporting checklist.