Smoking profile among the gay and lesbian community in Ireland

Second-hand smoke exposure levels and tobacco consumption patterns among a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community in Ireland

OBJECTIVES

To estimate and identify characteristics of tobacco use, including use of roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes and second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure, among a self-identified lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community in Ireland.

STUDY DESIGN

Web-based self-administered questionnaire survey using a cross-sectional study design.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 661 self-identified LGBT respondents was recruited through a well-advertised web-based survey tool method between March and May 2012. Prevalence rates were adjusted for age, sexual orientation, social class and nationality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to characterize tobacco use profile and SHS exposure levels for estimating adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of the 661 respondents, 45.3% (95% CI 44.9-45.7) reported current use of tobacco and 15.6% reported current use of RYO cigarettes (results were significantly higher for lesbians in both categories). In addition, 40.3% (95% CI 39.9-40.6) of respondents reported SHS exposure at home (significantly higher in gays), and 50.1% (95% CI 49.3-50.8) reported SHS exposure in cars (significantly higher in lesbians); these two groups were not mutually exclusive. The oldest individuals and non-Irish nationals were more than twice as likely to report SHS exposure in cars compared with the youngest individuals and Irish nationals, and the least-educated individuals were more than twice as likely to report current use of RYO cigarettes compared with the most-educated individuals (AOR 2.26; 95% CI 1.06-4.79). Non-tobacco users were less likely to report SHS exposure at home compared with current tobacco users (AOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.21-0.46).

DISCUSSION

Despite inherent methodological limitations associated with identification of such a study sample, the adjusted rates indicate that tobacco use is very high among the LGBT community in Ireland compared with the general Irish population (smoking rate 29%). High levels of SHS exposure at home and in cars further underscore the significance of smoke-free private vehicle and 100% smoke-free home policies. A targeted tobacco control strategy should be explored for this vulnerable population.

A systematic review of the aetiology of tobacco disparities for sexual minorities

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature examining risk factors/correlates of cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay and bisexual (ie, sexual minority) populations.

METHODS

Sets of terms relevant to sexual minority populations and cigarette smoking were used in a simultaneous search of 10 databases through EBSCOhost. The search was limited to the peer-reviewed literature up to January 2011, using no geographic or language limits. For inclusion, the paper was required to: (1) have been written in English, (2) have sexual minorities (defined by either attraction, behaviour, or identity) included in the study population and (3) have examined some form of magnitude of association for risk factors/correlates of any definition of cigarette smoking. A total of 386 abstracts were reviewed independently, with 26 papers meeting all inclusion criteria. Abstracts were reviewed and coded independently by authors JB and JGLL using nine codes derived from the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Studies used various measures of sexual orientation and of smoking. Risk factors that could be considered unique to sexual minorities included internalised homophobia and reactions to disclosure of sexual orientation. Some studies also indicated common smoking risk factors experienced at higher rates among sexual minorities, including stress, depression, alcohol use and victimisation.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified risks that were associated with sexual minority status and common to the general population but experienced at potentially higher rates by sexual minorities. Government and foundation funds should be directed towards research on the origins of this disparity.