1
|
Nitiwarangkul L, Hongku N, Pattanaprateep O, Rattanasiri S, Woratanarat P, Thakkinstian A. Which approach of total hip arthroplasty is the best efficacy and least complication? World J Orthop 2024; 15:73-93. [PMID: 38293261 PMCID: PMC10824060 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i1.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty is as an effective intervention to relieve pain and improve hip function. Approaches of the hip have been exhaustively explored about pros and cons. The efficacy and the complications of hip approaches remains inconclusive. This study conducted an umbrella review to systematically appraise previous meta-analysis (MAs) including conventional posterior approach (PA), and minimally invasive surgeries as the lateral approach (LA), direct anterior approach (DAA), 2-incisions method, mini-lateral approach and the newest technique direct superior approach (DSA) or supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath). AIM To compare the efficacy and complications of hip approaches that have been published in all MAs and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS MAs were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus from inception until 2023. RCTs were then updated from the latest MA to September 2023. This study included studies which compared hip approaches and reported at least one outcome such as Harris Hip Score (HHS), dislocation, intra-operative fracture, wound complication, nerve injury, operative time, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, incision length and VAS pain. Data were independently selected, extracted and assessed by two reviewers. Network MA and cluster rank and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were estimated for treatment efficacy and safety. RESULTS Finally, twenty-eight MAs (40 RCTs), and 13 RCTs were retrieved. In total 47 RCTs were included for reanalysis. The results of corrected covered area showed high degree (13.80%). Among 47 RCTs, most of the studies were low risk of bias in part of random process and outcome reporting, while other domains were medium to high risk of bias. DAA significantly provided higher HHS at three months than PA [pooled unstandardized mean difference (USMD): 3.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 6.00 with SUCRA: 85.9], followed by DSA/SuperPath (USMD: 1.57, 95%CI: -1.55, 4.69 with SUCRA: 57.6). All approaches had indifferent dislocation and intraoperative fracture rates. SUCRA comparing early functional outcome and composite complications (dislocation, intra-operative fracture, wound complication, and nerve injury) found DAA was the best approach followed by DSA/SuperPath. CONCLUSION DSA/SuperPath had better earlier functional outcome than PA, but still could not overcome the result of DAA. This technique might be the other preferred option with acceptable complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lertkong Nitiwarangkul
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
- Orthopaedics Surgery, Police General Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Natthapong Hongku
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindrahiraj University, Bangkok 10300, Thailand
| | - Oraluck Pattanaprateep
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Sasivimol Rattanasiri
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Patarawan Woratanarat
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramadanov N, Ostojic M, Lazaru P, Liu K, Hable R, Marinova-Kichikova P, Dimitrov D, Becker R. Risk Factors and Predictors for Functional Outcome and Complication Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty through Minimally Invasive and Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 41 Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5895. [PMID: 37762836 PMCID: PMC10531834 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate and identify risk factors and predictors for the difference in functional outcome and complications between total hip arthroplasty (THA) through minimally invasive and conventional approaches, using a meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS A systematic review of the literature up to 31 July 2022 was performed. A meta-regression was conducted based on a random effects meta-analysis using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method. RESULTS A total of 41 RCTs with 3607 patients were found. The following predictors of HHS ≥ 6 months postoperatively were identified: patient age (predictor estimate = 0.14; p < 0.01), avascular necrosis of the femoral head (predictor estimate = -0.03; p = 0.04); incision length (predictor estimate = -0.82; p < 0.01). The following predictors of complication rate were identified: osteoarthritis (predictor estimate = 0.02; p = 0.02); femoral neck fracture (predictor estimate = -0.02; p = 0.02); SuperPATH (predictor estimate = -1.72; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patient age, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and incision length were identified as predictors of the effect size of the HHS ≥ 6 months postoperatively; and osteoarthritis, femoral neck fracture, and SuperPATH as predictors of the effect size of the complication rate. Based on these findings, we recommend that more frequent use of minimally invasive THA in elderly patients should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials. Registered in PROSPERO on 10 August 2022 (CRD42022350287).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Ramadanov
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany;
| | - Marko Ostojic
- Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital Mostar, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina;
| | - Philip Lazaru
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery and Coloproctology, St. Marien Hospital, 12249 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Kuiliang Liu
- Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, 75179 Pforzheim, Germany;
| | - Robert Hable
- Faculty of Applied Computer Science, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany;
| | - Polina Marinova-Kichikova
- Department of Surgical Propaedeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria;
| | - Dobromir Dimitrov
- Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria;
| | - Roland Becker
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen J, Ji W, Shen Y, He S, Lin Y, Ye Z, Wang B. Comparison of the early clinical efficacy of the SuperPath approach versus the modified Hardinge approach in total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:215. [PMID: 36935491 PMCID: PMC10024840 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03713-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of the SuperPath approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly population. METHODS From February 2018 to March 2019, 120 patients were randomly divided into two groups with 60 patients each: the SuperPath group and the conventional group. The results evaluated included the general operation situation, serum markers, blood loss, pain score, hip function and prosthesis location analysis. RESULTS There was no demographic difference between the two groups. Compared with the conventional group, the SuperPath group had a shorter operation time (78.4 vs. 93.0 min, p = 0.000), a smaller incision length (5.8 vs. 12.5 cm, p = 0.000), less intraoperative blood loss (121.5 vs. 178.8 ml, p = 0.000), a shorter hospitalization time (8.0 vs. 10.8 days, p = 0.000) and less drainage volume (77.8 vs. 141.2 ml, p = 0.000). The creatine kinase level in the SuperPath group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group, while there was no difference in the C-reactive protein level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate level. The visual analog scale score was lower one month postoperatively, and the Harris hip score was higher three months postoperatively in the SuperPath group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the cup abduction angle or anteversion angle of the two groups. CONCLUSION We found better clinical efficacy after using the SuperPath approach with less muscle damage, less postoperative pain and better postoperative function than after using the modified Hardinge approach. Trial registration The randomized clinical trial was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 31/12/2020 (ChiCTR-2000041583, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=57008 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiquan Shen
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Weiping Ji
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Yonghui Shen
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shijie He
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Youbin Lin
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhijun Ye
- Department of Orthopaedics, The People's Hospital of Yunhe, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, 323000, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan L, Ge L, Dong S, Saluja K, Li D, Reddy KS, Wang Q, Yao L, Li JJ, Roza da Costa B, Xing D, Wang B. Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2253942. [PMID: 36719679 PMCID: PMC9890287 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Each approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a long learning curve, so a surgeon's choice to change their preferred approach needs to be guided by clear justifications. However, current evidence does not suggest that any of the THA approaches are more beneficial than others, and the choice of approach is mainly based on the knowledge and experience of the surgeon and individual patient characteristics. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety associated with different surgical approaches for THA. DATA SOURCES A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 26, 2022; reference lists of eligible trials; and related reviews. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing different surgical approaches, including the 2-incision approach, direct anterior approach (DAA), direct lateral approach (DLA), minimally invasive direct lateral approach (MIS-DLA), minimally invasive anterolateral approach (MIS-ALA), posterior approach (PA), minimally invasive posterior approach (MIS-PA), and supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (SuperPath), for primary THA. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, 2 reviewers independently extracted data on study participants, interventions, and outcomes as well as assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. A frequentist framework was used to inform a series of random-effects network meta-analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The outcomes were hip score (range, 0-100, with higher scores indicating better overall hip condition), pain score (range, 0-100, with higher scores indicating more pain), hospitalization time, operation time, quality of life score, blood loss, cup abduction angle, and cup anteversion angle. RESULTS Of 2130 retrieved studies, 63 RCTs including 4859 participants (median [IQR] age, 64.0 [60.3-66.5] years; median [IQR] percentage male, 46.74% [38.64%-54.74%]) were eligible for analysis. Eight surgical approaches were evaluated. For hip score, DAA (mean difference [MD], 4.04; 95% CI, 1.92 to 6.16; moderate certainty), MIS-ALA (MD, 3.00; 95% CI, 0.43 to 5.59; moderate certainty), MIS-DLA (MD, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.68; moderate certainty), MIS-PA (MD, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.60 to 7.31; moderate certainty), PA (MD, 4.37; 95% CI, 1.87 to 6.88; high certainty), and SuperPath (MD, 5.00; 95% CI, 0.58 to 9.42; high certainty) were associated with greater improvement in hip score compared with DLA. DLA was associated with lower decrease in pain score than SuperPath (MD, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.13 to 2.20; high certainty) and MIS-DLA (MD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.76; moderate certainty). PA was associated with shorter operation times compared with 2-incision (MD, -23.85 minutes; 95% CI, -36.60 to -11.10 minutes; high certainty), DAA (MD, -13.94 minutes; 95% CI, -18.79 to -9.08 minutes; moderate certainty), DLA (MD, -10.50 minutes; 95% CI, -16.07 to -4.94 minutes; high certainty), MIS-ALA (MD, -6.76 minutes; 95% CI, -12.86 to -0.65 minutes; moderate certainty), and SuperPath (MD, -13.91 minutes; 95% CI, -21.87 to -5.95 minutes; moderate certainty). The incidence of 6 types of complications did not differ significantly between the approaches. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, moderate to high certainty evidence indicated that compared with PA, all surgical approaches except DLA were associated with similar improvements of hip score but longer operation time. DLA was associated with smaller improvement of hip score. The safety of the different approaches did not show significant differences. These findings will help health professionals and patients with better clinical decision-making and also provide references for policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Yan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Long Ge
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shengjie Dong
- Orthopedic Department, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, China
| | - Kiran Saluja
- Bruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dijun Li
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - K. Srikanth Reddy
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Qi Wang
- Health Policy PhD Program and McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liang Yao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jiao Jiao Li
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bruno Roza da Costa
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dan Xing
- Arthritis Clinic & Research Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Busch A, Wegner A, Wassenaar D, Brandenburger D, Haversath M, Jäger M. SuperPath® vs. direct anterior approach : A retrospective comparison between two minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty. ORTHOPADIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 51:986-995. [PMID: 36205756 PMCID: PMC9715526 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04310-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive approaches are subject to controversy in orthopedic surgery. The aim of the current study was to compare the radiographic parameters between two minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2018 and February 2019, the radiographic parameters of 80 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty via minimally invasive approaches (DAA: n = 40; SuperPath® SP: n = 40) have been measured. The radiographic analysis was performed with digital software tool mediCad® (HECTEC™ GmbH, Landshut, Germany). RESULTS Patients treated with DAA showed significantly higher inclination (SP: 39.7° ± 7.3° vs. DAA: 44.7° ± 5.3°) and significantly lower cup anteversion values (SP: 31.2° ± 7.9° vs. DAA: 27. 5° ± 5.3°, p < 0.001) than patients undergoing THA via SP postoperatively. The horizontal femoral offset was neither preoperatively nor postoperatively higher in DAA than in SP cohort (preoperative: p = 0.71, postoperative: p = 0.25) (preoperative: SP:37.2 mm ± 7.3 vs. DAA 38.2 mm ± 7.5; postoperative: SP: 38.0 mm ± 7.2 vs. DAA: 40.5 mm ± 7.0). At both times, the acetabular offset was significantly higher in DAA cohort than in SP cohort (preoperative: SP: 32.9 mm ± 5.9 vs. DAA: 36.8 mm ± 4.9; postoperative: SP: 28.9 mm ± 4.2 vs. DAA: 33.4 mm ± 3.8) (preoperative: 0.001; postoperative: p < 0.001). The vertical height was preoperatively and postoperatively not significantly higher in SP cohort than in DAA cohort (preoperative: SP: 16.1 mm ± 4.1 vs. DAA: 15.5 mm ± 4.9; postoperative: SP: 16.6 mm ± 4.6 vs. DAA: 16.1 mm ± 4.6) (preoperative: p = 0.77; postoperative: p = 0.58). The preoperatively existing leg length discrepancy of the affected leg could be compensated via surgery without showing significant differences between the two cohorts (preoperative: SP: -3.2 mm ± 5.4 vs. DAA: 1.9 mm ± 4.9; postoperative: SP: 1.5 mm ± 5.4 vs. DAA: 4.8 mm ± 5.6) (preoperative: p = 0.34; postoperative: p = 0.09). CONCLUSION The current study demonstrates suitable cup positioning and stem alignment in the coronal plane using minimal-invasive approaches DAA and Superpath®.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Busch
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Philippusstift Essen, Essen Hülsmannstraße 17, 45355, Essen, Germany
- Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Wegner
- Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany
- Departments of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Marien Hospital Mülheim, Kaiserstraße 50, 45468, Mülheim a. d. Ruhr, Germany
| | - Dennis Wassenaar
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Philippusstift Essen, Essen Hülsmannstraße 17, 45355, Essen, Germany
- Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniel Brandenburger
- Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Haversath
- Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcus Jäger
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Philippusstift Essen, Essen Hülsmannstraße 17, 45355, Essen, Germany.
- Chair of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Duisburg - Essen, Essen, Germany.
- Departments of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Marien Hospital Mülheim, Kaiserstraße 50, 45468, Mülheim a. d. Ruhr, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Minimally Invasive Intermuscular Approaches Versus Conventional Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:1658-1666. [PMID: 35346808 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, the literature has not yet revealed superiority of Minimally Invasive (MI) approaches over conventional techniques. We performed a systematic review to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty for clinical and functional outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence to determine whether minimally invasive approaches are superior to conventional approaches for clinical outcomes. METHODS All studies comparing MI approaches to conventional approaches were eligible for analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were adhered to throughout this study. Registries were searched using the following MeSH terms: 'minimally invasive', 'muscle-sparing', 'THA', 'THR', 'hip arthroplasty' and 'hip replacement'. Locations searched included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union (EU) clinical trials register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organisation). RESULTS Twenty studies were identified. There were 1,282 MI total hip arthroplasty (THAs) and 1,351 conventional THAs performed. There was no difference between MI and conventional approaches for all clinical outcomes of relevance including all-cause revision (P = .959), aseptic revision (P = .894), instability (P = .894), infection (P = .669) and periprosthetic fracture (P = .940). There was also no difference in functional outcome at early or intermediate follow-up between the two groups (P = .38). In level I studies exclusively, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in aseptic revision (P = .461) and all other outcomes between both groups. CONCLUSION Intermuscular MI approaches are equivalent to conventional THA approaches when considering all-cause revision, aseptic revision, infection, dislocation, fracture rates and functional outcomes. Meta-analysis of level 1 evidence supports this claim.
Collapse
|
7
|
Joseph VM, Nagy M, Board TN. Systematic review and meta-analysis on SuperPATH approach versus conventional approaches for hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2022:11207000221099862. [PMID: 35658603 DOI: 10.1177/11207000221099862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM The SuperPATH approach has been in practice for almost a decade. There is no systematic review to date comparing the novel SuperPATH approach with conventional approaches. Therefore, it is important to conduct an up-to-date review to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the SuperPATH approach in comparison to widely accepted traditional approaches.Our primary aim was to compare the newer SuperPATH approach with the traditional approaches to the hip in terms of functional outcome and radiological parameters. We also aimed to identify any potential complications of the SuperPATH approach as it is a new surgical technique lacking any published sytematic reviews. MATERIALS AND METHODS The review was conducted in accordance with the steps detailed in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic reviews of intervention and will be reported bearing in mind the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PICO terms were independently searched in multiple databases. Studies that compared SuperPATH with traditional approaches were included in the analysis. RESULTS 7 studies including a total of 730 patients were available for final analysis. 3 studies were randomised control trials, 2 were prospective cohort studies and 2 were non-randomised case control studies.Patients in the SuperPATH group were discharged earlier (2 days difference in weighted mean). The operative time was 5 minutes longer (84.46 vs. 78.99) and there was a marginal decrease in blood loss (38 ml lesser) in the SuperPATH approach. VAS Score and HHS at the end of 1 year was comparable in both study groups. Cup abduction angle and anteversion angles were acceptable and comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The SuperPATH approach shows minimal improvement in length of hospital stay and blood loss with no significant improvement in pain or functional outcome score. There are no major complications reported and the radiological parameters are comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay M Joseph
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK
| | - Mathias Nagy
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Migliorini F, Pintore A, Eschweiler J, Oliva F, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:281. [PMID: 35585545 PMCID: PMC9118783 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The present systematic review investigated possible factors which may influence the surgical outcome of minimally invasive surgery for total hip arthroplasty (MIS THA). Methods In January 2022, the Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed. All the clinical trials investigating the clinical outcome of MIS THA were considered.
Results Data from 9486 procedures were collected. Older age was moderately associated with greater Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (P = 0.02) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (P = 0.009) at last follow-up, and shorter surgical duration (P = 0.01). Greater body mass index (BMI) at baseline was moderately associated with greater cup anteversion (P = 0.0009), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at last follow-up (P = 0.04), longer surgical duration (P = 0.04), increased leg length discrepancy (P = 0.02), and greater rate of infection (P = 0.04). Greater VAS at baseline was weakly associated with greater VAS at last follow-up (P < 0.0001), total estimated blood lost (P = 0.01), and lower value of Harris Hip Score (HHS) (P = 0.0005). Greater OHS at baseline was associated with greater post-operative VAS (P = 0.01). Greater WOMAC at baseline was associated with lower cup anteversion (P = 0.009) and greater VAS (P = 0.02). Greater HHS at baseline was associated with shorter hospitalisation (P = 0.001). Conclusion Older age and greater BMI may represent negative prognostic factors for MIS THA. The clinical outcome is strongly influenced by the preoperative status of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Andrea Pintore
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Joerg Eschweiler
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Francesco Oliva
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Frank Hildebrand
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.,School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, England, UK.,Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, 275 Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Maro A, Creaco S, Albini M, Latiff M, Merlo M. Radiographic results on acetabular cup placement with the SuperPath technique: a retrospective study of 756 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:101. [PMID: 35101011 PMCID: PMC8802501 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05065-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPath) technique is a relatively new minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Good clinical outcomes related to its use are reported in the literature. Nonetheless, there are still uncertainties about its validity in terms of radiographic outcomes. Main purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the SuperPath in acetabular cup positioning through radiographic evaluation of acetabular inclination angle (IA) and acetabular anteversion (AA) angle within the safe zone described by Lewinnek. The leg length discrepancy (LLD), femoral offset (FO), and acetabular offset (AO) were also measured to ascertain the radiographic effectiveness of SuperPath in the acetabular cup placement. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2019, all SuperPath cases eligible for the study were included. They were operated by three orthopaedic surgeons with long-standing experience in THA via conventional posterolateral approach and who have performed SuperPath training fellowship. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical assessments (p-value < 0.05). Means ± standard deviation (SD) of the radiographic IA and AA were calculated for each year. Results A retrospective analysis of 756 THAs was performed. The average percentage of IA within the Lewinnek’s safe zone was from 80 to 85%, while the average percentage of AA was from 76 to 79%. Both IA and AA showed no statistically significant difference between two consecutive years. Good results, in the ranges of normal values, were also obtained for LLD, FO and AO, with homogeneous outcomes between 1 year and the following one. Conclusion It is possible to achieve good radiographic values of acetabular cup orientation through the SuperPath within the Lewinnek’s safe zone. These results are similar to those reported in the literature by authors using SuperPath. Low rate (0,3%) of hip dislocations were reported. Therefore, the SuperPath technique represents a good alternative THA approach. Nevertheless, there is not a statistically significant improvement in these radiographic parameters over a four-year time. Level of evidence Level IV, retrospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agostino Di Maro
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of Ospedale di Circolo Busto Arsizio, ASST Valle Olona, Via Arnaldo da Brescia,1, Varese, Italy.
| | - Santo Creaco
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of Ospedale di Circolo Busto Arsizio, ASST Valle Olona, Via Arnaldo da Brescia,1, Varese, Italy
| | - Mattia Albini
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Viale Borri 57, Varese, Italy
| | - Mahfuz Latiff
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Viale Borri 57, Varese, Italy
| | - Marco Merlo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery of Ospedale di Circolo Busto Arsizio, ASST Valle Olona, Via Arnaldo da Brescia,1, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2019; 29:1693-1704. [PMID: 31363848 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02516-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early research shows several advantages of the direct anterior approach (DAA) in THA that claimed to be as effective but less invasive than the posterior approach. However, due to the difficult femoral exposure and possible complications related to femoral preparation, this approach may result in a higher rate of undersized stems when compared to other approaches. The present authors believe that the femoral implant design (collar or collarless stem, short or long stem) in a collared femoral stem may relate to lower rates of stem subsidence and limb length discrepancy (LLD) in mid-term to long-term follow-up when compared to collarless femoral stems. However, currently, there is no consensus as to which femoral implant design is the most suitable for DAA in THA. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess and compare postoperative complications (neurapraxia, wound infection, LFCN, hematoma, artery injury, cup malposition, embolism, fracture and implant loosening) and revision rates due to dislocation, periprosthetic fracture and implant migration after DAA using collared compared to collarless femoral stem and short femoral stem compared to long femoral stem in THA. These clinical outcomes consist of the postoperative complications and revision femoral stem due to neurapraxia, wound, LFCN and LLD. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS Relevant studies that reported postoperative complications and revision of either implant were identified from Medline and Scopus from inception to June 6, 2018. Thirty-four studies were included for the analysis of DAA in THA; 23 studies were retrospective cohorts, four studies were prospective cohorts, and seven studies were RCTs. Thirty-one studies and three studies were included for analysis of collarless and collared femoral stems. Twenty-six studies were long femoral stems and eight studies were short femoral stems. Overall, there were 6825 patients (6457 in the collarless group and 368 in the collared group, 4280 in long stem and 2545 in short stem). A total of 469 and 66 patients had complications and revisions in the collarless group, and no patient had complications and revisions in the collared stem group. The total complication and revision rate per patient were 5% (95%CI 3.3%, 7%) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.6%, 1.2%) in all patients. The complication rate and revision rate were 5.7% (95%CI 3.8%, 7.7%) and 0.9% (95%CI 0.6, 1.2) in the collarless group. There was no prevalence of complications and revisions in the collared stem group. The complication rate and revision rate were 10.2% (95%CI 9%, 11.4%), 0.7% (95%CI 0.3%, 1%) and 5.2% (95%CI 3.1, 7.2), 1.5% (95%CI 1%, 2%) in short and long femoral stems, respectively. Indirect meta-analysis shows that collared femoral stem provided a lower risk of complications of 0.02 (95%CI 0.001, 0.30) when compared to collarless femoral stem. Long femoral stems had a lower risk of having complications of 0.57 (95%CI 0.48, 0.68) when compared to short femoral stems. In terms of revision, there is no statistically significant difference in collared femoral stem compared to collarless femoral stem and long femoral stem compared to short femoral stem. CONCLUSION In DAA THA, collared femoral stem and long femoral stem had decreased complication rates when compared to collarless femoral stem and short femoral stem by both direct and indirect meta-analysis methods. However, in terms of revision rates, there were no differences between all femoral stems (short versus long and collared versus collarless). Prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings as the current literature is still insufficient.
Collapse
|
11
|
Migliorini F, Biagini M, Rath B, Meisen N, Tingart M, Eschweiler J. Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2018; 43:1573-1582. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
12
|
Delanois RE, Sultan AA, Albayar AA, Khlopas A, Gwam CU, Sodhi N, Lamaj S, Newman JM, Mont MA. The Röttinger approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, comparison to the direct lateral approach and review of literature. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:S31. [PMID: 29299478 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Multiple approaches to the hip joint have been developed utilizing various intervals and/or intermuscular planes when performing a total hip arthroplasty (THA), each proposing certain advantages. Of these, the Röttinger approach (modified anterolateral or Watson-Jones) is potentially muscle-sparing. Multiple studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes with this approach. However, others showed more complications with a slow learning curve. Due to the paucity of evidence we conducted this study to: (I) present our operative experience and technique of the Röttinger approach; (II) compare short-term complications and operative room (OR) times of this approach to the direct lateral; and (III) review the available literature. Methods This was a review of a longitudinally maintained single-surgeon database of patients who underwent primary THA using either the Röttinger or direct lateral approach. A total of 100 consecutive patients (100 hips) who underwent primary unilateral THA using the Röttinger approach between April 1st, 2012 and April 30th, 2015 were identified. These patients were compared to another cohort of 147 consecutive patients (147 hips) who underwent the procedure using the direct lateral approach (of Hardinge). The operative technique for the Röttinger approach involves accessing the hip joint through muscle-sparing technique between the tensor fascia lata and gluteus medius muscles. We evaluated and compared the short-term complications and the mean operative times for each cohort. In addition, we performed a literature search on the clinical studies that reported on the Röttinger approach using the following databases; PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO Host, and SCOPUS. Studies published between January 1st of 2000 and September 1st of 2017 were reviewed. We included only studies that compared this approach to other standard approaches and excluded single-cohort case series, case reports, cadaveric studies, and studies not in English language. Results At mean follow-up time of 12 weeks (range, 6 to 24 weeks), there were two patients in the Röttinger cohort who experienced lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsies (2%), which were self-limited and resolved at 6 and 12 weeks. In the direct lateral cohort, there was one hip dislocation (2%) at 6 weeks post-operatively, which was successfully managed by a closed reduction. In patients who received the Röttinger approach, mean OR time was 130 minutes (range, 74 to 202 minutes), compared to the direct lateral cohort mean of 111 minutes (range, 71 to 222 minutes). Our literature analysis covered 2,252 patients who received the Röttinger approach vs. 19,941 patients who underwent variety of other standard approaches including anterior, direct lateral, and posterior. At final follow up (range, 6 to 52 months), patients who underwent the Röttinger approach demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes and complications to patients who underwent primary THA using other approaches. Conclusions In this analysis of a single-surgeon experience of the Röttinger approach compared to the direct lateral, we presented our experience with the technique and demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this relatively novel approach. Our study results demonstrated that patients who underwent this approach had similar short-term complications and OR times to those who underwent the direct lateral approach. Additionally, our findings agree with previous comparative studies that demonstrated similar outcomes of this approach. Therefore, it can be used as an alternative for primary THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Assem A Sultan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ahmed A Albayar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Anton Khlopas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Nipun Sodhi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Suela Lamaj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jared M Newman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2017; 28:255-267. [DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2046-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
14
|
Xie J, Zhang H, Wang L, Yao X, Pan Z, Jiang Q. Comparison of supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach total hip versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res 2017; 12:138. [PMID: 28946892 PMCID: PMC5613398 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0636-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been one of the most successful orthopedic procedures over the past 30 years. Nowadays, the techniques of exposure for THA have undergone great changes, allowing surgeons to perform THA through mini-incisions. Recently, a novel minimally invasive surgical technique of the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty was reported in 2011. The purpose of this study was to compare the SuperPath approach with the conventional posterior approach, in terms early outcomes and radiologic results. METHODS Ninety-two consecutive unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis adult patients were randomly divided into two groups. Forty-six patients (SuperPath group) were operated on using the SuperPath approach, and 46 patients (conventional group) were operated on with the conventional posterior approach. Outcomes were evaluated using preoperative index, intraoperative data, and postoperative function data. The positioning of the implants was analyzed by radiography. RESULTS No significant difference was detected in skin-to-skin operation time, blood loss, transfusion rate, postoperative complications, abduction angle, anteversion angle, and stem alignments. The incision length and length of stay (LOS) in the SuperPath group were significantly lower. The VAS score in the SuperPath group at the 1-week, 1-month and 3-month postoperative intervals were lower than those VAS scores in the conventional group. The Harris Hip Score and Barthel Index (BI) for Activities of Daily Living in the SuperPath group were significantly higher at the 1- and 3-month follow-up intervals and were not significantly different 1 year after operation. CONCLUSIONS This prospective randomized study reveals that the SuperPath technique was associated with shorter LOS, earlier time to walk and climb, and lower postoperative pain levels. It also allowed early postoperative rehabilitation and faster recovery than conventional technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Xie
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Dianli Road 8, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Hongxi Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Dianli Road 8, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Dianli Road 8, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.
| | - Xiang Yao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Dianli Road 8, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Zhanpeng Pan
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Dianli Road 8, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Qinyi Jiang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Dianli Road 8, Jiangsu Province, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tudor A, Ruzic L, Vuckovic M, Prpic T, Rakovac I, Madjarevic T, Legovic D, Santic V, Mihelic R, Sestan B. Functional recovery after muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty in comparison to classic lateral approach - A three years follow-up study. J Orthop Sci 2016; 21:184-90. [PMID: 26775058 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Revised: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The muscle sparing total hip arthroplasty had generated a distinguishable interest, in both the patients and the surgeons, but its benefits are still often questioned. The main idea of this study was to compare the functional clinical outcome of the patients operated by the anterolateral approach with a muscle-sparing technique (modified Watson-Jones approach), and the patients operated by modified direct lateral approach without the muscle-sparing technique (Bauer/Hardinge approach). METHODS The patients (N = 130) were divided into two groups: 68 in a standard method group (STAND) and 62 patients in a muscle sparing surgery group (MSS). The hip flexibility, mobility, the strength of the hip abduction, the pain scale, Harris hip scores, the duration of the hospital stay and the overall satisfaction were measured seven days, three months, one year and three years (in 80 patients) after the surgery. There were no differences in any of the parameters between the groups prior to the procedure. RESULTS The statistically significant differences in first three follow-ups (up to one year) were determined between the groups in passive and active hip flexion ability but the hip abduction strength, which is a crucial parameter for functional recovery, and 50 m walk test remained better in MSS group even after three years. Patients, who underwent MSS suffered also less pain, stayed in hospital shorter and were more satisfied with the operation outcome. CONCLUSIONS The functional recovery in patients treated with muscle sparing method was faster than in patients operated with conventional lateral approach. Based on the results, we could recommend anterolateral muscle sparing approach for a total hip replacement for its faster and fuller functional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Tudor
- Orthopaedic Clinic Lovran, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Lana Ruzic
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
| | | | - Tomislav Prpic
- Orthopaedic Clinic Lovran, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ivan Rakovac
- Orthopaedic Clinic Lovran, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | | | - Dalen Legovic
- Orthopaedic Clinic Lovran, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Veljko Santic
- Orthopaedic Clinic Lovran, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| | | | - Branko Sestan
- Orthopaedic Clinic Lovran, University of Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Impact of Study Period on Perioperative Outcomes Following Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30:1167-71. [PMID: 25682207 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Revised: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We hypothesized that the time period studied would have a greater impact on perioperative outcomes than the hip arthroplasty procedure performed, demonstrating concerns with studies comparing new techniques to "historical" controls. One hundred total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 100 surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) patients performed between 2004 and 2010 ("historical" period) were matched and compared to 50 THA and 50 SRA patients performed between 2010 and 2012 ("recent" period). Time to discharge was significantly improved for both the THA and SRA groups in the recent versus historical period by 16hours (P<0.001). At both periods, THA patients were discharged earlier by 9hours versus SRAs (P<0.0001). Study time frame had a greater impact than the operative procedure on perioperative metrics.
Collapse
|
17
|
Nakai T, Liu N, Fudo K, Mohri T, Kakiuchi M. Early complications of primary total hip arthroplasty in the supine position with a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. J Orthop 2014; 11:166-9. [PMID: 25561750 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2014.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For total hip arthroplasty (THA), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been developed to reduce incision length, muscle damage, and a shorter hospital stay. However, reduced exposure of anatomical landmarks may result in technical errors and inferior implant survivorships. The aim of this study was to report the short-term results and clinical complications of primary MIS THA in the supine position. METHODS A consecutive series of 103 patients who underwent MIS cementless THA with a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach (AL) were enrolled. Outcomes data were reviewed at a minimum of 12 months following the procedure. Clinical evaluations were made using the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel hip score. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of a historical series of 98 total hip arthroplasties that had been performed by the same surgeon with use of a posterolateral approach (PL). RESULTS In the MIS AL THA group, intraoperative fracture was observed in 6 hips; 3 in greater trochanter and 3 in calcar femoral. One hip was subjected to irrigation because of postoperative infection was suspected. In the PL group, intraoperative fracture was demonstrated in 4 hips in calcar femoral. No postoperative dislocation and no pulmonary embolism or nerve paralysis was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The MIS AL THA did not show a clinically relevant superior outcome compared with the PL THA. When performing MIS AL THA, special attention should pay for prevention of greater trochanter fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Nakai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Itami City Hospital, Itami 664-8540, Japan
| | - Naxin Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Itami City Hospital, Itami 664-8540, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Fudo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Itami City Hospital, Itami 664-8540, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Mohri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Itami City Hospital, Itami 664-8540, Japan
| | - Masaaki Kakiuchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka 543-0035, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Xu CP, Li X, Song JQ, Cui Z, Yu B. Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2013; 8:e80021. [PMID: 24265792 PMCID: PMC3827164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2013] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose It remains controversial whether mini-incision (MI) benefits patients in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of MI on surgical and functional outcomes in THA patients. Methods A systematic electronic literature search (up to May 2013) was conducted to identify RCTs comparing MI with standard incision (SI) THA. The primary outcome measures were surgical and functional outcomes. According to the surgical approach taken, MI THA patients were divided into four subgroups for sub-group meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk differences (RDs) with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a fixed-effect or random-effect model according to the heterogeneity. Results A total of 14 RCTs involving THA 1,174 patients met the inclusion criteria. The trials were medium risk of bias. The overall meta-analysis showed MI THA reduced total blood loss (95% CI, -201.83 to -21.18; p=.02) and length of hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.08; p=.01) with significant heterogeneity. However, subgroup meta-analysis revealed posterior MI THA had perioperative advantages of reduced surgical duration ( 95% CI, -8.45 to -2.67; P<.001), less blood loss ( 95% CI, -107.20 to -1.73; P=.04) and shorter hospital stay ( 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.06; p=.002) with low heterogeneity. There were no significant differences between MI and SI THA groups in term of pain medication dose, functional outcome (HHS), radiological outcome or complications (P>.05, respectively). Conclusions Although no definite overall conclusion can be arrived at on whether MI THA is superior to SI THA, posterior MI THA clearly result in a significant decrease in surgical duration, blood loss and hospital stay. It seems to be a safe minimally invasive surgical procedure without increasing the risk of component malposition or complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Peng Xu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xue Li
- Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jin-Qi Song
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhuang Cui
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Yu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471:1283-94. [PMID: 23229424 PMCID: PMC3586026 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2012] [Accepted: 11/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature comparing limited incision and standard incision THAs is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival. Further, previously published meta-analyses cannot conclude that limited incision THA is better. With new data, we seek to discover if the answers now exist. PURPOSE We used meta-analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates, and thus (1) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to standard incision THA; and (2) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over standard incision THA. METHODS The PubMed database was searched using the terms "minimally", "invasive", and "total hip". Inclusion was limited to studies directly comparing limited incision with standard incision THA and reporting effect sizes. RESULTS We identified 418 articles. Of these 11 provided background information and 30 provided data (3548 THAs) for the systematic review. Limited incision THA was better than standard incision THA in four measures: length of hospitalization (6 versus 7 days), VAS pain at discharge (2 versus 4), blood loss (421 mL versus 494 mL), and the Harris hip score at 3 months postoperation (90 versus 84). There were no outcomes for which standard incision was better. There was no major difference in the rate of complications. CONCLUSIONS Short-term recovery favors limited incision over standard incision THA. The lack of consistent reporting for surgical outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications continues to create difficulties when comparing limited and standard incision THAs.
Collapse
|
20
|
Jung J, Anagnostakos K, Kohn D. [Clinical results of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty]. DER ORTHOPADE 2012; 41:399-406. [PMID: 22581150 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1895-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM This article presents an analysis and review of recent literature with a focus on clinical results after minimally invasive (MIS) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and with special attention to the different approaches currently used. METHODS An online database (Medline) search for clinical trials after THA between 2007 and 2011 was performed with a special focus on prospective controlled randomized trials focusing on THA with a MIS approach. The data were analyzed for pain, blood loss, complications, gait analysis, Harris hip and other scores. RESULTS A total of 24 studies (19 comparative studies) were included in this study with a total of 801 MIS THA cases and 695 conventionally operated hips. Almost every study showed superior results for the MIS group with respect to postoperative pain, blood loss and rehabilitation but these advantages almost totally disappeared after 3-6 months. The complication rate was comparable in both groups. After 3-6 months the clinical scores, such as the Harris hip score did not show any differences between conventional and MIS groups. CONCLUSIONS In this present study all MIS approaches showed advantages over the conventional surgical approach but these benefits disappeared after 3-6 months. With comparable risks for complications, MIS surgical approaches are superior in the early postoperative phase and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jung
- Klinik für Orthopädie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, Gebäude 37, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li N, Deng Y, Chen L. Comparison of complications in single-incision minimally invasive THA and conventional THA. Orthopedics 2012; 35:e1152-8. [PMID: 22868598 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether single-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is superior to conventional incision THA by comparing postoperative complication rates, Harris Hip Scores, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. Randomized, controlled trials comparing single-incision minimally invasive THA and conventional THA were reviewed. The methodological quality of each randomized, controlled trial was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale (Centre for Evidence-based Physiotherapy, The George Institute for Global Health, New South Wales, Australia). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the quality of the evidence. Fourteen studies involving 1254 patients (1329 hips) were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 659 single-incision minimally invasive THAs (mean patient age, 63.9 years) and 670 conventional incision THAs (mean patient age, 65.0 years). A funnel plot of postoperative complication rates showed that a slight publication bias existed in the study. According to the meta-analysis, no significant statistical difference was observed in complication rates in no more than 3 postoperative years (odds ratio=1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.63; P=.79), in Harris Hip Scores in no more than 2 postoperative years (weighted mean difference=0.71; 95% confidence interval, -3.09 to 4.51; P=.71), and in WOMAC scores at 6 weeks postoperatively (weighted mean difference=-0.55; 95% confidence interval, -3.54 to 2.44; P=.72) between single-incision minimally invasive THA and conventional THA. Therefore, single-incision minimally invasive THA is not superior to conventional THA in early postoperative recovery, hip function, and complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Heisel J. [Postoperative rehabilitation after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty]. DER ORTHOPADE 2012; 41:407-12. [PMID: 22581151 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1896-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Currently more than 150,000 total hip arthroplasties (THA) are performed in Germany each year. Despite limited financial resources approximately 50% of these patients participate in a standardized inpatient rehabilitation program. This report reflects own experiences with patients after a minimally invasive approach for THA compared to others with conventional procedures, in context with findings from the literature. Rehabilitation and convalescence in patients with a minimally invasive approach for THA seem to have advantages especially in the first weeks after surgery, with manageable complications and socioeconomic improvements compared to conventional approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Heisel
- Orthopädische Abteilung, Fachkliniken Hohenurach, Immanuel-Kant-Str. 31, 72574, Bad Urach, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
[Minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty : Surgical technique of the future?]. DER ORTHOPADE 2012; 40:1068-74. [PMID: 22095458 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM A selective analysis of the latest literature was carried out including prospective clinical controlled studies on the comparison between minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (MIS) and the conventional technique. METHODS An online data base search for controlled study designs within the last 3 years (2009-2011) which compared MIS with standard procedures was performed. Data such as operation time, blood loss, Harris hip score, complications and implant positioning were compared. RESULTS A total of 11 studies which compared the results of 387 MISs and 264 operations on hips with the standard technique were analyzed. In the majority of the studies reduced levels of creatine kinase and myoglobin as well as reduced intraoperative blood loss were reported. In the early postoperative period up to postoperative week 6 significant advantages in the Harris hip score were reported for the MIS patients. Postoperative complications and implant positioning were comparable in both groups. The operation time was significantly longer in the MIS group for some studies. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive techniques in total hip arthroplasty are nowadays no longer seen as just cosmetically attractive but rather as a real improvement for the clinical outcome. In this respect prospective clinically controlled studies within the last 3 years showed advantages in the early postoperative period.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hansen BJ, Hallows RK, Kelley SS. The Rottinger approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique and review of the literature. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011; 4:132-8. [PMID: 21826433 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-011-9093-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The surgical approach utilized in total hip arthroplasty has been identified as a factor that may affect surgical outcomes. There have been many different approaches and modifications used since the procedure was popularized by Sir John Charnley. The popular approaches today can be grouped by their relationship to the trochanter (anterior or posterior), patient position, leg position for dislocation/femoral preparation, and treatment of the abductors and short external rotators. The Rottinger approach is an anterior approach which utilizes the muscle interval between the tensor fascia lata and abductor musculature. The abductor attachments are preserved and the femur is prepared in extension, adduction, and external rotation. This approach has been shown in literature to be safe with some studies showing improved outcomes both in terms of reduced complications and better function than other standard approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin J Hansen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MD Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kappe T, Bieger R, Wernerus D, Reichel H. Minimalinvasive Hüftendoprothetik – nur Trend oder schon Standard? DER ORTHOPADE 2011; 40:774-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1751-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
26
|
Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2010; 35:173-84. [PMID: 20559827 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1075-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2010] [Revised: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 06/03/2010] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, minimally invasive surgery has gained popularity as a means of optimising early postoperative rehabilitation and increasing patient satisfaction and cosmesis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, this surgical exposure has also been associated with increased risk of iatrogenic nerve injury and implant mal-positioning due to limited visibility compared to conventionally larger surgical incisions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of these two surgical exposures. A systematic review of the published and unpublished literature was conducted to include all randomised and non-randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive and conventional THA procedures. In total, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria and included 2,849 hips, i.e. 1,428 minimally invasive compared to 1,421 conventional THAs. The meta-analysis of the current evidence base showed that minimally invasive THA is associated with a significantly increased risk of transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (p = 0.006) with no significantly better outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby O Smith
- Faculty of Health, Queen's Building, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|