Survival after incidental prostate cancer diagnosis at transurethral resection of prostate: 10-year outcomes

Incidence and associated factors for incidental prostate cancer among patients who underwent surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: first report from Somalia

BACKGROUND

The incidence rate of incidental prostate cancer (IPC) differs significantly among the reported studies in the relevant literature. There is a scarcity of studies regarding IPC reported from Sub-Saharan African Countries, including Somalia. The present is the first study that evaluates the incidence and associated factors for IPC among patients who had surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia at a tertiary hospital in Somalia.

METHOD

This retrospective study reviewed the data of 538 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia, 464 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and 74 patients with open prostatectomy (OP) over 5 years. A binary logistic regression model was used to investigate the association between perioperative factors such as age, prostate volume, total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) levels, type of surgery, specimen weight, and the finding of IPC.

RESULTS

IPC was detected in 17.6%, 18.3% of TURP, and 13.5% of OP patients (p = 0.002). The mean age of the patients was 71.82 ± 7.4; IPC patients had a significantly higher mean age than the BPH group (74 ± 10.9 vs. 71.3 ± 10.8, p < 0.001). Sixty-two percent of the patients were T1b, while 57.8% had ISUP grade groups 1 and 2. Patients with T1a had significantly higher International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grades 1 and 2 than those with T1b (69.4% in T1a vs. 50.8% in T1b, p < 0.001). Increased age, higher TPSA levels, low prostate volume, and specimen weight were independently associated with the finding of incidental prostate carcinoma (OR 1.978, 95% CI 0.95-1.60, P < 0.04; OR 1.839, 95% CI 0.99-2.02, P < 0.001; OR 1.457, 95% CI 0.7102.99, P < 0.001, OR 0.989, 95% CI 1.07-2.94, P = 0.01). IPC was most commonly managed by active surveillance (54.7%), followed by androgen deprivation therapy in 28.4%. The overall survival rate for a 5-year follow-up in the entire cohort was 79%. The cancer-specific mortality was 8.4%.

CONCLUSION

The study findings revealed a higher incidence and cancer-specific mortality rate of incidental prostate carcinoma. T1b stage, higher ISUP grade, older age, and higher preoperative TPSA were significantly associated with the overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality rate. More than half of the cases were managed by active surveillance, and it is a safe management strategy, particularly in low-income countries like Somalia.

Incidental prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: incidence and predictive factors for clinical progression

OBJECTIVES

To describe the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) rate and identify predictive factors for PCa progression after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all iPCa cases diagnosed after HoLEP procedures between April 2012 and May 2020 was conducted. iPCa was defined as a symptom-free cancer diagnosed after HoLEP in patients without any diagnosis or suspicion of PCa before surgical treatment. PCa progression was suspected by rise in PSA from baseline after HoLEP and confirmed by progressive disease detected on transrectal needle biopsy or by the appearance of metastatic disease. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify predictive factors for cancer progression.

RESULTS

The iPCa rate in our cohort was 10.7% (n = 134). Among patients with iPCa, 25 (18.6%) progressed with a mean follow-up of 32 months. Regarding predictive factors, post-operative PSA (OR 2.35, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with PCa progression in multivariate analysis. The cutoff value for post-operative PSA was determined at 2 ng/mL. Among iPCa cases, 14 patients (10.4%) had both T1b stage disease and PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL, while 68 (50.7%) had neither of these factors. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with both factors had the highest risk of progression (OR 49.4; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, post-operative PSA above 2 ng/mL was the only independent risk factor for iPCa progression after HoLEP. Patients with post-operative PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL must be considered to be at risk of progression and may require early curative treatment or closer follow-up in the post-operative period, especially when this is associated with T1b stage disease.

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: comparison between incidental tumors vs. tumors diagnosed at prostate biopsies

PURPOSE

To test discontinuation rates during Active Surveillance (AS) in patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancers (IPCa) vs. tumors diagnosed at prostate biopsies (BxPCa).

METHODS

Retrospective single center analysis of 961 vs. 121 BxPCa vs. IPCa patients (2008-2020). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested four different outcomes: (1) any-cause discontinuation; (2) discontinuation due to ISUP GG upgrading; (3) biopsy discontinuation due to ISUP GG upgrading or > 3 positive cores; (4) biopsy discontinuation or suspicious extraprostatic extension at surveillance mpMRI. Then, multivariable logistic regression models tested rates of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (ISUP GG ≥ 3 or pT ≥ 3a or pN1) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

RESULTS

Median time follow-up was 35 (19-64) months. IPCa patients were at lower risk of any-cause (3-year survival: 79.3 vs. 66%; HR: 0.5, p = 0.001) and biopsy/MRI AS discontinuation (3-year survival: 82.3 vs. 72.7%; HR: 0.5, p = 0.001), compared to BxPCa patients. Conversely, IPCa patients exhibited same rates of biopsy discontinuation and ISUP GG upgrading over time, relative to BxPCa. In multivariable logistic regression models, IPCa patients were associated with higher rates of csPCa at RP (OR: 1.4, p = 0.03), relative to their BxPCa counterparts.

CONCLUSION

AS represents a safe management strategy for IPCa. Compared to BxPCa, IPCa patients are less prone to experience any-cause and biopsy/MRI AS discontinuation. However, the two mentioned groups present similar rates of biopsy discontinuation and ISUP GG upgrading over time. In consequence, tailored AS protocols with scheduled repeated surveillance biopsies should be offered to all newly diagnosed IPCa patients.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Incidentally Diagnosed Prostatic Carcinoma among Patients Who Had Transurethral Prostatectomy in Tanzania: A Retrospective Study

Background

Prostatic carcinoma carries a high morbidity and mortality if it is not diagnosed early. In resource limited countries, patients are at increased risk of being diagnosed late as they are operated for presumed benign prostatic hyperplasia. The information on the magnitude and risk factors of this problem in our setting could assist in the overall optimization of care of patients at risk.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients who underwent prostatectomy for presumed benign prostatic enlargement was done at Bugando University Hspital in Tanzania. Patients' age, creatinine levels, urological Ultrasound, prostate specific antigen and Biopsy results were analyzed using STATA 11. The prevalence of incidental prostatic cancer was calculated and logistic regression was done for factors associated with incidental prostatic cancer.

Results

In total, 152 patients were included in this study. The median age was 69 (SD 9.4) years, 16 (10.53%,) and 49 (32.24%) participants had Hydronephrosis and elevated creatinine levels respectively. Eighty six (58.56%) patients had PSA >10 ng/mL and in total; 33 (21.71%) had incidental prostatic carcinoma. The incidental prostatic carcinoma was independently associated with age of 70– 80years (AOR=2.8, p = 0.013) and PSA levels >10ng/mL (AOR=3.2, p=0.014).

Conclusions

The prevalence of incidental prostatic carcinoma is high among patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy for presumed benign prostatic hyperplasia in Tanzania with increased risk at age of 70–80 years and among those with PSA >10ng/mL. A national awareness campaign coupled with focused screening of patients above 60 years could increase the detection rate of prostatic carcinoma and reduce the magnitude of incidental diagnosis of this disease.

Incidental prostate cancer in transurethral resection of prostate specimens in men aged up to 65 years

Background

The identification of prostate cancer (PC) is important in men aged ≤ 65 years. We examined complete transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) specimens to quantify the incidence and nature of PC in men aged ≤ 65 years.

Methods

A prospective multi-institutional database included TURP specimens. The cohort was stratified into two groups according to age. For men aged ≤ 65 years, the entire specimen was submitted for histological analysis, while the TURP specimens from men aged > 65 years were sampled following standard guidelines.

Results

A total of 923 men were included, with 224 in the younger group. PC was identified in 13.4% in men aged ≤ 65 years, compared with 28.7% the older group. The younger group had a lower proportion of Gleason score ≥ 7 (30% compared with 40%) and higher rates of pT1a (57% compared with 43%). In men aged ≤ 65 years with cancer, tumor was identified in one block in 15 of 30 cases (50%). Following diagnosis, 4/30 underwent radical prostatectomy, 5/30 underwent curative radiotherapy, 10/30 androgen deprivation, and 1/30 received palliative radiotherapy.

Conclusion

Incidental PC in men aged ≤ 65 years is not uncommon. Our results suggest that TURP specimens in men aged ≤ 65 years should be completely assessed. Underidentification of cancer may occur as a result of increasing use of laser prostatectomy and the consequent loss of tissue for pathological examination.

Treatment of Incidental Prostate Cancer by Active Surveillance: Results of the HAROW Study

Objective: To report on a cohort of patients with incidental prostate cancer (IPC) that was treated by an active surveillance (AS) protocol in the HAROW study. Materials and Methods: The HAROW study is an observational study on the management of localized prostate cancer in Germany. Treating urologists were reporting clinical parameters, information on therapy and clinical course of disease at 6-month intervals. Results: In total, 3,169 patients were enrolled. In 224 patients were found an IPC and 104 (46%) of them were put on an AS protocol. The mean follow-up was 26.5 months. Tumor progression was noted in 16 patients. In 11 patients, AS was replaced by a definite intervention. In univariate and multivariate analyses, only PSA density correlated with progression. Conclusion: This is the first prospective description of an IPC patient cohort on AS as part of an outcomes research study. AS was selected as a therapeutic strategy in nearly half of the patients (46%). Only a minor proportion (16%) displayed progression. Of the clinical parameters, only PSA density correlated with progression.

What Is the Clinical Significance of FDG Unexpected Uptake in the Prostate in Patients Undergoing PET/CT for Other Malignancies?

Purpose. To determine the clinical significance of unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate in patients undergoing FDG-PET/CT for staging of other primary malignancies without a prior history of prostate carcinoma. Methods. Retrospective search of FDG-PET/CT studies to identify patients with unexpected, abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate gland, who underwent subsequent biopsy, was performed. 26 patients were identified. Images were reviewed to determine the pattern of uptake within the prostate (focal or diffuse) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). PSA and Gleason scores were recorded. Results. 15/26 (58%) patients were found to have prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores ranged from 6 to 9.9. There was no statistical difference in the pattern of uptake (focal versus diffuse) or the SUVmax. Serum PSA levels with cancer (range, 2-26.8 ng; mean, 10.2 ng) and those without cancer (range, 2-10.5 ng; mean, 2.2 ng) were statistically significant (P < 0.007, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions. Patients with abnormal uptake in the prostate have a 58% likelihood of occult prostate cancer. In the setting of elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal prostate uptake should therefore be viewed with suspicion and a urology consult should be obtained; however, it is irrelevant in patients with underlying aggressive malignancies.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia: from bench to clinic

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent disease, especially in old men, and often results in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This chronic disease has important care implications and financial risks to the health care system. LUTS are caused not only by mechanical prostatic obstruction but also by the dynamic component of obstruction. The exact etiology of BPH and its consequences, benign prostatic enlargement and benign prostatic obstruction, are not identified. Various theories concerning the causes of benign prostate enlargement and LUTS, such as metabolic syndrome, inflammation, growth factors, androgen receptor, epithelial-stromal interaction, and lifestyle, are discussed. Incomplete overlap of prostatic enlargement with symptoms and obstruction encourages focus on symptoms rather than prostate enlargement and the shifting from surgery to medicine as the treatment of BPH. Several alpha antagonists, including alfuzosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, and terazosin, have shown excellent efficacy without severe adverse effects. In addition, new alpha antagonists, silodosin and naftopidil, and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are emerging as BPH treatments. In surgical treatment, laser surgery such as photoselective vaporization of the prostate and holmium laser prostatectomy have been introduced to reduce complications and are used as alternatives to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy. The status of TURP as the gold standard treatment of BPH is still evolving. We review several preclinical and clinical studies about the etiology of BPH and treatment options.