A comparison of outcomes of eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: one centre experience

Update in Carotid Disease

This review of the literature analyzes publications over the past five years on various problems associated with carotid endarterectomy: 1. Is the eversion or classical technique of surgery with plastic repair of the reconstruction area with a patch more effective? 2. Carotid endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty with stenting is more optimal? 3. When should brain revascularization be performed after the development of ischemic stroke? 4. Should a temporary shunt be used to protect the brain during carotid endarterectomy? 5. How to prevent and treat different types of intraoperative ischemic strokes? 6. What tactics of treatment of patients with combined lesions of the carotid and coronary arteries is more effective? 7. What are the causes and methods of elimination of restenosis of the internal carotid artery known? 8. Is carotid endarterectomy safe in old age?

A systemic review into carotid plaque features as predictors of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) limits its long-term efficacy for stroke prevention. Thus, it is of utmost importance to identify the factors that predispose a patient to restenosis after CEA. This systemic review aims to survey the current literature regarding restenosis after CEA and discuss the predictive value of carotid plaque features.

METHODS

A systemic review of studies on the predictive value of carotid plaque features for restenosis after CEA was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched up to March 20, 2020. Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias with the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Given the heterogeneity in the measurement of prognostic factors, types of CEA, and clinical outcomes, a qualitative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles with a sample size that ranged from 11 to 1203 were included in this systematic review. Based on the presence of calcification in original carotid plaques, two progression patterns of restenosis were hypothesized: patients with calcified plaques may experience a temporary increase in the intima-media thickness (IMT) followed by a decrease in IMT after CEA, whereas patients with noncalcified plaques may experience a gradual increase in IMT after CEA. Accordingly, patients with a high calcium score may have a high restenosis rate within 6 months after CEA and a low restenosis rate thereafter. Thus, the late restenosis rate in patients with uniformly echogenic plaques was lower than that in patients with uniformly echolucent plaques. Pathologically, a lipid-rich, inflammatory carotid plaque is associated with a decreased risk of restenosis within 1 year after CEA, mainly owing to the relatively mild reactive intimal hyperplasia at the surgical site and active inflammation in the remaining media and adventitia. Molecular predictors for restenosis included a Mannose-binding lectin 2 genotype, preoperative C-reactive protein, serum homocysteine, apolipoprotein J, vitamin C, and telomere length of carotid plaques.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrated that carotid plaque features, including imaging features, cellular composition, and molecular features, are correlated with the risk of restenosis after CEA. A comprehensive evaluation of plaque characteristics may help to stratify the risk of restenosis after CEA.