1
|
Kudsi OY, Kaoukabani G, Friedman A, Bou-Ayash N, Bahadir J, Gokcal F. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2023; 33:592-595. [PMID: 37725816 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic strained the health care sector, putting severe constraints on surgical departments. In this study, we evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent RC 1 year before and after March 2020 were included in this retrospective study and assigned accordingly to the pre or post-COVID group. Pre, intra, and postoperative variables were compared between groups. RESULTS In total, 110 patients were assigned to the pre-COVID group versus 80 in the post-COVID group. There were no differences in the demographics, except for a higher rate of previous gallbladder disease in the pre-COVID group (35.5% vs 13.8,% P < 0.001). The post-COVID group had a higher rate of emergent RCs (62.5% vs 39.1%, P = 0.002). Operative times were greater in the post-COVID group due to the more frequent participation of clinical fellows in the cases. The median hospital length of stay for both groups was 1 day, with higher rates of same-day discharge (pre-COVID 40.9% vs post-COVID 57.5%, P = 0.028). Complications were comparable between both groups, with no recorded cases of COVID-19 contraction within the virus incubation period. The median follow-up was 10 months for the entire cohort. CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in emergent cases, as well as higher rates of same-day discharge, were recorded, with no impact on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Yusef Kudsi
- Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Medical Center, Brockton
- Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Jenna Bahadir
- Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Medical Center, Brockton
| | - Fahri Gokcal
- Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Medical Center, Brockton
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tóth I, Ábrahám S, Karamya Z, Benkő R, Matuz M, Nagy A, Váczi D, Négyessy A, Czakó B, Illés D, Tajti M, Ivány E, Lázár G, Czakó L. Multidisciplinary management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16257. [PMID: 37759081 PMCID: PMC10533883 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43555-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had a major impact on most medical services. Our aim was to assess the outcome of acute cholecystitis during the nationwide lockdown period. All patients admitted to our emergency department for AC were analysed. Patient characteristics, performance status, AC severity, treatment modality and outcome of AC were assessed during the lockdown period (Period II: 1 April 2020-30 November 2021) and compared to a historical control period (Period I: 1 May 2017-31 December 2018). AC admissions increased by 72.8% in Period II. Patients were younger (70 vs. 74 years, p = 0.017) and greater in number in the CCI 1 group (20.4% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.043) in Period II. The unplanned readmission rate (6.3 vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and the gallbladder perforation (GP) rate was higher (18.0 vs. 7.3%, p = 0.006) in Period II. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) was more frequent (24.1 vs. 12.8%, p = 0.012) in Period II. In addition to a drop in patient age and CCI, a significant rise in the prevalence of acute cholecystitis, GP and unplanned readmissions was observed during the nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. PTGBD was more frequent during this period, whereas successful conservative treatment was less frequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Tóth
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - S Ábrahám
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Z Karamya
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária Sgt. 57., Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | - R Benkő
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - M Matuz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - A Nagy
- Department of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - D Váczi
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - A Négyessy
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Urology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - B Czakó
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária Sgt. 57., Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | - D Illés
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária Sgt. 57., Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | - M Tajti
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária Sgt. 57., Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | - E Ivány
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária Sgt. 57., Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | - G Lázár
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Czakó
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Kálvária Sgt. 57., Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cochrun SL, Finnegan T, Kennedy GE, Garland M, Grams JM, Parmar AD. A retrospective single-institution review of the impact of COVID-19 on severity of biliary disease. Am J Surg 2023; 225:352-356. [PMID: 36243562 PMCID: PMC9513400 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic possessed far-reaching health implications beyond the public health impact that have yet to be fully elucidated. We hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in biliary disease complexity and incidence of emergency cholecystectomy. METHODS We reviewed our institutional experience with cholecystectomy from February 2019-February 2021, n = 912. Pre COVID-19 pandemic patients were compared to patients after the onset of the pandemic. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups. A Cochran-Armitage test for trend assessed the temporal impact of COVID-19 on emergency presentation and gallbladder disease complexity. RESULTS We identified 442 patients pre-pandemic and 470 patients during the pandemic. No significant differences were noted in demographics. COVID-19 significantly impacted emergency presentation (43.2% vs. 56.8%, p= <0.01), cholecystitis (53.2% vs 61.8%; p=<0.01), and gangrenous cholecystitis (2.8% vs 6.1%; p=<0.01). Both groups had similar clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic affected an increased incidence of emergency presentation and complexity of gallbladder disease but did not significantly impact clinical outcomes. These findings may have broader implications for other diseases possibly affected by COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Cochrun
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Timothy Finnegan
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grace E Kennedy
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Mason Garland
- Department of Surgery, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, USA
| | - Jayleen M Grams
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Abhishek D Parmar
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Almuhaymidi R, Al-Hojailan AA, Alharbi AZ, Alolayan SS, Alqarzaee RS, Algosair I. Impacts of COVID-19 on Patients With Common Surgical Emergencies at the King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2022; 14:e31868. [PMID: 36579249 PMCID: PMC9792327 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic is a global disaster with millions of infections and deaths. Healthcare systems and services were significantly affected, necessitating adjustments. These included postponement of scheduled appointments and elective surgeries. During the pandemic, there was an increase in the number of acute appendicitis, gallstones, and hernia with a significant impact on the signs and symptoms of presenting problems due to prehospital delay. AIM This study aims to measure the impacts of COVID-19 on patients with common surgical emergencies in King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective study conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia. We reviewed all medical records of patients diagnosed with common surgical emergencies (acute appendicitis, gallstones, and hernia) during a selected time of COVID-19 lockdown and compared it with a similar set period before the crisis as a control sample. All medical records were reviewed to find out the overall number of admissions, frequency of emergency department (ED) visits, duration of illness, picture of clinical presentation, intraoperative findings, course and duration of admission, and final pathology if any. RESULTS A total of 322 patients were included in the study. Of these, 119 (37%) patients underwent surgery before COVID-19 while 203 (63%) patients underwent surgery during the pandemic. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was 63.9% and 47.7%, hernia 27.7% and 34.6%, and gallstone was 8.4% and 17.7% for control and pandemic periods, respectively. The duration varied from 10 hours to two days and four hours to one month, seven hours to one day to eight hours to six months, and two hours to one day to seven hours to one and half a month for acute appendicitis, hernia, and gallstone in control and pandemic period, respectively. The mean length of stay for acute appendicitis was reduced from two days during the control period to one day during the pandemic period, from four to three days for gallstone, and for hernia, it remained three days for both the control and pandemic periods, respectively. Regarding the course of admission for acute appendicitis, the uneventful cases were reduced while an increase in uneventful cases for both hernia and gallstone was observed. CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a noticeable reduction in hospital visits. We observed an increase in the number of one-time visits and a reduction of three, four, and seven-time visits, which was attributed to the fact that patients have been reported to visit the hospital after a long time from the onset of symptoms with a higher chance of complication and subsequent surgeries. The number of acute appendicitis cases was reduced while the cases of hernia and gallstones increased significantly. The minimum period for the duration of acute illness for appendicitis was reduced in the pandemic period, while the minimum period for both gallstone and hernia was increased as both conditions could require conservative management. The mean length of hospital stay was reduced during the pandemic period, mainly due to the early discharge implemented in COVID-19 protocols to decrease the risk of infection. The severity of symptoms was increased due to the cancellation and delaying of surgeries.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rahimli M, Wex C, Wiesmueller F, Weber F, Dölling M, Rose A, Al-Madhi S, Andric M, Croner R, Perrakis A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital in Germany: higher rates of acute and gangrenous cholecystitis in elderly patients. BMC Surg 2022; 22:168. [PMID: 35538571 PMCID: PMC9087165 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01621-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic caused a global health crisis in 2020. This pandemic also had a negative impact on standard procedures in general surgery. Surgeons were challenged to find the best treatment plans for patients with acute cholecystitis. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in a tertiary care hospital in Germany. Patients and methods We examined perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the pandemic from March 22, 2020 (first national lockdown in Germany) to December 31, 2020. We then compared these to perioperative outcomes from the same time frame of the previous year. Results A total of 182 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the above-mentioned periods were enrolled. The pandemic group consisted of 100 and the control group of 82 patients. Subgroup analysis of elderly patients (> 65 years old) revealed significantly higher rates of acute [5 (17.9%) vs. 20 (58.8%); p = 0.001] and gangrenous cholecystitis [0 (0.0%) vs. 7 (20.6%); p = 0.013] in the “pandemic subgroup”. Furthermore, significantly more early cholecystectomies were performed in this subgroup [5 (17.9%) vs. 20 (58.8%); p = 0.001]. There were no significant differences between the groups both in the overall and subgroup analysis regarding the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, morbidity and mortality. Conclusion Elderly patients showed particularly higher rates of acute and gangrenous cholecystitis during the pandemic. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in the COVID-19 era without negative impact on perioperative results. Therefore, we would assume that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended for any patient with acute cholecystitis, including the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirhasan Rahimli
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Cora Wex
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Felix Wiesmueller
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Frederike Weber
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Dölling
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rose
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sara Al-Madhi
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mihailo Andric
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Roland Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Aristotelis Perrakis
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shahramian I, Parooie F, Salarzaei M. Acute Cholecystitis Management During the COVID-19
Pandemic – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2022; 94:6-14. [DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.7099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
<br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of acute cholecystitis (AC) and review its possible management options during the COVID-19 pandemic.</br>
<br><b>Methods:</b> The present systematic review and meta-analysis was done in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. In August 2021, two independent reviewers reviewed a number of articles with the aim of finding studies on the management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in the Cochrane, Embassies, and Medline libraries. Using the Stata statistical software 14, the estimated pooled rates were calculated. Funnel plot and I2 indices were applied for evaluating the heterogeneity between the studies.</br>
<br><b>Results:</b> An overall of 8 studies consisting of 654 patients suspected for AC were included. The prevalence of COVID-19 among our included patients was 82% (95% CI: 79–84%, I2: 99.2%). Regarding the type of management, 35% (95% CI: 26–45%, I2: 46.9%) of patients undergone cholecystectomy, 47% (95% CI: 43–51%, I2: 54.4%) were managed by non-surgical methods, and 19% (95% CI: 14–23%, I2: 68.1%) of patients were treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy. The prevalence of grade 2 and 3 among our patients was 44 and 15%, respectively.</br>
<br><b>Conclusions:</b> Considering the fact that due to the current pandemic, the number of patients referring with higher grades is assumed to be increased, early cholecystectomy remains the best management option for AC patients. However, LC seems not to be the most favorable option since it is associated with a relatively higher risk of contamination with COVID-19. PC can also be considered as a temporary and safe method in high-risk patients which might enable us to protect both patients and healthcare providers.</br>
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iraj Shahramian
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - Fateme Parooie
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - Morteza Salarzaei
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| |
Collapse
|