Role of (Neo)adjuvant Denosumab for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Establishment and characterization of NCC-GCTB10-C1: a novel cell line derived from a patient with recurrent giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteolytic tumor composed of mononuclear stromal cells, macrophages, and osteoclast-like giant cells. While generally benign, GCTB has a high risk of local recurrence and can occasionally undergo malignant transformation or metastasis, posing significant clinical challenges. The primary treatment is complete surgical resection; however, effective management strategies for recurrent or advanced GCTB remain elusive, underscoring the need for further preclinical research. This study reports the establishment of a novel cell line, NCC-GCTB10-C1, derived from a recurrent GCTB lesion. NCC-GCTB10-C1 retains the characteristic H3-3A G34W mutation, which is central to the tumor's pathogenesis, and demonstrates significant growth potential, spheroid formation capability, and invasive properties. Extensive drug screening of NCC-GCTB10-C1, along with nine previously established GCTB cell lines, revealed a distinct drug response profile, with the cell line showing resistance to many previously effective agents. However, doxorubicin, foretinib, and ceritinib were identified as promising therapeutic candidates due to their low IC50 values in NCC-GCTB10-C1. The establishment of NCC-GCTB10-C1 offers a critical resource for further research into GCTB, especially in the context of recurrent disease, and holds potential for the development of more effective treatment strategies.

Immunohistochemical expression of H3.3 G34W in 100 giant cell tumors of bone and its diagnostic mimics, including its value in resolving uncommon diagnostic scenarios: A single institutional study at a tertiary cancer referral center, India

BACKGROUND

There can be a diagnostic challenge in differentiating giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) from its mimics. Lately, histone H 3 F 3 A (Histone 3.3 ) G34W has been identified as a promising immunohistochemical marker.

AIMS

This study was aimed at evaluating H3.3 G34W immunostaining in 100 GCTBs, including its value in resolving diagnostic dilemmas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for H3.3 G34W was graded in terms of staining intensity (1+ to 3+) and the percentage of tumor cells showing crisp nuclear staining.

RESULTS

One hundred GCTBs occurred in 58 males and 42 females (M: F ratio = 1.3), of 7-66 years age (average = 31.3, median = 28), commonly in distal femur (26), followed by proximal tibia (17), distal radius (12), proximal humerus (7), metacarpals (7), sacrum (6), proximal fibula (6), and relatively unusual sites (19), including a single multicentric case. Out of 92 GCTBs, wherein H3.3 G34W immunostaining worked, 81 (88.1%) showed positive staining in the mononuclear cells, including tumors with fibrous histiocytoma-like areas, sparing osteoclast-like giant cells, with 3+ staining intensity in 65/81 (80%) tumors. All 7/7 (100%) malignant GCTBs showed positive staining, including the pleomorphic/sarcomatous cells. All 7/7 (100%) metastatic GCTBs showed positive immunostaining. Seven out of 10 post-denosumab treated GCTBs showed positive H3.3 G34W immunostaining in the residual mononuclear cells. None of the other 37 "giant cell-rich" lesions displayed H3.3 G34W immunostaining. Four of 9 GCTBs tested for H3.3 G34W mutation showed positive results.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of H3.3 G34W for GCTB were 88.1% and 100%, respectively. This constitutes one of the first reports from our country, further validating the diagnostic value of H3.3 G34W in differentiating GCTB, including metastatic and malignant forms from its mimics, including small biopsy samples. Its value in various diagnostic dilemmas is presented and utility in identifying residual tumor cells in post-denosumab treated GCTBs is worth exploring.

Pathological Fractures in Benign Bone Lesions - Diagnosis and Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Most tumour-related pathological fractures occur in patients with bone metastases. However, in mostly younger patients, a pathological fracture can be due to both a benign or a malignant bone tumour. Making the correct diagnosis from among these two differential diagnoses is enormously important. If the tumour is malignant, treating the fracture inevitably leads to tumour cell contamination and can significantly worsen the oncological situation. The aim of this review article is firstly to provide the reader with diagnostic assistance in the case of suspected pathological fractures, and secondly to focus on the treatment of pathological fractures occurring with benign bone tumours.

METHODS

This is a non-systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of pathological fractures in benign bone tumours or tumour-like lesions, based on an electronic PubMed database search. We also present our own procedures, in particular for ruling out a malignant bone tumour.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Whenever a fracture occurs in the absence of sufficient traumatic force, the possibility of a pathological fracture should always be considered. As well as taking a general history for a possible primary tumour, it is particularly important to ask the patient whether they had any pain before the fracture occurred. If the findings from clinical examination or conventional radiological imaging give rise to suspicion of a pathological fracture, an MRI of the affected skeletal section with contrast medium should be carried out before commencing any fracture treatment. A CT scan is also helpful for accurately assessing bone destruction. If a malignant or locally aggressive benign bone tumour such as giant cell tumour (GCT) or aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) cannot be definitively ruled out through imaging, a biopsy is essential. The bone biopsy must always be carried out on the assumption that the histological work-up will reveal a malignant bone tumour; it must therefore be performed according to strict oncological criteria. If the radiological diagnosis is unambiguous, e. g., a juvenile bone cyst (JBC) or a non-ossifying fibroma (NOF), conservative treatment of the fracture can be considered, depending on the location. In the presence of a locally aggressive benign bone tumour such as a GCT or ABC, curettage of the tumour must be carried out as well as treating the fracture. With GCT in particular, neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab prior to curettage and osteosynthesis or en bloc resection of the tumour should be considered, depending on the extent of the tumour.

CONCLUSION

Pathological fractures, especially in younger patients, should not be overlooked. Only after a malignant or benign locally aggressive bone tumour has been definitively ruled out should fracture treatment be performed. In the presence of a locally aggressive bone tumour, as well as treating the fracture, it is usually necessary to perform curettage of the tumour - also en bloc resection, where applicable, in the case of a GCT. Depending on the location, benign, non-aggressive tumours can be treated conservatively if necessary.

Surgical Strategy for Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor in the Thoracolumbar Spine

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent giant cell tumor (RGCT) of the spine represents a clinical challenge for surgeons, and the treatment strategy remains controversial. This study aims to describe the long-term follow-up outcomes and compare the efficacy of en bloc spondylectomy versus piecemeal spondylectomy in treating RGCT of the thoracolumbar spine.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with RGCT of the thoracolumbar spine treated from June 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 15 patients received total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) with wide or marginal margin while 17 patients received total piecemeal spondylectomy (TPS) with intralesional margin. Postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG-PS), Frankel classification and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated after surgery. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were analyzed with the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with Cox regression to identify the independent prognostic factors affecting RFS.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 41.9 ± 17.5 months, all patients with compromised neurologic functions exhibit significant improvement, with the mean ECOG-PS decreasing from 1.5 ± 1.3 to 0.13 ± 0.3 (p < 0.05). Among the 17 patients treated with TPS, eight patients developed local recurrence after a median time of 15.9 ± 6.4 months and four patients died from progressive disease. On the other hand, local recurrence were well managed with TES, since only one out of 15 patients experienced local relapse and all patients are alive with satisfied function at the latest follow-up. The median RFS for patients receiving TES and TPS are 75.0 months (95% CI: 67.5-82.5 m) and 38.3 months (95% CI: 27.3-49.3 m) respectively (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis shows that the Ki67 index (p = 0.016), resection mode (p = 0.022), and denosumab (p = 0.039) are independent risk factors affecting RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

TES with wide/marginal margin should be offered to patients with RGCT whenever feasible, given its long-term benefits in local control and symptom alleviation. Additionally, patients with lower Ki67 index and application of denosumab tend to have a better prognosis.

Management of a rare mandibular giant cell tumor of bone by neoadjuvant denosumab therapy and surgery: A 4-year follow-up case report

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a very rare tumor encountered in the jaws and its histology is quite similar to the more common giant cell granuloma of the jaws (GCGJ). These two entities can be easily confused in maxillofacial region. They are classically managed surgically, but in some localizations and in specific medical-surgical contexts, neoadjuvant therapy with denosumab may be indicated. This report tends to reinforce existing evidence in favor of the use of a neoadjuvant approach, particularly for localization of GCTB in the orofacial region.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This is a 57-year-old female patient, an alcoholic smoker, in whom a voluminous mandibular radiolucent lesion was discovered during a routine X-ray by her dentist. After medical imaging assessment and incisional biopsy, diagnosis of GCTB was established. A neoadjuvant denosumab therapy was proposed first followed by a secondary surgical curettage. After 4 years' follow-up, complete healing was observed with no recurrence of the lesion.

DISCUSSION

Surgical management of aggressive GCTB is risky particularly in localizations involving the sacrum, spine or craniofacial skeleton with a high residual recurrence rate. The use of denosumab to stop tumor progression and facilitate secondary excision surgery is a recent approach that is now well documented in the literature showing promising results with a low rate of side effects.

CONCLUSION

This case of mandibular GCTB is to our knowledge the unique case described in this localization and treated by denosumab neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery with a 4-year follow-up showing a complete healing.

Preliminary Results of Preoperative Planning Using 3D Printing and Augmented Reality in Cryotherapy Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone-CRIO2AR Project

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone is a benign tumor with high local aggressive expansion, which, in rare cases, spreads metastasis. Surgical treatment, which often consists of wide curettage to reduce recurrence risk, can lower the quality of life for those affected. Along with aggressive surgery, adjuvant intraoperative techniques have been implemented such as PMMA and cryotherapy. One of the most widely used cryotherapy techniques involves the use of probes to generate ice balls, which have been scientifically shown to have various impacts on the tumor. Although this has been acknowledged, no one has yet tested a way to accurately plan the positioning of cryotherapy probes before surgery, according to the research conducted by the authors. CRIO2AR is a randomized clinical prospective ongoing study by which it will be experimented via preoperative planning of ice probes placement using AR and 3D printing technologies. By studying a single clinical case with these technologies, the surgeon gains better awareness of patient's anatomy and tumor localization. Preliminary results are shown in the article. The first results are confirming that these technologies are applicable in clinical practice. Secondly, preoperative planning is proving to be reliable, easily replicable, and useful for the surgeon.

Proximal Tibia Tumour Location and Curettage Are Major Risk Factors of Local Recurrence in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is one of the most common local aggressive tumourous lesions with a wide variety of biological behaviour. However, there are no clear indicative criteria when choosing the type of procedure and the complication rates remain high, especially in terms of local recurrence. The purpose of the study was to (1) identify the main risk factors for local recurrence, (2) evaluate the recurrence-free survival in dependence on neoadjuvant denosumab use and the type of procedure, and (3) compare the functional outcomes after curettage and en bloc resection. The group included 102 patients with GCTB treated between 2006 and 2020. The mean age of patients was 34.4 years (15-79). The follow-up period was 8.32 years (2-16) on average. Local recurrence occurred in 14 patients (29.8%) who underwent curettage and in 5 patients (10.6%) after en bloc resection. Curettage was shown to be a factor in increasing recurrence rates (OR = 3.64 [95% CI: 1.19-11.15]; p = 0.023). Tibial location was an independent risk factor for local recurrence regardless of the type of surgery (OR = 3.22 [95% CI: 1.09-9.48]; p = 0.026). The recurrence-free survival rate of patients treated with resection and denosumab was higher compared to other treatments at five years postoperatively (p = 0.0307). Functional ability and pain as reported by patients at the latest follow-up were superior after curettage compared to resection for upper and lower extremity (mean difference: -4.00 [95% CI: -6.81 to -1.18]; p < 0.001 and mean difference: -5.36 [95% CI: -3.74 to -6.97]; p < 0.001, respectively). Proximal tibia tumour location and curettage were shown to be major risk factors for local recurrence in GCTB regardless of neoadjuvant denosumab treatment. The recurrence-free survival rate of patients treated with resection and denosumab was higher compared to other treatments. The functional outcome of patients after curettage was better compared to en bloc resection.

The Role of Denosumab in the Treatment of Primary Tumors of Bone

Many hand surgeons treat benign bone tumors without referral to orthopedic oncologists. However, there have been considerable advances in medical therapy for some of these tumors, with which hand surgeons may not be as familiar. This review focuses on the mechanism and uses of denosumab in the treatment of benign tumors of bone. Although the hand surgeon may not be directly prescribing this therapy, they are often the only physician treating the patient for these conditions. As such, awareness regarding the use of this therapy in reducing pain, decreasing tumor volume, and treatment of potential lung metastases is critical to those taking on these cases without the support of an orthopedic oncologist. This article aims to familiarize hand surgeons with denosumab to help promote knowledge of this therapeutic option and the potential role of this medication in the treatment of primary bone tumors in the hand.

Progress on Denosumab Use in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Dose and Duration of Therapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an aggressive non-cancerous bone tumor associated with risks of sarcoma and metastasis. Once malignancy occurs, the prognosis is generally poor. Surgery remains the main treatment for GCTB. Multidisciplinary management is a feasible option for patients wherein surgical resection is not an option or for those with serious surgery-related complications. Denosumab is an anti-nuclear factor kappa B ligand approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bone metastases, and advanced or inoperable GCTB. However, the guidelines for treating GCTB are unclear; its short-term efficacy and safety in inoperable patients have been demonstrated. Lengthier therapies (high cumulative doses) or pre-operative adjuvant therapy may be associated with severe complications and high local recurrence rates. Short-term administration helps attain satisfactory local control and functionality. As a result, lately, the impact of different doses and lengths of treatment on the efficacy of denosumab in GCTB treatment, the incidence of complications, and recurrence rates have gained attention. The efficacy and safety of denosumab against GCTB, its impact on imaging assessment, related complications, and recurrence of GCTB were previously reviewed. For further research direction, this paper reviews the progress of studies evaluating the impact of the dose and duration of denosumab therapy for GCTB.

Nuclear β-catenin translocation plays a key role in osteoblast differentiation of giant cell tumor of bone

Denosumab is a game-changing drug for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB); however, its clinical biomarker regarding tumor ossification of GCTB has not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the relationship between Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the ossification of GCTB and evaluated whether endogenous nuclear β-catenin expression predicted denosumab-induced bone formation in GCTB. Genuine patient-derived primary GCTB tumor stromal cells exhibited osteoblastic characteristics. Identified osteoblastic markers and nuclear β-catenin translocation were significantly upregulated via differentiation induction and were inhibited by treating with Wnt signaling inhibitor, GGTI-286, or selective Rac1-LEF inhibitor, NSC23766. Furthermore, we reviewed the endogenous ossification and nuclear β-catenin translocation of 86 GCTB clinical samples and elucidated that intra-tumoral ossification was significantly associated with the nuclear translocation. Three-dimensional quantitative analyses (n = 13) of tumoral CT images have revealed that the nuclear β-catenin translocation of naïve GCTB samples was significantly involved with the denosumab-induced tumor ossification. Our findings suggest a close relationship between the nuclear β-catenin translocation and the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB. Investigations of the nuclear β-catenin in naïve GCTB samples may provide a promising biomarker for predicting the ossification of GCTB following denosumab treatment.

Updated concepts in treatment of giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumors. For conventional GCTB, surgery remains treatment of choice. For advanced GCTB, a more important role came into play for systemic therapy including denosumab and bisphosphonates over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, focus has been on H3F3A (G34) driver mutations present in GCTB. The most frequent mutation (G34W) can be detected using immunohistochemistry and is highly specific in differentiating GCTB from other giant cell containing tumors. PD-L1 expression can be used as biological marker to predict higher recurrence risks in GCTB patients.The use of bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement is under investigation in a randomized controlled trial. A new technique consisting of percutaneous microwave ablation and bisphosphonate-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cementoplasty was proposed for unresectable (pelvic) GCTB.Increased experience with use of denosumab raised concern on elevated recurrence rates. However, conclusions of meta-analyses should be interpreted with risk of indication bias in mind. Several small studies are published with short-course denosumab (varying from 3 to 6 doses). One small trial directly compared denosumab and zoledronic acid, with no statistical differences in radiological and clinical outcome, and nonsignificantly higher recurrence rate after denosumab. As bisphosphonates directly target neoplastic stromal cells in GCTB, larger directly comparative trials are still warranted.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant denosumab is highly effective for advanced GCTB, and a short-course is advised to facilitate surgery, whereas increased recurrence rates remain of concern. Randomized controlled trials are conducted on bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement and on optimal dose and duration of neoadjuvant denosumab. PD-L1 could be a potential new therapy target in GCTB.

Bone Turnover Marker (BTM) Changes after Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumors of Bone (GCTB): A Phase II Trial Correlative Study

Background: Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are osteolytic tumors. Denosumab, a RANK-L inhibitor, is approved for GCTB. Data on serum bone turnover marker (sBTM) changes are lacking. We present a phase II correlative study on sBTMs in GCTB patients treated with denosumab. Methods: All GCTB patients receiving denosumab within a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study were enrolled. Serum levels of carboxyterminal-crosslinked-telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTX), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone-alkaline phosphatase (bALP), parathyroid hormone (sPTH), and osteocalcin (OCN) were prospectively assessed (baseline, T0, 3 months, T1, 6 months, T2). The primary endpoint was assessment of sBTM changes after denosumab; the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and sBTM correlation. Results: In 54 cases, sBTMs decreased during denosumab treatment except for sPTH. With a median follow-up of 59 months, 3-year DFS was 65% (%CI 52−79), with a significantly worse outcome for patients with high (≥500 UI/mL) s-CTX at baseline, as compared to low s-CTX (<500 UI/mL) (3-year DFS for high CTX 45% (95%CI 23−67) vs. 75% (95%CI 59−91) for low s-CTX. Higher median ALP and s-CTX were found for patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm (p = 0.0512; p = 0.0589). Conclusion: Denosumab induces ALP/OCN and s-CTX reduction. High baseline s-CTX identifies a group of patients at higher risk of progression of the disease.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine: Update on Current Management Strategies

(1) Background: Giant Cell Tumor of the spine remains a difficult tumor to treat. Recent advances in adjuvant therapy such as denosumab and innovations in surgical technique in the last 5 years have given providers new options for treatment after a successful diagnosis of the tumor. (2) Methods: Articles published between 1927 and 2021 were selected from PubMed and Scopus searches using key words “Giant Cell Tumor” AND “Lumbar Spine” AND “Treatment”. Relevant articles were reviewed and selected by the authors. (3) Results: A total of 191 articles were discovered. Complete en bloc spondylectomy remains the most definitive treatment option; however, this surgery is challenging and carries a high rate of complication. New adjuvant therapies including denosumab offer a viable alternative to surgery. (4) En bloc spondylectomy remains the gold standard treatment for Giant Cell Tumor of the spine with the lowest published recurrence rate. The use of (neo)adjuvant denosumab improves recurrence rates. More data are needed to determine if denosumab alone is a viable standalone definitive treatment.

Hypercalcemia following discontinuation of denosumab therapy: A systematic review

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that has been approved to treat osteoporosis, skeletal metastasis, and giant cell tumor of bone in skeletally mature patients. Due to its potential adverse effects on normal bone growth, its use has not yet been approved in skeletally immature patients; however, the use of this agent in such patients with overt or dysregulated bone resorptive conditions has been explored in recent years. While most studies have proven the effectiveness of denosumab in controlling the progression of various disorders in skeletally immature patients, they have also revealed that refractory hypercalcemia often follows the discontinuation of denosumab treatment, raising a concern over the use of this agent in these patients. Thus, this study was designed to better understand the pathology of this condition through a systematic review of the published literature. Our analysis suggests that this condition has a potential male predisposition, that there is a correlation between the duration of denosumab treatment and patient age, and that this condition often occurs within 3 months after the last administration of denosumab in skeletally immature patients but is significantly less likely in adults. These results may further underscore that high bone formation and bone turnover rates are critically associated with hypercalcemia after the discontinuation of denosumab. In contrast, given that not all skeletally immature patients develop hypercalcemia, it is probable that other unidentified factors are involved in the pathology of this condition.

•

Rebound hypercalcemia often follows denosumab cessation in juveniles.

•

Although relatively rare, rebound hypercalcemia can occur in adults.

•

Rebound hypercalcemia may have a male predisposition in juveniles.

•

Treatment duration of denosumab required to trigger hypercalcemia correlates with age.

•

Onset of hypercalcemia is significantly earlier in juveniles than in adults.

New Target for Precision Medicine Treatment of Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone: Sunitinib Is Effective in the Treatment of Neoplastic Stromal Cells with Activated PDGFRβ Signaling

Simple Summary

The purpose of this study was to analyze differential cell signaling in response to denosumab treatment to identify and subsequently inhibit molecular targets in the neoplastic stromal cell population, which poses a risk for tumor recurrence. Using phosphoprotein arrays, a distinct signaling profile was detected in GCTB tissues treated with denosumab, a specific RANKL antibody, which coincided with the RTK profile in derived cell lines. PDGFRβ was selected as a promising receptor target, and its inhibition by the small-molecule inhibitor sunitinib resulted in potent inhibition of cell proliferation in vitro. The addition of sunitinib to denosumab resulted in the disappearance of both multinuclear giant cells and neoplastic stromal cells, as reported here. Thus, sunitinib could become an effective addition to denosumab in the treatment of GCTB with activated PDGFRβ.

Abstract

Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate type of primary bone tumor characterized by locally aggressive growth with metastatic potential. The aim of this study was to identify new druggable targets among the cell signaling molecules involved in GCTB tumorigenesis. Profiles of activated signaling proteins in fresh-frozen tumor samples and tumor-derived cell lines were determined using phosphoprotein arrays. Analysis of the obtained data revealed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ) as potential targets, but only the PDGFR inhibitor sunitinib caused a considerable decrease in stromal cell viability in vitro. Furthermore, in the case of a 17-year-old patient suffering from GCTB, we showed that the addition of sunitinib to the standard treatment of GCTB with the monoclonal antibody denosumab resulted in the complete depletion of multinucleated giant cells and mononuclear stromal cells in the tumor tissue. To summarize, the obtained data showed that a specific receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling pattern is activated in GCTB cells and plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation. Thus, activated RTKs and their downstream signaling pathways represent useful targets for precision treatment with low-molecular-weight inhibitors or with other types of modern biological therapy.