Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

The Impact of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

The utility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is expanding in the treatment of breast cancer. Although individual trials have shown comparable survival between patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, large-scale data analyses for outcomes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) are lacking. We conducted an individual-level statistical analysis using patients from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating survival outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by abstracting and analyzing only the patients with LABC. Individual patient data for 779 patients with LABC were collected from six RCTs. Overall and disease-free survival rates were compared between patients receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy with the Cox hazard model and log-rank statistics. Since chemotoxicity causing delays to surgical care is a potential drawback of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, local cohort data were then employed to assess the actual incidence of this, along with the causes behind any delays to surgery in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A time interval from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery of >8 weeks was investigated in a local cohort of 563 patients, representing all locally treated patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2019. The statistical analysis demonstrated no overall or disease-free survival differences in LABC patients receiving neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.96 and 0.74, respectively). Within our cohort, 31 (5.5%) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced a delay of >8 weeks to surgery, with only 13 (2.3%) attributed to chemotherapy-related complications. Our study provides further support for the paradigm shift towards delivering chemotherapy for breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant setting.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast are characterized by neuroendocrine architectural and cytological features, which must be supported by immunohistochemical positivity for neuroendocrine markers (such as Chromogranin and Synaptophysin). According to the literature, making a diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine breast cancer always needs to rule out a possible primary neuroendocrine neoplasm from another site. Currently, the latest 2022 version of the WHO of endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms has classified breast NENs as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), differentiating them from invasive breast cancers of no special type (IBCs-NST). with neuroendocrine features. The current review article describes six cases from our series and a comprehensive review of the literature in the field of NENs of the breast.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: The Devil is in the Detail

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Update on the most recent clinical evidence on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decade, CDK4/6i have become part of the standard of care treatment of patients with both metastatic and high-risk early HR + /HER2- breast cancers. The three available CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) have been extensively studied in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with consistent prolongation of progression free survival; however, ribociclib has emerged as the preferred first line agent in mBC given overall survival benefit over endocrine monotherapy. In early BC, abemaciclib is the only currently approved agent while ribociclib has early positive clinical trial data. Toxicities and financial burden limit the use of CDK4/6i in all patients and resource-poor settings, and optimal timing of their use in mBC remains unclear. There is considerable evidence for the use of CDK4/6i in metastatic and early HR + /HER2- breast cancer, but knowledge gaps remain, and further research is necessary to better define their optimal use.

The Value of Neoadjuvant Anthracycline-Based Regimens for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Including 1366 Patients

Background

The standard recommendation for neoadjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients is trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy, but there is no current standard recommendation for appropriate chemotherapy regimens. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and cardiac safety of the concurrent use of anti-HER2 targeted drugs and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for HER2-positive breast cancers.

Methods

The pooled odds ratio (OR) rate for pathologic complete response (pCR), the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline events were all calculated. Differences in efficacy, prognosis, and cardiac safety were compared between patients receiving an anthracycline-containing regimen (AB) and those treated with non-anthracycline-based (nAB) NAC.

Results

A total of 1366 patients in 4 prospective and 3 retrospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR for pCR rate was 0.73 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.43 to 1.24 (P = .246). Subgroup analysis of low tumor burden cases showed no improvement in pCR rate for patients in the AB group compared with nAB, with the pooled OR rate being 0.73 with a 95% CI of 0.37 to 1.44 (P= .357). The 3-year OS rate was 95.63% and 95.54% in the AB and nAB groups, respectively, with no statistical difference (P= .157). There was a significant increase in the rate of LVEF decline of 19.07% in the AB group compared with 13.33% for the nAB group, with an HR of 1.62 and a 95% CI of 1.11 to 2.36 (P = .013).

Conclusions

The addition of anthracyclines did not improve pCR rates and survival after neoadjuvant and the increased cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines further limited their application. This study showed that it was feasible to use anti-HER2 drugs without anthracyclines in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Nomogram for predicting axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The prediction of axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) becoming critical because of the advocation of the de-escalation of axillary management. We investigate associated factors of axillary upstaging in clinical node-negative (cN0) breast cancer patients receiving NAC to develop and validate an accurate prediction nomogram.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1892 breast cancer patients with stage of cT1-3N0 treated by NAC and subsequent surgery between 2010 and 2020 in twenty hospitals across China. Patients randomly divided into a training set and validation set (3:1). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed, after which a nomogram was constructed and validated.

RESULTS

In total, pathologic node negativity (ypN0) achieved in 1406 (74.3%) patients and another 486 (25.7%) patients upstaged to pathologic node positive (ypN+). Breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) was achieved in 445 (23.5%) patients and non-bpCR in 1447 (76.5%) patients. A nomogram was established by ER, tumor histology, HER2 status, cycle of NAC treatment, and the bpCR, which were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis as independent predictors of nodal upstaging in the training cohort (n = 1419). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the training cohort and validation cohort (n = 473) were 0.73 (95% CI 0.693-0.751) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.723-0.812) respectively.

CONCLUSION

We present a nomogram with a nationwide large sample data which can effectively predict axillary upstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to give better advice for individualized axillary lymph node management of breast cancer.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Minimal Residual Lesions of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To review the latest research of minimal residual disease (MRD) in breast cancer as well as some emerging or potential detection methods for MRD in breast cancer.

METHODS

Springer, Wiley, and PubMed databases were searched for the electronic literature with search terms of breast cancer, minimal residual disease, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), exosomes, etc. RESULTS: Minimal residual disease refers to the occult micrometastasis or minimal residual lesions detected in patients with tumor after radical treatment. An early and dynamic monitoring of breast cancer MRD can contribute to clinical treatment decision-making, improving the diagnosis accuracy and prognosis of breast cancer patients. The updated knowledge regarding MRD in breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis were summarized, followed by the review of several emerging or potential detection technologies for MRD in breast cancer. With the developed new MRD detection technologies referring to CTCs, ctDNA and exosomes, the role of MRD in breast cancer has been growingly verified, which is expected to serve as a new risk stratification factor and prognostic indicator for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

This paper systematically reviews the research progress, opportunities and challenges in MRD in breast cancer in recent years.

Correlation between the Warburg effect and progression of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is ineligible for hormonal therapy and Her-2-targeted therapy due to the negative expression of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2. Although targeted therapy and immunotherapy have been shown to attenuate the aggressiveness of TNBC partially, few patients have benefited from them. The conventional treatment for TNBC remains chemotherapy. Chemoresistance, however, impedes therapeutic progress over time, and chemotherapy toxicity increases the burden of cancer on patients. Therefore, introducing more advantageous TNBC treatment options is a necessity. Metabolic reprogramming centered on glucose metabolism is considered a hallmark of tumors. It is described as tumor cells tend to convert glucose to lactate even under normoxic conditions, a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. Similar to Darwinian evolution, its emergence is attributed to the selective pressures formed by the hypoxic microenvironment of pre-malignant lesions. Of note, the Warburg effect does not disappear with changes in the microenvironment after the formation of malignant tumor phenotypes. Instead, it forms a constitutive expression mediated by mutations or epigenetic modifications, providing a robust selective survival advantage for primary and metastatic lesions. Expanding evidence has demonstrated that the Warburg effect mediates multiple invasive behaviors in TNBC, including proliferation, metastasis, recurrence, immune escape, and multidrug resistance. Moreover, the Warburg effect-targeted therapy has been testified to be feasible in inhibiting TNBC progression. However, not all TNBCs are sensitive to glycolysis inhibitors because TNBC cells flexibly switch their metabolic patterns to cope with different survival pressures, namely metabolic plasticity. Between the Warburg effect-targeted medicines and the actual curative effect, metabolic plasticity creates a divide that must be continuously researched and bridged.

Phosphoproteomic analysis of neoadjuvant breast cancer suggests that increased sensitivity to paclitaxel is driven by CDK4 and filamin A

Precision oncology research is challenging outside the contexts of oncogenic addiction and/or targeted therapies. We previously showed that phosphoproteomics is a powerful approach to reveal patient subsets of interest characterized by the activity of a few kinases where the underlying genomics is complex. Here, we conduct a phosphoproteomic screening of samples from HER2-negative female breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant paclitaxel (N = 130), aiming to find candidate biomarkers of paclitaxel sensitivity. Filtering 11 candidate biomarkers through 2 independent patient sets (N = 218) allowed the identification of a subgroup of patients characterized by high levels of CDK4 and filamin-A who had a 90% chance of achieving a pCR in response to paclitaxel. Mechanistically, CDK4 regulates filamin-A transcription, which in turn forms a complex with tubulin and CLIP-170, which elicits increased binding of paclitaxel to microtubules, microtubule acetylation and stabilization, and mitotic catastrophe. Thus, phosphoproteomics allows the identification of explainable factors for predicting response to paclitaxel.

Treatment Strategies for Residual Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Breast cancer continues to be the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for breast cancer patients with locally advanced disease and patients with poor pathological features, such as triple-negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive subtypes. Neoadjuvant therapy offers several advantages, including better surgical outcomes, early systemic treatment for micro-metastases, and accurate tumor biology and chemosensitivity assessment. Multiple studies have shown that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better prognosis and better treatment outcomes; almost half of such patients may fail to achieve pCR. Tumor proliferative index, hormone receptor (HR) status, and HER2 expression are the major predictors of pCR. Strategies to improve pCR have been dependent on augmenting neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes and dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive tumor, and more recently, immunotherapy for patients with TN disease. The clinical management of patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies and depends mostly on the level of HR expression and HER2 status. Recent data have suggested that switching trastuzumab to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive disease and the addition of capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and HR-negative subtype is associated with a better outcome; both strategies are incorporated into current clinical practice guidelines. This paper reviews available and ongoing studies addressing strategies to better manage patients who continue to have residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Controversial Opinion of “All pCRs are the Same” in St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines 2021

The opinion of “all pCRs are the same” in St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines 2021 attracted the attention from clinical doctors. But this opinion is not consistent with the current clinical practice guidelines. The evidence-based medical evidence supported that the survival benefit of pCR was associated with treatment regimes, initial staging, and tumor biomarkers. To compare with the different status, the survival prognosis of pCRs is not the same. Furthermore, the pretreatment clinical stage, pathological stage, tissue grade, and subtype still influence on the survival prognosis of pCR. The pCR should be stratified according to histological factors and to guide the identification of individualized treatment after neoadjuvant therapy. In the future, a de-escalation treatment might be detected by the clinical trials of neoadjuvant therapy which would approach “all pCRs are the same”.

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Breast: The Latest WHO Classification and Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Breast tumors exhibiting neuroendocrine differentiation are a heterogeneous group of tumors that have been variously defined in previous World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. In the WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th edition, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the breast, both of which are invasive cancers, are classified as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast. However, the clinical significance of NE differentiation in breast cancers, especially in NETs of the breast, is not yet fully understood, and a large overlap appears to exist between breast cancers showing NE differentiation and invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST). While breast NECs show distinct clinical and morphological features, diagnosis of NETs based on the morphological characteristics alone can be challenging; one reason is that breast NETs do not necessarily have the same morphological characteristics as those of NENs arising in other organs. Thus, the heterogeneity of breast tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation and the changes in their classifications over the years have left many open issues that still need to be resolved. In this review, we shall summarize the history of breast “NENs,” including of mixed types of tumors and the characteristics of these tumors, and discuss their differences from NENs arising in other organs.

Abstract

Breast tumors with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation comprise an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors, including invasive breast cancer of no special type (IBC-NST) with NE features, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2019 defined neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast (Br-NENs) as tumors in which >90% of cells show histological evidence of NE differentiation, including NETs (low-grade tumors) and NEC (high-grade). Due to the low prevalence of these tumors and successive changes in their diagnostic criteria over the years, only limited evidence of these tumors exists, derived mainly from case reports and retrospective case series. Breast tumors with NE differentiation are usually treated like the more commonly occurring IBC-NSTs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of breast tumors with NE differentiation usually shows a hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor type 2 (HER2)-negative profile, so that hormonal therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors or other targeted agents would be reasonable treatment options. Herein, we present a review of the literature on breast tumors with NE differentiation as defined in the latest WHO 2019 classification, and discuss the clinical management of these tumors.

Physical Therapies for Psychosomatic Symptoms and Quality of Life Induced by Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the effects of Physical Therapies (PTs) on improvement in psychosomatic symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients.

Data Sources

Seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang, VIP, and China Biology Medicine disc databases) were systematically searched from the database inception through May 18, 2021.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared acupuncture or exercise with a sham control or usual care for the treatment of aromatase inhibitors (AIs)-related psychosomatic symptoms and QOL.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were screened and extracted independently using predesigned forms. The quality of RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The effect size was calculated via random-effects modeling. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The score of pain was measured with BPI scale and Western Ontario and the McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) scale. Emotional state was measured with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue). The QOL score was measured by self-reported measurements, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scale.

Results

Eleven RCTs (with 830 patients) were included in the systematic review, and data from 10 RCTs (with 798 patients) were used in the meta-analysis. Results showed acupuncture significantly reduced worst pain scores (P < 0.00001, I² = 83.5%) [SMD = −0.81, 95% CI (−1.51, −0.11)], but the effect of exercise therapies was not significant in overall change in worst pain scores (P =0.006, I² = 72.3%) [SMD = −0.30, 95% CI (−0.76, 0.16)]. Both acupuncture and exercise resulted in little to no difference in overall change in HADS-A subscale (P = 0.026<0.05, I² = 79.8%) [WMD = −0.21, 95% CI (−3.44, 3.03)], PSQI subscale (P = 0.488, I² = 0%) [WMD = 0.98, 95% CI (−0.57, 2.53)], and FACIT-Fatigue subscale (P = 0.022<0.05, I² = 81.0%) [WMD = 1.6, 95% CI (−5.75, 8.94)]. Exercise (compared with usual care) was associated with improving overall change in health-related QOL (subscales of SF-36 tool) (P = 0, I² = 72.1%) [WMD = 7.97, 95% CI (5.68, 10.25)] and cancer-specific QOL (subscales of FACT-G tool) (P = 0.304, I² = 16%) [WMD = 1.16, 95% CI (0.34, 1.97)].

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that based on moderate-level evidence, acupuncture was associated with significant reductions in pain intensity, and exercise might improve QOL in breast cancer patients treated with AIs. However, in psychosomatic symptoms such as anxiety, sleep disturbance, and fatigue, acupuncture and exercise training did not result in significant improvements.