Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: Presentation, Risk Factors, and Management

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy and anti-VEGF combination therapy: a real-world study of the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) regimens showed new hope for cancer patients and considered as future pillar of cancer therapy. However, severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in patients with ICIs and anti-VEGF combined therapy raise a serious concern and remain thoroughly assessed in clinics.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data retrieved from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2022 in FAERS database underwent disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were utilized to detect and assess the SCAR signals of ICIs and ICIs and anti-VEGF combined therapy for comparison.

RESULTS

In total, 854 (1.10%) and 80 (1.06%) reports on SCARs associated with ICIs and a combination of ICIs and anti-VEGF therapy, respectively, were analyzed. Most of SCARs reports were associated with the use of pembrolizumab (36.01%), nivolumab (23.97%) and a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (19.71%). A use of atezolizumab and bevacizumab combined therapy (60.00%) caused the most SCARs records out of ICIs and anti-VEGF combined therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with joint therapy of ICIs and anti-VEGF agents may cause severe cutaneous adverse events. It is vital to identify ICI-related SCARs early, and to manage them appropriately.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions due to antibiotics therapy: a pharmacovigilance analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system events

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to monitor, identify and evaluate severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) induced by antibiotics in patients.

METHODS

Disproportionality algorithms were performed in data mining to screen suspected SCAR after using nine categories of antibiotics based on the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to December 2022. The drug information and demographic characteristics of antibiotic-associated SCAR were also investigated.

RESULTS

The FAERS database received 12,212 antibiotic-associated SCAR cases. Approximately half of the SCAR patients were females, the majority of them were adults aged 18-65 years (48.35%), and 47.68% of SCAR patients required hospitalization. The highest SCAR signals RORs (95% CI) for antibiotics were: sulfonamides 23.30 (22.05-24.62), glycopeptides 21.27 (20.26-22.33), penicillins 16.00 (15.44-16.59), carbapenems 10.46 (9.57-11.44), and cephalosporins 13.27 (12.57-14.00). Cefotaxime, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, cefixime, vancomycin, piperacillin, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, and meropenem had stronger associations with the SCAR than the other antibiotics. However, sulfonamides-associated SCAR cases had the lowest fatality rate (6.23%), penicillin-associated SCAR cases had the highest hospitalization rate (54.16%), and carbapenem-associated SCAR cases seemingly resulted in the highest risk of death (19.03%).

CONCLUSION

Data mining of FAERS identified 30 antibiotic-associated SCAR signals, and provided a referable evidence of the occurrence, characteristics and prognosis of antibiotic-related SCARs.

Risk-conferring HLA variants in an epilepsy cohort: benefits of multifaceted use of whole genome sequencing in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Whole genome sequencing is increasingly used in healthcare, particularly for diagnostics. However, its clinically multifaceted potential for individually customised diagnostic and therapeutic care remains largely unexploited. We used existing whole genome sequencing data to screen for pharmacogenomic risk factors related to antiseizure medication-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs), such as human leucocyte antigen HLA-B*15:02, HLA-A*31:01 variants.

METHODS

Genotyping results, generated from the Genomics England UK 100 000 Genomes Project primarily for identification of disease-causing variants, were used to additionally screen for relevant HLA variants and other pharmacogenomic variants. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for clinical and cADR phenotypes for HLA variant carriers. Descriptive statistics and the χ2 test were used to analyse phenotype/genotype data for HLA carriers and compare frequencies of additional pharmacogenomic variants between HLA carriers with and without cADRs, respectively.

RESULTS

1043 people with epilepsy were included. Four HLA-B*15:02 and 86 HLA-A*31:01 carriers were identified. One out of the four identified HLA-B*15:02 carriers had suffered antiseizure medication-induced cADRs; the point prevalence of cADRs was 16.9% for HLA-A*31:01 carriers of European origin (n=46) and 14.4% for HLA-A*31:01 carriers irrespective of ancestry (n=83).

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive utilisation of genetic data spreads beyond the search for causal variants alone and can be extended to additional clinical benefits such as identifying pharmacogenomic biomarkers, which can guide pharmacotherapy for genetically-susceptible individuals.

Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Co-Trimoxazole-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

BACKGROUND

Co-trimoxazole has been reported as a common culprit drug for various cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). However, information on genotypic and phenotypic characteristics is still limited. We aimed to study clinical characteristics, genetic suitability, laboratory findings, and treatment outcomes in patients with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR and determine variables associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).

METHODS

The medical records of all patients diagnosed with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR during October 2015 and October 2021 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and laboratory investigation with an emphasis on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and HLA-DRB1 results linked to subtypes of cutaneous adverse reactions were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients diagnosed with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR were included in the study. Mean age at diagnosis was 38.0 ± 14.6 years old, and 72% were female. Subtypes of reactions included maculopapular eruption (MPE; 56.9%), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS; 23.6%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS; 12.5%), fixed drug eruption (4.2%), and urticaria (2.8%). Characteristics that were significantly associated with SCARs included male gender (OR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.04-8.75), HIV infection (OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.13-10.75), prophylactic use of co-trimoxazole (OR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.54-15.57), and co-trimoxazole administration longer than 10 days (OR = 7.65, 95% CI: 2.57-22.78). HLA-B*38:02 was associated with co-trimoxazole-induced SJS, while HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, and HLA-DRB1*12:01 were associated with co-trimoxazole-induced DRESS. HLA-B*52:01 was associated with co-trimoxazole-induced MPE.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-trimoxazole could induce various phenotypes of CADRs. Genotypic and phenotypic factors that may potentially predict co-trimoxazole-induced SCARs include male gender, HIV infection, prophylactic and prolonged drug use, as well as the presence of HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, HLA-B*38:02, or HLA-DRB1*12:01 alleles.

Why drug exposure is frequently associated with T-cell mediated cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions

Cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions represent the most common manifestation of drug allergy seen in the clinic, with 25% of all adverse drug reactions appearing in the skin. The severity of cutaneous eruptions can vastly differ depending on the cellular mechanisms involved from a minor, self-resolving maculopapular rash to major, life-threatening pathologies such as the T-cell mediated bullous eruptions, i.e., Stevens Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. It remains a significant question as to why these reactions are so frequently associated with the skin and what factors polarise these reactions towards more serious disease states. The barrier function which the skin performs means it is constantly subject to a barrage of danger signals, creating an environment that favors elicitation. Therefore, a critical question is what drives the expansion of cutaneous lymphocyte antigen positive, skin homing, T-cell sub-populations in draining lymph nodes. One answer could be the heterologous immunity hypothesis whereby tissue resident memory T-cells that express T-cell receptors (TCRs) for pathogen derived antigens cross-react with drug antigen. A significant amount of research has been conducted on skin immunity in the context of contact allergy and the role of tissue specific antigen presenting cells in presenting drug antigen to T-cells, but it is unclear how this relates to epitopes derived from circulation. Studies have shown that the skin is a metabolically active organ, capable of generating reactive drug metabolites. However, we know that drug antigens are displayed systemically so what factors permit tolerance in one part of the body, but reactivity in the skin. Most adverse drug reactions are mild, and skin eruptions tend to be visible to the patient, whereas minor organ injury such as transient transaminase elevation is often not apparent. Systemic hypersensitivity reactions tend to have early cutaneous manifestations, the progression of which is halted by early diagnosis and treatment. It is apparent that the preference for cutaneous involvement of drug hypersensitivity reactions is multi-faceted, therefore this review aims to abridge the findings from literature on the current state of the field and provide insight into the cellular and metabolic mechanisms which may contribute to severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

A 5-Year Study of Antiseizure Medications (ASMs) Monitoring in Patients with Neuropsychiatric Disorders in an Italian Clinical Center

Despite receiving appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs), a relevant percentage of neuropsychiatric patients do not benefit from this approach, and one reason is subtherapeutic ASMs plasma concentration (C(p)) due to improper drug adherence, interindividual pharmacokinetic differences, or metabolic interactions among different drugs. For these reasons, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by measuring ASMs C(p) is an effective tool that improves pharmacological therapies in clinical practice. Based on these premises, in the present real-world study, we analyzed the C(p) of the most used ASMs in diverse medical conditions, which were assayed during the years 2018-2022 at the University Hospital of Pisa, including about 24,000 samples. This population was largely heterogeneous, and our database did not contain clinical information about the patients. The most used ASMs were Valproate (VPA: 54.5%) and Levetiracetam (LEV: 18.6%), followed by Oxcarbazepine (OxCBZ: 8.3%) and Carbamazepine (CBZ: 7.2%), whereas the associations LEV/VPA, Ethosuximide (ESM)/VPA, and CBZ/VPA were the most frequently proposed. In about 2/3 of assays, ASMs C(p) was in range, except for VPA, which was underdosed in almost half of the samples. Importantly, toxic levels of ASMs C(p) were found very rarely. For VPA, there was a decrease of mean C(p) across ages, from adolescents to older patients, while the C(p) of LEV, CBZ, OxCBZ, and Topiramate (TPM) showed a slight tendency to increase. When we compared females and males, we found that for VPA, the average age was higher for females, whereas women taking Lamotrigine (LTG) and OxCBZ were younger than men. Then, comparing ASMs used in neurologic and psychiatric disorders, based on the request form, it emerged that the mean C(p) of CBZ, OxCBZ, and LTG on samples collected in the Psychiatric Unit was lower compared to the Neurology and Child Neuropsychiatry Units. Finally, the ASMs subjected to multiple dosing starting from an initial subtherapeutic C(p) increased their level at different time points within a year, reaching the reference range for some of them. In conclusion, the present study suggests that TDM is widely applied to monitor ASMs C(p), finding many of them within the reference range, as a demonstration of its utility in clinical practice.

Current understanding of genetic associations with delayed hypersensitivity reactions induced by antibiotics and anti-osteoporotic drugs

Drug-induced delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) is still a clinical and healthcare burden in every country. Increasing reports of DHRs have caught our attention to explore the genetic relationship, especially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs), including acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). In recent years, many studies have investigated the immune mechanism and genetic markers of DHRs. Besides, several studies have stated the associations between antibiotics-as well as anti-osteoporotic drugs (AOD)-induced SCARs and specific human leukocyte antigens (HLA) alleles. Strong associations between drugs and HLA alleles such as co-trimoxazole-induced DRESS and HLA-B*13:01 (Odds ratio (OR) = 45), dapsone-DRESS and HLA-B*13:01 (OR = 122.1), vancomycin-DRESS and HLA-A*32:01 (OR = 403), clindamycin-DHRs and HLA-B*15:27 (OR = 55.6), and strontium ranelate (SR)-SJS/TEN and HLA-A*33:03 (OR = 25.97) are listed. We summarized the immune mechanism of SCARs, update the latest knowledge of pharmacogenomics of antibiotics- and AOD-induced SCARs, and indicate the potential clinical use of these genetic markers for SCARs prevention in this mini review article.

Revisiting the question of toxidermia classification

In connection with the upcoming transition to the International Classification of Diseases and Health-related Problems of the eleventh revision (ICD-11), the authors of the article propose to replace the term toxidermy with a new, widely used in the world term drug-induced skin reactions. For standardization of definitions and diagnostic criteria, a unified working classification of this group of diseases is based on a mixed principle clinical manifestations (primary morphological elements of skin rash), etiological and pathogenetic aspects are taken into account. The applied unified classification of drug-induced skin reactions is proposed for discussion.

Mechanism of Lethal Skin Toxicities Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors and Related Treatment Strategies

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are widely used to treat various types of cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer. Adverse reactions such as skin toxicity, interstitial lung disease, hepatotoxicity, ocular toxicity, hypomagnesemia, stomatitis, and diarrhea may occur during treatment. Because the EGFR signaling pathway is important for maintaining normal physiological skin function. Adverse skin reactions occurred in up to 90% of cancer patients treated with EGFR inhibitors, including common skin toxicities (such as papulopustular exanthemas, paronychia, hair changes) and rare fatal skin toxicities (e.g., Stevens–Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis). This has led to the dose reduction or discontinuation of EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of cancer. Recently, progress has been made about research on the skin toxicity of EGFR inhibitors. Here, we summarize the mechanism of skin toxicity caused by EGFR inhibitors, measures to prevent severe fatal skin toxicity, and provide reference for medical staff how to give care and treatment after adverse skin reactions.

Potential role of regulatory DNA variants in modifying the risk of severe cutaneous reactions induced by aromatic anti-seizure medications

Objective

Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) with aromatic ring structure, including carbamazepine, are among the most common culprits. Screening for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele HLA‐B*15:02 is recommended prior to initiating treatment with carbamazepine in Asians, but this allele has low positive predictive value.

Methods

We performed whole genome sequencing and analyzed 6 199 696 common variants among 113 aromatic ASM‐induced SJS/TEN cases and 84 tolerant controls of Han Chinese ethnicity.

Results

In the primary analysis, nine variants reached genome‐wide significance (p < 5e‐08), one in the carbamazepine subanalysis (85 cases vs. 77 controls) and a further eight identified in HLA‐B*15:02‐negative subanalysis (35 cases and 53 controls). Interaction analysis between each novel variant from the primary analysis found that five increased risk irrespective of HLA‐B*15:02 status or zygosity. HLA‐B*15:02‐positive individuals were found to have reduced risk if they also carried a chromosome 12 variant, chr12.9426934 (heterozygotes: relative risk = .71, p = .001; homozygotes: relative risk = .23, p < .001). All significant variants lie within intronic or intergenic regions with poorly understood functional consequence. In silico functional analysis of suggestive variants (p < 5e‐6) identified through the primary and subanalyses (stratified by HLA‐B*15:02 status and drug exposure) suggests that genetic variation within regulatory DNA may contribute to risk indirectly by disrupting the regulation of pathology‐related genes. The genes implicated were specific either to the primary analysis (CD9), HLA‐B*15:02 carriers (DOCK10), noncarriers (ABCA1), carbamazepine exposure (HLA‐E), or phenytoin exposure (CD24).

Significance

We identified variants that could explain why some carriers of HLA‐B*15:02 tolerate treatment, and why some noncarriers develop ASM‐induced SJS/TEN. Additionally, this analysis suggests that the mixing of HLA‐B*15:02 carrier status in previous studies might have masked variants contributing to susceptibility, and that inheritance of risk for ASM‐induced SJS/TEN is complex, likely involving multiple risk variants.

Clinical characteristics and management of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis with haemodynamic instability

Background

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a severe pustular drug eruption with rare reports of haemodynamic instability.

Objective

To describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with AGEP‐associated haemodynamic instability.

Methods

This retrospective case series identified adult patients diagnosed with AGEP who had haemodynamic instability from November 2012 to February 2020 that were seen at two academic teaching hospitals with roles as a burn centre and tertiary referral centre at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, TX USA. Patients with a discharge diagnosis of AGEP that had haemodynamic instability during their eruption were included. Patients with a history of psoriasis, presentations thought to be a flare of generalized pustular psoriasis, or concurrent infection during eruption were excluded. AGEP with haemodynamic instability was characterized by degree of hypotension, dermatologic phenotype at time of dermatologic consultation, and management approach.

Results

This study included 19 patients with AGEP‐associated haemodynamic instability (mean age, 52 years; age range, 29–76 years; 11 (58%) female). Patients were classified on a spectrum of haemodynamic instability; three had sustained hypotension, 10 had hypotension with organ dysfunction, and six had shock. Patients with AGEP‐associated haemodynamic instability had a range of dermatologic phenotypes at initial consultation: subtle exanthematous eruption with minimal pustules, typical eruption with pustules and flexural predominance, and severe eruption with features of Stevens–Johnson syndrome. Both topical and systemic corticosteroids were used for treatment of several patients. Of the patients that required vasopressors and received systemic steroids, the majority were off vasopressors within 24 h of steroid initiation.

Conclusion

Approximately 22% of patients presenting with AGEP to a tertiary referral center had haemodynamic instability. Clinicians should be aware that dermatologic phenotype of AGEP at presentation does not correlate with development of haemodynamic instability.

Efficacy of add-on therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin in steroid hyporesponsive DRESS syndrome

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare, potentially life-threatening, delayed, drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Immediate withdrawal of the culprit drug and administration of systemic corticosteroids is the most widely accepted treatment. However, it is difficult to manage patients with DRESS syndrome who are not responsive to systemic steroids. We studied the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) in patients with DRESS syndrome unresponsive to systemic steroids. We retrospectively reviewed patients with DRESS syndrome who received IVIG in addition to systemic steroids during 2012-2017 and compared the clinical features and course of DRESS syndrome, before and after IVIG treatment. Eighteen DRESS patients (9 men) were included. The most frequent offending drugs were dapsone in five patients, followed by vancomycin in three patients, and carbamazepine in three patients. Rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, atypical lymphocytes, and hepatic involvement were common clinical findings. IVIG treatment was added within a median time of 7 days from the commencement of systemic steroid therapy. After IVIG treatment (total dosage: 1-2 g/kg), the fever resolved within a median time of 1 day (range, 0-3) and liver enzymes improved substantially within a median time of 13 days (range, 0-27). No severe adverse reactions related to IVIG therapy were observed in this study; however, there was one case of mortality. The addition of IVIG in DRESS syndrome in cases refractory to systemic steroid treatment may be helpful in hastening recovery. However, comparative studies using a placebo group are needed.

Current Perspectives on Severe Drug Eruption

Adverse drug reactions involving the skin are commonly known as drug eruptions. Severe drug eruption may cause severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs), which are considered to be fatal and life-threatening, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Although cases are relatively rare, approximately 2% of hospitalized patients are affected by SCARs. There is an incidence of 2 to 7 cases/million per year of SJS/TEN and 1/1000 to 1/10,000 exposures to offending agents result in DRESS. However, the mortality rate of severe drug eruptions can reach up to 50%. SCARs represent a real medical emergency, and early identification and proper management are critical to survival. The common pathogenesis of severe drug eruptions includes genetic linkage with HLA- and non-HLA-genes, drug-specific T cell-mediated cytotoxicity, T cell receptor restriction, and cytotoxicity mechanisms. A multidisciplinary approach is required for acute management. Immediate withdrawal of potentially causative drugs and specific supportive treatment is of great importance. Immunoglobulins, systemic corticosteroids, and cyclosporine A are the most frequently used treatments for SCARs; additionally, new biologics and plasma exchange are reasonable strategies to reduce mortality. Although there are many treatment methods for severe drug eruption, controversies remain regarding the timing and dosage of drug eruption. Types, dosages, and indications of new biological agents, such as tumor necrosis factor antagonists, mepolizumab, and omalizumab, are still under exploration. This review summarizes the clinical characteristics, risk factors, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies of severe drug eruption to guide clinical management.

Genotyping HLA alleles to predict the development of Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs): state-of-the-art

Introduction: Pharmacogenomics has great potential in reducing drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs). Pharmacogenomic studies have revealed an association between HLA genes and SCARs including acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).Areas covered: Pharmacogenomics-guided therapy could prevent severe drug hypersensitivity reactions. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) provided guidelines in the translation of clinically relevant and evidence-based SCARs pharmacogenomics research into clinical practice. In this review, we intended to summarize the significant HLA alleles associated with SCARs induced by different drugs in different populations. We also summarize the SCARs associated with genetic and non-genetic factors and the cost-effectiveness of screening tests.Expert opinion: The effectiveness of HLA screening on a wider scale in clinical practice requires significant resources, including state-of-the-art laboratory; multidisciplinary team approach and health care provider education and engagement; clinical decision support alert system via electronic medical record (EMR); laboratory standards and quality assurance; evidence of cost-effectiveness; and cost of pharmacogenomics tests and reimbursement.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic predictor in emergency department patients with cutaneous adverse drug reaction

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in emergency department (ED) patients with cutaneous adverse drug reactions to identify the severe patients at an early stage.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients aged 18 and over who admitted to the ED of a university hospital with the diagnosis of cutaneous adverse drug reaction were included. For included patients, clinical findings and ED admission complete blood count results were recorded. The primary outcome was hospitalization and the secondary outcome was the type of drug reaction.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included in the study. The median age of patients was 50 (36-64) years. There was no significant difference between the patients hospitalized and discharged from the ED in terms of age and gender (p = 0.340 and p = 0.762, respectively). There was no significant difference between hospitalized and discharged patients in terms of complete blood count parameters (p > 0.05, for all). The median NLR of hospitalized patients was significantly higher than that of patients discharged from the ED (6.13 vs. 3.69, p = 0.006). The median NLR of the patients with erythema multiform/Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrosis was significantly higher than the NLR of the patients with maculopapular and fixed drug eruptions (p = 0.022 and p = 0.015, respectively). The area under the curve value of NLR in predicting hospitalization was 0.640 (0.546-0.734). For 8.4 of NLR cutoff value, specificity was 83.9%.

CONCLUSION

NLR is a useful and simple prognostic parameter as an indicator of systemic inflammatory involvement in ED patients with cutaneous adverse drug reactions. NLR is a useful parameter for deciding which patient will be admitted to the hospital in that patient group.

Hypersensitivity reactions to multiple anti-tuberculosis drugs

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate hypersensitivity reactions to anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of single and multiple drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs).

Results

Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with anti-TB DHRs using oral drug provocation tests. Of these 28 patients, 17 patients (60.7%) had DHRs to a single drug and 11 (39.3%) had multiple DHRs. The median age of patients was 57.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 39.2–73.2). Of the total patients, 18 patients (64.3%) were men. The median number of anti-TB drugs causing multiple DHRs was 2.0 (IQR 2.0–3.0). Rifampin was the most common drug that caused DHRs in both the single and multiple DHR groups (n = 8 [47.1%] and n = 9 [52.9%], respectively). The treatment success rate was lower in the multiple DHR group than in the single DHR group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (81.8% vs. 94.1%; P = 0.543).

Conclusions

Multiple anti-TB DHRs were common in all patients who experienced DHRs, and rifampin was the most common causative drug. The treatment outcomes appeared to be poorer in patients with multiple DHRs than in those with single DHRs.

Terbinafine-Induced Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis

Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions are uncommon but potentially critical clinical situations demanding prompt diagnosis and treatment. We report a rare and severe case of terbinafine-induced acute generalized pustulosis. The patient was directly referred to a Burn Unit where she underwent diagnostic confirmation, systemic supportive care, and wound care treatments. Clinical and histopathological differential diagnosis of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions is fundamental due to their significantly different management and prognosis.

Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Anti-tuberculosis Drugs in Korean Patients

Purpose

Anti-tuberculosis drugs (ATDs) can cause severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Underlying tuberculous infection and co-administration of multiple drugs may contribute to the complexity of ATD-related SCARs. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of ATD-related SCARs.

Methods

We analyzed ATD-related SCAR cases in 2010-2015, selected from a web-based Database of the Korean Registry of SCAR.

Results

Among 783, 53 patients with ATD-induced SCARs were enrolled, including 12 with SJS/TEN (22.6%) and 41 with DRESS (77.4%). When comparing the ATD and non-ATD groups, the prevalence of DRESS patients was higher in the ATD group than in the non-ATD group (77.4% vs. 45.8%, P < 0.001). Among patients with ATD-related SCARs, those with SJS/TEN were significantly older, had higher intensive care unit admissions, and had higher mortality than those with DRESS (70.5 vs. 50.0 years, P < 0.001; 41.7% vs. 6.1%, P = 0.010; and 33.3% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.003, respectively). ATDs were challenged in 14 cases. The ATD associated most often with SCAR cases was rifampin (81.8%), followed by isoniazid (66.7%), ethambutol (50.0%), pyrazinamide (33.3%). Six patients (42.9%) had hypersensitivity reactions to 2 or more drugs.

Conclusions

DRESS was more common among the ATD-related SCAR cases. Although treatment with most ATDs carries the risk of SCAR development, the use of rifampin was most frequently involved in the occurrence of SCARs. Multiple hypersensitivity was frequently observed in ATD-related SCARs.

Clinical and pathogenic aspects of the severe cutaneous adverse reaction epidermal necrolysis (EN)

The severe cutaneous adverse reaction epidermal necrolysis (EN) which includes toxic epidermal necrolysis and the milder Stevens-Johnson syndrome is characterized by epidermal loss due to massive keratinocyte apoptosis and/or necroptosis. EN is often caused by a drug mediating a specific TCR-HLA interaction via the (pro)hapten, pharmacological interaction or altered peptide loading mechanism involving a self-peptide presented by keratinocytes. (Memory) CD8 + T cells are activated and exhibit cytotoxicity against keratinocytes via the perforin/granzyme B and granulysin pathway and Fas/FasL interaction. Alternatively drug-induced annexin release by CD14 + monocytes can induce formyl peptide receptor 1 death of keratinocytes by necroptosis. Subsequent keratinocyte death stimulates local inflammation, activating other immune cells producing pro-inflammatory molecules and downregulating regulatory T cells. Widespread epidermal necrolysis and inflammation can induce life-threatening systemic effects, leading to high mortality rates. Research into genetic susceptibility aims to identify risk factors for eventual prevention of EN. Specific HLA class I alleles show the strongest association with EN, but risk variants have also been identified in genes involved in drug metabolism, cellular drug uptake, peptide presentation and function of CD8 + T cells and other immune cells involved in cytotoxic responses. After the acute phase of EN, long-term symptoms can remain or arise mainly affecting the skin and eyes. Mucosal sequelae are characterized by occlusions and strictures due to adherence of denuded surfaces and fibrosis following mucosal inflammation. In addition, systemic pathology can cause acute and chronic hepatic and renal symptoms. EN has a large psychological impact and strongly affects health-related quality of life among EN survivors.

[Cholesterol crystal embolism mimicking a DRESS]

INTRODUCTION

Clinical presentation of cholesterol crystal embolism (CCE) can be dermatologic when cholesterol crystals become lodged in small cutaneous arteries resulting in ischemia. We report a case of CCE with erythroderma misleading to a diagnostic of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).

CASE REPORT

A 66 year-old woman presented with erythroderma few months after initiation of allopurinol. Acute renal failure was present with elevation in plasma creatinine concentration (523μmol/L) and hypereosinophilia (HE) (5666/mm³). Finally, the REGISCAR score helped to rule out DRESS diagnostic. Past blood-count tests were analyzed revealing chronic HE present before allopurinol initiation. Renal biopsy identified CCE.

CONCLUSION

This case is the first to report a DRESS like presentation of CCE. Clinical findings are secondary to HE and not to occlusion of cutaneous arteries.

HIV infection confers distinct mechanisms in severe drug eruption: Endogenous virus activation with aberrant Th2/Th1 and CD8+ T cells function

Severe drug eruption (SDE), a common skin disease, becomes dangerous when it occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Forty patients including HIV⁺ SDE⁺ (n = 15), HIV^- SDE⁺ (n = 15) and HIV⁺ SDE^- (n = 10) subjects were enrolled in our study. All HIV⁺ patients were at acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) stage. Serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-13, IL-6, CXCL9, and CCL17 were quantified by ELISA. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) loads were quantified by RT-qPCR. CD4, CD8, Th1, Th2, TNF-α-CD8, and IFN-γ-CD8 T cell populations were measured by flow cytometry. Levels of biochemical indexes in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients were significantly different from in HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). EBV and CMV viral loads were significantly higher in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients, but not in HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IFN-γ were significantly elevated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Th2/Th1 populations and TNF-α secreting or IFN-γ secreting CD8⁺ T cells, were significantly up-regulated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients compared to HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Conversely, the CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly down-regulated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients compared to HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). HIV infection confers distinct clinical phenotypes and immune inflammatory mechanisms in SDE. Sustained EBV and CMV activation, unbalanced Th2/Th1 and overactive CD8⁺ T cells mediating a pro-inflammatory response could act as distinct mechanisms in the aggravation of SDE in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients.

Aetiopathogenesis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in children: A 9-year experience in a tertiary care paediatric hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to drugs including as follows: Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP). Incidence, triggers and management of SCARs have not been investigated in large-scale epidemiological studies on children.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to collect epidemiological, clinical and aetiological data from children with SCARs referred to our tertiary care paediatric hospital of Florence.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2018 charts of children with diagnosis of SCAR were reviewed, and data collected during the acute phase and/or the subsequent allergy evaluation. Patients underwent patch tests, intradermal tests and lymphocyte transformation tests. All children were investigated for infectious diseases.

RESULTS

Incidence of SCARs in hospitalized children was 0.32% over a 9-year period. Fifty-four children were enrolled (31 M; 23 F; median age 6.5 years): 17 cases of DRESS, 30 SJS, 3 TEN, 2 AGEP, 1 linear immunoglobulin A bullous disease (LABD) and 1 pemphigus. Twenty-eight out of 54 patients underwent drug allergy investigations, and 50% of them resulted positive. Combining clinical history and results of allergy work-up, 74% SCARs seem to be caused by drugs, 18.6% by both drugs and infections, 3.7% by infections, and 3.7% remained idiopathic. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, SCARs incidence is in line with literature data. Drugs were most commonly the leading cause. Management of SCARs requires cooperation among professional figures for an early diagnosis and a prompt treatment. Mortality rate seems to be lower in children.

Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Diabetes Mellitus Medications and Medical Devices: A Review

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the USA. If uncontrolled, diabetes can lead to devastating complications. Diabetes medications and medical devices largely contribute to the significant financial expense that the disease inflicts on affected individuals and society. Alongside significant economic burden, there are numerous cutaneous adverse effects associated with diabetes medications and medical devices. Despite the large and increasing number of individuals living with diabetes and the wide use of the related medications and medical devices, there is limited literature that comprehensively documents their cutaneous adverse effects. These cutaneous adverse effects are significant as they can worsen glycemic control, increase disease distress, and may increase risk of associated complications. Thus, it is important that providers can recognize these cutaneous adverse effects, identify the culprit agents, and can properly manage them. In this article, we provide a critical review of the cutaneous adverse effects of medications and devices used in the management of diabetes and provide insight into risk factors and prevention and an overview of therapeutic management. An emphasis is placed on clinical recognition and treatment for use of the medical providers who, regardless of practice setting, will treat patients with diabetes.