So the First Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Failed…Now What?

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse

OBJECTIVES

We set out to assess long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in women after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

All women with a history of pelvic organ prolapse surgery operated between 2005 and 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. The indication for recurrent POP surgery was a symptomatic stage II and above pelvic organ prolapse. The data from objective urogynecologic examination and subjective patient assessment using validated questionnaires were collected. The last follow-up information was evaluated. The outcomes were compared with preoperative state using Student t-test and Wilcoxon test, p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

39 women were enrolled in the study. The rate of perioperative complications was very low; no significant hemorrhage, ureteral damage or conversion to laparotomy were observed. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 26.8 months. The postoperative course was not complicated by bowel incarceration, pelvic infection or mesh exposure. We observed a statistically significant elevation of all POP-Q points and decrease in all mean scores of PFDI, PFIQ, Wexner and VAS prolapse bother postoperatively. Improvement in stress urinary incontinence, anal incontinence and constipation was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse is a safe and effective surgery regardless of the type of the original repair performed. It provides good subjective and anatomical outcomes with a lasting effect on the quality of life in a long-term follow-up.

Pelvic organ prolapse: An unusual cause of small bowel obstruction

We present the rare case of a small bowel obstruction secondary to pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A 77-year-old female presented with four days of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. She had a history of abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-opherectomy and a mildly symptomatic cystocele. She was found to have an enterocele causing small bowel obstruction. The enterocele was manually reduced and subsequently managed non-operatively with a pessary. Prior case reports of small bowel obstructions secondary to POP required emergent surgical intervention. Post-menopausal women should be asked about symptoms or presence of pelvic organ prolapse and in the correct patient population, pelvic examination can be important for diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction. If the enterocele is manually reduced non-operative management can be safe and effective.