Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: How Far Up the Coagulation Cascade Will We Go?

Pharmacological Difference Between Platelet Aggregations in Cardioembolic Stroke Patients with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Pilot Study

Background Selecting the appropriate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for embolic ischemic stroke patients, especially on concurrent antiplatelet therapy, is important. However, a limited number of studies have reported on the pharmacological differences in platelet aggregation of each DOAC. We aimed to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of selected DOACs, by comparing dabigatran (a direct oral thrombin inhibitor) and factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors (apixaban and rivaroxaban) in patients who had suffered a cardioembolic stroke. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 12 patients diagnosed with a cardioembolic stroke who took any DOAC without an antiplatelet drug and underwent platelet aggregation tests within 60 days from the onset of symptoms. The platelet aggregation tests were analyzed by both light transmission aggregometry and VerifyNow®. Results Six patients (50%) took dabigatran, while the other six (50%) took an FXa inhibitor (n = 4 for apixaban and n = 2 for rivaroxaban). From the light transmission aggregometry analysis, it was found that the maximal extent of aggregation for adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was significantly higher with dabigatran than with FXa inhibitors, and the ED₅₀ value of ADP on platelet aggregation was significantly lower with dabigatran than with FXa inhibitors. Moreover, the VerifyNow® analyses revealed that P2Y₁₂ reaction units were significantly higher with dabigatran than with FXa inhibitors. Conclusions Dabigatran had little impact on platelet aggregation compared to FXa inhibitors in patients who had suffered a cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation, and who took DOACs for secondary prevention within 60 days from the onset.

New Antithrombotic Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome

In recent years, much progress has been made in the field of antithrombotic drugs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment, as reflected by the introduction of the more potent P2Y12-inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor, and novel forms of concomitant anticoagulation, such as fondaparinux and bivalirudin. However, despite substantial improvements in contemporary ACS treatment, there remains residual ischemic risk in this group and hence the need for even more effective antithrombotic drugs, while balancing antithrombotic efficacy against bleeding risk. This review discusses recently introduced and currently developed antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs in ACS treatment.

A novel approach in potential anticoagulants from peptides epitope 558-565 of A2 subunit of factor VIII

Factor VIII, a human blood plasma protein, plays an important role during the intrinsic pathway of blood coagulation cascade after its activation by thrombin. The activated form of FVIII acts as cofactor to the serine protease Factor IXa, in the conversion of the zymogen Factor X to the active enzyme Factor Xa. The Ser558-Gln565 region of the A2 subunit of Factor VIII has been shown to be crucial for FVIIIa-FIXa interaction. Based on this, a series of linear peptides, analogs of the 558-565 loop of the A2 subunit of the heavy chain of Factor VIII were synthesized using the acid labile 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin and biologically evaluated in vitro by measuring the chronic delay of activated partial thromboplastin time and the inhibition of Factor VIII activity, as potential anticoagulants.

Mechanisms and monitoring of bypassing agent therapy

Understanding the mechanism of action of normal hemostasis and how the bypassing agents recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven) and plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate (Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Agent [FEIBA]) control abnormal bleeding is imperative for healthcare professionals who treat patients with hemophilia and other bleeding disorders. A cell-based model has improved our understanding of in vivo mechanisms of hemostasis and the basis of the bleeding tendency in hemophilia. Bypassing agents do not restore the normal pathways of hemostasis in hemophilia, but rather boost thrombin generation in spite of a lack of platelet surface FVIIIa-FIXa ('tenase') activity. Thus, the common clinical laboratory coagulation assays do not reflect the clinically relevant hemostatic activity of bypassing agents, and no validated assay is available with which to measure the in vivo efficacy of these agents or predict individual patient responses to treatment. Global hemostasis assays measuring overall coagulation capacity have potential for assessment of the effects of bypassing agents. This review will focus on the mechanisms of clotting and their relationship to understanding the mechanisms of action of the bypassing agents in vivo and the methodologies that are emerging to monitor the clinical efficacy of bypassing agent therapy.