New developments in the management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension

A decade of approved first-in-class small molecule orphan drugs: Achievements, challenges and perspectives

In the past decade (2011-2020), there was a growing interest in the discovery and development of orphan drugs for the treatment of rare diseases. However, rare diseases only account for a population of 0.65‰-1‰ which usually occur with previously unknown biological mechanisms and lack of specific therapeutics, thus to increase the demands for the first-in-class (FIC) drugs with new biological targets or mechanisms. Considering the achievements in the past 10 years, a total of 410 drugs were approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which contained 151 FIC drugs and 184 orphan drugs, contributing to make up significant numbers of the approvals. Notably, more than 50% of FIC drugs are developed as orphan drugs and some of them have already been milestones in drug development. In this review, we aim to discuss the FIC small molecules for the development of orphan drugs case by case and highlight the R&D strategy with novel targets and scientific breakthroughs.

Hypertension, hypotension and syncope

Hypertension and hypotension are strictly related phenomena, that frequently coexist within the spectrum of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, especially at advanced age. Indeed, antihypertensive treatment may predispose to orthostatic and post-prandial hypotension, while intensive blood pressure lowering may be responsible for systemic hypotension. Over recent years, systemic and orthostatic hypotension have emerged as important although often neglected risk factors for adverse outcomes, paralleling the widely recognized arterial hypertension. Both hypertension and hypotension are associated with detrimental effects on target organs and survival, thus significantly impacting patients' prognosis, functional autonomy and quality of life. Balancing low and high blood pressure requires accurate diagnostic assessment of blood pressure values and patients' hypotensive susceptibility, which allow for the development of customized treatment strategies based on individual hypo/hypertensive risk profile. The present review illustrates the complex interrelationship between hypotension and hypertension and discusses the relevant prognostic role of these conditions. Additionally, it provides an overview on hypotension detection and treatment in patients with hypertension, focusing on customized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Pharmacologic treatment of orthostatic hypotension

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a disabling disorder caused by impairment of the normal autonomic compensatory mechanisms that maintain upright blood pressure. Nonpharmacologic treatment is always the first step in the management of this condition, but a considerable number of patients will require pharmacologic therapies. Denervation hypersensitivity and impairment of baroreflex buffering makes these patients sensitive to small doses of pressor agents. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology can help in selecting between treatment options. In general, patients with low "sympathetic reserve", i.e., those with peripheral noradrenergic degeneration (pure autonomic failure, Parkinson's disease) and low plasma norepinephrine, tend to respond better to "norepinephrine replacers" (midodrine and droxidopa). On the other hand, patients with relatively preserved "sympathetic reserve", i.e., those with impaired central autonomic pathways but spared peripheral noradrenergic fibers (multiple system atrophy) and normal or slightly reduced plasma norepinephrine, tend to respond better to "norepinephrine enhancers" (pyridostigmine, atomoxetine, and yohimbine). There is, however, a spectrum of responses within these extremes, and treatment should be individualized. Other nonspecific treatments include fludrocortisone and octreotide. The presence of associated clinical conditions, such as supine hypertension, heart failure, postprandial hypotension, PD, MSA, and diabetes need to be considered in the pharmacologic management of these patients.

Management of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in the heart failure patient

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is a common comorbidity in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. It is associated with an increased risk of falls, incident cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. There are over 5 million individuals in the U.S. with heart failure (HF) with an associated 50% mortality rate at 5 years. The prevalence of nOH and HF increase with age and, as the population continues to age, will be increasingly common comorbid conditions. Thus, the effective management of these conditions has important implications for public health. The management of orthostatic hypotension in the context of congestive heart failure is challenging due to the fact that the fundamental principles of management of these disease states are in opposition to each other. In this review, we will discuss the principles of management of nOH and HF and outline strategies for the effective treatment of these comorbid conditions.

Impact of orthostatic hypotension on wheelchair use in patients with Parkinson's disease

Wheelchair use is an important indicator of disease progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we investigated whether orthostatic hypotension (OH) affects the time to wheelchair use. We examined 33 PD patients with OH and 95 without OH. Median time to start using a wheelchair calculated from the time of disease onset was significantly shorter in patients with OH than in those without OH (12.0 vs 19.0 years; p < 0.001). Thus, appropriate management of OH and motor function is necessary.

Orthostatic hypotension in internal medicine wards

OBJECTIVES

Most studies of orthostatic hypotension (OH) have focused on community-dwelling and institutionalized patient populations. Less is known about OH in hospitalized patients. Moreover, a comprehensive review of OH in internal medicine wards has not been published in the English literature. Our purpose is to provide current information regarding OH in internal medicine inpatients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of medical databases was performed for potentially relevant articles, using the following keywords: postural or orthostatic hypotension, with the combination of hospitalization or internal medicine. Inclusion criteria were: population of patients hospitalized for acute disorders in internal medicine or geriatric wards with a sample size of ≥50 and publication as an original full-length article in the English language. Data from 14 selected studies are reviewed, including: pathophysiology, evaluation, prevalence, manifestations, risk factors, prognosis, and management.

RESULTS

OH is a common and often symptomatic disorder in elderly internal medicine patients. The prevalence of OH in this population ranges from 22-75%. There are substantial discrepancies between the studies reviewed regarding definitions and means of evaluating OH. OH in internal medicine wards is largely non-neurogenic and multifactorial. The main predisposing factors for OH are prolonged bed rest, hypertension, and heart failure. OH in internal medicine wards is managed mainly with non-pharmacologic interventions, and is frequently reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

In internal medicine inpatients, OH warrants attention because this disorder is common, potentially dangerous, and treatable. In the hospital setting, OH should be routinely assessed on ambulation, following the current guidelines for OH definition and meaning.

Orthostatic hypotension: pathophysiology, assessment, treatment and the paradox of supine hypertension

Both hypertension and orthostatic hypotension (OH) are strongly age-associated and are common management problems in older people. However, unlike hypertension, management of OH has unique challenges with few well-established treatments. Not infrequently, they both coexist, further compounding the management. This review provides comprehensive information on OH, including pathophysiology, diagnostic workup and treatment, with a view to provide a practical guide to its management. Special references are made to patients with supine hypertension and postprandial hypotension and older hypertensive patients.

Evidence-based treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and related symptoms

Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, postprandial hypotension and exercise-induced hypotension are common features of cardiovascular autonomic failure. Despite the serious impact on patient’s quality of life, evidence-based guidelines for non-pharmacological and pharmacological management are lacking at present. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on therapeutic options for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension and related symptoms with evidence-based recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Patient’s education and non-pharmacological measures remain essential, with strong recommendation for use of abdominal binders. Based on quality of evidence and safety issues, midodrine and droxidopa reach a strong recommendation level for pharmacological treatment of neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. In selected cases, a range of alternative agents can be considered (fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, yohimbine, atomoxetine, fluoxetine, ergot alkaloids, ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, octreotide, indomethacin, ibuprofen, caffeine, methylphenidate and desmopressin), though recommendation strength is weak and quality of evidence is low (atomoxetine, octreotide) or very low (fludrocortisone, pyridostigmine, yohimbine, fluoxetine, ergot alkaloids, ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, indomethacin, ibuprofen, caffeine, methylphenidate and desmopressin). In case of severe postprandial hypotension, acarbose and octreotide are recommended (strong recommendation, moderate level of evidence). Alternatively, voglibose or caffeine, for which a weak recommendation is available, may be useful.

Impact of the Norepinephrine Prodrug Droxidopa on the QTc Interval in Healthy Individuals

A double‐blind, 4‐period crossover study (NCT01327066) was conducted to assess the effect of the novel norepinephrine prodrug droxidopa on the QT interval in in healthy subjects. Subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of droxidopa 600 mg (maximal dose) and 2000 mg (supratherapeutic dose) compared with the positive control, moxifloxacin 400 mg, and placebo, each separated by a 3‐day washout period. Patients were monitored by continuous Holter monitoring, and electrocardiograms (ECGs) were extracted 0.5–23 hours after dosing. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected before dosing and after ECG data collection. The primary end point was the time‐matched placebo‐adjusted change from baseline in the individually corrected QT (QTcI). The time‐averaged QTcI mean placebo‐corrected changes from baseline for droxidopa 600 and 2000 mg were 0.1 milliseconds (90%CI, ‐0.9 to 1.0 milliseconds) and 0.3 milliseconds (90%CI, ‐0.6 to 1.3 milliseconds), respectively, and 9 milliseconds (90%CI, 8.4–10.3 milliseconds) for moxifloxacin. This study found no effect of either dose of droxidopa on cardiac repolarization using QTcI. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship and cardiac repolarization showed no association with droxidopa exposure. There were no clinically relevant effects of droxidopa on heart rate, atrioventricular conduction, or cardiac depolarization identified. No morphologic ECG changes were observed.

Effectiveness of droxidopa compared to midodrine in standing blood pressure and orthostatic tolerance in adults with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION

The question of this review is: what is the effectiveness of droxidopa compared to midodrine on standing blood pressure and orthostatic intolerance symptoms in adults with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension?

Hyperinsulinemia and Insulin Resistance in Dopamine β-Hydroxylase Deficiency

CONTEXT

Dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) deficiency is a rare genetic disorder characterized by failure to convert dopamine to norepinephrine. DBH-deficient patients lack sympathetic adrenergic function and are therefore predisposed to orthostatic hypotension. DBH-deficient mice exhibit hyperinsulinemia, lower plasma glucose levels, and insulin resistance due to loss of tonic sympathetic inhibition of insulin secretion. The impact of DBH deficiency on glucose homeostasis in humans is unknown.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe the metabolic profile of an adolescent female DBH-deficient patient. The patient underwent genetic testing, cardiovascular autonomic function testing, and evaluation of insulin secretion and sensitivity with hyperglycemic clamp under treatment-naive conditions. All procedures were repeated after 1 year of treatment with the norepinephrine prodrug droxidopa (300 mg, 3 times a day). Genetic testing showed a homozygous mutation in the DBH gene (rs74853476). Under treatment-naive conditions, she had undetectable plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels, resulting in sympathetic noradrenergic failure and orthostatic hypotension (-32 mm Hg supine to seated). She had high adiposity (41%) and fasting plasma insulin levels (25 μU/mL), with normal glucose (91 mg/dL). Hyperglycemic clamp revealed increased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and insulin resistance. Droxidopa restored plasma norepinephrine and improved orthostatic tolerance, with modest effects on glucose homeostasis.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence for impairment in cardiovascular autonomic regulation, hyperinsulinemia, enhanced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and insulin resistance in a DBH-deficient patient. These metabolic derangements were not corrected by chronic droxidopa treatment. These findings provide insight into the pathophysiology and treatment of DBH deficiency and into the importance of catecholaminergic mechanisms to resting metabolism.

Parkinson's disease between internal medicine and neurology

General medical problems and complications have a major impact on the quality of life in all stages of Parkinson's disease. To introduce an effective treatment, a comprehensive analysis of the various clinical symptoms must be undertaken. One must distinguish between (1) diseases which arise independently of Parkinson's disease, and (2) diseases which are a direct or indirect consequence of Parkinson's disease. Medical comorbidity may induce additional limitations to physical strength and coping strategies, and may thus restrict the efficacy of the physical therapy which is essential for treating hypokinetic-rigid symptoms. In selecting the appropriate medication for the treatment of any additional medical symptoms, which may arise, its limitations, contraindications and interactions with dopaminergic substances have to be taken into consideration. General medical symptoms and organ manifestations may also arise as a direct consequence of the autonomic dysfunction associated with Parkinson's disease. As the disease progresses, additional non-parkinsonian symptoms can be of concern. Furthermore, the side effects of Parkinson medications may necessitate the involvement of other medical specialists. In this review, we will discuss the various general medical aspects of Parkinson's disease.

Impaired peripheral vasoconstrictor response to orthostatic stress in patients with multiple system atrophy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Most patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) develop autonomic dysfunction; however, orthostatic hypotension is not always present. Failure of the vasoconstrictor response is thought to be responsible for orthostatic hypotension, but the degree of impairment of this response in patients with MSA is unclear. We assessed autonomic function in patients with MSA by evaluating the vasoconstrictive response during a head-up tilt test and determining its relationship to orthostatic hypotension. As an additional examination, the efficacy of norepinephrine in treating orthostatic hypotension was also assessed.

METHODS

The study included 82 patients with MSA and 28 controls. Measures of total peripheral resistance were obtained during a head-up tilt test. Norepinephrine was administered to the patients lacking a vasoconstrictive response to evaluate its ability to treat orthostatic hypotension.

RESULTS

At a 60° tilt, orthostatic hypotension occurred in 47.6% of the patients and 0% of controls. Reduction in total peripheral resistance from baseline at a 60° tilt was observed in 69.5% of the patients and 0% of controls. In patients with MSA, changes in systolic blood pressure from the baseline at a 60° tilt correlated positively with changes in the total peripheral resistance (r = 0.69, p < 0.0001). Norepinephrine prevented the reduction of total peripheral resistance and development of orthostatic hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

A large number of patients with MSA with and without orthostatic hypotension have an impaired peripheral vasoconstrictive response, suggesting a high frequency of cardiovascular dysautonomia with an associated risk of developing orthostatic hypotension. A norepinephrine infusion was effective for treating orthostatic hypotension.