Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation: the Role of Additional Sites in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Incidence, electrophysiological characteristics, and long-term follow-up of perimitral atrial flutter in patients with previously confirmed mitral isthmus block

INTRODUCTION

After mitral isthmus (ΜΙ) catheter ablation, perimitral atrial flutter (PMF) circuits can be maintained due to the preservation of residual myocardial connections, even if conventional pacing criteria for complete MI block are apparently met (MI pseudo-block). We aimed to study the incidence, the electrophysiological characteristics, and the long-term outcome of these patients.

METHODS

Seventy-two consecutive patients (mean age 62.4 ± 10.2, 62.5% male) underwent MI ablation, either as part of an atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation strategy (n = 35), or to treat clinical reentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) (n = 32), or to treat AT that occurred during ablation for AF (n = 5). Ιn all patients, the electrophysiological characteristics of PMF circuits were studied by high-density mapping.

RESULTS

Mitral isthmus block was successfully achieved in 69/72 patients (95.6%). Five patients developed PMF after confirming MI block. In these patients, high-density mapping during the PMF showed a breakthrough in MI with extremely low impulse conduction velocity (CV). In contrast, in usual PMF circuits that occurred after AF ablation, the lowest CV of the reentrant circuit was of significantly higher value (0.07 ± 0.02 m/s vs 0.25 ± 0.07 m/s, respectively; P < .001). Patients presented with clinical AT had better prognosis in maintaining sinus rhythm after MI ablation compared with patients presented with AF.

CONCLUSION

Perimitral atrial flutter with MI pseudo-block may be present after MI ablation and has specific electrophysiological features characterized by remarkably slow CV in the MI. Thus, even after MI block is achieved, a more detailed mapping in the boundaries of the ablation line or reinduction attempts may be needed to exclude residual conduction.

Rhythm Control of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Systolic Heart Failure: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Catheter ablation for the management of atrial fibrillation: current technical perspectives

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, with a prevalence that increases alongside the ageing population worldwide. The management of AF involves restoration of sinus rhythm through antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Yet, these medications have only modest efficacy in achieving long-term success, have not shown to result in a mortality benefit, are frequently not tolerated and have associated adverse side effects. Therefore, catheter ablation has become a valuable treatment approach for AF and even a viable first-line strategy in select cases. Traditionally, the combination of radiofrequency energy and a three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system has been used to guide catheter ablation for AF. However, single-procedural efficacy and long-term outcomes still remain suboptimal for many patients, particularly those with persistent or long-standing AF. Recent advances in ablation technology and strategy, therefore, provide new procedural approaches for catheter-based treatment with the aim of overcoming current challenges in procedural duration and overall success. The aim of this paper was to provide an updated review of the current practices and techniques relating to ablation for AF and to compare the use of these strategies for paroxysmal and persistent AF.

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Percutaneous catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. However, catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with unsatisfying success rates. This review aims to summarize the recent literature on the progress of catheter ablation among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we outline the potential future therapeutic techniques of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. We highlight the innovative techniques (rotor mapping, substrate mapping, delayed enhancement MRI, and high-resolution mapping catheter) of current approaches and optimal procedural endpoint for persistent atrial fibrillation.

SUMMARY

In summary, the optimal catheter ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation remains unknown. Current data highlight the need for a better understanding of the substrate and mechanisms of arrhythmia maintenance in this population. Current mapping technologies offer additional tools (improved automatic algorithm for annotation, multiple electrode mapping, high-resolution mapping, and application of different processing techniques) for identifying the putative mechanism underlying atrial fibrillation. Further prospective studies are needed for the optimal procedural endpoint and the recent innovative techniques and their clinical benefits in ablation strategies.

Influence of substrate modification in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on the incidence of acute complications: Analysis of 10 795 procedures in J-CARAF Study 2011-2016

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In expectation of better outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), several strategies of extra-PV (pulmonary vein) substrate modification have been utilized. We assessed whether substrate modification or ablation of extra-PV source is a predictor of complications.

METHODS

Japanese Heart Rhythm Society requested electrophysiology centers to register the data of patients who underwent AF ablation.

RESULTS

The data of 10 795 AF ablation cases (age; 63.8 ± 10.6 years) treated during 2011-2016 were registered. Pericardial effusion (n = 105), massive bleeding (n = 108), stroke (n = 6), atrial-esophageal fistula (n = 2), and other 114 complications occurred in 323 patients (3.0%). Univariate analysis revealed that age ≧ 65 years, female gender, heart failure, CHA2DS2-VASc≧3, hemodialysis, deep sedation, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation ([+] vs [-] = 4.3% vs 2.8%, P = .005) were related with the higher incidence of complications. Redo session, 3-D imaging system ([+] vs [-]: 4.4% vs 2.9%, P = .017), and periprocedural dabigatran were related with the lower incidence of complications. None of the linear ablation of the left atrium, ganglionated plexi ablation, and superior vena cava ablation affected the incidence of complications. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that in addition to 3-D imaging system, age ≧ 65 years, redo session, and deep sedation, CFAE ablation was an independent predictor of the risk of complications (OR 1.78, P = .001). Specifically, implantation of a permanent pacemaker due to emerging sinus node dysfunction was frequent after CFAE ablation (CFAE [+] vs [-] = 4/1047 vs 2/9748, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among extra-PV ablation strategies, CFAE-guided ablation is a predictor of ablation-related complications.