White Coat Hypertension and Cardiovascular Diseases: Innocent or Guilty

Establishment of a scoring model for the differential diagnosis of white coat hypertension and sustained hypertension

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to establish a scoring model for the differential diagnosis of white coat hypertension (WCH) and sustained hypertension (SHT).

METHODS

This study comprised 553 adults with elevated office blood pressure, normal renal function, and no antihypertensive medications. Through questionnaire investigation and biochemical detection, 17 parameters, such as gender and age, were acquired. WCH and SHT were distinguished by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The participants were randomly divided into a training set (445 cases) and a validation set (108 cases). The above parameters were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and univariate logistic regression analysis in the training set. Afterward, a scoring model was constructed through multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Finally, six parameters were selected, including isolated systolic hypertension, office systolic blood pressure, office diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, serum creatinine, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Multivariate logistic regression was used to establish a scoring model. The R2 and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the scoring model in the training set were 0.163 and 0.705, respectively. In the validation set, the R2 of the scoring model was 0.206, and AUC was 0.718. The calibration test results revealed that the scoring model had good stability in both the training and validation sets (mean square error = 0.001, mean absolute error = 0.014; mean square error = 0.001, mean absolute error = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

A stable scoring model for distinguishing WCH was established, which can assist clinicians in identifying WCH at the first diagnosis.

Hemodynamic Changes Associated With Transcervical Laryngeal Injection of Botulinum Toxin

PURPOSE

Laryngeal dystonia is a chronic neurologic disorder characterized by intention-induced spasms of the vocal folds driven by aberrant central motor processing. The use of in-office transcervical botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of laryngeal disorders, such as laryngeal dystonia, has been deemed safe and efficacious. There is, however, no available data outlining the hemodynamic changes experienced by patients undergoing this frequently performed procedure.

METHODS

One hundred and one patients diagnosed with laryngeal dystonia were enrolled in this prospective study. These patients underwent transcervical laryngeal botulinum toxin injection to address their dysphonia. Vital signs where acquired prior to, and at the time of injection. Alterations in these parameters were then evaluated for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Statistically significant increases in mean heart rate (5.8 ± 10.8 bpm, P < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (7.0 ± 9.5 mm Hg, P < 0.0001; 8.7 ± 14.7 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) were discovered. No statistically significant difference in oxygen saturation was noted and no patients in the study faced major adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Though these findings may not have related to clinically significant complication, our study demonstrates the importance of understanding potential stressors in a procedure routinely performed by laryngologists. This may result in more careful patient selection, alterations in procedure, and improved safety by acting in a timely fashion if alarming changes in hemodynamic parameters are noted.

Reproducibility and Predictive Value of White-Coat Hypertension in Young to Middle-Age Subjects

(1) Aim. The aim of the study was to investigate the reproducibility of white-coat hypertension (WCH) and its predictive capacity for hypertension needing antihypertensive treatment (HT) in young to middle-age subjects. (2) Methods. We investigated 1096 subjects from the HARVEST. Office and 24 h blood pressures (BP) were measured at baseline and after 3 months. The reproducibility of WCH was evaluated with kappa statistics. The predictive capacity of WCH was tested in multivariate Cox models (N = 1050). (3) Results. Baseline WCH was confirmed at 3-month assessment in 33.3% of participants. Reproducibility was fair (0.27, 95%CI 0.20-0.37) for WCH, poor (0.14, 95%CI 0.09-0.19) for office hypertension, and moderate (0.47, 95%CI 0.41-0.53) for ambulatory hypertension. WCH assessed either at baseline or after 3 months (unstable WCH) was not a significant predictor of HT during 17.4 years of follow-up. However, participants who had WCH both at baseline and after 3 months (stable WCH) had an increased risk of HT compared to the normotensives (Hazard ratio, 1.50, 95%CI 1.06-2.1). (4) Conclusions. These results show that WCH has limited reproducibility. WCH diagnosed with two BP assessments but not with one showed an increased risk of future HT. Our data indicate that WCH should be identified with two sets of office and ambulatory BP measurements.

Relationship of the White Coat Effect with Endpoints and Several Prognostic Indicators in Hypertensive Patients Treated with Regular Antihypertensive Therapy

Aim of the study was to evaluate in a prospective cohort study the relationship between the severity of the white coat effect (WHE) in patients with hypertension, who treated with regular antihypertensive therapy, and the composite endpoint, several prognostic indicators, in a routine clinical practice.

Material and Methods. We analyzed the data of a prospective cohort study, which included 125 patients with hypertension who received regular antihypertensive therapy. The study consisted of three visits (baseline, 6 and 12 months) and an outcome data collection period (30.1±7.6 months of follow-up after the third visit). This study included three visits every 3 months: 1 visit – screening, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) session, Echo; 2 – assessment of the patient’s status and the therapy effectiveness; 3- assessment of the patient’s status, ABPM session, Echo (the total number of ABPM was 239, Echo - 240). The primary composite endpoint included death for any reason angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack, development of chronic heart failure, arterial revascularization, frequent ventricular extrasystoles, atrial fibrillation, secondary - deterioration of the cardiovascular diseases course and tertiary endpoint – deterioration of the arterial hypertension, concomitant diseases course.

Results. The study involved 125 patients: 28 men (22%), 97 women (78%), mean age was 62.6±0.8 years, duration of hypertension 11.6±0.8 years, height 163.6±0.7 cm, body weight 83.1±1.4 kg. The baseline mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) was 125.1±9.8 and diastolic (DBP) – 76.1±7.0 mm Hg, age was 62.8±9.0 years, the WCE level for SBP was 16.5±1.4, for DBP 10.9±0.7 mm Hg. We identified a positive correlation between tertiary composite endpoint data and WCE: for systolic WCE (SWCE) (F = 4.7, p<0.031). We found correlations between WCE and Echo parameters: 1) SWCE level had with LVMI (r = 0.16. p<0.017); 2) diastolic WCE (DWCE) had negative relationship with LV contractility parameters.

Conclusions. Thus, only systolic WCE level had correlation with composite endpoint data and LVMI. DWCE level had negative associations with echocardiography LV contractility parameters.

Impact of Uncontrolled Hypertension at 3 Months After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background

Survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are at high risk for recurrent stroke, which is associated with blood pressure control. Because most recurrent stroke events occur within 12 to 18 months of the index ICH, rapid blood pressure control is likely to be crucial. We investigated the frequency and prognostic impact of uncontrolled short‐term hypertension after ICH.

Methods and Results

We analyzed data from Massachusetts General Hospital (n=1305) and the University of Hong Kong (n=523). We classified hypertension as controlled, undertreated, or treatment resistant at 3 months after ICH and determined the following: (1) the risk factors for uncontrolled hypertension and (2) whether hypertension control at 3 months is associated with stroke recurrence and mortality. We followed 1828 survivors of ICH for a median of 46.2 months. Only 9 of 234 (4%) recurrent strokes occurred before 3 months after ICH. At 3 months, 713 participants (39%) had controlled hypertension, 755 (41%) had undertreated hypertension, and 360 (20%) had treatment‐resistant hypertension. Black, Hispanic, and Asian race/ethnicity and higher blood pressure at time of ICH increased the risk of uncontrolled hypertension at 3 months (all P<0.05). Uncontrolled hypertension at 3 months was associated with recurrent stroke and mortality during long‐term follow‐up (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Among survivors of ICH, >60% had uncontrolled hypertension at 3 months, with undertreatment accounting for the majority of cases. The 3‐month blood pressure measurements were associated with higher recurrent stroke risk and mortality. Black, Hispanic, and Asian survivors of ICH and those presenting with severe acute hypertensive response were at highest risk for uncontrolled hypertension.

Long-Term Risk of Progression to Sustained Hypertension in White-Coat Hypertension with Normal Night-Time Blood Pressure Values

Background

The long-term prognosis and transition towards sustained ambulatory hypertension (SHT) of white-coat hypertension (WCHT) remain uncertain particularly in those with both normal nighttime and daytime blood pressure (BP) values. Different classification criteria and the use of antihypertensive drugs may contribute to conflicting results. Patients and Methods. We prospectively evaluated for a 7.1 year transition to SHT in 899 nondiabetic subjects free from cardiovascular (CV) events: normotensive (NT) (n = 344; 52, 9% female; ageing 48 ± 14 years); untreated WCHT (UnWCHT n = 399; 50, 1% female; ageing 51 ± 14 years); and treated WCHT with antihypertensive drugs after baseline (TxWCHT n = 156; 54, 4% female; ageing 51 ± 15 years). All underwent 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (24 h-ABPM) at baseline, at 30 to 60 months, and at 70 to 120 months thereafter. WCHT was at baseline (with no treatment) as office BP ≥ 140/or 90 mm·Hg, daytime BP < 135/85 mm·Hg, and nighttime BP < 120/70 mm·Hg. Development of SHT was considered if daytime BP ≥ 135/or 85 mm Hg and/or nighttime BP ≥ 120/or 70 mm·Hg.

Results

Baseline metabolic parameters did not differ among groups. At 30–60 months and at the end of follow-up, development of SHT occurred, respectively, in NT (3.8% (n = 13) and 9.6% (n = 33)) and in UnWCHT (10.1% (n = 40) and 16.5% (n = 66)) (p < 0.009). The mean annual increase of average 24 h-systolic BP was 0.48 + 0.93 in NT and 0.73 + 1.06 in UnWCHT, whereas annual SBP in office increased in NT by 1.2 + 0.95 but decreased in UnWCHT by 1.36 + 1.35 mm Hg (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Untreated WCHT patients exhibit a faster and a higher risk of developing SHT compared to NT with TxWCHT assuming an intermediate position between them.

Effects of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension on coronary artery stenosis and cardiac arrhythmia

This study aimed to investigate whether hypertension phenotypes such as white-coat hypertension (WCHT), diagnosed with the addition of nighttime blood pressure (BP) criteria, are related to coronary artery stenosis (CAS) and cardiac arrhythmia. In this cross-sectional observational study, 844 participants who did not use antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and antiplatelet drugs were selected. The subjects were divided into normotensive (NT), WCHT, masked hypertension (MHT), and sustained hypertension (SHT) groups based on the results of clinic BP measurement and ambulatory BP monitoring. Coronary angiography and ambulatory electrocardiography were performed to determine the participants' CAS and cardiac arrhythmia status. Coronary angiography revealed 556 patients with CAS and 288 participants with normal coronary arteries. The chi-squared test showed that the incidence of CAS was higher in the MHT and SHT groups than in the NT group, while no significant change was found in the WCHT group (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P = 0.119). The logarithm of the Gensini score was used to compare the degree of CAS between the groups. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the degree of CAS was higher in the WCHT, MHT, and SHT groups than in the NT group (P < 0.05). The incidences of frequent atrial premature beats, atrial tachycardia, and ventricular cardiac arrhythmia were significantly higher in the WCHT and SHT groups than in the NT group, while only ventricular cardiac arrhythmia changes were observed in the MHT group. This study found that hypertension phenotypes such as WCHT were closely associated with CAS and cardiac arrhythmia.

White-coat hypertension: management and adherence to guidelines by European and Canadian GPs. A cross-sectional clinical vignette study

BACKGROUND

White-coat hypertension (WCH) is also referred to as 'isolated clinic hypertension'. While it is a frequently encountered phenomenon, WCH is not systematically evoked, and its management remains unclear due to the contradictory guidelines provided by professional societies.

AIM

To examine WCH management by GPs in Europe and Canada.

DESIGN & SETTING

A clinical vignette of a possible case of WCH was created from the literature, and the responses of GPs to WCH-specific questions in a cross-sectional electronic questionnaire were compared.

METHOD

Complete electronic questionnaire responses from Europe and Canada were systematically analysed.

RESULTS

Among 770 eligible questionnaires (useful response rate: 10.6%), 43.5% were from France, 19.2% from Belgium, 7.8% from England, 19.5% from Switzerland, and 10.0% from Canada. Based on the clinical information provided in the vignette, GPs overall diagnosed hypertension and WCH equally (50.7% versus 49.3%, respectively). Canadian GPs suggested hypertension more frequently than European GPs in general (64.2% versus 46.1%, P<10-4), and more frequently used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ([ABPM] 42.3% versus 26.1%, P = 0.01). In both groups of GPs, WCH was managed similarly (no treatment, 100% versus 97.3%, P = 0.39). Generally, the GPs all followed WCH patients for 3-6 months (51.3% versus 66.2%, P = 0.1), and they were not aware of the WCH guidelines (47.3% versus 52.1%, P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

Although WCH guidelines are different, WCH management by GPs is very similar except for diagnosis. Homogeneity in WCH guidelines is required and should be systematically implemented in hypertension guidelines to avoid inappropriate management of the condition.

Association of circulating miR-155 expression level and inflammatory markers with white coat hypertension

Circulating miR-155 play a vital role in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to explore the association of miR-155 with blood pressure and inflammatory markers, and to investigate the predictive value of circulating miR-155 for white coat hypertension (WCH). This cross-sectional study was continuously enrolled 105 subjects and was divided into three groups based on office blood pressure monitoring and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM): normal hypertension, WCH, and hypertension group. Circulating miR-155 was assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Spearman correlation coefficient and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used. We found miR-155 in hypertension group were significantly higher than those in the WCH and normal hypertension group. The level of miR-155 was positively correlated with C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, office systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and ABMP parameters (24-h SBP, 24-h DBP, 24-h daytime SBP, 24-h daytime DBP, 24-h nighttime SBP and 24 h nighttime DBP) (all P < 0.05). Circulating miR-155 yielded an AUC of 0.843 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.933; P < 0.001) and 0.832 (95% CI: 0.736, 0.928; P < 0.001) for differing hypertension and WCH from control subjects, respectively. Our results suggested that miR-155 was significantly associated with inflammatory markers, and may become a potential noninvasive marker for WCH detection.

El ritmo circadiano de la presión arterial y su relación con los factores de riesgo cardiovascular

Introducción: Numerosos estudios han establecido tanto la hipertensión arterial como la hipertensión de bata blanca como factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Un ritmo circadiano anómalo de la presión arterial podría aumentar el riesgo cardiovascular. Objetivo: Determinar la existencia de una relación clínicamente relevante entre un ritmo circadiano anómalo de la presión arterial y un incremento del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con hipertensión arterial o hipertensión de bata blanca. Material y Método: Estudio descriptivo en 166 pacientes mayores de 18 años del Área Básica de Salud de Balaguer que tuvieran una monitorización ambulatoria de la presión arterial realizada entre junio de 2014 y marzo de 2018 y cumplieran los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Se realizó un análisis univariado y bivariado de las variables. Resultados: Se obtuvo que en casi todos los promedios de presión arterial nocturna destaca el patrón riser mostrando que el 25% tenía un riesgo cardiovascular mayor o igual al 10%, seguido del dipper extremo 16,67%, dipper 9,4% y no dipper 8,27%. Conclusión: Un ritmo circadiano alterado se relaciona con un riesgo cardiovascular más elevado y un peor control de los factores que conllevan al mismo.

Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in White Coat Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The long-term cardiovascular risk of isolated elevated office blood pressure (BP) is unclear.

PURPOSE

To summarize the risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality associated with untreated white coat hypertension (WCH) and treated white coat effect (WCE).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE, without language restriction, from inception to December 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Observational studies with at least 3 years of follow-up evaluating the cardiovascular risk of WCH or WCE compared with normotension.

DATA EXTRACTION

2 investigators independently extracted study data and assessed study quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

27 studies were included, comprising 25 786 participants with untreated WCH or treated WCE and 38 487 with normal BP followed for a mean of 3 to 19 years. Compared with normotension, untreated WCH was associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.00]), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.33 [CI, 1.07 to 1.67]), and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.09 [CI, 1.23 to 4.48]); the risk for WCH was attenuated in studies that included stroke in the definition of cardiovascular events (HR, 1.26 [CI, 1.00 to 1.54]). No significant association was found between treated WCE and cardiovascular events (HR, 1.12 [CI, 0.91 to 1.39]), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.11 [CI, 0.89 to 1.46]), or cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.65 to 1.66]). The findings persisted across several sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATION

Paucity of studies evaluating isolated cardiac outcomes or reporting participant race/ethnicity.

CONCLUSION

Untreated WCH, but not treated WCE, is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Out-of-office BP monitoring is critical in the diagnosis and management of hypertension.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Long-term cardiovascular risk of white-coat hypertension with normal night-time blood pressure values

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of white-coat hypertension (WCHT) is still a matter of debate and controversy. Night-time blood pressure (NBP) is related strongly to cardiovascular (CV) prognosis, but this has not been considered currently in the definition of WCHT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated the long-term CV prognosis of 2659 patients submitted at admission to 24 h-ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring divided into three groups: normotension (NT) (n=812; 59% female; ageing 49±13 years), sustained hypertension (SHT) (n=1230; 56% female; ageing 51±13 years) and WCHT (n=617; 55% female; ageing 50±3 years) defined as office BP of at least 140/90 mmHg, daytime BP less than 135/85 mmHg and NBP less than 120/70 mmHg.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 7.6 years (range: 0.4-24.4), during which a total of 257 CV events (36 fatal) occurred (46% strokes, 32% coronary and 22% others), 38 in NT, 31 in WCHT and 188 in SHT. The event rate per 100 patient-years was 0.60 in the WCHT group, 0.66 in the NT group and 2.09 in the SHT group. Cox's regression analysis adjusted for covariables showed a higher risk of CV events in patients with SHT than WCHT [hazard ratio (HR)=2.230, 95% confidence interval: 1.339-3.716, P=0.002], whereas there was no difference between WCHT and NT groups. Event-free survival was significantly different from SH versus WCHT and NT groups. Within the group of WCHT, 29% of patients received sustained antihypertensive medication during the follow-up, but the HR of CV events between WCHT either treated or not treated did not differ: HR=0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.37-1.51, P=0.42).

CONCLUSION

In patients with WCHT defined by normal daytime and NBP values, the risk of CV events was significantly lower than that of SHT and similar to that of NT patients, suggesting that NBP should be included in the WCHT definition and in its prognostic stratification.

Clinician accountability in a primary care clinic time-interval blood pressure measurements study: Practice implications

BACKGROUND

Accurate blood pressure measurements (BPM) are important, as clinicians are tasked daily with using such measurements to make clinical diagnoses and patient care judgments. Research studies and controlled trials hold such measurements to a higher standard than everyday clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate difference in BPM outcomes of individuals in a clinic setting when clinicians collect BPM as usual vs BPM after 5- (USPSTF recommendation) and 10- minute (study unique intervention) timed rest interval.

METHODS

A repeated-measures design was used to examine individual BPMs at the intervals of baseline, after a 5-minute rest interval post-baseline, and after a 10-minute rest interval post-baseline. Results Pairwise comparisons indicated that baseline SBP was the highest when compared to SBP measured at both 5- and 10-minutes post-baseline. SBP measured at 5-minutes was also significantly higher compared to SBP collected at 10-minutes post-baseline (ps < .05). For DBP, the repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that there was no significant difference across BPMs, F(2,198) = 1.25, p = .29.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study revealed that implementing a 5-minute rest interval before BPMs are taken in a clinic setting produces a "clinically observable" reduction in the overall mean systolic BPs as seen at both 5- and 10-minute BPM intervals. It is important for all healthcare clinicians to recognize the importance of accurate BPM and the need to encourage better regulated BPM standard in everyday practice.